Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Engel

Publications and source records attributed to E Engel.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Modeling of the gastric gel mucus layer: application to the measured pH gradient.

The gastric gel mucus layer plays an important role in the defense against acid-induced injury. Previous investigations have modeled the interaction between the mucus, bicarbonate, acid moving towards the epithelial surface, and water carrying ions away from the epithelium. We measured the diffusion coefficient of protons through gastric mucus and applied this parameter to the model. Using the measured diffusion coefficient, we applied the model to previously published gastric mucus gel pH gradients to assess the relative contribution of bicarbonate or water fluxes in maintaining the gradient in the face of luminal acid. Mucus was harvested from the stomachs of anesthetized rats, mixed with bromphenol blue, and placed in capillary tubes. The tubes were submerged in 0.15 N HCl at 37 degrees C. The color change from blue to yellow was measured with time as the HCl migrated through the tube. From the distance and time data, the diffusion coefficient could be calculated. Controls of bromphenol blue in water were studied. The diffusion coefficient for water was 30.2 +/- 0.8 x 10(-6) cm2 s-1, almost identical to the standard value reported in the literature. The HCl diffusion coefficient through saline was 67.8 +/- 0.7 x 10(-6) cm2 s-1. For gastric mucus it was 5.4 +/- 1.3 x 10(-6) cm2 s-1. Application of this diffusion coefficient to the model and subsequently to observed pH gradients suggested that the most potent defense mechanism against concentrations of luminal acid is the bulk movement of water away from the epithelial surface through the mucus gel layer.

Animals↗

Angelman syndrome due to paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 15: a milder phenotype?

The Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurological disorder characterized by severe mental retardation, absent speech, seizures, gait disturbances, and a typical age-dependent facial phenotype. Most cases are due to an interstitial deletion on the maternally inherited chromosome 15, in the critical region q11-q13. Rare cases also result from paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 15. In a group of 14 patients with sporadic AS diagnosed in Switzerland, we found 2 unrelated females with paternal isodisomy for the entire chromosome 15. Their phenotypes were milder than usually seen in this syndrome: one girl did not show the typical AS facial changes; both patients had late-onset mild seizures; as they grew older, they had largely undisturbed gross motor functions, in particular no severe ataxia. Both girls were born to older fathers (45 and 43 years old, respectively). The apparent association of a relatively milder phenotype in AS with paternal uniparental disomy will have to be confirmed by detailed clinical descriptions of further patients.

Adult↗

Uniparental disomy revisited: the first twelve years.

Uniparental disomy (UPD), the exceptional derivation of a pair of the offspring chromosomes from one parent only, may be compatible with normal or abnormal development and can result from gamete complementation, chromosome loss in trisomy, or duplication in monosomy (with or without residual mosaicism) and somatic recombination. In isodisomy, the uniparental pair is a duplicate of a same chromosome DNA template and causes an increased risk of recessive disorder by reduction to homozygosity. In heterodisomy, the pair remains heterozygous, made up of 2 non-recombinant homologous segments. But both iso- and heterodisomy may also cause disruption of the genomic imprints needed for differential expression of some maternal and paternal genes crucial to growth and development. Pure UPD preserves euploidy and, when harmful, is best regarded as a genomic qualitative imbalance by symmetrical excess and loss of parental homologous contribution affecting zygosity and imprint content. Instances of UPD reported till the spring 1992 are reviewed and their deleterious effects are described as they carried out lethality or morbidity by altering imprinting processes, mimicking deletions, generating recessive disorders, or prompting malignant cellular growth.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

Effect of Toremifene in patients with metastatic melanoma: a phase II study of the EORTC Melanoma Cooperative Group.

The EORTC Melanoma Cooperative Group conducted a phase II trial (study number 18891) to study the effect of Toremifene in 45 patients with advanced, metastatic melanoma. Male and female patients, median age 61 (range 23-88) years received a mean total dose of 11 g (4.3-62.6) orally for at least 6 weeks. No objective remissions were seen. Four patients (3 women and 1 man; 9%) experienced 3-6 months' disease stabilization. The toxicity of the drug, given at a dose of 240 mg daily, was negligible. Because of the minimal side-effects, Toremifene may be recommended for patients who have only a small number of slowly growing metastases, in particular to soft tissue and lung.

Adult↗

Mechanisms of ring chromosome formation in 11 cases of human ring chromosome 21.

We studied the mechanism of ring chromosome 21 (r(21)) formation in 13 patients (11 unique r(21)s), consisting of 7 from five families with familial r(21) and 6 with de novo r(21). The copy number of chromosome 21 sequences in the rings of these patients was determined by quantitative dosage analyses for 13 loci on 21q. Nine of 11 r(21)s, including the 5 familial r(21)s, showed no evidence for duplication of 21q sequences but did show molecular evidence of partial deletion of 21q. These data were consistent with the breakage and reunion of short- and long-arm regions to form the r(21), resulting in deletion of varying amounts of 21q22.1 to 21qter. The data from one individual who had a Down syndrome phenotype were consistent with asymmetric breakage and reunion of 21q sequences from an intermediate isochromosome or Robertsonian translocation chromosome as reported by Wong et al. Another patient, who also exhibited Down syndrome, showed evidence of a third mechanism of ring formation. The likely initial event was breakage and reunion of the short and long arms, resulting in a small r(21), followed by a sister-chromatid exchange resulting in a double-sized and symmetrically dicentric r(21). The phenotype of patients correlated well with the extent of deletion or duplication of chromosome 21 sequences. These data demonstrate three mechanisms of r(21) formation and show that the phenotype of r(21) patients varies with the extent of chromosome 21 monosomy or trisomy.

Alleles↗

Uniparental disomy, isodisomy, and imprinting: probable effects in man and strategies for their detection.

The concept of uniparental disomy--the presence of a chromosome pair derived solely from one parent in a diploid offspring--was introduced in 1980 as a probable consequence of the high rate of germ cell aneuploidy in man, and has now been convincingly demonstrated through molecular analyses in several families. A most likely mechanism for the production of uniparental disomy is the chance reunion, and complementation, of 2 gametes aneuploid for the same chromosome member; uniparental disomy could also occur through other mechanisms including postzygotic non-segregation in a trisomic conceptus. Uniparental disomy may result in isodisomy, i.e., homozygosity of a series of contiguous alleles in a pair of homologues. The presence and degree of isodisomy in an offspring depend in turn on the occurrence, timing, and extent of the meiotic recombination that had occurred in the chromosome pair of the disomic gamete involved. Uniparental disomy with or without isodisomy can explain a number of unusual observations, such as the unexpected pattern of transmission of a genetic disorder. The two may be associated with an imprinting effect to produce pathological phenotypes, as has been observed in the mouse, and may be the basis for a number of syndromes of as yet unclear cause. The evidence for uniparental disomy, isodisomy, and imprinting in man is reviewed, and strategies for their detection presented.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

[The future of medical genetics in a university hospital setting].

The author presents three potential ways of developing an university centre of medical genetics, to make most effective use of this fast-evolving discipline. The three possibilities discussed are: i) the attachment of genetics units to major departments; ii) the creation of a large autonomous genetics centre (be Department or Institute) fulfilling all the requirements of the hospital; and iii) an "ecumenical" approach, that is a main genetics centre with a very few associated, highly specialized, departmental satellite units. The author argues in favour of the last solution.

Academic Medical Centers↗