Biomedical subjects

E J Small

Publications and source records attributed to E J Small.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Androgen deprivation therapy in locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer.

Numerous studies have been performed testing the efficacy of early androgen deprivation (AD) in patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. A systematic review of recent publications that report on the use of AD in non-metastatic prostate cancer patients was performed. Recently published mature randomized trials of AD plus local therapy were evaluated plus 2 large datasets on the use of AD for patients with serologic relapse after local therapy. Four mature randomized studies demonstrate an overall survival benefit to the use of AD in conjunction with definitive local therapy (3 with radiation and 1 with surgery). One retrospective analysis suggests that AD administered at early after serologic progression improves overall survival, and one retrospective analysis shows a reduction in metastasis-free survival but has not yet shown an overall survival benefit. In virtually all analyses, patients with high-risk features benefited from early AD when compared to deferred therapy. Consideration of AD is therefore warranted early in the clinical course of high-risk patients.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed2003

The evolving role of androgen deprivation therapy in the management of prostate cancer.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plays a central role in the management of prostate cancer. ADT is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic disease; the most common method is gonadal suppression via luteinizing hormone release hormone (LH) agonists, with or without antiandrogens. Antiandrogen monotherapy remains investigational, as is the appropriate role of 5alphareductase inhibition for prostate cancer. Intermittent ADT offers the promise of improved quality of life and reduced cost without a decrease found to date in oncologic efficacy. A growing menu of options exists for secondary androgen deprivation after disease progression on primary therapy: these include high-dose antiandrogens, estrogens, and adrenal androgen suppressants. ADT is being used with increasing frequency as primary monotherapy in patients with localized disease, but only small, nonrandomized studies of highly selected patients have been reported to date. Neoadjuvant ADT (NADT) has been demonstrated in prospective, multi-institutional trials to improve outcomes for patients with high-risk or locally advanced disease undergoing external-beam radiotherapy. Trials for patients with lower-risk, localized disease are still ongoing. Neoadjuvant therapy does not improve outcomes for patients with localized disease opting for radical prostatectomy (RP) and has not been well studied in association with brachytherapy. The side effects of ADT can be managed increasingly successfully; in particular, the introduction of zoledronate may reduce the impact of ADT-associated osteoporosis. Finally, contemporary practice pattern data suggest that use of ADT is increasing across patient risk groups, both in contexts where such therapy is well supported by current evidence and in others where it is not.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2001

Prognostic significance of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for prostate-specific antigen in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic significance of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNA in the blood of men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood was obtained from 193 men enrolled on Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9480, a prospective randomized comparison of three doses of suramin. RNA was isolated from the samples and assayed for the presence of PSA transcripts by RT-PCR. RESULTS: RNA could be isolated in 156 (83%) of samples. PSA transcripts as measured by RT-PCR were detectable in 75 (48%) of the 156 patients. The median survival for those patients in whom no transcripts were detectable was 18 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14 to 22 months) compared with 13 months (95% CI, 11 to 15 months) (P =.004) for those in whom transcripts were detectable. In a multivariate analysis in which other factors predictive of survival were used, RT-PCR for PSA provided independent prognostic information. CONCLUSION: RT-PCR for PSA predicts survival duration in a population of men with HRPC.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Phase II study of docetaxel, estramustine, and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a final report of CALGB 9780. Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

