New drugs for therapy of AML.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to E H Estey.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
It has been unclear whether regimens containing topotecan + ara-C (TA) or fludarabine + ara-C (FA) +/- idarubicin are superior to regimens containing idarubicin + ara-C (IA) without either fludarabine or topotecan for treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-t), or RAEB. Of 1279 patients treated here for these diagnoses between 1991 and 1999, 322 received IA regimens, 600 FA regimens, and 357 TA regimens. All regimens used ara-C doses of 1 to 2 gm/m(2)/d, given by continuous infusion in IA, and over 2 to 4 hours in FA and TA. Complete remission (CR) rates were lower with FA (55%) and TA (59%) than with IA (77%). Both event-free survival (EFS) in CR and survival were shorter: median EFS in CR (95% confidence interval) was 63 weeks (range, 55-76 weeks) for IA, 40 (range, 31-46 weeks) for FA, and 36 (range, 27-44 weeks) for TA; median survival was 77 weeks (range, 57-88 weeks) for IA, 30 (range, 27-35 weeks) for FA, and 41 (range, 35-50 weeks) for TA. These trials were not randomized, and patients with worse prognoses were disproportionately given the FA and TA regimens. Nonetheless, after accounting for prognosis the FA and TA regimens remained highly significantly associated with lower CR rates, shorter EFS in CR, and shorter survival. Accounting for possible effects of individual trials within each of the IA, FA, and TA groups did not alter these findings. It is unlikely that, as given here, either FA or TA is, in general, superior to IA, highlighting the need for new treatments.
BACKGROUND: Antileukemic chemotherapy has been used for two decades to treat high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (refractory anemia with excess of blasts [RAEB] and RAEB in transformation into acute leukemia [RAEB-t]) patients. Because the results of standard regimens have been disappointing, high-dose chemotherapeutic regimens were investigated recently. In the absence of randomized trials, the relative merits of various treatment regimens are unknown. METHODS: The authors analyzed the outcome for 394 newly diagnosed patients treated between 1991 and 1999 with five regimens consisting of intermediate- or high-dose cytosine arabinoside (A) in combination with idarubicin (I), and introduced cyclophosphamide (C) and the new agents fludarabine (F) and topotecan (T) into new combinations with A. In addition to defining the role of high-intensity chemotherapy in the overall outcome for patients with RAEB-t and RAEB, the authors determined the relative merits of the five regimens (IA, FA, FAI, TA, and CAT), accounting for the nonrandom distribution of the prognostic covariates. RESULTS: The overall complete response (CR) rate of 58% was significantly associated with karyotype, performance status (PS), treatment in the laminar air flow room, duration of antecedent hematologic disorder and age, but not French-American-British or International Prognostic Scoring System risk categories. Multivariate analysis did not identify statistically significant differences in CR rates obtained with each regimen. Induction death rates increased with age with all but the TA regimen; they were lowest with TA (5.4%) and highest with FAI (20.7%), and these differences were significant in patients older than 65 years. The trend for time to death was the same as for time to recurrence in all groups. Multivariate analysis of time to death identified treatment regimen (FA, FAI, and CAT), cytogenetic status (-5/-7), increasing age, and PS greater than 2 as significant independent unfavorable prognostic factors. After prognostic variables were accounted for, survival with IA treatment remained superior to that of FA and FAI but comparable to TA, and CR duration was only marginally shorter with FA. Landmark analysis showed the overall survival of responders to be superior to that of nonresponders, the difference remaining significant after adjustment for prognostic covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Although the newer regimens did not improve outcome, TA and CAT produced results comparable to those of IA and may be considered treatment alternatives. The TA regimen was particularly effective in RAEB patients and could be delivered safely, with low induction mortality. Our results indicated that although CR seemed associated with survival advantage, innovative post-remission managements represent a challenge because improvement in outcome is not likely to come from intensified therapy.
BACKGROUND: General therapeutic options for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) are reviewed and specific new therapies are described. METHODS: Data in this review came from the published literature and the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center's acute leukemia database. RESULTS: Outcome following standard therapy of AML is so variable that is best to speak of a range of outcomes determined by various prognostic factors. Therapy can (and usually does) fail because of treatment-induced mortality or (more usually) resistance to therapy. Performance status and age are the principal predictors of early death, whereas cytogenetics, a history of abnormal blood counts, and MDR1 expression are predictors of resistance. Using this information, physicians can categorize patients into those in whom 1) standard therapy is indicated, 2) either standard or investigational therapy is appropriate, and 3) investigational therapy is indicated. The majority of even newly diagnosed patients belong to Group 3. The availability of allogeneic or autologous transplantation does not alter this conclusion. Investigational therapies have been developed that are directed against the CD33 surface antigen, the multidrug-resistant MDR1 protein, and other targets. Because of the number of new therapies clinical research in AML should emphasize pilot trials rather than traditionally large Phase III studies. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with newly diagnosed AML should be offered investigational regimens.
