Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E C Nelson

Publications and source records attributed to E C Nelson.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Molecular basis of AmpC hyperproduction in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli.

DNA sequencing data showed that five clinical isolates of Escherichia coli with reduced susceptibility to ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime contain an ampC gene that is preceded by a strong promoter. Transcription from the strong promoter was 8- to 18-fold higher than that from the promoter from a susceptible isolate. RNA studies showed that mRNA stability does not play a role in the control of AmpC synthesis.

Base Sequence↗

Building an idealized measurement system to improve clinical office practice performance.

The aim of this article is to introduce key concepts and approaches for building a better practice-based measurement. Physicians are being challenged to produce measurably higher quality of services, lower costs, and better clinical outcomes to remain viable. In the absence of provider-driven practice improvements and independent measurement systems, office practices will remain dependent on performance data from external forces as drivers of change. Three key questions will be addressed in our pursuit of better measurement systems for continuous improvement and competitive advantage: (1) What do we want a measurement system to tell us in the first place? (2) What might an idealized measurement system look like if we had one? (3) What are some of the challenges that office practices face in closing the gap between building an idealized measurement system and the current state of office practice measurement?

Data Collection↗

Neonatal intensive care: satisfaction measured from a parent's perspective.

Health care systems today are complex, technically proficient, competitive, and market-driven. One outcome of this environment is the recent phenomenon in the health care field of "consumerism." Strong emphasis is placed on customer service, with organized efforts to understand, measure, and meet the needs of customers served. The purpose of this article is to describe the current understanding and measurement of parent needs and expectations with neonatal intensive care services from the time the expectant parents enter the health care system for the birth through the discharge process and follow-up care. Through literature review, 11 dimensions of care were identified as important to parents whose infants received neonatal intensive care: assurance, caring, communication, consistent information, education, environment, follow-up care, pain management, participation, proximity, and support. Five parent satisfaction questionnaires-the Parent Feedback Questionnaire, Neonatal Index of Parent Satisfaction, Inpatient Parent Satisfaction-Children's Hospital Minneapolis, Picker Institute-Inpatient Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Survey, and the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit-Parent Satisfaction Form-are critically reviewed for their ability to measure parent satisfaction within the framework of the neonatal care delivery process. An immense gap was found in our understanding about what matters most and when to parents going through the neonatal intensive care experience. Additional research is required to develop comprehensive parent satisfaction surveys that measure parent perceptions of neonatal care within the framework of the care delivery process.

Consumer Behavior↗

Building measurement and data collection into medical practice.

Clinicians can use data to improve daily clinical practice. This paper offers eight principles for using data to support improvement in busy clinical settings: 1) seek usefulness, not perfection, in the measurement; 2) use a balanced set of process, outcome, and cost measures; 3) keep measurement simple (think big, but start small); 4) use qualitative and quantitative data; 5) write down the operational definitions of measures; 6) measure small, representative samples; 7) build measurement into daily work; and 8) develop a measurement team. The following approaches to using data for improvement are recommended. First, begin with curiosity about outcomes or a need to improve results. Second, try to avoid knee-jerk, obstructive criticism of proposed measurements. Instead, propose solutions that are practical, goal-oriented, and good enough to start with. Third, gather baseline data on a small sample and check the findings. Fourth, try to change and improve the delivery process while gathering data. Fifth, plot results over time and analyze them by using a control chart or other graphical method. Sixth, refine your understanding of variation in processes and outcomes by dividing patients into clinically homogeneous subgroups (stratification) and analyzing the results separately for each subgroup. Finally, make further changes while measuring key outcomes over time. Measurement and improvement are intertwined; it is impossible to make improvements without measurement. Measuring and learning from each patient and using the information gleaned to test improvements can become part of daily medical practice in local settings.

Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring↗

Building a quality future.

How can healthcare leaders stay ahead of the curve? What can they do to see what the future holds and to secure a place for their employees and their organizations? They must begin doing today what they need to do to survive tomorrow. Furthermore, they must take wise action today or there will be no tomorrow. This article looks into the future and connects it with what we must see and do today. The article begins with a glimpse of the future and with an exploration of what people really want from health and healthcare. Next, it examines what appear to be inexorable megatrends and healthcare trends that are sweeping through society. This leads us to consider the quality and value imperatives that must be faced to secure a stake in the healthcare delivery. We will discuss a model for managing care for individual patients and small populations by focusing on where patients, populations, and caregivers meet--at the front lines of patients care. We conclude with some advice on how to build sustainable organizations by exploiting the inevitable.