PURPOSE: To investigate the combination of docetaxel, estramustine (EM), and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Combinations of EM with other antimitotic agents such as docetaxel are synergistic in vitro and show significant clinical activity in patients with HRPC. We studied intravenous administration of docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), oral estramustine, and low-dose daily hydrocortisone in men with HRPC who demonstrated progression after initial hormone therapy. RESULTS: Of the 47 men enrolled onto this multicenter cooperative group study, 46 were assessable for response and/or toxicity. In the 24 patients with measurable disease, there were three complete and nine partial responses for a measurable disease response rate of 50% (12 of 24 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27% to 73%). In the 44 patients in whom pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was elevated, 30 (68%) had a 50% or greater decrease, and 25 (57%) had a 75% or greater decrease in PSA. The combined measurable disease and biochemical response rate in all 46 assessable patients was 54% (three complete responses, 22 partial responses, 95% CI, 37% to 71%). The predominant toxicity was neutropenia, with 26% of patients having grade 3 and 30% having grade 4 granulocytopenia; there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Other common but mild adverse effects included malaise/fatigue, peripheral edema, and hyperglycemia. The incidence of thromboembolic events during therapy was 9%. With a median follow-up of 17 months, the median survival was 20 months. The median time to disease progression was 8 months for all patients, and 10 months for those with measurable disease. CONCLUSION: This therapy is efficacious and moderately well tolerated in HRPC and should be compared in a phase III trial with mitoxantrone and prednisone.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor urine levels as predictors of outcome in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

Better prognostic markers are needed for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. No single biochemical or clinical parameter can reliably predict patient response to therapy or rapidity of disease progression. Peptide factors involved in major cancer growth pathways, such as tumor angiogenesis, are attractive candidates as markers of low- and high-risk HRPC patients. We analyzed prospectively collected urine specimens from 100 of 390 HRPC patients undergoing therapy with the growth factor antagonist suramin as part of CALGB 9480. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were assessed from day 1 of therapy (D1) and day 29 (D29) urine samples from this subset of 100 randomly selected patients. Growth factor levels were determined by standardized ELISA microtiter plate assays from a commercial (bFGF) or proprietary (VEGF) source. Pretreatment urine VEGF levels were predictive of survival. In univariate analysis, patients whose baseline urine VEGF level was < or =28 pg/ml (the median level) had an average survival of 17 months; those with baseline VEGF >28 pg/ml had a significantly shorter survival of 10 months (P = 0.024). This difference corresponded to a 60% increased risk of dying for the higher urine VEGF patients (hazard ratio, 1.62; P = 0.03) and remained significant in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.72, P = 0.02). No significant correlations between urine bFGF level or change in bFGF levels and survival were found. These results support the notion that certain peptide growth factor-mediated, mitogenic pathways are important in HRPC and that their levels can predict outcome.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Serum prostate-specific antigen decline as a marker of clinical outcome in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients: association with progression-free survival, pain end points, and survival.

PURPOSE: Validated end points are lacking for clinical trials in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Controversy remains regarding the utility of a posttreatment decline of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether posttreatment declines in PSA were associated with clinical measures of improvement in a randomized phase III trial of suramin plus hydrocortisone versus placebo plus hydrocortisone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 460 HRPC patients were randomized to receive suramin plus hydrocortisone (n = 229) or placebo plus hydrocortisone (n = 231). All patients had symptomatic, metastatic HRPC requiring opioid analgesics. Clinical end points evaluated included overall survival, objective progression-free survival (OPFS), and time to pain progression (TTPP). An evaluation of overall survival, OPFS, and TTPP as a function of a PSA decline of > or = 50%, lasting at least 28 days, was undertaken by using a landmark analysis at 6, 9, and 12 weeks. A multivariate analysis of the impact of PSA decline was performed on these clinical end points. RESULTS: A decline in PSA of > or = 50% lasting > or = 28 days was significantly associated with a prolonged median overall survival, OPFS, and TTPP, both in the entire group and the suramin plus hydrocortisone group at all three landmarks in both univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In this prospective, randomized trial of suramin plus hydrocortisone versus placebo plus hydrocortisone, a posttherapy decline in PSA of > or = 50%, lasting 28 days, was associated with prolonged median overall survival, improved median progression-free survival, and median TTPP. This analysis suggests that a posttreatment decline in PSA may be a reasonable intermediate end point in HRPC trials and calls into question the clinical utility of preclinical assays evaluating the in vitro effect of given agents on PSA secretion.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate, and carboplatin in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and activity of weekly paclitaxel in combination with estramustine and carboplatin (TEC) in patients with advanced prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a dose-escalation study, patients with advanced prostate cancer were administered paclitaxel (weekly 1-hour infusions of 60 to 100 mg/m(2)), oral estramustine (10 mg/kg), and carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg/mL-min every 4 weeks). Paclitaxel levels were determined 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes and 18 hours after infusion, and a concentration-time curve was estimated. Once a safe dose was established, a multi-institutional phase II trial was conducted in patients with progressive androgen-independent disease. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with progressive androgen-independent disease were treated for a median of four cycles. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated from 60 to 100 mg/m(2) without the occurrence of DLT. Posttherapy decreases in serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 50%, 80%, and 90% were seen in 67%, 48%, and 39% (95% confidence interval, 55% to 79%, 35% to 61%, 26% to 52%) of the patients, respectively. Of the 33 patients with measurable disease, two (6%) had a complete response and 13 (39%) had a partial response. The overall median time to progression was 21 weeks, and the median survival time for all patients was 19.9 months. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse effects were thromboembolic disease (in 25% of patients), hyperglycemia (in 38%), and hypophosphatemia (in 42%). Significant leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy were not observed. CONCLUSION: TEC has significant antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with progressive androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Immunotherapy for prostate cancer.