BACKGROUND: Mylotarg (Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, St. Davids, PA) is the brand name for a calicheamicin-conjugated humanized anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody (gemtuzumab ozogamicin, CMA-676) and has been approved recently for the treatment of a subset of elderly patients who have relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Mylotarg is associated with an incidence of approximately 20% Grade 3 or 4 hyperbilirubinemia and liver transaminitis in this patient population. Hepatic venoocclusive disease (VOD) has been reported in patients who have undergone stem cell transplantation (SCT) after Mylotarg therapy. Outside of the SCT setting, VOD has been associated very rarely with cytotoxic therapy. METHODS: The authors assessed the incidence of VOD in 119 patients who were receiving Mylotarg-containing non-SCT regimens. VOD was diagnosed through the use of standard Seattle and Baltimore criteria. RESULTS: A cohort of 119 (61 previously untreated, 58 with relapsed disease) patients with AML (92 patients), advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (25 patients), or chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase (2 patients), received Mylotarg-based regimens. Fourteen (12%) developed VOD. The diagnosis of VOD was supported by histology in 2 patients and radiologic studies in a further 10 patients. Five (36%) of 14 patients with VOD had received no prior antileukemic cytotoxic therapy, including 2 patients who received single-agent Mylotarg therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Mylotarg was shown to be associated with the development of potentially fatal VOD in patients with leukemia who had not received SCT. VOD occurred when Mylotarg was used either as a single agent or when it was given with other cytotoxic agents. VOD occurred in Mylotarg-treated patients who had received no prior cytotoxic therapy. The current study concluded that risk factors for VOD should be assessed when considering Mylotarg therapy, and that attempts to avoid and treat VOD are warranted in patients who receive Mylotarg therapy.
Sixty-two adults underwent marrow or blood stem cell transplantation from an HLA-matched related donor using high-dose thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide (TBC) as the preparative regimen for treatment of advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (refractory anemia with excess blasts with or without transformation) or acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) past first remission. All evaluable patients engrafted and had complete donor chimerism. A grade 3-4 regimen-related toxicity occurred in eight (13%) patients, and a diagnosis of MDS was the only independent risk factor for grade 3-4 regimen-related toxicity (hazard ratio 9.25, P = 0.01). Day-100 treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 19%. Poor-prognosis cytogenetics increased the risk of day-100 TRM (hazard ratio 11.4, P = 0.003), and use of tacrolimus for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis reduced the risk of day-100 TRM (hazard ratio 0.13, P = 0.027). For all patients, the three-year relapse rate was 43% (95% CI, 28%-58%). Refractoriness to conventional induction chemotherapy prior to transplantation was an independent risk factor for relapse (hazard ratio 10.8, P = 0.02). Three-year survival was 26% (95% CI, 14%-37%); survival rates were 29% for those transplanted for AML in second remission, 31% transplanted for AML in relapse, and 17% with MDS, and there were no independent risk factors for survival. TBC is an active preparative regimen for advanced AML. Patients with advanced MDS appeared to have a higher risk of toxicity and early mortality, and alternative preparative regimens should be considered for these patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Clinical trials of colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) have been conducted for over 10 years. Initially, these agents, generally either granulocyte-macrophage (GM)- or granulocyte (G)-CSF, were hypothesized to reduce rates of major infection and/or death in the initial weeks after administration of chemotherapy. Although trials have consistently shown that both cytokines accelerate neutrophil recovery, only 1 out of 5-10 large randomized trials has reported that a decrease in major infection occurs as a result. While some of these trials have found that the use of cytokines lowers days in hospital, on antibiotics, or with fever, it is unclear whether the magnitude of these effects outweighs the expense currently entailed in CSF administration; indeed it appears that estimates of cost are themselves quite variable. The second major use of cytokines has been in priming acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) blasts to the cytotoxic actions of chemotherapy. Here again, the results of several randomized trials do not justify application of this strategy. It remains possible that there are subsets of AML patients who would benefit from priming. However, the identification of such patients might require years of accrual into clinical trials from which the majority of patients would not benefit. Future years may see trials of cytokines (e.g. pegylated recombinant human megakaryocytic growth and development factor +G- or GM-CSF) in patients in remission and as a means to increase the number of normal granulocytes that can be given to patients with infections. Further therapies may