[Serum anti-elastase activity in collagen diseases].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to E Pretolani.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Targeting exclusive antigens in atherosclerotic plaques with antibodies may provide a noninvasive means to detect rapidly proliferative atherosclerotic lesions. 111In-labeled negative charge-modified Z2D3 F(ab')2 (Z2D3) specific for an antigen expressed exclusively by proliferating smooth muscle cells has been shown to accumulate in rabbit atherosclerotic plaques. METHODS: The safety, biodistribution, accumulation, and elimination of Z2D3 were assessed in 11 patients who were candidates for carotid endarterectomy. The presence of atheromas in these patients was confirmed by angiography and Doppler ultrasound. Z2D3 (250 microg) labeled with 5 mCi of 111In was administered by slow intravenous injection. Planar and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images were obtained 4, 24, 48, and 72 hours later. Carotid endarterectomy was performed and the surgical specimens were imaged, weighed, gamma-counted, and analyzed by immunostaining. RESULTS: Uptake of Z2D3 at the site of the carotid plaques was observed in the planar and SPECT views at 4 hours in all subjects. In addition, antibody uptake was noted in the contralateral vessel in 5 subjects. SPECT images identified the atherosclerotic plaques with focal uptake. The antibody uptake corresponded with the angiographic location of the disease. Immunohistochemical studies of the endarterectomy specimens confirmed the localization of Z2D3 into the plaque areas containing smooth muscle cells. Adverse drug reactions were not observed. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of targeting atherosclerotic lesions with negative charge-modified antibody. It also proposes the possibility of selective identification of various components of atherosclerotic plaque, which may contribute to determining strategies of intervention in future.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the combinations of lisinopril (LIS) 20 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg and captopril (CAP) 50 mg + HCTZ 25 mg in moderately hypertensive patients not adequately controlled by LIS or CAP alone. The study was multicentre (11 centres), open, random and carried out in parallel groups. After two weeks' placebo run in patients were randomly assigned to LIS 10-20 mg/o.d. or CAP 25-50 mg/b.i.d. treatment for 6 weeks. After this, patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) greater than 90 mmHg were treated with the combinations LIS 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg/o.d. or CAP 50 mg + HCTZ 25 mg/o.d. for 4 weeks; this dose was doubled if DBP was found to be greater than 90 mmHg after 2 weeks' combined therapy. A total of 175 patients were enrolled (92 females and 83 males) of which 153 completed the study. The LIS + HCTZ association caused a significant reduction of DBP in comparison to the other combined treatment (88.1 +/- 0.7 vs 90.3 +/- 0.7; p = 0.026). The statistical analysis of mean SBP values showed no significant difference between the two groups (144.0 +/- 1.3 vs 146.8 +/- 1.3; p = 0.15). At the end of the study 79.5% of patients treated with LIS + HCTZ presented normal results (DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg), whereas the percentage of similar results in the comparison group was 72%. The percentage of "responder" patients to therapy (DBP reduced by 10 mmHg or more in relation to basal values) was 96.3% in the LIS + HCTZ group and 86.7% in the CAP + HCTZ group. In the CAP + HCTZ group 0.6% of patients reported adverse reactions, while only 0.3% were observed in the LIS + HCTZ group.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.