Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Mazza

Publications and source records attributed to E Mazza.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

A neuroendocrinological approach to evidence an impairment of central cholinergic function in aging.

A hypothalamic pathogenesis for the reduced GH secretion in aging has been reported for both animal and man. To further address this issue we studied in 31 elderly normal subjects (6 males and 25 females, aged 66-90 yr) and in 22 young healthy controls (13 males and 9 females, aged 20-35 yr) the GH responses to GHRH test (GHRH29, 1 microgram/kg i.v. as a bolus at 0 min) alone and combined with pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor (PD, 120 mg po 60 min before GHRH), or with arginine (ARG, 30 g in 100 ml infused from 0 to 30 min). Serum IGF-I levels were lower in elderly than in young subjects (mean +/- SE: 86.9 +/- 7.2 vs 288.7 +/- 22.1 micrograms/L, p < 0.01). The GHRH-induced GH increase was lower in elderly than in young subjects (p < 0.01). PD increased the GH response to GHRH in both groups (p < 0.001), but in elderly subjects this response persisted lower (p < 0.0001) than that observed in young adults. Also ARG coadministration potentiated the GHRH-induced GH release in both groups (p < 0.0001) but in this case the elderly's responses overlapped with the young's. The GH increase observed after combined administration of ARG and GHRH was higher (p < 0.0001) than that elicited by PD plus GHRH in elderly but not in young subjects. Analyzing individual GH responses, a GH peak below the limit of normality for young adults was observed in 19 (61.3%) elderly subjects after PD plus GHRH administration while ARG plus GHRH test elicited a normal GH peak in all but one.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Interactions of galanin and arginine on growth hormone, prolactin, and insulin secretion in man.

Galanin (GAL), a 29 amino acid neuropeptide, is known to increase both basal and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced growth hormone (GH) secretion while not significantly increasing prolactin (PRL) secretion in man. GAL is also endowed with an inhibiting effect on glucose-stimulated insulin release in animals, but not in man. We studied the effect of GAL (80 pmol/kg/min infused over 60 minutes) on the arginine- (ARG, 30 g infused over 30 minutes) stimulated GH, PRL, insulin, and C-peptide secretion in eight healthy volunteers (age, 20 to 30 years). GAL induced an increase of GH (GAL v saline, area under curve [AUC], mean +/- SEM: 316.5 +/- 73.9 v 93.2 +/- 20.9 micrograms/L/h, P less than .05), but failed to modify both PRL and insulin secretion. GAL enhanced the ARG-induced stimulation of both GH (1,634.1 +/- 293.1 v 566.9 +/- 144.0 micrograms/L/h, P less than .02) and PRL secretion (1,541.9 +/- 248.8 v 1,023.8 +/- 158.7 micrograms/L/h, P less than .02). On the contrary, GAL blunted the ARG-stimulated insulin (816.3 +/- 87.7 v 1,322.7 +/- 240.9 mU/L/h, P less than .05), as well as C-peptide secretion (105.1 +/- 9.8 v 132.8 +/- 17.3 micrograms/L/h, P less than .02). ARG administration induced a transient increase of glucose levels (P less than .01 v baseline) followed by a significant decrease (P less than .05 v baseline). This latter effect was prevented by the coadministration of GAL. In conclusion, these results show that in man GAL potentiates the GH response to ARG, suggesting that these drugs act at the hypothalamic level, at least in part, via different mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Arginine potentiates but does not restore the blunted growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in obesity.

