Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Macaluso

Publications and source records attributed to E Macaluso.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

The neural basis of temporal auditory discrimination.

When two identical stimuli, such as a pair of clicks, are presented with a sufficiently long time-interval between them they are readily perceived as two separate events. However, as they are presented progressively closer together, there comes a point when the two separate stimuli are perceived as one. This phenomenon applies not only to hearing but also to other sensory modalities. Damage to the basal ganglia disturbs this type of temporal discrimination irrespective of sensory modality, suggesting a multimodal process is involved. Our aim was to study the neural substrate of auditory temporal discrimination in healthy subjects and to compare it with structures previously associated with analogous tactile temporal discrimination. During fMRI scanning, paired-clicks separated by variable inter-stimulus intervals (1-50 ms) were delivered binaurally, with different intensities delivered to each ear, yielding a lateralised auditory percept. Subjects were required (a) to report whether they heard one or two stimuli (TD: temporal discrimination); or (b) to report whether the stimuli were located on the right or left side of the head mid-line (SD: spatial discrimination); or (c) simply to detect the presence of an auditory stimulus (control task). Our results showed that both types of auditory discrimination (TD and SD) compared to simple detection activated a network of brain areas including regions of prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Critically, two clusters in pre-SMA and the anterior cingulate cortex were specifically activated by TD. Furthermore, these clusters overlap with regions activated for similar judgments in the tactile modality suggesting that they fulfill a multimodal function in the temporal processing of sensory events.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2005

High binaural coherence determines successful sound localization and increased activity in posterior auditory areas.

Our brain continuously receives complex combinations of sounds originating from different sources and relating to different events in the external world. Timing differences between the two ears can be used to localize sounds in space, but only when the inputs to the two ears have similar spectrotemporal profiles (high binaural coherence). We used fMRI to investigate any modulation of auditory responses by binaural coherence. We assessed how processing of these cues depends on whether spatial information is task relevant and whether brain activity correlates with subjects' localization performance. We found that activity in Heschl's gyrus increased with increasing coherence, irrespective of whether localization was task relevant. Posterior auditory regions also showed increased activity for high coherence, primarily when sound localization was required and subjects successfully localized sounds. We conclude that binaural coherence cues are processed throughout the auditory cortex and that these cues are used in posterior regions for successful auditory localization.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2005

Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance.

During covert attention to peripheral visual targets, presenting a concurrent tactile stimulus at the same location as a visual target can boost neural responses to it, even in sensory-specific occipital areas. Here, we examined any such crossmodal spatial-congruence effects in the context of overt spatial orienting, when saccadic eye-movements were directed to each peripheral target or central fixation maintained. In addition, we tested whether crossmodal spatial-congruence effects depend on the task-relevance of visual or tactile stimuli. On each trial, subjects received spatially congruent (same location) or incongruent (opposite hemifields) visuo-tactile stimulation. In different blocks, they made saccades either to the location of each visual stimulus, or to the location of each tactile stimulus; or else passively received the multisensory stimulation. Activity in visual extrastriate areas and in somatosensory parietal operculum was modulated by spatial congruence of the multisensory stimulation, with stronger activations when concurrent visual and tactile stimuli were both delivered at the same contralateral location. Critically, lateral occipital cortex and parietal operculum showed such crossmodal spatial effects irrespective of which modality was task relevant; and also of whether the stimuli were used to guide eye-movements or were just passively received. These results reveal crossmodal spatial-congruence effects upon visual and somatosensory sensory-specific areas that are relatively 'automatic', determined by the spatial relation of multisensory input rather than by its task-relevance.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Influence of gaze direction on crossmodal modulation of visual ERPS by endogenous tactile spatial attention.