target cytokine receptors on AML blasts, to improve anti-leukaemia therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The authors examined the relationship between the time required to enter complete remission (CR) after a first course of chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-t), or refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB). They also examined subsequent survival time and disease-free survival time after accounting for cytogenetic status, age, and treatment. The data set consisted of 1101 patients with these diagnoses treated at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1980 and 1996 for whom outcomes were established after first-course therapy. Of the 1101 patients, 740 (67%) were in CR after this time; 508 of these 740 (69%) have died (80% had disease recurrence before death). The authors used the parametric model of Shen and Thall to estimate, in particular, T(C) (time to CR), T(C,D) (time from CR to death = residual survival after CR), and T(C,R) (residual disease-free survival [DFS] after CR) as functions of the covariates noted above and to estimate the dependence of T(C,D) and T(C,R) on T(C). There was a strong inverse association between T(C) and both T(C,D) and T(C,R) (P <.001 for both) that was independent of cytogenetic status, age, or treatment. The residual survival time of patients who required >50 days to enter CR was closer to the residual survival time of resistant patients than to that of patients known to be in CR within approximately 30 days of the start of treatment. Time to CR is an independent predictor of residual survival and disease-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed AML who achieve CR after 1 course of chemotherapy. (Blood. 2000;95:72-77)
Evidence suggests that the salvage therapy utilized for relapsed and refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) should differ based on the duration of a patient's complete remission (CR), the principal predictor of outcome. While standard regimens have produced higher CR rates than investigational regimens, these rates have not translated into improved survival in patients with initial remission durations of <1 year. Accordingly, there is no need to give standard regimens to these patients who rather should receive investigational therapy once relapse is discovered. In contrast, in patients with initial remission durations of 1-2 years, standard regimens do increase survival compared to investigational regimens. A somewhat artificial distinction has been placed between phase I and phase II studies. The agents to be studied in phase II trials are many, but the patients are limited, so we need to be more innovative in our trial designs. One such proposal, utilizing a Bayesian selection design which calls for randomizing a small number of patients among several investigational treatments, will be discussed.
11q23 chromosomal abnormalities and rearrangement of the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene are important prognostic factors in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the presence of 11q23 abnormalities does not always correlate with that of MLL gene rearrangement. We retrospectively compared the occurrence of 11q23 abnormalities (measured by karyotyping) and MLL gene rearrangement (measured by Southern blotting) in bone marrow from 311 consecutive adult patients with AML or MDS. 11q23 abnormalities were found in 18 patients (5.8%), of whom 7 (39%) did not have the MLL gene rearrangement. MLL gene rearrangement was detected in 35 patients (11.2%). Of these 35 patients, only 11 (31%) had cytogenetic evidence of 11q23 abnormalities. None of the 21 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia had 11q23 abnormalities or MLL gene rearrangement. 11q23 abnormalities were associated with shorter survival than was a diploid karyotype. Both cytogenetic and molecular studies should be performed to detect 11q23 abnormalities in patients with AML or MDS.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with AML, RAEB-t, or RAEB and abnormalities involving chromosomes 5 and/or 7 (-5, -7) generally, but not always, have poorer prognoses than patients with a normal karyotype. Our objective was to see whether the occasional relatively favorable outcome in -5/-7 patients is a random event or, rather, reflects true heterogeneity in -5/-7. DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined 3 factors known to be prognostic in AML for their prognostic significance in 400 -5/-7 patients treated at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1980-1998 for AML or MDS. The outcome of comparative interest was survival as assessed by log-rank test. RESULTS: There was evidence that outcome was better in -5/-7 patients with a simple (rather than complex) karyotype, with > 1 normal metaphase (rather than only metaphases containing -5/-7), and without an antecedent hematologic disorder. More importantly, the 10% of the patients with a simple karyotype, > 1 normal metaphase, and no antecedent hematologic disorder not only had a better outcome than the other -5/-7 patients but had essentially identical outcomes to the 669 AML/MDS patients with a normal karyotype treated at M.D. Anderson during the same period. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the -5/-7 group should not a priori be regarded as having an unfavorable prognosis, and more generally suggest the need to refine prognosis within each of the cytogenetic subsets of AML.