A blunted growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli, including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), has been shown in obesity. Arginine (ARG) has been demonstrated to potentiate the GHRH-induced GH increase in normal subjects, likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To shed further light onto the mechanisms underlying the blunted GH secretion in obesity, we studied the effect of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused intravenously [IV] over 30 minutes) on both basal and GHRH (1 micron/kg IV)-stimulated GH secretion. Eight obese subjects (aged 26.4 +/- 3.9 years; body mass index, 39.0 +/- 1.9 kg/m2) and eight normal control volunteers (aged 27.0 +/- 1.7 years; body mass index, 22.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) were studied. In obese subjects, the GH response to both GHRH and ARG was lower (P less than .01 and P less than .002, respectively) than in controls. ARG potentiated the GH response to GHRH in obese patients (P less than .0003). However, in these patients, the GH secretion elicited by GHRH, even when coadministered with ARG, persisted at reduced levels (P less than .005) when compared with controls. Basal insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels did not significantly differ in obese subjects and in normal subjects (161.1 +/- 37.0 v 181.0 +/- 12.8 micrograms/L). In conclusion, ARG enhances the blunted GHRH-induced GH increase in obese patients, but the GH responses to ARG alone and to ARG + GHRH persist at lower levels than in normals. Thus, our results suggest the existence of a reduced pituitary GH pool in obesity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Galanin reinstates the growth hormone response to repeated growth hormone-releasing hormone administration in man.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the mechanism by which galanin, a 29-amino-acid peptide, increases GH secretion in man. DESIGN: We studied the GH-releasing effect of this neurohormone (galanin, 15 micrograms/kg) infused over 60 minutes after 120 minutes of saline, following a previous GHRH bolus (GHRH 1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 minutes, galanin infused from 120 to 180 minutes) and coadministered with the second of two consecutive GHRH boluses (GHRH every 120 minutes, galanin infused from 120 to 180 minutes). PATIENTS: Fourteen healthy male subjects, aged 20-34 years, in two groups (group A, 20-31 years (n = 8); group B, 25-34 years (n = 6)) were studied. MEASUREMENT: Blood samples were drawn every 15 minutes of 255 minutes. Serum GH was measured in duplicate by IRMA. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out by non-parametric ANOVA test. RESULTS: The GH response to galanin infused 120 minutes after saline overlapped with that induced by the neuropeptide infused following previous GHRH bolus (AUC, mean +/- SEM: 317.3 +/- 73.2 vs 326.8 +/- 54.2 micrograms/l/h). The GH-releasing effect of the second GHRH bolus (126.9 +/- 32.3 micrograms/l/h) was lower than that of the first one (503.4 +/- 41.3 micrograms/l/h; P = 0.0002). Galanin markedly enhanced the GH responses to the second GHRH bolus (1118.0 +/- 212.7 micrograms/l/h; P = 0.0002 vs second GHRH bolus alone) so that it did not significantly differ from the first one (710.9 +/- 107.8 micrograms/l/h). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the GH-releasing effect of galanin is not modified by GHRH pretreatment and that the neuropeptide reinstates the GH response to the repeated GHRH stimulation in man. They suggest that these effects are due to the inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Arginine reinstates the somatotrope responsiveness to intermittent growth hormone-releasing hormone administration in normal adults.

It is well known that in normal adults the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) is inhibited by previous administration of the neurohormone. In 7 healthy volunteers (age 20-34 years) we studied the GH responses to two consecutive GHRH boluses (1 microgram/kg i.v. every 120 min) alone or coadministered with arginine (30 g i.v. over 30 min). The GH response to the first GHRH bolus (area under the curve, mean +/- SEM: 506.3 +/- 35.1 micrograms/l/h) was higher (p = 0.0001) than that to the second one (87.1 +/- 14.6 micrograms/l/h). The latter response was clearly increased (p = 0.0001) by coadministering arginine (980.5 +/- 257.5 micrograms/l/h). When every GHRH bolus was combined with arginine a marked potentiation of GH response to both boluses was found. However, the second combined administration of arginine and GHRH induced a GH increase which was lower compared to the first one (p = 0.016). In conclusion, our results show that arginine potentiates the GHRH-induced GH secretion preventing the lessening of somatotrope responsiveness to the neurohormone alone. As there is evidence that this phenomenon is due to an enhanced somatostatin release, these findings give further evidence of a somatostatin-suppressing effect of arginine.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Intranasal administration of neostigmine potentiates both intravenous and intranasal growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-induced GH release in short children.