Recent evidence indicates that the spatial direction of endogenous covert spatial attention in one sensory modality can crossmodally influence early processing of stimuli in a different modality. However, spatial locations are initially coded according to different frames of reference for different modalities (e.g., body-centered for touch versus retinocentric vision) and postural changes (e.g., gaze shifts) will realign these. Here, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate how the direction of endogenous tactile attention affects sensory-specific visual ERP components. Critically, by manipulating direction of gaze, we were able to test whether any crossmodal effects depend on visual and tactile projections to a common hemisphere, on common locations in external space, or on some combination of the two. We found that both P1 and N1 visual components were modulated according to the direction of endogenous tactile attention. While the P1 crossmodal effect followed purely hemispheric constraints, the attentional modulation of N1 appeared to combine both anatomical and external spatial constraints.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Spatial and temporal factors during processing of audiovisual speech: a PET study.

Speech perception can use not only auditory signals, but also visual information from seeing the speaker's mouth. The relative timing and relative location of auditory and visual inputs are both known to influence crossmodal integration psychologically, but previous imaging studies of audiovisual speech focused primarily on just temporal aspects. Here we used Positron Emission Tomography (PET) during audiovisual speech processing to study how temporal and spatial factors might jointly affect brain activations. In agreement with previous work, synchronous versus asynchronous audiovisual speech yielded increased activity in multisensory association areas (e.g., superior temporal sulcus [STS]), plus in some unimodal visual areas. Our orthogonal manipulation of relative stimulus position (auditory and visual stimuli presented at same location vs. opposite sides) and stimulus synchrony showed that (i) ventral occipital areas and superior temporal sulcus were unaffected by relative location; (ii) lateral and dorsal occipital areas were selectively activated for synchronous bimodal stimulation at the same external location; (iii) right inferior parietal lobule was activated for synchronous auditory and visual stimuli at different locations, that is, in the condition classically associated with the 'ventriloquism effect' (shift of perceived auditory position toward the visual location). Thus, different brain regions are involved in different aspects of audiovisual integration. While ventral areas appear more affected by audiovisual synchrony (which can influence speech identification), more dorsal areas appear to be associated with spatial multisensory interactions.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Preparatory states in crossmodal spatial attention: spatial specificity and possible control mechanisms.

We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to study the neural correlates of endogenous spatial attention for vision and touch. We examined activity associated with attention-directing cues (central auditory pure tones), symbolically instructing subjects to attend to one hemifield or the other prior to upcoming stimuli, for a visual or tactile task. In different sessions, subjects discriminated either visual or tactile stimuli at the covertly attended side, during bilateral visuotactile stimulation. To distinguish cue-related preparatory activity from any modulation of stimulus processing, unpredictably on some trials only the auditory cue was presented. The use of attend-vision and attend-touch blocks revealed whether preparatory attentional effects were modality-specific or multimodal. Unimodal effects of spatial attention were found in somatosensory cortex for attention to touch, and in occipital areas for attention to vision, both contralateral to the attended side. Multimodal spatial effects (i.e. effects of attended side irrespective of task-relevant modality) were detected in contralateral intraparietal sulcus, traditionally considered a multimodal brain region; and also in the middle occipital gyrus, an area traditionally considered purely visual. Critically, all these activations were observed even on cue-only trials, when no visual or tactile stimuli were subsequently presented. Endogenous shifts of spatial attention result in changes of brain activity prior to the presentation of target stimulation (baseline shifts). Here, we show for the first time the separable multimodal and unimodal components of such preparatory activations. Additionally, irrespective of the attended side and modality, attention-directing auditory cues activated a network of superior frontal and parietal association areas that may play a role in voluntary control of spatial attention for both vision and touch.

Attention↗
PubMed2002

Crossmodal spatial influences of touch on extrastriate visual areas take current gaze direction into account.