The components of an effective immune response have been elucidated in recent years. An understanding of the dysfunction of the immune response in cancer in one or more of these components has led to a variety of immunotherapeutic approaches. These therapeutic strategies are designed to stimulate dendritic cell proliferation, promote antigen uptake and processing, stimulate an effector cell response via direct antigen presentation, or target tumor cells via antibody therapy. Many approaches in prostate cancer have demonstrated successful induction of the desired immune response. Limited clinical success has also been seen.

Antigen Presentation↗

PubMed2001

Secondary hormonal manipulation of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality among men in Western countries. The initial treatment of advanced prostate cancer is suppression of testicular androgen production by medical or surgical castration, but nearly all men with metastases develop disease progression. Patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) have a median survival of approximately 18 months, and no therapy has yet demonstrated a definitive survival advantage. However, in the past several years, a number of promising new treatment strategies have emerged. One of the most important new treatment strategies involves secondary hormonal manipulation after the failure of primary androgen deprivation. This approach is predicated on the recognition that HRPC is a heterogeneous disease, and some patients may respond to alternative hormonal interventions despite the presence of castrate levels of testosterone.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed2001

Intermittent androgen deprivation: update of cycling characteristics in patients without clinically apparent metastatic prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To update the cycling characteristics and patterns of treatment in patients receiving intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) for clinically localized and recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS: We report our experience with 61 patients treated with IAD. Thirty-four patients had received no prior treatment, and 27 had developed recurrent disease after previous local therapy. No patient had clinically apparent metastatic disease before the initiation of therapy. The mean and median serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before treatment was 25.3 ng/mL and 16.0 ng/mL, respectively (range 0.5 to 190 ng/mL). For each cycle, androgen deprivation was continued until PSA became undetectable or a nadir level was reached. Patients were then observed without treatment, and therapy was reinstituted after the serum PSA value reached a predetermined level. Patients were no longer eligible to cycle off treatment when their serum PSA increased despite ongoing androgen deprivation or if any objective evidence of disease progression was present on imaging studies. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 7 to 60 months (mean 30) from the start of treatment. Patients received from one to five treatment cycles (median two), with a median cycle length of 14 months. The median nadir serum PSA level during androgen deprivation was 0.01 ng/mL and was reached within an average of 6 months (range 4 to 9) after beginning treatment. Patients spent an average of 45% of the time not receiving therapy, but the time off therapy decreased as the number of treatment cycles increased. Five patients (8.1%) demonstrated progressive disease, with a median time to progression of 48 months. When examining the cycling characteristics of these patients, no consistent pattern of failure emerged. CONCLUSIONS: IAD appears to be a viable treatment option in select patients with localized prostate cancer. With each consecutive cycle, the amount of time the patient was not receiving therapy decreased, despite achieving a low nadir PSA. Longer follow-up with more patients failing IAD will be required before clear patterns of failure emerge in these patients.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Androgen deprivation therapy for patients with clinically localized (stages T1 to T3) prostate cancer and for patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Recently published studies suggest a benefit for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) delivered early in the course of prostate cancer. However, the use of ADT specifically in patients with clinically localized disease or biochemical-disease recurrence after local therapy is not well defined. Potential candidates for primary ADT include patients who are poor candidates for definitive local therapy because of advanced age or comorbid conditions, as well as patients with significant local disease who refuse standard therapy. Treatment strategies designed to minimize the side effects of prolonged therapy, such as intermittent ADT or antiandrogen monotherapy, show promise as alternatives to continuous ADT in some patients. The role of ADT in patients with clinically localized and recurrent prostate cancer, whether it is delivered in a continuous or intermittent fashion, must be determined in randomized, prospective trials.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed2001

