Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Bruera

Publications and source records attributed to E Bruera.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

The addition of an audiocassette recording of a consultation to written recommendations for patients with advanced cancer: A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Communication between physicians and advanced cancer patients is frequently difficult. Patients often report poor levels of satisfaction with communication. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on patients' recall of and overall satisfaction with their consultation by the addition of an audiocassette recording of a consultation to written recommendations. METHODS: Sixty patients with advanced cancer were randomized to either receive a tape recording of their consultation or receive no tape in addition to written recommendations in this randomized, double-blind trial. Patients gave their global ratings of the clinic, were tested for their recall of information given, and responded to questions about the utilization and role of the cassette in influencing family communication. RESULTS: The addition of the audiocassette to written communications significantly increased patient satisfaction with the clinic (8.7 +/- 1.7 vs. 7.7 +/- 2.0 on a scale of 0-10; P = 0.04) and significantly improved recall of the information given during the consultation (88% +/- 8.7% vs. 80% +/- 15.5%; P = 0.02). Patients expressed a high level of satisfaction with the audiocassette. Patients listened to the tape a median of 2 (range 1-4) times, whereas family members and friends listened to the cassette a median of 2 (range 1-3) times. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of an audiocassette recording of an outpatient consultation to written recommendations for patients with advanced cancer is capable of increasing both the overall patient recall of the visit and satisfaction with the outpatient clinical setting. Patients expressed a high level of satisfaction with the audiocassette.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Edmonton Regional Palliative Care Program: impact on patterns of terminal cancer care.

The Edmonton Regional Palliative Care Program was established in July 1995 to measure the access of patients with terminal cancer to palliative care services, decrease the number of cancer-related deaths in acute care facilities and increase the participation of family physicians in the care of terminally ill patients. In this retrospective study the authors compared the pattern of care and site of deaths before establishment of the program (1992/93) and during its second year of operation (1996/97). Significantly more cancer-related deaths occurred in acute care facilities in 1992/93 than in 1996/97 (86% [1119/1304] v. 49% [633/1279]) (p < or = 0.001). The number of inpatient days decreased, from 24,566 in 1992/93 to 6960 in 1996/97. More cancer patients saw a palliative care consult team in 1996/97 than in 1992/93 (82% v. 22%). The shift from deaths in acute care facilities to palliative hospices suggests that the establishment of an integrated palliative care program has increased access of patients with terminal cancer to palliative care.

Alberta↗
PubMed1999

The relative accuracy of the clinical estimation of the duration of life for patients with end of life cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although the prediction of the duration of life of patients with end of life cancer most often relies on the clinical estimation of survival (CES) made by the treating physician, the accuracy and practical value of CES remains controversial. METHODS: The authors prospectively evaluated the accuracy of CES in an inception and population-based cohort of 233 cancer patients who were seen at the onset of their terminal phase. They also systematically reviewed the literature on CES in advanced or end-stage cancer patients in MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, and EMBASE data bases, using two search strategies developed by a research librarian. RESULTS: CES had low sensitivity in detecting patients who died within shorter time frames (< or =2 months), and a tendency to overestimate survival was noted. A moderate correlation was observed between actual survival (AS) and CES (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.47, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.46, weighted kappa coefficient = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Treating physicians appear to overestimate the duration of life of end of life ill cancer patients, particularly those patients who die early in the terminal phase and who may potentially benefit from earlier participation in palliative care programs. CES should be considered one of many criteria, rather than a unique criterion, by which to choose therapeutic intervention or health care programs for patients in the end of life cancer phase.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The use of intermittent subcutaneous injections of oxycodone for opioid rotation in patients with cancer pain.

Oxycodone is a strong opioid that has been available for at least 70 years. At present, commercially prepared parenteral oxycodone is only available in Finland. We report in this paper our experience of administering oxycodone s.c. From 21 October 1996 to 31 July 1998, 63 advanced cancer patients received intermittent s.c. injections of oxycodone via the Edmonton Injector, a simple, low-cost mechanical device. Local tolerance and systemic toxicity were followed prospectively. Only 2 patients developed s.c. injection site intolerance, and in both cases doses of 50 mg/ml or more were being administered. Most of the patients in this study were rotated to oxycodone because of opioid toxicity, and in 34% of those patients their delirium subsided. A subgroup of 19 patients who underwent rotation to oxycodone SC from morphine and hydromorphone were studied for equivalent analgesia with oxycodone. We found a ratio (mean +/- SD) of 1.2+/-0.4 for morphine s.c. to oxycodone s.c. and a mean ratio of 0.5+/-0.4 for hydromorphone s.c. to oxycodone s.c. When hydromorphone s.c. was converted to a morphine s.c. equivalent dose and the results for these patients were added to those for the morphine s.c. group, the mean and median overall ratios of morphine s.c. equivalent dose to oxycodone were 1.9+/-1.5 and 1.4, respectively. The cost of the oxycodone s.c. was also evaluated and was found to be comparable to that of morphine s.c. and lower than that of hydromorphone s.c. We conclude that s.c. oxycodone can be an effective, safe and inexpensive alternative opioid agonist.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Twice-daily versus once-daily morphine sulphate controlled-release suppositories for the treatment of cancer pain. A randomized controlled trial.