Recent results indicate that crossmodal interactions can affect activity in cortical regions traditionally regarded as "unimodal." Previously we found that combining touch on one hand with visual stimulation in the anatomically corresponding hemifield could boost responses in contralateral visual cortex. Here we manipulated which visual hemifield corresponded to the location of the stimulated hand, by changing gaze direction such that right-hand touch could now arise in either the left or right visual field. Crossmodal effects on visual cortex switched from one hemisphere to the other, depending on gaze direction, regardless of whether the hand was seen. This indicates that crossmodal influences of touch upon visual cortex depend on spatial alignment for the multimodal stimuli, with gaze posture taken into account.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Directing attention to locations and to sensory modalities: multiple levels of selective processing revealed with PET.

We used positron emission tomography (PET) to investigate the neural correlates of selective attention in humans. We examined the effects of attending to one side of space versus another (spatial selection) and to one sensory modality versus another (intermodal selection) during bilateral, bimodal stimulation of vision and touch. Attention toward one side resulted in greater activity in several contralateral areas. In somatosensory cortex, these spatial attentional modulations were found only when touch was relevant. In the intraparietal sulcus, spatial attentional effects were multimodal, independent of the modality attended. In occipital areas, spatial modulations were also found during both visual and tactile attention, indicating that tactile attention can affect activity in visual cortex; but occipital areas also showed more activity overall during visual attention. This suggests that while spatial attention can exert multimodal influences on visual areas, these still maintain their specificity for the visual modality. Additionally, irrespective of the attended side, attending to vision activated posterior parietal and superior premotor cortices, while attending to touch activated the parietal operculi. We conclude that attentional selection operates at multiple levels, with attention to locations and attention to modalities showing distinct effects. These jointly contribute to boost processing of stimuli at the attended location in the relevant modality.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Multimodal mechanisms of attention related to rates of spatial shifting in vision and touch.

Covert attention can be directed spatially in several different sensory modalities (e.g. vision and touch). Recent psychological experiments indicate the existence of crossmodal links in spatial attention, but their neural basis in humans remains underspecified. We used positron emission tomography (PET) to assess the role of stimulus modality in the activity of brain regions involved in different rates of spatial attention shifting. A 2 x 2 factorial design manipulated the rate (high versus low) of spatial attention shifts between left and right hemifields, plus the sensory modality (vision versus touch) of stimulation. Two brain regions showed activations related to attentional shift-rate, independent of the stimulated modality: these were the right frontopolar gyrus, and the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS). The anterior area showed higher blood flow with the high rate of shifts in spatial attention, while the posterior area showed higher flow during the low rate conditions, where attention was sustained for longer on one side. No area showed a significant rate effect in one modality without an effect in the second modality. These results demonstrate multimodal roles for the activated brain regions in relation to the rate of spatial attention shifting, plus right-hemisphere dominance for this. They also suggest that anterior and posterior regions of the spatial-attention network play different roles in attention shifting.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Spatial attention and crossmodal interactions between vision and touch.

In the present paper, we review several functional imaging studies investigating crossmodal interactions between vision and touch relating to spatial attention. We asked how the spatial unity of a multimodal event in the external world might be represented in the brain, where signals from different modalities are initially processed in distinct brain regions. The results highlight several links between visual and tactile spatial representations. First, we found that activity in the anterior part of the intraparietal sulcus was influenced by stimulus position independently of the modality of the stimulation. This is consistent with crossmodal interactions via sensory convergence from early modality-specific spatial maps to higher-order multimodal regions. Second, we found that stimulation in, or attention to, one modality could affect activity in areas dedicated to a different modality, in a spatially-specific manner. These spatial crossmodal effects in unimodal regions demonstrate congruous activity in anatomically distant brain areas that represent similar external locations, implicating a distributed network of spatial representations in crossmodal integration. Finally, the results suggest that the temporo-parietal junction may be involved in aspects of controlling spatial attention, for both vision and touch. A multimodal attentional system may influence activity in distinct brain areas representing common regions of space for different modalities, thus suggesting a link between spatial attention and crossmodal integration.

Attention↗
PubMed2000

Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention.