Administration of cholinergic agonists increases both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion, probably acting via inhibition of endogenous somatostatin release. The aim of our study was to verify in two groups of children with idiopathic short stature the effect of intranasal administration of neostigmine (inNS; 3 mg), a cholinesterase inhibitor, on basal GH levels as well as on the somatotroph response to GHRH when the peptide was administered either iv (ivGHRH; 1 microgram/kg) or intranasally (inGHRH; 10 micrograms/kg). In group A (n = 6; age, 10.6-16.0 yr) inNS induced a significant GH increase [inNS vs. saline, area under the curve (AUC; mean +/- SEM), 263.7 +/- 60.2 vs. 73.8 +/- 3.1 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.03] and potentiated the somatotroph response to ivGHRH (inNS with ivGHRH vs. ivGHRH, 1316 +/- 183.0 vs. 644.9 +/- 154.5 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.03). In group B (n = 6; age, 11.5-15.9 yr) ivGHRH induced a GH rise clearly higher than that induced by inGHRH (604.2 +/- 154.3 vs. 137.1 +/- 28.2 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.03). Administration of inNS induced a GH rise similar to that occurring after inGHRH (AUC, 239.2 +/- 69.5 micrograms/L.h) and markedly increased the inGHRH-induced GH response (482.4 +/- 103.6 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.05 and 0.03 vs. inNS and inGHRH, respectively), so that it overlapped with that induced by ivGHRH alone. In conclusion, cholinergic agonists such as neostigmine are able to increase both basal and GHRH-induced GH secretion in short children even when given intranasally. Combined intranasal administration of neostigmine and GHRH (10 micrograms/kg) is able to induce a GH rise similar to that induced by ivGHRH alone (1 microgram/kg), suggesting the potential usefulness of this combination cocktail and route of administration for the treatment of short stature.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1990

A new test for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency due to primary pituitary impairment: combined administration of pyridostigmine and growth hormone-releasing hormone.

The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is currently based on failure to increase plasma GH levels to an arbitrary cutoff point of 7 or 10 micrograms/l in response to two provocative stimuli. False negative responses to these tests, however, frequently occur thus reducing their diagnostic reliability. The aim of this study was to assess a combination of pyridostigmine (PD) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) (60 mg oral PD 60 min before 1 microgram/Kg GHRH iv) as a reliable test probing pituitary somatotropic function. In fact PD, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, strikingly potentiates GH response to GHRH likely by inhibiting somatostatin release. The combination PD + GHRH was tested in normal children and adolescents (NS, n = 27) and in a large group of short children classified as having familial short stature (FSS, n = 24), constitutional growth delay (CGD, n = 34) and GH deficiency (organic, oGHD, n = 6; idiopathic, iGHD, n = 10). In all groups results obtained by PD + GHRH were compared with those obtained by testing with GHRH, clonidine (CLON) and PD alone and by studying spontaneous nocturnal GH secretion over 8 hours. Assuming 7 micrograms/l as minimum normal GH peak, a positive response occurred in only 18/24, 11/12 and 12/13 NS for GHRH, CLON, and PD, respectively. In contrast even assuming a minimum normal GH peak as high as 20 micrograms/l, PD + GHRH induced a positive response in 27/27 NS all having a nocturnal GH mean concentration (MC) greater than or equal to 3 micrograms/l. Therefore PD + GHRH test gave no false negative responses and this was true not only in NS but even in all FSS and CGD having a GH MC greater than or equal to 3 micrograms/l. On the other hand, PD + GHRH induced a negative GH response in all oGHD and in 8/10 iGHD patients. In the remaining two iGHD patients, PD + GHRH demonstrated a normal pituitary GH reserve in spite of a GH MC less than 3 micrograms/l and low IGF-I level, thus pointing to a hypothalamic pathogenesis for the GHD. Considering FSS and CGD children having a GH MC less than 3 micrograms/l, PD + GHRH showed a primary pituitary GH deficiency in 3/12 CGD with low plasma IGF-I levels. In conclusion, in slowly growing children PD + GHRH test is the most reliable provocative test for the diagnosis of primary pituitary GH deficiency being capable to discriminate between an unequivocally normal and impaired somatotropic function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Arginine potentiates the GHRH- but not the pyridostigmine-induced GH secretion in normal short children. Further evidence for a somatostatin suppressing effect of arginine.

To investigate the mechanism underlying the GH-releasing effect of arginine (ARG), we studied the interactions of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused i.v. over 30 min) with GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) and with pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg orally) on GH secretion in 15 children and adolescents with familial short stature (5.1-15.4 years). In a group of eight subjects ARG induced a GH increase not statistically different to that observed after GHRH (peak, mean +/- SEM: 38.0 +/- 10.4 vs 64.0 +/- 14.4 mU/l). The combined administration of ARG and GHRH led to GH levels (101 +/- 15.2 mU/l) higher than those observed after GHRH (P less than 0.025) or ARG alone (P less than 0.001) and overlapping with those recorded after combined PD and GHRH administration (111 +/- 22.4 mU/l). In the other seven subjects, ARG and PD administration induced a similar GH response either when administered alone (25.2 +/- 13.6 and 27.8 +/- 4.0 mU/l, respectively) or in combination (33.8 +/- 5.4 mU/l). In conclusion, our results show that in children ARG administration potentiates GHRH- but not PD-induced GH increase. These findings agree with the hypothesis that the GH-releasing effect of both ARG and PD is mediated via the same mechanism, namely, by suppression of endogeneous somatostatin release. Combined administration of either ARG or PD with GHRH has a similar striking GH-releasing effect which is clearly higher than that of GHRH alone.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Pyridostigmine potentiates L-dopa- but not arginine- and galanin-induced growth hormone secretion in children.

