Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Materia

Publications and source records attributed to E Materia.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

[The efficacy of surgical treatment of hypospadias: analysis of hospital data from Lazio region during the three year period (1996-8)].

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to assess effectiveness of surgical treatment for hypospadia in the Regione Lazio (Italy). Hospital discharge data concerning surgical repair of hypospadia between 1996-1998 were analysed in order to: 1. estimate the trend of demand for hypospadia treatment; 2. correlate clinical results with the type of Surgical Unit of admission (general pediatric, urological, plastic); 3. correlate surgical results with the workload of the Unit; 4. quantify the general risk of a secondary treatment. METHODS: The source of data was the Hospital Information System of the Regione Lazio. Cases have been grouped according to Health District, age at first operation, interval to re-hospitalization after the first treatment for hypospadia. RESULTS: Age at first operation progressively declined in the last years. The annual risk of readmission and reoperation after the first surgical treatment, calculated on a group of 521 cases in 1996, are respectively 6.6% and 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The demand for hypospadia surgery in children was, as expected, stable in the time. However, a tendency to an earlier correction has been observed, mainly in the first and second year of life. Nearly all (99%) of the surgery for hypospadia in the Regione Lazio is performed in four hospitals; one of them accounts for three quarters of the workload. During the observed period a progressive reduction of hospital stay was seen. In the hospital with the best results in term of surgical efficiency, a significant number of patients is treated on a Day Surgery basis. Institutions treating less than 50 cases per year show a significantly high rate of re-hospitalisation within 12 months.

Adolescent↗

[Evaluating hospital appropriateness with different tools: administrative data versus analytic review].

PRUO, a modified version of AEP, is a widely used clinical-based tool to evaluate hospital appropriateness in Italy. We developed the APPRO method for assessing organizational appropriateness using administrative data. APPRO estimates the amount of inappropriate hospitalisation, giving consideration to severity of illness through APR-DRG classification system. The aims of the study were to: measure the agreement between evaluators using PRUO; investigate the relation between APR-DRG severity subgroups and PRUO assessment; asses the validity of APPRO method comparing its performance to PRUO results. We selected 361 hospital episodes assigned to DRG 39 ("lens procedures with or without vitrectomy") and 242 hospital episodes assigned to DRG 183 ("miscellaneous of digestive disorders, age > 17") from three hospitals in 2000. Clinical records were independently evaluated by two pairs of physicians using PRUO. Proportions of inappropriate episodes by hospital and DRG were also estimated through APPRO using data from Lazio regional hospital information system. The agreement between the two pairs of evaluators was high (k=0.93; p<0.0001). We observed no statistically significant association between APR-DRG severity subgroups and inappropriate hospitalisation found by PRUO. APPRO underestimates rates of inappropriate hospitalisation compared to PRUO. It depends on the different characteristics of the tools and particularly on the caution of APPRO in performing the evaluation using routine data.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗

[Epidemiology of tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy in Italy].

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Aim of the study was to describe frequency, causes, regional variations, setting and risk of mortality of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in Italy. The study is based on hospital discharge data for the years 1998-2000 provided by the Ministry of Health. RESULTS: During the year 2000, 61.280 tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy and 32.655 adenoidectomy alone were performed in Italy. ICD-9-CM codes reported on discharge abstracts indicated that the most frequent causes of tonsillectomy were chronic tonsillitis (45%) and hypertrophy of tonsils and adenoids (43%). The total tonsillectomy rate was 10.6 x 10.000 (CI 10.5-10.7) in 2000, and it was stable throughout the study period. We observed a wide geographical variability of regional tonsillectomy rates, standardised by age and sex. They ranged from 3.5 x 10.000 (CI 3.1-4.0) in Basilicata to 19.0 (CI 18.6-19.5) in Piemonte. We found an inverse correlation (r = -0.50) between regional tonsillectomy rates for tonsillitis and minimum temperatures recorded in capitals of the regions. Most operations were performed in the acute setting with a hospital stay longer than one day. The mortality risk associated to surgery was estimated to be at least of one case over 95.000 operations. CONCLUSIONS: The observed variability of regional tonsillectomy rates, only partly explained by weather differences, may be ascribed to disagreement among physicians. Inappropriate variations and setting were the two main reasons conducive to the development of the guidelines "Clinical and organisational appropriateness of tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy in Italy", in the frame of LINCO project and of the Italian National Program for Guidelines.

Adenoidectomy↗

[Evaluation of the appropriateness of hospital admissions with the Italian version of the AEP in a university hospital].

It has been carried out a survey to evaluate the appropriateness of hospital stay in a university hospital. The aims of the study were: to determine the amount of inappropriate hospital admissions and inappropriate days of stay in relation to either wards and characteristics of admission; to analyse the reasons for inappropriate patient stay. A randomised sample stratified by ward of discharge of 224 medical records were analysed using the Italian version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. 37.9% of the hospital admissions and 18.9% of hospitalisation days were judged to be inappropriate. The main reasons for categorising an admission or a day of stay as inappropriate were a) delay in performing elective surgery procedures; b) that the patient's problem could be treated on an outpatient basis; c) delay in performing diagnostic examinations. The univariate statistical analysis showed an association between appropriateness of hospital stay and gender age, ward of discharge, length of hospital stay and DRG type (medical/surgical). The study highlights a lower level of inappropriateness compared to the results of other investigations. Hints were also identified for achieving an improved efficiency at hospital level.

Adolescent↗

Perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum and ileocecal junction: technique, normal patterns, and comparison with transileostomy manometry.

The technique of perendoscopic manometry was used to study the motor patterns of the ileocecal junction and distal ileum. An expert endoscopist cannulated the distal ileum of 20 unsedated subjects in 260 +/- 252 (mean +/- SD) seconds, causing no discomfort beyond that of an ordinary colonoscopic examination. No sphincter-like motor activity was detected at the ileocecal junction, and four distinct motility patterns were identified in the distal ileum: (1) tone variations, (2) slow phasic contractions, (3) regular rapid phasic contractions, and (4) prolonged rapid phasic contractions. Previous appendectomy and insertion of the colonoscope into the distal ileum to position the manometric catheter did not affect the manometric recordings. Perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum was compared with transileostomy manometry in 9 subjects. Perendoscopic and transileostomy manometric recordings showed the same motor patterns except for a longer occurrence of tone variations with perendoscopic manometry. In conclusion, this study shows that perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum and ileocecal junction is feasible; recorded motor patterns are not affected.

Adolescent↗