Expanding the role of the diagnostic imaging specialist: new opportunities for today and tomorrow.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to E J Ferris.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the titanium Greenfield filter-modified hook for prevention of pulmonary embolism. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in 173 patients from four institutions who underwent clinical examination, abdominal radiography, and duplex ultrasound examinations of the vena cava and lower extremities. If indicated by protocol or clinical presentation, computed tomography scans, pulmonary angiograms, or venacavograms were obtained. RESULTS: The most common procedural event was filter limb asymmetry (10%), which had no clinical significance. A variety of other minor procedural events occurred in another 10% of cases. Early follow-up (< 6 months) was completed in 149 patients, and long-term evaluation was completed in 113 (> 12 months). Deaths in 24 patients were from nonembolic causes in all but one. There were four suspected or confirmed recurrent pulmonary emboli, for an incidence of 3.5% (four of 113), with one death (0.9%). Four patients had inferior vena cava occlusion at early follow-up and at long-term evaluation, only one remained occluded (1%). Insertion site venous thrombosis was seen in only two patients (2%). CONCLUSION: The titanium Greenfield filter provides protection comparable to the standard stainless steel Greenfield filter after 1 year with a low incidence of recurrent pulmonary embolism (3.5%) and a high caval patency rate (99%).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To determine the incidence of thromboembolism in relation to thoracotomy, 77 patients undergoing pulmonary resection were prospectively studied up to 30 days postoperatively for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Overall, 20 of 77 patients (26%) had thromboembolic events during their hospitalization. Four deep venous thromboses and 1 pulmonary embolism were detected in 5 of 77 patients preoperatively for an incidence of 6%. Postoperative thromboembolism was detected in 15 of 77 (19%): deep venous thrombosis in 11 (14%) and pulmonary embolism in 4 (5%). No postoperative thromboembolisms occurred in the 17 patients receiving preoperative aspirin or ibuprofen, whereas they did occur in 25% of the remainder (15/60). Thromboembolism after pulmonary resection was more frequent with bronchogenic carcinoma than with metastatic cancer or benign disease (15/59 [25%] versus 0/18 [0%]; p < 0.01), adenocarcinoma compared with other types of carcinoma (11/25 [44%] versus 4/34 [12%]; p < 0.0004), large primary lung cancer (> 3 cm in diameter) compared with smaller lesions (9/19 [47%] versus 6/40 [15%]; p < 0.0001), stage II compared with stage I (7/14 [50%] versus 7/34 [21%]; p < 0.04), and pneumonectomy or lobectomy compared with segmentectomy and wedge resection (14/49 [29%] versus 1/28 [4%]; p < 0.005). Three of 4 patients with thromboembolism detected preoperatively had operation within the previous year. Postoperative pulmonary embolism was fatal in 1 of 4 (25%) and accounted for the one death. These results suggest patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung cancer, especially adenocarcinoma, should be considered for thromboembolic prophylaxis.
Three hundred twenty-four percutaneous inferior vena caval (IVC) filters of different designs were placed in 320 patients from April 1985 through June 1992. No acute mortality or substantial morbidity was attributed to filter placement. Radiologic or pathologic follow-up data were obtained in 227 (71%) patients (230 filters); clinical follow-up data only were obtained in 50 (16%) patients (50 filters). One hundred twenty (43%) patients died; post-filter-placement pulmonary emboli (PE) were related to the cause of death in eight. At IVC filter imaging studies, 26 of 137 (19%) filters demonstrated caval thrombus; 12 of 132 (9%) filters had delayed penetration through the IVC wall of greater than 3 mm; 13 of 230 (6%) filters migrated more than 1 cm; and five of 230 (2%) filters had fracture of a strut or leg. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) at the insertion puncture site or in the lower extremity was noted in 26 of 117 (22%) cases of filter placement. Among patients without imaging studies, clinical suspicion of complications included PE in four patients, IVC thrombus in 14 patients, and lower-extremity DVT in 10 patients. Long-term clinical and radiologic follow-up of all IVC filters is indicated due to the relatively high prevalence of some complications.