Docetaxel, estramustine, plus trastuzumab in patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer.

The incidence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression and its prognostic value are not well characterized in patients with prostate cancer. A phase I study was designed to evaluate docetaxel/estramustine plus trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the HER2 receptor, in patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). HER2 positivity was not required because safety was the primary endpoint. Patients received oral estramustine 280 mg three times daily (days 1 to 5); docetaxel, 70 mg/m(2) intravenously (day 2); and trastuzumab, 2 mg/kg intravenously (days 2, 9, and 19), every 21 days until the disease progressed or toxicity became unacceptable. This regimen was well tolerated among the first 13 treated patients. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 10% of administered cycles. There were two episodes of febrile neutropenia and two thrombembolic events. Of the 13 patients evaluable for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, nine (69%) experienced a decrease in PSA level of >50%. Two (33%) of six patients with measurable disease had objective responses, and one complete response was seen on bone scan. Docetaxel/estramustine/trastuzumab appears to be a safe combination when used in the treatment of metastatic AIPC. The response data are too preliminary for speculation about the relative benefits of this 3-drug regimen compared with the combination of only docetaxel and estramustine in this clinical setting.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

An update on prostate cancer.

Consideration of the number of prostate biopsy samples found to be positive for cancer may add clinically useful information to T stage, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen level in predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy. Higher radiation doses and neoadjuvant hormone therapy has been applied successfully to patients with higher risk disease. Brachytherapy has emerged as a modality for localized prostate cancer with outcomes and toxicity being further defined. Efforts to measure and improve quality of life are an important part of prostate cancer research. Standard management of metastatic disease remains androgen ablation, with long-term side effects being recognized. Newer hormonal and chemotherapeutic agents are being explored for patients with metastatic disease.

Humans↗

PubMed2001

HER2 protein expression and gene amplification in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

The role of the HER2 receptor remains uncertain in the pathogenesis and progression of human prostate cancer. Previous studies have reported widely divergent rates for HER2 expression in primary prostate tumors, probably owing to significant methodologic differences in the studies. Few data exist about the frequency of HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC), although recent xenograft models suggest HER2 expression may be up-regulated in the transition from androgen-dependent to androgen-independent disease. We studied the role of HER2 protein in AIPC by immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses on AIPC specimens using well-characterized and validated reagents. Fourteen (36%) of 39 specimens expressed HER2; however, only 2 (5%) had moderate (2+) expression, and 2 (5%) had high-level (3+) expression. Two (6%) of 36 specimens had gene amplification by FISH. These data suggest that HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification are relatively uncommon in AIPC.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2001

Hormonal treatment for prostate cancer.

