Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Olavarria

Publications and source records attributed to E Olavarria.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Durability of responses following donor lymphocyte infusions for patients who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia.

An analysis was performed of the response to treatment with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and the survival in 66 consecutive patients who relapsed after primary treatment by allogeneic stem cell transplantation for BCR-ABL-positive chronic myeloid leukemia. The transplant donor was an HLA-identical sibling (n = 35) or a "matched" unrelated volunteer (n = 31). Fifty-seven patients were transplanted in chronic phase, eight in accelerated phase, and one in second chronic phase. The recognition of relapse was based on precise molecular, cytogenetic, or hematologic criteria. The median interval from transplant to relapse was 12 months (range 3-85). The median interval from relapse to initiation of DLI was 9.4 months (range 1-70). Patients received DLI from their original transplant donors on a bulk-dose (n = 34) or on an escalating-dose (n = 32) regimen. Patients were monitored serially by hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular criteria. Molecular remission was defined by the finding of negative results by nested primer reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for BCR-ABL transcripts on two consecutive occasions, subject to satisfactory controls. Forty-four patients (67%) achieved molecular remission. Patients who had relapsed to advanced phase disease and patients with short intervals between transplant and relapse had significantly lower probabilities of achieving molecular remission. Of the 44 patients who achieved molecular remission, 4 reverted to a PCR-positive status at 15, 18, 37, and 87 weeks after remission. The probability of survival for patients who achieved molecular remission was significantly better than for those who failed to do so (95% versus 53% at 3 years post-DLI, P = .0001). We conclude that the majority of molecular remissions after DLI are durable, and thus the majority of responding patients may prove to have been cured. (Blood. 2000;96:2712-2716)

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Estimating leukemia-free survival after allografting for chronic myeloid leukemia: a new method that takes into account patients who relapse and are restored to complete remission.

A significant number of patients who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) will achieve sustained remissions after treatment with interferon-alpha, second transplants, or donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) from the original stem cell donor. Because leukemia-free survival (LFS) is at present defined as survival without evidence of relapse at any time posttransplant, patients who relapse but are then restored to complete remission are treated as failures when estimating LFS. We have established a new category of LFS, termed current LFS (CLFS), which we define as survival without evidence of leukemia at the time of most recent assessment. To gauge the contribution of treatment for relapse to the efficacy of allogeneic SCT in the management of CML in chronic phase, we compared conventional LFS and CLFS in 189 consecutive patients who underwent SCT over a 7-year period with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Patients with sibling donors (n = 111) received cyclosporine and methotrexate as prophylaxis for graft versus host disease; patients with unrelated donors (n = 78) also received Campath-1G or 1H as intravenous T-cell depletion. The 5-year LFS defined conventionally was 36% (CI: 29% to 43%) versus a 5-year CLFS of 49% (CI: 36% to 62%). This new method of defining LFS confirms the view that appropriate "salvage" therapy, principally DLI, makes a major contribution to the capacity of allogeneic SCT to produce long-term LFS in patients who receive SCT for CML and emphasizes the importance of redefining LFS to take account of successful treatment of relapse.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of single-dose and escalating-dose regimens of donor lymphocyte infusion for relapse after allografting for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was originally administered as a single, relatively large dose of lymphocytes called a bulk dose regimen (BDR). It has since been suggested that the use of an escalating dose regimen (EDR) may be equally effective against leukemia while it induces less graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We therefore compared the efficacy and incidence of complications in a nonrandomized sequential study of the 2 regimens in 48 consecutive patients who had relapses with cytogenetic or hematologic evidence of chronic myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Twenty-eight patients were treated on a BDR (August 1990 to November 1995) and 20 were treated on an EDR (December 1995 to January 1998). Although the probability of achieving cytogenetic remission within 2 years of starting DLI did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (EDR, 91% [CI, 63%-98%] vs. BDR, 67% [CI,49%-83%], P =.70), the incidence of GVHD was much lower using EDR (10% vs. 44%, P =.011). When we considered only subsets of patients treated by BDR or EDR who had received comparable total lymphoid cell doses, the incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD were both significantly lower for recipients treated by EDR than for recipients treated by BDR (P =.005 and P =.031, respectively). These findings suggest that the incidence of GVHD associated with the EDR is low, not because the final cell dose is small, but because lymphocytes are administered over a considerable number of months. (Blood. 2000;95:67-71)

Disease-Free Survival↗
PubMed2000

A phase I/II study of multiple-dose intravenous busulfan as myeloablation prior to stem cell transplantation.