A sudden touch on one hand can improve vision near that hand, revealing crossmodal links in spatial attention. It is often assumed that such links involve only multimodal neural structures, but unimodal brain areas may also be affected. We tested the effect of simultaneous visuo-tactile stimulation on the activity of the human visual cortex. Tactile stimulation enhanced activity in the visual cortex, but only when it was on the same side as a visual target. Analysis of effective connectivity between brain areas suggests that touch influences unimodal visual cortex via back-projections from multimodal parietal areas. This provides a neural explanation for crossmodal links in spatial attention.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Interhemispheric differences in extrastriate areas during visuo-spatial selective attention.

Functional asymmetries between hemispheres have been reported in relation to spatial and temporal information processing. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the influence of task on activity in extrastriate areas during selective spatial attention. During bilateral visual stimulation, subjects attended either the left or the right hemifield. Within the attended side, the task was either to discriminate the orientation of the stimuli or to judge their temporal characteristics. The bilateral stimulation caused symmetric activation of the left and right occipitotemporal junction. Within these regions we investigated the modulatory effects attention and the effect of task upon these. A region of interest approach was used to compare activity in the two hemispheres. The signal at occipitotemporal junction was analyzed in a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design, with attended side, type of task, and hemisphere as factors. We found that, in both hemispheres, activity was higher when attention was directed to the contralateral hemifield compared with the ipsilateral hemifield. However, the size of these contralateral attentional modulations was dependent on the task. In the left occipitotemporal junction, contralateral modulations were stronger during the temporal task, while in the right occipitotemporal junction contralateral modulations were stronger during orientation discrimination. Overall, this pattern of activity lead to a significant three-way interaction between attended side, type of task, and hemisphere. We conclude that task characteristics influence brain activity associated with spatial selective attention. Our results support the hypothesis that temporal and orientation processing are preferentially associated with the left and right hemisphere, respectively.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Selective spatial attention in vision and touch: unimodal and multimodal mechanisms revealed by PET.

Two positron-emission tomography (PET) experiments explored the neural basis of selective spatial attention in vision and touch, testing for modality-specific versus multimodal activations due to attended side. In the first study, either light flashes or finger vibrations were presented bilaterally. Twelve healthy volunteers were scanned while sustaining covert attention on the left or right hemifield within each modality. The main effect for attending right minus left, across both modalities, revealed bimodal spatial attention effects in the left intraparietal sulcus and left occipitotemporal junction. Modality-specific attentional effects (again, for attending right vs. left) were found in the left superior occipital gyrus for vision, and left superior postcentral gyrus for touch. No significant activations were seen for attending left minus right. The second study presented only tactile stimuli, manipulating whether the eyes were open or closed, and including passive stimulation and rest baselines. The unimodal activation for tactile spatial attention in the left superior postcentral gyrus was replicated. The bimodal activation of the left intraparietal sulcus observed in the first study was now found for touch, but only when the eyes were open (hands visible), apparently confirming its multimodal nature. These results reveal mechanisms of sustained spatial attention operating at both modality-specific and multimodal levels.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Motile areas of leech neurites are rich in microfilaments and two actin-binding proteins: gelsolin and profilin.

Cell motility is produced by changes in the dynamics and organization of actin filaments. The aim of the experiments described here was to test whether growing neurites contain two actin-binding proteins, gelsolin and profilin, that regulate polymerization of actin and affect non-neuronal cell motility. The distribution of gelsolin, profilin and the microfilaments was compared by immunocytochemistry of leech neurons growing in culture. We observed that microfilaments are enriched in the peripheral motile areas of the neurites. Both gelsolin and profilin are also concentrated in these regions. Gelsolin is abundant in filopodia and is associated with single identifiable microfilament bundles in lamellipodia. Profilin is not prominent in filopodia and shows a diffuse staining pattern in lamellipodia. The colocalization of gelsolin and profilin in motile, microfilament-rich areas supports the hypothesis that they synergistically regulate the actin dynamics that underlie neurite growth.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