For nearly six decades the preferred primary treatment for advanced prostate cancer has been continuous suppression of testicular androgen production by medical or surgical castration. While androgen deprivation is effective in inducing tumour regression in the large majority of cases, essentially all patients will develop progressive disease. In addition androgen deprivation may be associated with a variety of side effects. Thus, strategies that minimise the use of these agents could potentially lower the morbidity and cost associated with the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. In the era of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, hormonal therapy is being used earlier in the course of the disease when the only evidence of recurrent disease is an elevated PSA. These men may survive for many years and thus have the potential for long periods of exposure to hormonal therapy and its side effects. It has been hoped that the development of alternative hormonal interventions might lead to both enhanced antitumour efficacy as well as improvements in side effect profile.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed2001

Independent association of angiogenesis index with outcome in prostate cancer.

New molecular factors have been characterized that are associated with the prognosis of prostate carcinoma patients, including p53 status and angiogenesis. We reported recently that mutant p53 (mp53) was associated with decreased expression of an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis, thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), and increased microvessel density in melanoma and breast cancer. In this study, we performed a similar analysis on primary prostate carcinoma to determine whether these factors were associated with each other or patient outcomes. Paraffin-embedded specimens of 98 cases of primary prostate carcinoma were obtained and examined to confirm tissue diagnosis and Gleason scores. Carcinoma-specific levels of p53, TSP-1, and tumor angiogenesis were determined using semiquantitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods. Acquisition of mp53 was significantly associated with decreased TSP-1 (P = 0.002) and increased angiogenesis (P < 0.0001). An angiogenesis index integrating mp53, TSP-1, and angiogenesis (CD31) scores was found to be an independent predictor of survival in univariate and multivariate analyses that included Gleason score, clinical stage, and patient age. Further validation of the angiogenesis index in prostate carcinoma may provide a new tool to stratify patient risk.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

A multi-institutional phase ii study of SU101, a platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitor, for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

In a multi-institutional Phase II trial, we evaluated the efficacy of a platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-r) inhibitor, SU101, in patients with hormonerefractory prostate cancer. The patients received a 4-day i.v. loading dose of SU101 at 400 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive days, followed by 10 weekly infusions at 400 mg/m(2). The primary study end points were a decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and a decrease in measurable tumor. Secondary end points were time to progression and an effect on pain as measured by the Brief Pain Survey. Expression of PDGF-r was examined in both metastatic and archival primary prostate tumor samples. Forty-four patients were enrolled at four centers. The median age was 72 years, the median PSA was 223 ng/ml, and 21 patients had at least one prior chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients are evaluable for PSA, and three patients demonstrated a PSA decline >50% from baseline (55-99.9% decrease). The median time to progression was 90 days. Of 19 patients evaluable for measurable disease, 1 patient had a partial response. Nine of 35 evaluable patients had significant improvement in pain. The most frequent adverse events were asthenia (75%), nausea (55%), anorexia (50%), and anemia (41%). PDGF-r expression was detected in 80% of the metastases and 88% of primary prostate cancers. The results of this trial may warrant further clinical studies with other PDGF-r inhibitors.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Docetaxel in prostate cancer.

In contrast to several other tumor types, there has been relatively little experience with docetaxel in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. However, two phase II trials investigated the combination of docetaxel with estramustine, and reported prostate-specific antigen response rates of 69 and 74% and objective responses in 23% and 57% of patients. This activity is comparable with that of other estramustine combinations. However, there is uncertainty about whether estramustine itself should be omitted from therapy because of its emetogenic and thromboembolic potential, and also over the optimal schedule of docetaxel to avoid neutropenia. Preliminary data suggest that weekly docetaxel, with or without limited exposure to estramustine, may provide the right balance between efficacy and tolerability. Phase III studies now in progress are comparing regimens containing docetaxel and estramustine with a recent standard therapy consisting of mitoxantrone plus prednisone. In the future, the efficacy of docetaxel plus estramustine may be enhanced by adding agents to this regimen.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