Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E J Calabrese

Publications and source records attributed to E J Calabrese.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

5-Hydroxytryptamine (serotonin): biphasic dose responses.

This article briefly summarizes the occurrence of biphasic dose-response relationships associated with 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor systems, as well as 5-HT agonists and antagonists. Such biphasic responses have been reliably reported in multiple experimental settings that explored a broad range of responses, including aggressive behavior, cardiovascular functioning, muscle relaxation, and interactions with other receptor systems such as adrenergic interaction as well as with neurotransmitters such as NMDA.

Aggression↗
PubMed2001

Dopamine: biphasic dose responses.

The present article indicates that dopamine and/or its agonists induce biphasic dose-response relationships for numerous endpoints. These include locomotion, pain sensitivity, blood pressure, prolactin secretion, oxytocin release, heart rate, memory, and neuronal adenylate cyclase activity. Biphasic responses were reported predominantly with male Sprague-Dawley rats, but also with mice, dogs, monkeys, and humans. Regardless of the model or endpoint the maximum changes from the control were always modest being within the 10 to 80% range. The range of stimulatory responses was quite variable, extending from slightly greater than a factor of 10 for the endpoints such as memory, pain-vocalization, and diastolic blood pressure to the 10(6) range for prolactin release and the 10(8) range for oxytocin release. Mechanistic studies suggested that the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dopamine are mediated by different receptors or receptor subtypes having opposite actions and different ligand affinities.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed2001

Opiates: biphasic dose responses.

It was shown that biphasic responses are commonly reported for opiates with respect to a broad range of animal models and endpoints. These endpoints include such diverse functions as blood pressure, muscle tension, breathing rates, hCG production, HIV production, neutrophil migration, ACTH production, protein binding, and neuronal functioning. Quantitative features of the dose-response relationships indicated that the maximum stimulatory responses were < or = 3-fold greater than the controls with most being between 10 to 70% greater than the controls. In contrast to the striking similarity in the maximum stimulatory response, there was marked variation with respect to the dose range of the stimulatory responses that varied from 10(1) to 10(10). Mechanistic assessments were conducted for most biphasic dose-response relationships and are addressed in detail.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed2001

Amyloid beta-peptide: biphasic dose responses.

This article summarizes recent findings indicating that amyloid beta-peptide displays neurotoxic and neurotrophic effects, depending on concentration. Mechanistic findings revealed that reactive oxygen species mediate both the toxic and neurotropic responses as a function of concentration with low doses being neutotrophic, while higher doses were toxic. The data reveal a potential biological function for amyloid beta-peptide within an optimal concentration zone. These findings suggest the critical role of dose in understanding disease causation and clinical therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed2001

Apoptosis: biphasic dose responses.

The features of apoptotic dose responses typically have been evaluated over a broad dose-response continuum to differentiate apoptotic and necrotic responses. The present article specifically addresses the dose-response relationship for apoptosis in detail. It was determined that a number of well-documented cases exist in which the dose-response relationship for apoptosis is biphasic. The underlying mechanisms and biomedical implications of this biphasic dose-response phenomenon are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Cell migration/chemotaxis: biphasic dose responses.

The dose-dependent effects of chemoattractants on target cell migration such as tumor cells, fibroblasts, and especially neutrophils were assessed. In general, the dose-response characteristics were strikingly biphasic in nature and were independent of both the target tissue and chemoattractant agent. The assessment included evaluations of the quantitative features of the dose-response relationship, mechanistic foundations of the biphasic responsiveness and clinical applications.

Alcohols↗
PubMed2001

The future of hormesis: where do we go from here?

Although the occurrence of U-shaped dose responses in toxicology (i.e., hormetic effects) have been known for more than a century, the concept of hormesis has long been marginalized under the belief that such observations could be explained by a combination of poor study designs and normal variability. However, recent efforts have established that numerous highly reliable studies demonstrating hormetic effects exist and that such findings appear to be highly generalizable across species, endpoint measures, and class of agents assessed. In light of such a long and complicated history, and its significant biomedical/toxicological implications, this article explores the unique challenges that the concept of hormesis confronts in both the experimental and institutional domains with respect to assessing its scientific foundations and validity and the impediments to its intstitutional acceptance and use with society. This perspective is then immediately critiqued by five authors in subsequent articles.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2001

The frequency of U-shaped dose responses in the toxicological literature.