Simon nitinol vena caval filters were placed percutaneously in 20 patients. Follow-up (average, 14 months) data were available for 16 patients, and four patients were lost to follow-up. There were no proved or suspected cases of pulmonary embolism after filter insertion. Complications encountered included caval penetration (n = 5, one acute and four at follow-up), caval thrombus (n = 4, two determined radiologically and two clinically), postplacement deep venous thrombosis (n = 2, one radiologic and one clinical), filter migration (n = 1), and delayed fracture of a filter leg (n = 2). Although no deaths or significant morbidity resulted from any complication, the relatively high complication rate, especially of significant caval penetration (documented in 25% of filter insertions), merits continued short- and long-term assessment of patient status after filter placement.
This study comprises a series of 35 patients with pelvic or lower extremity fractures requiring surgery who also had a documented significant acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The authors treated these with low-dose Coumadin and 36 vena caval filters, which were used prophylactically prior to surgery. The patients received low-dose warfarin after placement of the vena caval filters and were maintained at 1.3-1.5 times the prothrombin control value for 6 weeks to 3 months. In this group of patients, there were no fatal pulmonary emboli and no clinically significant complications from filter placement. There were nine asymptomatic filter complications demonstrated radiographically in eight patients. Additionally, one patient with a tilted vena caval filter required placement of another filter. The combination of vena caval filters and low-dose warfarin appears to be a successful and relatively safe method of managing those patients who have acute DVT and require surgery for their pelvic or lower extremity fractures.
Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are significant causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States; estimates range from 120,000 to 150,000 deaths annually. Although usually symptomatic, deep venous thrombosis can be clinically occult, in part due to incomplete obstruction or in part related to duplication, triplication, and fenestration anomalies, primarily of the superficial femoral or popliteal vein. Additionally, pulmonary emboli caused by deep venous thrombosis may be clinically silent. Because of therapeutic implications, especially indications for insertion of inferior vena caval filters, comprehensive assessments of both the disease process (i.e., deep venous thrombosis) and the complication (i.e., pulmonary emboli) are important. Thus, when a pulmonary embolus is the presenting process, correlative assessment of deep venous thrombosis, even in the absence of symptoms or signs in the lower extremity, may be of therapeutic significance. Conversely, when deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities involving the popliteal or superficial femoral vein is the presenting process, correlative assessment of the pulmonary circulation, even when no pulmonary symptoms or signs are present, may be of therapeutic significance. Relative to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, the roles of assays of D-dimer, ventilation-perfusion lung scans, and segmental occlusion studies of the pulmonary circulation are discussed. Finally, the indications for insertion of inferior vena caval filters above the renal veins are presented and examples are shown.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of anticoagulation on the incidence of thrombotic propagation and pulmonary embolism in patients with calf vein thrombosis after total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Patients undergoing arthroplasties had prospective surveillance for postoperative deep vein thrombosis by both bilateral contrast venography and venous duplex scanning. Calf vein thrombosis was documented by venography in 42 patients (50 limbs), including 29 of 253 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (11.4%) and 13 of 99 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (13%). Of patients on whom follow-up duplex scans were performed, heparin followed by warfarin anticoagulation was used in 11 (13 limbs) and withheld in 21 (25 limbs). Propagation of thrombosis to the popliteal or superficial femoral vein or both was detected by serial duplex scanning in 3 of 13 treated limbs (23%) and 2 of 25 untreated limbs (8%), (p = 0.43). All thrombus propagations were detected within 2 weeks of the operative procedure. There were no pulmonary emboli or deaths. Propagation of asymptomatic calf vein thrombosis after arthroplasty was not influenced by anticoagulation, suggesting that postoperative calf vein thrombosis need not be routinely treated. Serial venous duplex scanning is useful to identify the occasional patient in whom thrombotic propagation requiring anticoagulation develops.
One hundred one LG-Medical (LGM) vena cava filters were placed in 97 patients at four institutions. Placement was a complete technical success in 90% (91 of 101). In 6% of attempts, LGM filter insertion was complicated by incomplete opening of the filter. Pulmonary embolism after filter placement was not definitely demonstrated in any patient. The probability of inferior vena cava patency was 92% at 6 months after filter insertion. Thrombosis at the insertion site was seen in eight of 35 patients (23%) evaluated with duplex ultrasound or venography. Thrombus was observed in 37% of filters at follow-up examination, with cephalic extension of thrombus above the filter in 20% of all patients examined. Filter migration (greater than 1 cm) was seen in 12%; significant angulation was observed in only one patient (2%). In vitro experimentation demonstrated that incomplete opening of the LGM filter during placement can be avoided, in part, by brisk retraction of the insertion cannula. The low-profile introducer system of the LGM filter allows increased alternatives in selecting the site for filter insertion. The low-profile system also makes outpatient filter placement a possibility. No significant difference in the prevalence of thrombosis at the insertion site following LGM filter insertion was noted compared with previous results reported for percutaneous transfemoral placement of the Greenfield filter. The nonopaque sheath does not permit careful localization prior to filter deposition. Modification of the LGM filter to include a radiopaque sheath is suggested.