Busulfan has been previously only available in an oral formulation due to its poor water solubility. We report the results of a phase I study of multiple escalating doses of intravenous busulfan (Spartaject Busulfan, Orphan Europe, Paris, France) for myeloablation prior to stem cell transplantation (SCT) in 12 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphocytic leukemia. One patient received allogeneic SCT; the other 11 patients received autologous SCT. The first six patients received i.v. busulfan diluted in 50 ml of 0.9% normal saline and the last six patients received busulfan in a 500-ml 5% dextrose solution. All patients experienced profound myelosuppression and all but one demonstrated hematopoietic engraftment. Toxicity was mild or moderate and there were no toxic deaths attributable to busulfan. Of note, there were no cases of veno-occlusive disease of the liver. Busulfan plasma concentrations were determined by gas chromatography with electron capture detection and showed little intrapatient variability. In most cases there was no significant difference between the first and last dose PK parameters. These data suggest that dose adjustment based on first dose PK data could allow uniformity of busulfan dosing for patients receiving SCT.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

High-dose busulphan alone as cytoreduction before allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukaemia: a single-centre experience.

Transplant-related morbidity and mortality remain a major problem following stem cell transplantation (SCT). The use of high-dose single-agent busulphan before allogeneic or autologous SCT may be a reasonable compromise between maintaining cytoreductive efficacy and minimizing toxicity in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Seventy patients with CML have received busulphan as the only cytoreductive therapy before SCT on 79 occasions. The probability of survival of the 14 allogeneic recipients (all of whom were undergoing a second transplant from the original donor) was 78% at 5 years. Sixty-five autologous SCT were performed in 56 patients, of whom 40 were in late chronic phase. The actuarial 3-year post-autograft survival was 54% for these 56 first autografts. For patients in chronic phase, the 3-year survival was 76% compared with 30% at 2 years for those with advanced phase disease. Busulphan therapy was well tolerated, and except for mild mucositis little toxicity was experienced. None of these patients developed hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Nine patients (one allogeneic and eight autologous recipients) received several doses of an intravenous formulation of busulphan with very low toxicity. High-dose busulphan alone appears sufficient to provide adequate cytoreduction and immunosuppression in second allogeneic transplants and is also effective as cytoreduction before autologous SCT in patients with CML.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Selection and use of chemotherapy with hematopoietic growth factors for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells.

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have become the preferred means of stem cell support for high-dose chemotherapy in recent years. The biology of PBPC mobilization is complex and may be influenced by several variables. Signals from both stromal and hemopoietic cells may induce downregulation of adhesion molecules and upregulate the expression of metalloproteinases. Cytokines alone can mobilize PBPCs but a synergistic effect has been shown when they are used in conjunction with chemotherapy. Disease-specific mobilization strategies appear to have the advantage of less toxicity, greater stem cell yield, and enhanced antitumor activity. Studies have demonstrated that the number of peripheral blood CD34+ cells can be used as a predictor for the timing of apheresis and for estimating PBPC yield. Similarly the CD34+ cell dose is the strongest predictor of hematologic recovery after PBPC transplant. Age, prior radiotherapy, marrow involvement, and prior chemotherapy (especially with alkylating agents) are important factors influencing the yield of stem cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Collection of Ph-negative progenitor cells from interferon responsive patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: effect of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor mobilization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The observation that patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) may relapse following stem cell transplantation because of Philadelphia positive cells contaminating the graft have led to a variety of strategies to reduce this contamination. This study investigate the feasibility of collective, Ph-re cells from patients with CML in chronic phase. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 18 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase who had responded to varying degrees to treatment with interferon-a (IFN) were subjected to mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors and peripheral blood progenitor cell collection. Nine patients were in complete cytogenetic remission (CCR) and nine were partial responders. IFN was stopped 2 to 4 weeks before the procedure. G-CSF was given by subcutaneous injection once daily at a dose of 10 microg/kg. RESULTS: Five patients underwent one collection procedure only, 10 underwent two procedures and 3 patients had three collections. The median number of nucleated cells (NC) per patient collected was 10.2 x 10(8)/kg (4.4-19.7) and the median number of CD34(+) cells was 2.5 x 10(6)/kg (0.4-9.4). Analyzable cytogenetic data were available for 26/34 (76%) leukapheresis procedures. The median percentage of Ph- negative metaphases for patients in CCR was 100% (73-100). Patients not in CCR had a higher level of Ph-positive cells in their collections (median 23%, range 0-79%, p=0.01). Of the nine patients in CCR, 8 had at least one apheresis from which progenitor cells were 100% Ph-negative; conversely, patients not in CCR had detectable Ph-positive cells in every collection. Four patients have undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to collect sufficient Ph negative progenitor cells from patients in CCR but collections from other patients contained significant numbers of Ph-positive cells.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels.

High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34+ cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield. Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic.

Acute Disease↗