The coadministration of growth hormone (GH) secretagogues can provide insight into the neuroregulation of GH secretion. The GH response to L-dopa (125, 250 and 500 mg orally for body weights less than 15 kg, between 15 and 30 kg and greater than 30 kg, respectively), arginine (Arg; 0.5 g/kg infused intravenously over 30 min) and galanin (GAL; 15 micrograms/kg infused intravenously over 60 min) when administered alone or combined with pyridostigmine (PD; 60 mg orally), a cholinergic agonist that likely acts via inhibition of endogenous somatostatin secretion, was studied in children with familial short stature. The GH-releasing effect of PD was also evaluated. In 8 children, PD and L-dopa when administered alone induced an equivalent GH rise (area under the response curve, mean +/- SEM: 241.4 +/- 31.1 vs. 202.9 +/- 38.6 micrograms/l/h) while their coadministration had an additive effect (435.4 +/- 41.4 micrograms/l/h; p less than 0.02 vs. PD and L-dopa alone). On the contrary, in other 8 children, PD and Arg induced similar GH increases either when administered alone (394.2 +/- 68.5 vs. 405.8 +/- 103.9 micrograms/l/h) or in combination (535.8 +/- 97.3 micrograms/l/h). GH increases almost superimposable were also observed when PD and GAL were administered alone (405.2 +/- 72.3 vs. 412.6 +/- 94.1 micrograms/l/h) or in combination (537.9 +/- 139.0 micrograms/l/h) in other 7 children. These data show that the enhancement of the cholinergic activity by PD increases the L-dopa-induced GH release but fails to modify both Arg- and GAL-induced GH release in short children.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Acute clonidine administration potentiates spontaneous diurnal, but not nocturnal, growth hormone secretion in normal short children.

It has been shown that alpha 2-adrenoreceptor activation induced by clonidine (CLON) increases plasma GH levels in both adults and children. In this study the effects of CLON (150 micrograms/m2, orally) on GH secretion were studied both in the morning (from 0800-1100 h) and at night (from 2300-0200 h) in nine short children previously shown to have normal spontaneous nocturnal GH secretion. In the morning, CLON induced a GH increase higher than placebo [peak (mean +/- SEM), 23.8 +/- 4.3 vs. 3.4 +/- 1.4 micrograms/L; P = 0.0001; area under curve (AUC), 624.4 +/- 62.7 vs. 135.6 +/- 33.3 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.00001]. In the night, no difference was observed between GH secretion after CLON (peak, 15.4 +/- 3.2 micrograms/L; AUC, 562.2 +/- 57.5 micrograms/L.h) and placebo (peak, 13.1 +/- 4.7 micrograms/L; AUC, 497.2 +/- 83.5 micrograms/L.h). Spontaneous GH secretion was higher during the night than in the morning (P = 0.0001), whereas nocturnal GH secretion overlapped with that in the morning after CLON. The data presented show that alpha 2-adrenoreceptor activation is probably mediated by increased endogenous GHRH release; our results suggest that the endogenous GHRH secretion is maximally stimulated at night.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to combined administration of arginine and GH-releasing hormone does not vary with age in man.