Delivery of Health Care↗

A longitudinal study of hospitalization rates for patients with chronic disease: results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare inpatient and outpatient utilization rates between prepaid (PPD) and fee-for-service (FFS) insurance coverage for patients with chronic disease. DATA SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: Data from the Medical Outcomes Study, a longitudinal observational study of chronic disease patients conducted in Boston, Chicago, and Los Angeles. STUDY DESIGN: A four-year prospective study of resource utilization among 1,681 patients under treatment for hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure in the practices of 367 clinicians. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Insurance payment system (PPD or FFS), hospitalizations, and office visits were obtained from patient reports. Disease and severity indicators, sociodemographics, and self-reported functional status were used to adjust for patient mix and to compute expected utilization rates. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Compared to FFS, PPD patients had 31 percent fewer observed hospitalizations before adjustment for patient differences (p = .005) and 15 percent fewer hospitalizations than expected after adjustment (p = .078). The observed rate of FFS hospitalizations exceeded the expected rate by 9 percent. These results are not explained by system differences in patient mix or trends in hospital use over four years. Half of the PPD/FFS difference in hospitalization rate is due to intrinsic characteristics of the payment system itself. CONCLUSIONS: PPD patients with chronic medical conditions followed prospectively over four years, after extensive patient-mix adjustment, had 15 percent fewer hospitalizations than their FFS counterparts owing to differences intrinsic to the insurance reimbursement system.

Adult↗

Behavior of infants with iron-deficiency anemia.

This study tested the hypothesis that infants with iron-deficiency anemia show behaviors, such as increased proximity to caregivers, increased wariness or hesitance, and decreased activity, that could contribute to "functional isolation." The behavior of 52 Costa Rican 12- to 23-month-old infants with iron-deficiency anemia was contrasted with that of 139 comparison group infants with better iron status during free play and mental and motor testing and in the home. Infants with iron-deficiency anemia maintained closer contact with caregivers; showed less pleasure and delight; were more wary, hesitant, and easily tired; made fewer attempts at test items; were less attentive to instructions and demonstrations; and were less playful. Adult behavior also differed. The results indicate that iron-deficiency anemia in infancy is associated with alterations in affect and activity, suggesting that functional isolation is a useful framework for understanding poorer developmental outcome in iron-deficiency anemia, the world's most common single nutrient deficiency.

Affect↗

Biologically active heteroarotinoids exhibiting anticancer activity and decreased toxicity.

A series of retinoids, containing heteroatoms in a cyclic ring and called heteroarotinoids, were synthesized, and their biological activity was evaluated using tissue culture lines that have measurable responses to trans-retinoic acid (t-RA). Transglutaminase (TGase) was assessed in the human erythroleukemia cell line (GMO6141A) as an indicator of differentiation and apoptosis. Proliferation was evaluated in a human cervical cell line, CC-1, which exhibits dose-dependent alterations in growth rate in response to treatment with trans-retinoic acid. Activation of nuclear retinoic acid receptors was determined in a reporter cell line established from CC-1. The reporter line, called CC-B, contains a reporter gene controlled by a retinoic acid responsive element (RARE) and a thymidine kinase (tk) promoter. Treatment of the CC-B line with the heteroarotinoids resulted in a dose-responsive and retinoid-dependent regulation of reporter gene expression. The heteroarotinoids exhibited activity in all assays and correlated in a statistically significant manner between assays. RARE transactivation activity in CC-B cells correlated with induction of TGase in GMO6141A (R = 0.96) and with a decrease in the growth rate of CC-1 cells (R = -0.90). The ability of the selected heteroarotinoids to induce differentiation, inhibit proliferation, and activate nuclear receptors demonstrates the chemotherapeutic potential of these agents. In view of the biological activity cited, an in vivo toxicity study was conducted on male B6D2F1 mice with three heteroarotinoids, namely 8 [(2E,4E,6E)-3,7-dimethyl-7-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-4,4-dimeth ylthiochroman-6-yl)-2,4,6-heptatrienoic acid], 10 [(2E,4E,6E)-3,7-dimethyl-7-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-4,4-dimeth ylchroman-6-yl)-2, 4,6-heptatrienoic acid], and 13 [(E)-p-[2-(4,4-dimethylchroman-6-yl)propenyl]benzoic acid]. The mice were used with gavage of heteroarotinoids in corn oil [0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 mg/kg] and with 0.01 or 0.05 mg/kg of TTNPB (5) [(E)-4-[2-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-1- propenyl]benzoic acid] as reference controls. The target organs affected in the mice by the three heteroarotinoids were those typically associated with t-RA (1) toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 13 was 9.4 mg/kg/day, which was equal in toxicity to that of t-RA (1) and 1000-fold less toxic than TTNPB (5). The MTDs of 8 and 10 were 34 and 32 mg/kg/day, respectively, which is 3-fold less toxic than t-RA (1) and 3000-fold less toxic than TTNPB (5). The 3000-fold reduced toxicity, compared with only a 27% reduction biological activity of 8 and 10 with respect to that of TTNPB, observed in our assays indicates a good therapeutic ratio of these heteroarotinoids over the parent compound. The biological activity and reduced toxicity of these heteroartinoids demonstrate the potential efficacy as anticancer agents.