Initial efforts to modify the stainless steel Greenfield filter for percutaneous insertion led to development of a titanium Greenfield filter, which could be inserted by use of a 12F carrier. This device functioned well as a filter but had an unacceptable 30% rate of migration, tilting, and penetration. Therefore a titanium Greenfield filter with modified hooks was developed and has been tested in 186 patients at 10 institutions. Successful placement occurred in 181 (97%); placement of the remainder was precluded by unfavorable anatomy. A contraindication to anticoagulation was the most frequent indication for insertion (75%). All but two were inserted percutaneously, predominantly via the right femoral vein (70%). Initial incomplete opening was seen in four patients (2%), which was corrected by guide wire manipulation and asymmetry of the legs in 10 (5.4%). Insertion site hematoma occurred in one patient, and apical penetration of the cava during insertion occurred in a second patient. Both events were without sequelae. Follow-up examinations were performed at 30 days at which time 35 deaths had occurred. Recurrent embolism was suspected in six patients (3%) and two of three deaths were confirmed by autopsy. Filter movement greater than 9 mm was seen in 13 patients, (11%) and increase in base diameter greater than or equal to 5 mm was seen in 17 patients (14%). CT scanning showed evidence of caval penetration in only one patient (0.8%). Insertion site venous thrombosis was seen in 4/46 (8.7%) patients screened. The modified hook titanium Greenfield filter is inserted percutaneously or operatively through a sheath, eliminating concern for misplacement from premature discharge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Vena caval filter placement via the right external jugular vein was attempted in 13 cases. Eleven percutaneous vena caval filters of four types were successfully placed in the inferior vena cava. Two of the attempts were unsuccessful. The indications for the external jugular vein approach were obstructive lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis in eight cases and hip or pelvic fractures in three cases; the approach was simply the radiologist's preference in the remaining two cases. There were five minor complications in four patients. None of the complications necessitated operative intervention or changed the clinical course of the patient. The external jugular vein is an excellent alternative route for caval filter placement. The external jugular vein approach does not necessitate surgical cutdown in the operating room for venous access, avoids deep vascular punctures in the neck and groin, and is safe in patients receiving systemic anticoagulation therapy.
A 20-MHz intravascular ultrasound (US) transducer inside a percutaneously inserted catheter was used to evaluate inferior vena caval (IVC) filters for thrombi in vitro and in vivo. Six different IVC filters were studied with intravascular US in a saline-filled model. Each filter had a characteristic, recognizable US pattern. Experimental thrombi as small as 0.5 cm3 were easily detected. Intravascular US was used clinically 25 times to evaluate the IVC in 23 patients with 24 IVC filters. Positive-contrast cavograms were available for comparison in all 25 cases. In 13 cases, no thrombi were identified in the filter or IVC with either intravascular US or cavography; in five of 12 cases with thrombi, intravascular US and cavography demonstrated the thrombi equally well. In six cases, intravascular US was superior to cavography in detection or delineation of thrombus in the IVC or filter. Intravascular US was considered superior to external duplex US in evaluation of caval thrombi in all 21 cases available for comparison. No complications from intravascular US were noted.
Amplatz vena caval filters were inserted percutaneously in 30 patients. Radiologic and clinical follow-up was available in 24 patients (cavogram, CT, or sonography in 20 patients, plain abdominal radiographs in two, and lower extremity venograms in two). Clinical follow-up only was available in four patients, and autopsy reports were available in two patients without radiologic follow-up. The filter was inserted without difficulty in 29 (97%) of the patients. Complications after insertion included recurrent pulmonary embolism in two (7%) of 30, caval thrombosis in seven (23%) of 30, ipsilateral lower extremity deep venous thrombosis after placement of the filter in one (3%) of 30, caval penetration in two (10%) of 20, and caval stenosis in one (5%) of 20. No migration of the filter was noted. Our experience suggests that the Amplatz vena caval filter is easy to insert and adequately prevents recurrent pulmonary embolism but is associated with a relatively high rate of caval thrombosis.