Beta-adrenergic blocking drugs are now commonly used in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. This review examines the possible mechanisms of their ventricular antiarrhythmic effect. Actions on the myocardial cell, as well as actions on the central and autonomic nervous system, are reviewed. Many clinical studies have attempted to show the efficacy of beta blockers in controlling ventricular arrhythmia and decreasing the incidence of sudden death after acute myocardial infarction. Although some of these clinical trials tended to show an impact on sudden death, the size of these trials or their design problems do not allow firm conclusions to be made. The Beta Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT) is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of propranolol currently under way in the United States. Important additions to the previous trials include the addition of drug levels to ensure beta-blocking dosage, long-term electrocardiographic monitoring, and a study population of 4200 patients followed for an average of three years. These important design features will be of value in addressing some of the unanswered questions presented in this review.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment of severe left ventricular dysfunction with calcium chloride in patients receiving verapamil.

This report describes two patients who received verapamil because of supraventricular arrhythmias. The patients both developed severe hypotension and signs of left ventricular compromise. The hypotension and left ventricular compromise were promptly reversed by administration of intravenous calcium chloride. The dramatic improvement was documented clinically and in one case by two-dimensional echocardiography.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Exercise in the geriatric population.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The prognostic value of the duration of the ambulatory electrocardiogram after myocardial infarction.

The purpose of this study was to examine the value of various durations of ambulatory ECG recording with regard to providing useful prognostic information. The authors explored a decision theoretic approach to determine the most useful period of monitoring for making a treatment decision based upon postulated benefit-to-risk ratios of antiarrhythmic therapies. They used data collected as part of the Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT), a randomized clinical trial of propranolol versus placebo in 3,837 post-myocardial-infarction patients. In BHAT, 1,336 placebo-treated patients had a 24-hour ambulatory ECG that had at least 23 readable hours. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for eight definitions of ventricular arrhythmia using either total mortality or sudden death (death within one hour of symptoms) as an endpoint. These indices were obtained using the first 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours plus a random hour, a random daytime hour, and a random nighttime hour of the 24-hour ECG of 1,336 placebo-treated patients. The study showed that in the case of high-risk, low-benefit therapies, no test is needed to make a treatment decision. No one should be treated. In the case of high-benefit, low-risk therapies, again, no test is required. Everyone should be treated. For therapies in the middle benefit-to-risk ratio range the most appropriate test for a treatment decision changes from the very specific to the most sensitive. Twenty-four hours of ambulatory monitoring is usually not necessary for a treatment decision, since four hours is likely to be sufficient.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Primary ventricular tachycardia.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