At present, the mechanism(s) underlying the reduced spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion in aging is still unclear. To obtain new information on this mechanism(s), the GH responses to both single and combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 1 microgram/kg iv) and arginine (ARG; 30 g infused over 30 min), a well known GH secretagogue probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, were studied in seven elderly normal subjects and seven young healthy subjects. Basal GH levels were similar in both groups, while insulin-like growth factor-I levels were lower in elderly subjects (76.7 +/- 9.2 vs. 258.3 +/- 29.2 micrograms/L; P = 0.01). In aged subjects GHRH induced a GH increase (area under the curve, 314.9 +/- 91.9 micrograms/L.h) which was lower (P = 0.01) than that in young subjects (709.1 +/- 114.4 micrograms/L.h). On the other hand, the ARG-induced GH increase in the elderly was not significantly different from that in young subjects (372.8 +/- 81.8 vs. 470.6 +/- 126.5 micrograms/L.h). ARG potentiated GH responsiveness to GHRH in both elderly (1787.1 +/- 226.0 micrograms/L.h; P = 0.0001 vs. GHRH alone) and young subjects (2113.0 +/- 444.3 micrograms/L.h; P = 0.001 vs. GHRH alone). The potentiating effect of ARG on the GHRH-induced GH response was greater in elderly than in young subjects (1013.0 +/- 553.5% vs. 237.9 +/- 79.1%; P = 0.0001); thus, the GH increase induced by combined administration of ARG and GHRH overlapped in two groups. In conclusion, these results show that, differently from the GHRH-induced GH increase, the somatotroph response to combined administration of ARG and GHRH does not vary with age. Our finding suggests that an increased somatostatinergic activity may underlie the reduced GH secretion in normal aging.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Failure of pyridostigmine to increase both basal and GHRH-induced GH secretion in the night.

The aim of this study was to verify that the stimulatory effect of cholinergic agonists on both basal and stimulated GH release observed in the morning persists in the night. The effects of pyridostigmine (120 mg orally), a cholinesterase inhibitor, on both basal and GHRH (1 micrograms/kg iv)-induced GH secretion were studied in 8 healthy volunteers, aged 22-30 years. In the morning, administration of pyridostigmine induced a significant increase in basal GH levels compared with saline (area under the response curve, mean +/- SEM: 277.0 +/- 54.0 vs 49.7 +/- 8.2 micrograms.l-1.h-1, p less than 0.02) as well as a strong potentiation of the GHRH-induced GH release (2117.6 +/- 353.0 vs 427.9 +/- 87.0 micrograms.l-h-1, p less than 0.02). In the night, GH secretion after pyridostigmine did not differ from saline (194.5 +/- 21.9 vs 89.4 +/- 28.7 micrograms.l-1.h-1). Moreover pyridostigmine failed to potentiate the GHRH-induced GH increase (1071.9 +/- 170.4 vs 740.2 +/- 150.9 micrograms.l-1.h-1). The pyridostigmine + GHRH-induced GH rise during the night was lower (p less than 0.05) than in the morning. All together, these data seem to indicate that cholinergic neurons controlling GH secretion are already maximally stimulated at night. As cholinergic activity negatively modulates SRIH secretion, our findings suggest that a reduced somatostatinergic tone in the hypothalamus is present during the night.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Pyridostigmine partially restores the GH responsiveness to GHRH in normal aging.

In 11 elderly normal subjects and in 17 young healthy subjects we studied the response of plasma growth hormone to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH(29), 1 microgram/kg iv) alone and preceded by pyridostigmine (120 mg orally 60 min before GHRH), a cholinesterase inhibitor likely able to suppress somatostatin release. The GH response to pyridostigmine alone was also examined. Basal plasma GH levels were similar in elderly and young subjects. In the elderly, GHRH induced a GH rise (AUC, median and range: 207.5, 43.5-444.0 micrograms.l-1.h-1) which was lower (p = 0.006) than that observed in young subjects (548.0, 112.5-2313.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1). The pyridostigmine-induced GH rise in the elderly was similar to that in young subjects (300.5, 163.0-470.0 vs 265.0, 33.0-514.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1). Pyridostigmine potentiated the GH responsiveness to GHRH in both elderly (437.5, 152.0-1815.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1; p = 0.01 vs GHRH alone) and young subjects (2140.0, 681.5-4429.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1; p = 0.0001 vs GHRH alone). However, the GH response to pyridostigmine + GHRH was significantly lower (p = 0.0001) in elderly than in young subjects. In conclusion, the cholinergic enhancement by pyridostigmine is able to potentiate the blunted GH response to GHRH in elderly subjects, inducing a GH increase similar to that observed after GHRH alone in young adults. This finding suggests that an alteration of somatostatinergic tone could be involved in the reduced GH secretion in normal aging. However, a decreased GH response to combined administration of pyridostigmine and GHRH in elderly subjects suggests that other abnormalities may coexist, leading to the secretory hypoactivity of somatotropes.

Adult↗