Animals↗

A replicable and customizable approach to improve ambulatory care and research.

Health care is a service industry. A fundamental attribute of many successful service industries is the "small replicable unit (SRU)." There are three essential elements of an SRU: (1) the smallest core unit of activity, (2) micromeasures designed to help manage the core activities, and (3) combinations of the activities and measures to match local customer needs. In this article, we describe a model for geriatric care based on "SRU thinking." We demonstrate how this approach places measurement of patient values, clinical improvement strategies, and research objectives into day-to-day health care delivery.

Aged↗

Transforming patient feedback into strategic action plans.

Patients' perceptions provide valuable insight into areas for improvement and opportunities for strategic planning. Using both quantitative and qualitative research methods, the topics of what drives patient satisfaction, what delights patients, and what disappoints patients were examined. A case study approach was used to develop strategic recommendations for two market segments. For primary care patients, recommendations revolve around "provider caring" and "choice." For specialty patients, recommendations concentrate on "provider caring," "provider competence," and "office wait time."

Feedback↗

Continually improving the health and value of health care for a population of patients: the panel management process.

Today's primary care provider faces the challenge of caring for individual patients as well as caring for populations of patients. This article offers a model--the panel management process--for understanding and managing these activities and relationships. The model integrates some of the lessons learned during the past decade as we have worked to gain an understanding of the continual improvement of health care after we have understood that care as a process and system.

Community Health Planning↗

Clinical process cost analysis: a promising tool for clinical improvement.

In today's environment, health care organizations are expected to provide the best possible care at the lowest possible cost. Neither aspect can be considered independently, but correlating the two with traditional systems of cost analysis is very difficult. This article presents a new method for linking costs to the process of care that also promises to be a powerful tool for clinical improvement and redesign.

Accounting↗

Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients' and physicians' opinions.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients' and physicians' opinions on the importance of discrete elements of health care as determinants of the quality of outpatient care. DESIGN: Analysis of results of a mailed survey. SETTING: Community-based internal medicine practices. PARTICIPANTS: 74 general internists and 814 patients randomly selected from the practices of these internists. MEASURES: 125 elements of care that covered nine domains were identified: physician clinical skill, physician interpersonal skill, support staff, office environment, provision of information, patient involvement, nonfinancial access, finances, and coordination of care. Participants rated each element on its importance to high-quality care on a 4-point scale: 1 = not important; 2 = of medium importance; 3 = of high importance; and 4 = essential. Patients' and physicians' ratings were compared for individual elements of care and for elements aggregated into domains. RESULTS: Survey response rates were 93% for physicians and 60% for patients. In an element-by-element comparison of ratings, ratings by the two groups differed substantially for 58% of the attributes. The most striking difference was seen in the domain of provision of information (median ratings, 3.56 for patients and 2.85 for physicians; P < 0.001). Ratings by the two groups also differed in the domains of clinical skill (3.75 for patients and 3.35 for physicians; P < 0.001), nonfinancial access (3.00 for patients and 2.87 for physicians; P < 0.001), and finances (3.00 for patients and 2.80 for physicians; P = 0.006). When relative rankings of the domains were compared, both groups agreed that clinical skill is most important; however, patients ranked provision of information second in importance whereas physicians ranked it sixth. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and physicians agreed that the most crucial element of outpatient care is clinical skill, but they disagreed about the relative importance of other aspects of care, particularly effective communication of health-related information. These differences in perception may influence the quality of interactions between physicians and patients.