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of controlled-release morphine sulphate suppositories administered 12-hourly and once daily in patients with chronic cancer in a randomized double-blind crossover trial. Pain was assessed using a 100-mm VAS pain scale and a five-point ordinal pain scale. The VAS pain intensity score was 17.5+/-17.2 after suppositories every 12 h, versus 16.2+/-13.4 after suppositories every 24 h (difference not significant). The difference between the mean VAS pain scores with 12-hourly and once-daily dosing was 1.3 mm (not significant). The mean ordinal pain scores were 1.0+/-0.7 versus 1.0+/-0.6 for 12-hourly and once-a-day dosing, respectively (not significant). A retrospective power analysis indicated that a difference of 5.9 mm was detectable, even with only 6 patients. Adverse events noted were constipation, nausea, anorexia, and dry mouth. The use of once-a-day controlled-release morphine suppository is a more convenient and equally effective alternative to twice a day dosing.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Respective limits of palliative care and oncology in the supportive care of cancer patients.

Advanced cancer patients develop a number of devastating physical and psychosocial symptoms before death. In recent years, there have been great advances in our knowledge on the appropriate assessment and management of many of the physical and psychosocial symptoms. There is also increasing understanding on the need for patients and families to receive appropriate follow-up and to have access to multiple settings for optimal care. Unfortunately, both models developed on the basis of palliative care/hospice and those developed on the basis of supportive care/oncology have failed to achieve these goals. Future models for the delivery of supportive cancer care will have to consider the need to ensure that patients receive a consistent level of assessment and management up to the time of death, that there is appropriate flexibility, to allow patients to access multiple levels of care in the trajectory of their illness, and that there is a significant contribution to the body of knowledge and future education of health care professionals. These programs will need to develop individually for each country with due consideration for the structure of the health care system, the structure of the academic system, and the financing of health care in different regions of the world.

Alberta↗
PubMed1999

Collegial disagreements over appropriate palliative care: a case study.

The appropriate limit or scope of investigation and treatment of the palliative patient is an evolving and still controversial area. Major differences of opinion persist. This case report highlights such differences. The ethics of decision-making in palliative care are discussed and a series of practical steps that may help in these dilemmas is briefly highlighted.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1999

Differences in the ratios of morphine to methadone in patients with neuropathic pain versus non-neuropathic pain.

The use of methadone in the treatment of cancer pain is becoming more attractive mainly because of its known efficacy, lack of active metabolites, and low cost. Methadone also blocks the n-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, and this property may result in other clinical advantages. Because of this capacity of methadone to block the NMDA receptors, we have hypothesized that the equianalgesic dose ratio of hydromorphone or morphine to methadone will be different in patients with neuropathic pain than in patients with non-neuropathic pain. To explore this hypothesis, we reviewed computerized patient records and determined the ratio of morphine and hydromorphone (expressed as morphine subcutaneous equivalent dose) to methadone in patients who underwent rotation from morphine or hydromorphone to methadone. We found that the ratio of morphine subcutaneous equivalent dose to methadone is between 5 and 7, which is different from previously described dose ratios. However, our study failed to show a difference in the ratios of patients with neuropathic or non-neuropathic pain syndromes.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Reduction in constipation and laxative requirements following opioid rotation to methadone: a report of four cases.

Constipation is a common symptom in cancer patients, especially in those who are receiving opioid analgesics for pain. Although several articles have recently examined constipation with respect to causation and treatment, little research has been done to elucidate the effects of different opioids on the bowel. Recent research has found that laxative doses may be lower in patients using methadone as an analgesic, but changes in constipation were not measured. We report here on four cases in which patients had improvement in constipation and decreased laxative requirements following opioid rotation to methadone.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1999

A randomized controlled trial of local injections of hyaluronidase versus placebo in cancer patients receiving subcutaneous hydration.