Hormesis has been defined as a dose-response relationship in which there is a stimulatory response at low doses, but an inhibitory response at high doses, resulting in a U- or inverted U-shaped dose response. To assess the proportion of studies satisfying criteria for evidence of hormesis, a database was created from published toxicological literature using rigorous a priori entry and evaluative criteria. One percent (195 out of 20,285) of the published articles contained 668 dose-response relationships that met the entry criteria. Subsequent application of evaluative criteria revealed that 245 (37% of 668) dose-response relationships from 86 articles (0.4% of 20,285) satisfied requirements for evidence of hormesis. Quantitative evaluation of false-positive and false-negative responses indicated that the data were not very susceptible to such influences. A complementary analysis of all dose responses assessed by hypothesis testing or distributional analyses, where the units of comparison were treatment doses below the NOAEL, revealed that of 1089 doses below the NOAEL, 213 (19.5%) satisfied statistical significance or distributional data evaluative criteria for hormesis, 869 (80%) did not differ from the control, and 7 (0.6%) displayed evidence of false-positive values. The 32.5-fold (19.5% vs 0.6%) greater occurrence of hormetic responses than a response of similar magnitude in the opposite (negative) direction strongly supports the nonrandom nature of hormetic responses. This study, which provides the first documentation of a data-derived frequency of hormetic responses in the toxicologically oriented literature, indicates that when the study design satisfies a priori criteria (i.e., a well-defined NOAEL, > or = 2 doses below the NOAEL, and the end point measured has the capacity to display either stimulatory or inhibitory responses), hormesis is frequently encountered and is broadly represented according to agent, model, and end point. These findings have broad-based implications for study design, risk assessment methods, and the establishment of optimal drug doses and suggest important evolutionarily adaptive strategies for dose-response relationships.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗
PubMed2001

U-shaped dose-responses in biology, toxicology, and public health.

The occurrence of U-shaped dose-response relationships (often termed hormesis) has been documented in numerous biological, toxicological, and pharmacological investigations. Many of the endpoints studied are of considerable significance to public health (e.g. body weight, cholesterol levels, ethanol consumption, longevity, cancer incidence, etc). Despite the fact that U-shaped dose-responses are widely and independently observed, little attempt has been made to assess this phenomenon in an integrative manner. This review provides an overview of the historical foundations of hormesis and a discussion of its definition within a mechanistic framework. The occurrence, generalizability, and biological significance of U-shaped dose-response relationships along with the concept of biological optimality are addressed.

Databases, Factual↗
PubMed2000

Detection of an estrogen receptor in two nematode species and inhibition of binding and development by environmental chemicals.

The presence of estrogen receptors or binding proteins was demonstrated in the free-living nematode species Panagrellus redivivus and Caenorhabditis elegans by radioimmunoassay. Twenty-five nanomolar concentrations of toxaphene, dieldrin, and dieldrin plus nonylphenol significantly inhibited estrogen binding to the receptor in P. redivivus. Binding was inhibited but not significantly by 25 nM nonylphenol, toxaphene plus dieldrin, or toxaphene plus nonylphenol. The current research supports the hypothesis that dieldrin, nonylphenol, and toxaphene may mimic estrogen, altering the normal pathways of estrogen metabolism. Based on observations of secondary sex structures, estrogenic chemicals had no effect on sex ratios or growth in Panagrellus redivivus, but caused a reduction of fecundity in this nematode.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

The effects of gamma rays on longevity.

A number of animal model studies have assessed the capacity of long-term whole body gamma rays to affect life span. The initial goal of such studies was to establish the equivalent of a no observed adverse effects level (NOAEL) that would provide a toxicological foundation for deriving an acceptable worker exposure standard. In the course of initial studies to establish such a 'tolerance threshold', data emerged suggesting that low dose rates/cumulative doses enhanced longevity in mice and guinea pigs of both sexes. Extensive large scale follow-up investigations with other mouse strains and rats revealed what appear to be inter-strain/species differences in response with some models providing strong evidence for a low dose increase in longevity. The subsequent positive studies in mouse models were generally well designed, well conducted and used extensive numbers of mice. In all experiments that displayed enhanced longevity the average life span was enhanced by 10-30% but not the maximum life span potential. The underlying mechanisms affecting the apparent enhancement in longevity are believed to result from the stimulation of hematopoietic and immune systems following an initial low level chronic injury to the bone marrow.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Daily soil ingestion estimates for children at a Superfund site.

Ingestion of contaminated soil by children may result in significant exposure to toxic substances at contaminated sites. Estimates of such exposure are based on extrapolation of short-term-exposure estimates to longer time periods. This article provides daily estimates of soil ingestion on 64 children between the ages of 1 and 4 residing at a Superfund site; these values are employed to estimate the distribution of 7-day average soil ingestion exposures (mean, 31 mg/day; median, 17 mg/day) at a contaminated site over different time periods. Best linear unbiased predictors of the 95th-percentile of soil ingestion over 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, and 365 days are 133 mg/day, 112 mg/day, 108 mg/day and 106 mg/day, respectively. Variance components estimates (excluding titanium and outliers, based on Tukey's far-out criteria) are given for soil ingestion between subjects (59 mg/day)2, between days on a subject (95 mg/day)2, and for uncertainty on a subject-day (132 mg/day)2. These results expand knowledge of potential exposure to contaminants among young children from soil ingestion at contaminated sites. They also provide basic distributions that serve as a starting point for use in Monte Carlo risk assessments.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed2000

Chemical hormesis: its historical foundations as a biological hypothesis.

Despite the long history of hormesis-related experimental research no systematic effort to describe its early history has been undertaken. The present paper attempts to reconstruct and assess the early history of such research and to evaluate how advances in related scientific fields affected the course of hormesis-related research. The purpose of this paper is not only to satisfy this gap in current knowledge, but also to provide a foundation for the assessment of how the concept of hormetic dose-response relationships may have affected the nature of the bioassay especially with respect to hazard assessment practices within a modern risk assessment framework.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2000

The marginalization of hormesis.

