Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E F Crain

Publications and source records attributed to E F Crain.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

The use of parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits among children with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of parent report and the accuracy of the medical record in documenting physician performance of elements of pediatric asthma care in the primary care setting. METHODS: A convenience sample of 79 English-speaking parents of 4--12-year old children with asthma presenting to medical center--affiliated inner-city primary care pediatric clinics in the Bronx, Dallas, and Chicago was enrolled, and the office visit was audiotaped. Parents were interviewed 1--16 days after the visit by telephone. OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy of parent report was the primary outcome. The "reference standard" was an independent evaluation of the audiotaped record of the primary care visit. The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program was used as a guide to select data elements to assess quality of pediatric asthma care during primary care visits. RESULTS: Sufficient documentation was significantly (P <.001) less likely to be present in the medical record than in the follow-up interview for each element of care. When these elements were combined into a cumulative score, 71% of parent interviews but only 37% of medical records scored > or = 5 (out of a possible 6), with 29% of medical records scoring < 3. Parents were able to accurately report (concordance of parent data with audiotape reference standard) whether or not the visit had included performance of 5 of the 6 elements of care. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that parent telephone interview within 2 weeks after the visit is more accurate than the medical record for documentation of the quality of asthma care in pediatric primary care visits. The medical record was not sufficient to assess the quality of primary care related to asthma, primarily because of missing data. Therefore, our data suggest that assessing quality of care using the medical record will not only bias the findings in the direction of more deficient care but will also make improvement in care more difficult. Further validation of our strategy for using parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits will require its application in a variety of other primary care settings.

Asthma↗

Insurance and quality of care for children with acute asthma.

BACKGROUND: Increasing attention has been paid to the role of insurance in determining quality and outcomes of care. Pressures to reduce health costs and to improve quality have prompted attempts by managed care organizations to decrease the use of the emergency department (ED) for acute asthma, but performance comparisons between insurance types remain rare. METHODS: We used prospective data from the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration on 965 children with acute asthma presenting to 36 EDs. We compared measures of quality of pre-ED care, acute severity, and short-term outcomes (length of stay, percent relapse, and percent with ongoing symptoms) across 4 different insurance categories: managed care, indemnity, Medicaid, and uninsured. We used multivariate regression to control for differences in education, estimated income, race/ethnicity, and chronic asthma severity and acute asthma characteristics. RESULTS: Children with managed care and indemnity had similar demographic and asthma characteristics, but these children differed significantly from Medicaid and uninsured patients. Managed care and indemnity insured children had similar ratings on all 7 quality measures, with Medicaid and uninsured children ranking significantly lower on most measures, including (1) percent with primary care provider (PCP) (P <.001), (2) percent using ED as usual site of asthma care (P <.001), (3) percent using ED for prescriptions (P <.001), (4) percent with a ratio of >1 of ED visits to acute office visits within the past year (P =.003), and (5) percent visiting their PCP within the week prior to ED visit (P <.001). Children with managed care were more acutely ill than were indemnity, Medicaid, or uninsured children on presentation to the ED (pulmonary index of 4.6, 4.0, 4.2, and 3.9, respectively, P =.007). There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay, relapse, and ongoing exacerbation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate similar quality of care, greater severity of acute asthma, and no worse outcomes for children with managed care compared to children with indemnity insurance. We found uninsured children to have consistently poorer quality of care than insured patients.

Analysis of Variance↗