Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E H Murphy

Publications and source records attributed to E H Murphy.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Stroboscopic rearing reduces direction selectivity in rabbit visual cortex.

Rabbits reared from birth in stroboscopic illumination have no experience of visual motion. In primary visual cortex of these animals there is a large reduction in the number of cells which are direction selective. This result, contrary to previous reports, shows that the rabbit visual system can be modified by early visual experience.

Animals↗

The rabbit and the cat: a comparison of some features of response properties of single cells in the primary visual cortex.

Receptive field characteristics of single cells in primary visual cortex of rabbit were studied. Seventy-two percent of cells were found to be orientation selective, and the remainder had concentric, uniform, movement selective or pure direction selective receptive fields. Single cells were also recorded from primary visual cortex of cat to permit a comparison of visual cortical organization in cats and rabbits. Laminar organization of receptive field types was observed in rabbits which was similar in most respects to that described in the cat. Although the major categories of orientation selective cells (simple, complex, hypercomplex) were similar for both cat and rabbit, many differences emerged: (I) tuning of orientation selectivity was narrower in cats than in rabbits; (II) units which preferred oblique orientations were less frequently represented in rabbits than in cats; (III) orientation preferences appeared to be arranged in clusters in rabbit cortex; in rabbits we found no evidence of the columnar organization of orientation selectivity which characterizes cat visual cortex. A comparison of our data with those previously reported for mouse, rat, hamster and opossum visual cortex suggest that mammals in which a significant proportion of visual cortical cells are not orientation selective have in common certain patterns of cortical organization involving a less precise and less specilized representation of stimulus orientation.

Animals↗

Functional organization of lateral geniculate cells following removal of visual cortex in the newborn kitten.

When the visual cortex of a newborn kitten is removed, most neurons in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus degenerate, but a small population of large cells is spared. Electrophysiological recording revealed that detailed visual topography in the nucleus is abnormal and that single cells have unusually large receptive fields. These results suggest that optic axons deprived of their normal synaptic targets rearrange their connections to converge on local surviving neurons.

Animals↗

Abnormal retino-geniculate and geniculo-cortical pathways in several genetically distinct color phases of the mink (Mustela vison).

Several genetically distinct color phases of mink, which all show an abnormal reduction of pigment in the retinal pigment epithelium and which also show abnormalities of the retinofugal pathways, have been studied. Autoradiographic methods have been used to demonstrate the retino-geniculate pathways, and retrograde degeneration or the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase has been used for the geniculo-cortical pathways. The retino-geniculate abnormality is mild in some of the color phases and extremely severe in others, but within any one color phase the variability is relatively low. Although the severity of the abnormality varies between color phases, a rather specific pattern of abnormal geniculate innervation is recognizable for mink in general and this is distinct from that found in Siamese cats. In the abnormal mink the size of geniculate lamina A1 is reduced and there is an abnormal crossed input going to the intermediate sectors of this reduced layer. Layer C1 also receives an abnormal crossed input, but this is more variable than that going to A1 and there appears to be little correspondence, retinotopically, between the normal inputs to layers A1 and C1. In some of the abnormal mink there are interruptions within the cytoarchitectionically definable layer A1, and opposite these gaps reduplications of layer A are commonly seen, as though there is an intrinsic geniculate mechanism for generating the characteristic multilaminar geniculate structure. However, there are also numerous examples of fusions between layers receiving afferents from the same eye, and these demonstrate that the development of geniculate lamination must also be under the influence of the retinal inputs. The geniculo-cortical pathway shows a normal topography in most of the mink. Abnormal geniculo-cortical projections, comparable to the "Boston" pattern of Siamese cats are extremely rare, and their occurrence could not be correlated with the severity of the retino-geniculate abnormality or with the laminar pattern in the lateral geniculate nucleus. We suggest that the development of one or the other pattern of geniculo-cortical projection may depend upon the relative timing of the two mechanisms that produce the geniculate lamination.

Animals↗

Alterations in receptive field properties of superior colliculus cells produced by visual cortex ablation in infant and adult cats.

To determine if functional alterations in the superior colliculus might account for recovery of visual behaviors following visual cortex removal in infant cats, the receptive field characteristics of single units in the superior colliculus of cats whose visual cortex was removed within the first week of life were compared with those of cats which sustained visual cortex lesions in adulthood and with those of normal cats. In the normal superior colliculus, 90% of all cells responded to moving stimuli irrespective of shape or orientation. Sixty-four percent of these units were directionally selective, responding well to movement in one direction but poorly or not at all to movement in the opposite direction. Ninety percent of units were binocular, the vast majority of these responding equally to stimulation of either eye or showing only slight preference for stimulation of the contralateral eye. Responses to stationary flashes of light were observed in only 33% of all visually activated cells in the normal superior colliculus. After visual cortex ablation in adult cats, only six percent of movement sensitive cells were directionally selective. Binocular preference was shifted following adult visual cortex lesions such that sixty percent of all cells responded exclusively or predominantly to stimulation of the contralateral eye. Seventy-one percent of all visually responsive units responded to stationary lights flashed on or off within their receptive field boundaries. Lesions limited primarily to area 17 had the same effect as larger lesions of visual cortex. Infant visual cortex lesions resulted in receptive field alterations similar to those observed after adult ablation. Only fifteen percent of motion sensitive units were directionally selective. Seventy-one percent responded exclusively or predominantly to stimulation of the contralateral eye. Seventy-six percent of visually responsive cells were activated by stationary light. Lesions largely confined to area 17 produced the same alterations as more extensive lesions of visual cortex. Thus, no evidence was found that the superior colliculus is involved in the functional reorganization presumed to occur following visual cortex ablation in infant cats. Recovery of visual behaviors following neonatal injury may therefore not involve alterations in the receptive fields of single cells.

Animals↗

Selective visual experience fails to modify receptive field properties of rabbit striate cortex neurons.

During development, rabbits were exposed only to vertical or horizontal lines to determine if the receptive field characteristics of visual cortex cells would be altered as they are in the cat. Motion and directional selectivity were preserved, and orientation specificity remained unaffected by the restricted experience, which suggests that the rabbit may lack the neural plasticity seen in some other mammals.

Action Potentials↗