Despite the substantial development and publication of highly reproducible toxicological data, the concept of hormetic dose-response relationships was never integrated into the mainstream of toxicological thought. Review of the historical foundations of the interpretation of the bioassay and assessment of competitive theories of dose-response relationships lead to the conclusion that multiple factors contributed to the marginalization of hormesis during the middle and subsequent decades of the 20th century. These factors include: (a) the close-association of hormesis with homeopathy lead to the hostility of modern medicine toward homeopathy thereby creating a guilt by association framework, and the carry-over influence of that hostility in the judgements of medically-based pharmacologists/ toxicologists toward hormesis; (b) the emphasis of high dose effects linked with a lack of appreciation of the significance of the implications of low dose stimulatory effects; (c) the lack of an evolutionary-based mechanism(s) to account for hormetic effects; and (d) the lack of appropriate scientific advocates to counter aggressive and intellectually powerful critics of the hormetic perspective.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Radiation hormesis: its historical foundations as a biological hypothesis.

This paper represents the first systematic effort to describe the historical foundations of radiation hormesis. Spanning the years from 1898 to the early 1940's the paper constructs and assesses the early history of such research and evaluates how advances in related scientific fields affected the course of hormetic related research. The present effort was designed to not only address this gap in current knowledge, but to offer a toxicological basis for how the concept of hormetic dose-response relationships may affect the nature of the bioassay and its role in the risk assessment process.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Radiation hormesis: the demise of a legitimate hypothesis.

This paper examines the underlying factors that contributed to the marginalization of radiation hormesis in the early and middle decades of the 20th century. The most critical factor affecting the demise of radiation hormesis was a lack of agreement over how to define the concept of hormesis and quantitatively describe its dose-response features. If radiation hormesis had been defined as a modest overcompensation to a disruption in homeostasis as would have been consistent with the prevailing notion in the area of chemical hormesis, this would have provided the theoretical and practical means to blunt subsequent legitimate criticism of this hypothesis. A second critical factor undermining the radiation hormesis hypothesis was the generally total lack of recognition by radiation scientists of the concept of chemical hormesis which was markedly more advanced, substantiated and generalized than in the radiation domain. The third factor was that major scientific criticism of low dose stimulatory responses was galvanized at the time that the National Research Council (NRC) was organizing a national research agenda on radiation and the hormetic hypothesis was generally excluded from the future planned research opportunities. Furthermore, the criticisms of the leading scientists of the 1930s which undermined the concept of radiation hormesis were limited in scope and highly flawed and then perpetuated over the decades by other 'prestigious' experts who appeared to simply accept the earlier reports. This setting was then linked to a growing fear of radiation as a cause of birth defects, mutation and cancer, factors all reinforced by later concerns over the atomic bomb. Strongly supportive findings on hormetic effects in the 1940s by Soviet scientists were either generally not available to US scientists or disregarded as part of the Cold War mindset without adequate analysis. Finally, a massive, but poorly designed, US Department of Agriculture experiment in the late 1940s to assess the capacity for low dose plant stimulation by radionuclides failed to support the hormetic hypothesis thereby markedly lessening enthusiasm for research and funding in this area. Thus, the combination of a failed understanding of the hormetic hypothesis and its linkage with a strong chemical hormesis database, flawed analyses by prestigious scientists at the critical stage of scientific research development, reinforced by a Cold War mentality led to marginalization of an hypothesis (i.e., radiation hormesis) that had substantial scientific foundations and generalizability.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2000

Tales of two similar hypotheses: the rise and fall of chemical and radiation hormesis.

This paper compares the historical developments of chemical and radiation hormesis from their respective inceptions in the late 1880's for chemical hormesis and early 1900's for radiation hormesis to the mid 1930's to 1940 during which both hypotheses rose to some prominence but then became marginalized within the scientific community. This analysis documents that there were marked differences in their respective temporal developments, and the direction and maturity of research. In general, the formulation of the chemical hormesis hypothesis displayed an earlier, more-extensive and more sophisticated development than the radiation hormesis hypothesis. It was able to attract prestigious researchers with international reputations from leading institutions, to be the subject of numerous dissertations, to have its findings published in leading journals, and to have its concepts incorporated into leading microbiological texts. While both areas became the object of criticism from leading scientists, the intensity of the challenge was greatest for chemical hormesis due to its more visible association with the medical practice of homeopathy. Despite the presence of legitimate and flawed criticism, the most significant limitations of both chemical and radiation hormesis and their respective ultimate undoing were due to their: (1) lack of development of a coherent dose-response theory using data of low dose stimulation from both the chemical and radiation domains; (2) difficulty in replication of low dose stimulatory responses without an adequate study design especially with respect to an appropriate number and properly spaced doses below the toxic threshold; (3) modest degree of stimulation even under optimal conditions which was difficult to distinguish from normal variation; and (4) lack of appreciation of the practical and/or commercial applications of the concepts of low dose stimulation.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