Biomedical subjects

E B Bortey

Publications and source records attributed to E B Bortey.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

A comparison of cilostazol and pentoxifylline for treating intermittent claudication.

PURPOSE: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of cilostazol and pentoxifylline. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe claudication from 54 outpatient vascular clinics, including sites at Air Force, Veterans Affairs, tertiary care, and university medical centers in the United States. Of 922 consenting patients, 698 met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to blinded treatment with either cilostazol (100 mg orally twice a day), pentoxifylline (400 mg orally 3 times a day), or placebo. We measured maximal walking distance with constant-speed, variable-grade treadmill testing at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Mean maximal walking distance of cilostazol-treated patients (n = 227) was significantly greater at every postbaseline visit compared with patients who received pentoxifylline (n = 232) or placebo (n = 239). After 24 weeks of treatment, mean maximal walking distance increased by a mean of 107 m (a mean percent increase of 54% from baseline) in the cilostazol group, significantly more than the 64-m improvement (a 30% mean percent increase) with pentoxifylline (P <0.001). The improvement with pentoxifylline was similar (P = 0.82) to that in the placebo group (65 m, a 34% mean percent increase). Deaths and serious adverse event rates were similar in each group. Side effects (including headache, palpitations, and diarrhea) were more common in the cilostazol-treated patients, but withdrawal rates were similar in the cilostazol (16%) and pentoxifylline (19%) groups. CONCLUSION: Cilostazol was significantly better than pentoxifylline or placebo for increasing walking distances in patients with intermittent claudication, but was associated with a greater frequency of minor side effects. Pentoxifylline and placebo had similar effects.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

A new pharmacological treatment for intermittent claudication: results of a randomized, multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective medication is limited for the relief of intermittent claudication, a common manifestation of arterial occlusive disease. Cilostazol is a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation with vasodilation effects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cilostazol for the treatment of intermittent claudication. METHODS: Thirty-seven outpatient vascular medicine clinics at regional tertiary and university hospitals in the United States participated in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial. Of the 663 screened volunteer patients with leg discomfort, a total of 516 men and women 40 years or older with a diagnosis of moderately severe chronic, stable, symptomatic intermittent claudication were randomized to receive cilostazol, 100 mg, cilostazol, 50 mg, or placebo twice a day orally for 24 weeks. Outcome measures included pain-free and maximal walking distances via treadmill testing, patient-based quality-of-life measures, global assessments by patient and physician, and cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality survival analysis. RESULTS: The clinical and statistical superiority of active treatment over placebo was evident as early as week 4, with continued improvement at all subsequent time points. After 24 weeks, patients who received cilostazol, 100 mg, twice a day had a 51% geometric mean improvement in maximal walking distance (P<.001 vs placebo); those who received cilostazol, 50 mg, twice a day had a 38% geometric mean improvement in maximal walking distance (P<.001 vs placebo). These percentages translate into an arithmetic mean increase in distance walked, from 129.7 m at baseline to 258.8 m at week 24 for the cilostazol, 100 mg, group, and from 131.5 to 198.8 m for the cilostazol, 50 mg, group. Geometric mean change for pain-free walking distance increased by 59% (P<.001) and 48% (P<.001), respectively, in the cilostazol, 100 mg, and cilostazol, 50 mg, groups. These results were corroborated by the results of subjective quality-of-life assessments, functional status, and global evaluations. Headache, abnormal stool samples or diarrhea, dizziness, and palpitations were the most commonly reported potentially drug-related adverse events and were self-limited. A total of 75 patients (14.5%) withdrew because of any adverse event, which was equally distributed between all 3 treatment groups. Similarly, there were no differences between groups in the incidence of combined cardiovascular morbidity or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, long-term use of cilostazol, 100 mg or 50 mg, twice a day significantly improves walking distances in patients with intermittent claudication.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Effect of the novel antiplatelet agent cilostazol on plasma lipoproteins in patients with intermittent claudication.

Cilostazol is an antiplatelet agent and vasodilator marketed in Japan for treatment of ischemic symptoms of peripheral vascular disease. It is currently being evaluated in the United States for treatment of symptomatic intermittent claudication (IC). Cilostazol has been shown to improve walking distance in patients with IC. In addition to its reported vasodilator and antiplatelet effects, cilostazol has been proposed to have beneficial effects on plasma lipoproteins. We examined the effect of cilostazol versus placebo on plasma lipoproteins in 189 patients with IC. After 12 weeks of therapy with 100 mg cilostazol BID, plasma triglycerides decreased 15% (P<0.001). Cilostazol also increased plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (10%) and apolipoprotein (apo) A1 (5.7%) significantly (P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively). Both HDL3 and HDL2 subfractions were increased by cilostazol; however, the greatest percentage increase was observed in HDL2. Individuals with baseline hypertriglyceridemia (>140 mg/dL) experienced the greatest changes in both HDL-C and triglycerides with cilostazol treatment. In that subset of patients, HDL-C was increased 12.2% and triglycerides were decreased 23%. With cilostazol, there was a trend (3%) toward decreased apoB as well as increased apoA1, resulting in a significant (9.8%, P<0.002) increase in the apoA1 to apoB ratio. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) concentrations were unaffected. Cilostazol treatment resulted in a 35% increase in treadmill walking time (P=0.0015) and a 9.03% increase in ankle-brachial index (P<0.001). These results indicate that in addition to improving the symptoms of IC, cilostazol also favorably modifies plasma lipoproteins in patients with peripheral arterial disease. The mechanism of this effect is currently unknown.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed1991

Applying survival methodology to adverse experience occurrences in controlled clinical trials.

On the basis of calculated cumulative hazard rates for initial occurrence of adverse experiences of patients following treatment for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, a simple function is evolved that fits such cumulative hazard rate data very well. From this simple function, we obtain the estimated hazard rate in terms of two physically meaningful parameters. These two parameters can be used to describe the rate of occurrence of adverse experiences, and to convey the concept of risk of adverse experience associated with duration of exposure to a drug. The parameters are rho 1, which represents the risk of adverse experience at baseline, and rho 2, which defines the rate of occurrence of adverse experience immediately following drug administration. A method of estimating rho 1 and rho 2 is the maximum likelihood approach, and the estimated parameters are given for series of data referring to patients treated for arthritis.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1991

Testing for consistency in a single multicenter trial.

One of the criteria for demonstrating efficacy in a single multicenter trial is that the centers are consistent with respect to the direction and significance of results. The purpose of this research is to discuss the use of the noncentrality parameter delta of an F distribution as a means of testing for the consistency of treatment effects across centers. We state the testing problem as H0: (delta > delta 0) versus H1: (delta < or = delta 0), where delta 0 is prespecified, so that H0 represents inconsistency and H1 consistency. Thus, strong evidence from the sample data is required in order to conclude that the treatment effects are consistent across centers. We discuss reasonable choices for delta 0 and develop the alpha-level, uniformly most powerful and unbiased test, which is equivalent to rejecting H0 if the 100(1 - alpha)% uniformly most accurate and unbiased upper confidence limit for delta is less than or equal to delta 0. We examine other tests based on upper confidence limits, such as those calculated from linear estimators of delta and those calculated from a likelihood approach. We investigate the performance of the tests in a small simulation study and present an example from a four-center clinical trial.

Humans↗