Arsenic compounds have recently been shown to induce high rates of complete remission in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). One of these compounds, As(2)O(3), induces apoptosis in APL cells via a mechanism independent of the retinoic acid pathway. To test the hypothesis that arsenic compounds may be effective against other forms of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), we studied the membrane-permeable arsenic compound phenylarsine oxide (PAO). Because interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) plays a key role in AML cell proliferation, we first tested the effect of PAO on OCIM2 and OCI/AML3 AML cell lines, both of which produce IL-1beta and proliferate in response to it. We found that PAO inhibited the proliferation of both OCIM2 and OCI/AML3 cells in a dose-dependent fashion (0.01 to 0.1 micromol/L) and that IL-1beta partially reversed this inhibitory effect. We then measured IL-1beta levels in these cells by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western immunoblotting and found that PAO almost completely abolished the production of IL-1beta in these AML cells, whereas it did not affect the production of IL-1 receptor antagonist. Because PAO inhibits activation of the transcription factor NF-kappaB and because NF-kappaB modulates an array of signals controlling cellular survival, proliferation, and cytokine production, we also studied the effect of PAO on NF-kappaB activation in AML cells and found that PAO suppressed the IL-1beta-induced activation of NF-kappaB. Because inhibition of NF-kappaB may result in cellular apoptosis, we also tested whether PAO may induce apoptotic cell death in AML cells. We found that PAO induced apoptosis in OCIM2 cells through activation of the cystein protease caspase 3 and subsequent cleavage of its substrate, the DNA repair enzyme poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. The PAO-induced apoptosis was caspase dependent, because it was completely blocked by the caspase inhibitor Z-DEVD-FMK. Finally, we tested the effect of PAO on fresh AML marrow cells from 7 patients with newly diagnosed AML and found that PAO suppressed AML colony-forming cell proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion. Taken together, our data showing that PAO is an effective in vitro inhibitor of AML cells suggest that this compound may have a role in future therapies for AML.
All-trans retinoic acid administered orally (oral ATRA) may not regularly lead to either molecular complete remissions (CRs) or prolonged hematologic CRs (HCR) unless combined with chemotherapy. Because serum tretinoin concentrations are higher, and maintained longer, after use of liposomal-encapsulated ATRA (lipoATRA) rather than oral ATRA, we investigated lipoATRA monotherapy in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Patients received lipoATRA 90 mg/m(2) every other day for remission induction. The same dose was given 3 times a week until 9 months had elapsed from HCR date. Treatment then stopped. Chemotherapy (idarubicin 12 mg/m(2) daily days 1-2 for 2 courses) was to be added only if 2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, performed 2 weeks apart, were positive at 3, 6, or 9 months from HCR date. The sensitivity level of the PCR was 10(-4). We treated 18 patients (median age, 54 years; median white blood cell [WBC] count 4,500/microL). The HCR rate was 12/18 (67%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 41% to 87%). This rate was similar to that we observed in a previous study using oral ATRA + idarubicin. Nine of 10 patients studied at HCR date were PCR-positive. Subsequently, however, overall (+/- idarubicin) rates of PCR positivity were 0/12 at 3 months, 1/10 at 6 months, 1/7 at 9 and 12 months, and 0/4 at 15 to 17 months. Idarubicin has been added in 3 patients, with this addition occurring at 6 months in 2 patients and at 9 months in 1 patient. Among patients who had not received idarubicin when the PCR was evaluated, 0 of 12 were PCR-positive at 3 months, 1 of 10 was positive at 6 months, 1 of 6 was positive at 9 months, 0 of 4 were positive at 12 months, and 0 of 3 were positive at 15 to 17 months. Morphologic APL has recurred in 1 patient, with a median follow-up time of 13 months in the 11 patients remaining in first CR. The median follow-up time is 91/2 months (range, 3 to 17) in the 9 patients who have received only lipoATRA and who remain PCR-negative and in first CR. Our data suggest that lipoATRA is an effective means of producing molecular CR in newly diagnosed APL.
Phase I dose-finding trials typically are conducted using adaptive rules that select dose levels for successive patient cohorts based on the outcomes of patients treated previously in the trial. When patient outcome cannot be observed immediately after treatment, the problem arises of how to deal with new patients while waiting to observe the current patient cohort's outcomes. We consider two alternative approaches to this problem in the context of a phase I trial conducted using the continual reassessment method. With the first approach, a patient requiring treatment before the next cohort opens is treated off protocol with standard therapy, and otherwise waits until the next cohort opens. The second approach treats each patient immediately upon arrival at the dose recommended based on currently available data. We compare these two approaches by simulation under varying dose--toxicity curves, accrual rates, cohort sizes and early stopping rules. We evaluate patient waiting time, trial duration, number of patients treated off protocol and the probabilities of toxicity and of selecting the correct dose. We also study three strategies for assigning patients to trials when two or more phase I trials may be ongoing simultaneously. Based on our results, we provide practical guidelines for deciding among these approaches and strategies in a given clinical setting.
