Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Hamaluk

Publications and source records attributed to E Hamaluk.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Aging and the development of automaticity in conjunction search.

In two experiments, younger and older observers carried out feature searches for targets defined by their luminance contrast and orientation. Additionally, they received consistent-mapping (CM) training in luminance contrast by orientation conjunction search, followed by a brief exposure to conjunction search under reversal conditions. In Experiment 1, display size effects on reaction time suggested that both younger and older observers were conducting a parallel search in all conditions and showed equivalent disruption at reversal. Experiment 2 was a substantive replication of the first using more difficult conjunction search displays. In addition to latency, we measured the number, duration, and feature-based selectivity of fixations made during conjunction search. Display size effects were larger than in Experiment 2 and were of equivalent magnitude in younger and older people. There were no age differences in improvement in conjunction search and minimal age differences in disruption following reversal. Both age groups demonstrated early in training that they could select items possessing target features (i.e., the color white), and both age groups demonstrated that they could not completely reverse this selectivity when these features no longer defined the target. These experiments have several implications for models of visual attention and age differences therein.

Adult↗

Age differences in saccadic averaging.

Younger and older adults were asked to saccade to an orientation-defined target that was presented alone, with a more central distractor, or with a more peripheral distractor. Both age groups exhibited saccadic averaging that was more pronounced in the central distractor condition, wherein older adults had the larger effect. These results are relevant to questions of oculomotor control and also have implications for the study of age differences in other visually guided behaviors.

Adult↗

Aging, texture segmentation, and exposure duration: evidence for a deficit is preattentive processing.

Younger and older observers were asked to detect the presence and identify the orientation of an orientation-based texture target presented at durations ranging from 15 to 75 ms. In Experiment 1a, an age by duration interaction indicated that older adults were less able to process the displays at short durations. In Experiment 1b, a group of younger adults was given the task under conditions designed to simulate age-related changes in retinal illuminance. Their performance was independent of luminance, and was still superior to that of older adults in Experiment 1a. Several mechanisms are potential contributors to these age deficits in lower-level processing that can influence higher-level visual perception.

Adolescent↗