Adolescent↗

Platelet serotonergic markers and Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire measures in a clinical sample.

A group of patients with major depressive disorder, with and without comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder, completed the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ). Harm Avoidance scores were found to be high compared to published age-matched norms and to display a significant positive correlation with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores. Platelet 125I-lysergic acid diethylamide (125I-LSD) and 3H-paroxetine binding Bmax values were measured to test Cloninger's hypothesis that Harm Avoidance scores would correlate significantly with measures of serotonergic function. A significant inverse correlation was found between Harm Avoidance scores and 125I-LSD Bmax values. Correlations between 3H-paroxetine Bmax values and TPQ scale scores were not significant. These results suggest an alternative view of the literature relating platelet 5-hydroxytryptamine-2a receptors and mood disorders in that the temperament dimension, Harm Avoidance, may explain prior inconsistencies involving links with depression and suicidality.

Adult↗

Improving health care, Part 1: The clinical value compass.

CLINICAL VALUE COMPASS APPROACH: The clinical Value Compass, named to reflect its similarity in layout to a directional compass, has at its four cardinal points (1) functional status, risk status, and well-being; (2) costs; (3) satisfaction with health care and perceived benefit; and (4) clinical outcomes. To manage and improve the value of health care services, providers will need to measure the value of care for similar patient populations, analyze the internal delivery processes, run tests of changed delivery processes, and determine if these changes lead to better outcomes and lower costs. GETTING STARTED--OUTCOMES AND AIM: In the case example, the team's aim is "to find ways to continually improve the quality and value of care for AMI (acute myocardial infection) patients." VALUE MEASURES--SELECT A SET OF OUTCOME AND COST MEASURES: Four to 12 outcome and cost measures are sufficient to get started. In the case example, the team chose 1 or more measures for each quadrant of the value compass. OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF MEASURES: An operational definition is a clearly specified method explaining how to measure a variable. Measures in the case example were based on information from the medical record, administrative and financial records, and patient reports and ratings at eight weeks postdischarge. COMMENTS: Measurement systems that quantify the quality of processes and results of care are often add-ons to routine care delivery. However, the process of measurement should be intertwined with the process of care delivery so that front-line providers are involved in both managing the patient and measuring the process and related outcomes and costs.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Using qualitative and quantitative patient satisfaction data to improve the quality of cardiac care.

BACKGROUND: In early 1993 leaders within the Hitchcock Clinic and cardiac services section at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (Lebanon, NH) formed the Cardiac Services Improvement Group (CSIG) as a pilot program for patient-centered quality improvement (QI) at the sectional level. CSIG PROGRAM: For open heart surgery (OHS) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), a flowchart was constructed of sequential patient experiences. Content analysis of focus group discussions resulted in six key patient-defined quality characteristics: comfort, caring, certainty, convenience, communication, and cost. Linking of patient comments to points on the patient experience flowchart made it possible to determine where particular quality characteristics were most relevant. A patient satisfaction survey with questions that were specific to a patient experience and to a quality characteristic was mailed to 100 consecutively discharged OHS and PTCA patients; 35 of the 50 patients in each group responded. EVALUATING SUCCESS: Analysis of the survey results led to the formation of two QI teams. One team began work on development of a critical pathway for discharge preparation and identified marker questions to track and monitor pathway success in subsequent surveys. Another team began the development of protocols for more effective pain management during and after the PTCA procedure. A repeat patient satisfaction survey that took place from November 1994 to March 1995 suggested a global improvement in patient satisfaction for all patient experiences and all key quality characteristics. CONCLUSION: The CSIG pilot program of patients-based quality measurement and management at the sectional level has been successful in fostering QI team formation and has been associated with a positive deflection in patient-based quality measures. Additional sections of the medical center have initiated similar projects, beginning with process definition and focus groups.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