Preclinical data suggest that retinoids, eg, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), lower concentrations of antiapoptotic proteins such as bcl-2, possibly thereby improving the outcome of anti-acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been considered to be potentially synergistic with ATRA in this regard. Accordingly, we randomized 215 patients with newly diagnosed AML (153 patients) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (refractory anemia with excess blasts [RAEB] or RAEB-t, 62 patients) to receive fludarabine + ara-C + idarubicin (FAI) alone, FAI + ATRA, FAI + G-CSF, or FAI + ATRA + G-CSF. Eligibility required one of the following: age over 71 years, a history of abnormal blood counts before M.D. Anderson (MDA) presentation, secondary AML/MDS, failure to respond to one prior course of chemotherapy given outside MDA, or abnormal renal or hepatic function. For the two treatment arms containing ATRA, ATRA was given 2 days (day-2) before beginning and continued for 3 days after completion of FAI. For the two treatment arms including G-CSF, G-CSF began on day-1 and continued until neutrophil recovery. Patients with white blood cell (WBC) counts >50,000/microL began ATRA on day 1 and G-CSF on day 2. Events (death, failure to achieve complete remission [CR], or relapse from CR) have occurred in 77% of the 215 patients. Reflecting the poor prognosis of the patients entered, the CR rate was only 51%, median event-free survival (EFS) time once in CR was 36 weeks, and median survival time was 28 weeks. A Cox regression analysis indicated that, after accounting for patient prognostic variables, none of the three adjuvant treatment combinations (FAI + ATRA, FAI + G, FAI + ATRA + G) affected survival, EFS, or EFS once in CR compared with FAI. Similarly, there were no significant effects of either ATRA ignoring G-CSF, or of G-CSF ignoring ATRA. As previously found, a diagnosis of RAEB or RAEB-t rather than AML was insignificant. There were no indications that the effect of ATRA differed according to cytogenetic group, diagnosis (AML or MDS), or treatment schedule. Logistic regression analysis indicated that, after accounting for prognosis, addition of G-CSF +/- ATRA to FAI improved CR rate versus either FAI or FAI + ATRA, but G-CSF had no effect on the other outcomes. We conclude that addition of ATRA +/- G-CSF to FAI had no effect on CR rate, survival, EFS, or EFS in CR in poor prognosis, newly diagnosed AML or high-risk MDS.
BACKGROUND: Interleukin-2 (IL-2) has immunomodulatory effects, including stimulating the activity of cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells, and inducing the generation of lymphokine-activated killer cells. The authors investigated whether IL-2 may improve the duration of complete remission (CR) and survival in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients in first CR. METHODS: Eighteen patients were included after achieving a CR and receiving at least two courses of consolidation chemotherapy. Therapy was comprised of IL-2 4.5 x 10(5) U/m2 daily by continuous infusion (CI) for 12 weeks, plus boluses of 1 x 10(6) U/m2 on Day 8 and weekly thereafter while continuing the CI. No further chemotherapy was given after the administration of IL-2 was started. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 50 years (range, 18-73 years), and 7 patients (39%) had an antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD). The median CR duration was 12 months, with 6 patients still alive in CR at a median follow-up of 64 months (range, 50-82 months). Long term CR by cytogenetics occurred in 2 of 5 patients with a normal karyotype (CR duration of 68+ months and 72+ months, respectively), 1 of 3 patients with t(8;21) (CR duration of 82+ months), 1 patient with inv(16) (CR duration of 67+ months), none of 2 patients with -5/-7 (1 patient died in CR after 10 months), 1 of 2 patients with abnormalities in chromosome 11 (CR duration of 60+ months), and 1 of 4 patients with miscellaneous abnormalities (CR duration of 74+ months). The median survival was 47 months. To assess the significance of these results, the authors selected two historic controls receiving long term postremission chemotherapy per each IL-2 case. The controls had remained in CR for at least as long as the cases when the latter underwent treatment initiation with IL-2 and were matched for the number of induction courses required to achieve CR, AHD, cytogenetic abnormalities, and age. Six of 18 IL-2 patients (33%) were alive in CR at 3 years compared with 7 of 36 controls (19%) (P = 0.31). Nine IL-2 patients (50%) were alive at 3 years compared with 10 controls (28%) (P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that IL-2 is tolerable in AML patients in first CR and should be studied further in future studies as a therapeutic strategy to prolong remission duration.