BACKGROUND: Most cancer patients develop reduced oral intake or dehydration before death. Subcutaneous hydration (SCH) can be safe and effective. SCH is frequently administered using hyaluronidase to improve fluid absorption. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of hyaluronidase on patient comfort during bolus SCH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one cancer patients requiring parenteral hydration were administered a 500 cc bolus of two-thirds dextrose (5%) and one-third normal saline solution subcutaneously at 08:00 and 16:00 hours during day 1 and day 2. On day 1 patients were randomized on a double-blind basis to receive 150 units of hyaluronidase versus placebo as a bolus into the site of infusion immediately before starting each one-hour infusion. During day 2 patients were crossed over to receive the alternate treatment at a new infusion site. Visual analogue scales (0 = best, 100 = worst) for pain and swelling at the infusion site were completed by each patient. In addition, investigators blindly assessed the site of infusion for the presence of edema, rash, and leakage. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed for pain, swelling, edema, rash or leakage between the placebo and the hyaluronidase scores. After completion of the two days of the study, patients blindly chose hyaluronidase in 1 (5%) case, placebo in 5 (24%) cases, and no preference in 15 (71%) cases (P < 0.01). There was no treatment or interaction effect for pain, except for a period effect (P = 0.045) for the morning bolus administration. There were no treatment, period, or interaction effects for any of the other variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that hyaluronidase is not necessary for routine bolus SCH. It may still be useful for a minority of patients who are not able to tolerate infusion well due to swelling or pain.

Cross-Over Studies↗
PubMed1999

Opioid use in cancer pain. Is a more liberal approach enhancing toxicity?

The majority of cancer patients develop pain before death. This pain has been shown to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. Opioid use has increased in the past 20 years in both developing and developed countries. The changing pattern in opioid use has resulted in the emergence of neurotoxicity as a major side effect of the treatment of cancer pain. The syndrome of opioid-induced neurotoxicity (OIN) encompasses delirium, hallucinosis, myoclonus/seizures and hyperalgesia. Increased vigilance can lead to the timely diagnosis of OIN, and strategies for its treatment can be implemented with encouraging results. Identification and modification of risk factors for the development of OIN can help in its prevention and improve the quality of life in advanced cancer patients.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1999

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as adjuvant analgesics in cancer patients.

The role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is examined in the control of cancer pain with a particular focus on their use as adjuvants to opioids in advanced cancer pain. These agents have both a peripheral effect on inflammation and a role in attenuating central pain pathways. The possibility of obtaining the benefits of NSAIDs with fewer side-effects by using COX-2-specific agents is discussed. The gastrointestinal, renal, haemostatic, cognitive and hypersensitivity side-effects of NSAIDs are reviewed and their potential impact assessed. The evidence for the efficacy of NSAIDs as single agents for cancer pain is reviewed together with the nine papers which have reported the effects of NSAIDs as adjuvants to opioids in cancer pain. All of these papers reported positive results of NSAIDs, but, in the absence of any randomized, double-blind controlled trials, where NSAIDs were used as adjuvants on a long-term basis alongside optimal opioid use, definite conclusions cannot be reached. Guidelines for the safe use of NSAIDs are suggested. Finally, suggestions for future research are made.

Analgesics↗
PubMed1999

Assessing the reliability of patient, nurse, and family caregiver symptom ratings in hospitalized advanced cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of symptom assessments in advanced cancer patients under various conditions, including multiple raters (patients, nurses, and family caregivers), occasions, and symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of 32 advanced cancer patients admitted to a tertiary palliative care unit. Symptom assessments were completed for each patient on two separate occasions, approximately 24 hours apart. On each occasion, the patient, the primary care nurse, and a primary family caregiver independently completed an assessment using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). The ESAS is a nine-item visual analogue scale for assessing symptoms in palliative patients. The reliability of the assessments (r) was examined using generalizability theory. RESULTS: Three important findings emerged from this analysis. First, the analysis of individual symptom ratings provided a more meaningful representation of the symptom experience than total symptom distress ratings. Secondly, patients, nurses, and caregivers varied in their ratings across different patients, as well as in their ratings of shortness of breath, which may have been a result of individual rater variability. Finally, reliability estimates (r), based on a single rater and one occasion, were less than.70 for all symptoms, except appetite. These estimates improved substantially (r >/=.70) for all symptoms except anxiety and shortness of breath, using three raters on a single occasion or two raters across two occasions. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study reinforce the need for the development of an integrated symptom assessment approach that combines patient and proxy assessments. Further research is needed to explore individual differences among raters.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1999

Role of methadone in the management of pain in cancer patients.

In most cancer patients who are treated with opioid analgesics for pain control, the type of opioid needs to be changed at least once because of the presence of side effects or the need to escalate analgesic doses to toxic levels. Methadone may be an excellent alternative in such patients due to its lack of known active metabolites, high lipid solubility, excellent absorption following oral and rectal delivery, and extremely low cost. However, it has unique problems, such as a long, unpredictable half-life and greater potency than previously assumed. At present, methadone is viewed as a second-line opioid for chronic cancer pain. Better pharmacokinetic and clinical studies are required to establish the role of methadone in this setting. Issues to be explored include a potential role in treating patients who have poorly responsive pain syndromes, such as neuropathic pain, or who develop a rapid tolerance to other opioids; the possibility of extending dosing intervals to every 12 or 24 hours; and its possible use as a first-line opioid.

Analgesics, Opioid↗