Biomedical subjects

E Gemade

Publications and source records attributed to E Gemade.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

Independent evaluation of onchocerciasis rapid assessment methods in Benue State, Nigeria.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of palpable nodules or skin depigmentation as rapid indicators of onchocerciasis epidemicity in at-risk communities. METHOD: We examined data collected in Benue State on 11035 individuals in 32 villages to evaluate these rapid assessment methods. RESULTS: The prevalence of palpable nodules correlates more closely with microfilarial prevalence (r=0.68, P<0.001) and community microfilarial load (r=0.64, P<0.001) than the prevalences of skin depigmentation or other potential rapid indicators. The recommended cut-off value for palpable nodules of 20% or more in males aged >20 years had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 50% compared to a cut-off of 40% or more for microfilarial prevalence in all ages. This would mean that in these 32 villages 17 of 18 would have been correctly identified for treatment, and a further 7 at lesser risk would have been targeted for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Skin snipping and parasitological examination can be replaced by the simpler method of palpating onchocercal nodules to identify communities at serious risk of onchocerciasis. This has important operational benefits for onchocerciasis control programmes.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Ivermectin dosing based on physical appearance.

Ivermectin is a safe and effective microfilaricide which has been shown to have a beneficial impact on some onchocercal eye lesions. Current requirements for the distribution of ivermectin are that patients be weighed, and that their dose be determined according to their weight. This requirement increases the cost of distributing the drug to communities in need of treatment and, when scales breakdown, may lead to the suspension of distribution. Data are presented on a simple, alternative method of dose assessment based on the physical appearance of the patient. Fifteen assessors achieved an overall level of agreement with the weight-based schedule of 86% on a sample of 6420 patients. The level of agreement varied between assessors, from 73% to 95%. About 6% of the population would have received doses outside the range of the current weight-based schedule. We believe that the current insistence that each individual's dose of ivermectin be determined by weighing will hamper efforts to distribute the drug to those most in need of it and that our data indicate that workers can be trained to distribute ivermectin safely without weighing every individual. We would welcome confirmation of our findings from other populations.

Adult↗