Factors in motor short-term memory: the interference effect of interpolated activity.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Amnesia↗
Biomedical subjects
E A Roy
Publications and source records attributed to E A Roy.
Memory for kinesthetically defined target location: evidence for manual asymmetries.
Sixteen right-handed male adults performed a pointing task without vision. The participant's arm was moved passively to one of four targets which was subsequently pointed to following a delay of 1, 2, or 10 s. Our previous research on visual memory for target location showed a rapid decay which was comparable for both hands. The present study of memory for kinesthetic target location found decay for the left hand only. These findings suggest two memory stores for target location information, one visual which decays over time but is accessible to both hands and another based on kinesthetic information which is more stable and limb specific.
Adult↗
Patterns of apraxia associated with the production of intransitive limb gestures following left and right hemisphere stroke.
The model of apraxia proposed by Roy (1996) states that three patterns of apraxia should be observed across pantomime and imitation conditions. In the present analysis the frequency and severity of each pattern of apraxia were examined in a consecutive sample of left-(LHD) and right-hemisphere-damaged (RHD) patients during the production of intransitive limb gestures. The results indicated that a significant proportion of LHD and RHD patients were selectively impaired in formulating the ideational component of intransitive limb gestures.
Apraxias↗
Transitive gesture production in apraxia: visual and nonvisual sensory contributions.
The production of transitive limb gestures is optimized when the appropriate tool can be physically manipulated. Little research has addressed the independent contributions of visual and nonvisual sources of sensory information to this phenomenon. In this study, 12 control, 37 LHD, and 50 RHD stroke patients performed transitive limb gestures to pantomime (to verbal command with the object visible) and object manipulation. Performance was more accurate in the object manipulation condition, suggesting that haptic and kinesthetic cues are important for transitive gesture production. Various patterns of performance were observed in the stroke groups, indicating that selective damage to the haptic/kinesthetic processing system is possible and common following unilateral stroke.
Adult↗
Analysis of task demands in apraxia.
Several task demands were examined in a battery of praxis tests: the movement system (limb versus axial), input modality (command versus imitation), movement complexity (single gestures versus a sequence of gestures), type of limb gesture (transitive versus intransitive), and the representational nature of the gestures. Performance accuracy for a group of left hemisphere patients was significantly lower than for two other groups of patients with either right hemisphere damage or no brain damage on all gestures. The right hemisphere patients were significantly different from the normals only for the most complex gestures involving a three movement sequence. Within the left hemisphere group performance to command was not different from imitation. Representational and nonrepresentational gestures were not different, and axial gestures was not different from the limb gestures. The transitive and complex gestures were not different but were both performed less accurately than the intransitive gestures. The implications of these findings for understanding apraxia were discussed.
Analysis of Variance↗
A developmental analysis of the relationship between hand preference and performance: II. A performance-based method of measuring hand preference in children.
The present study describes a performance-based method of measuring hand preference in children. Three aspects of handedness were considered to be important in developing the paradigm (a) overall hand preference across a number of tasks, (b) consistency of hand use and, (c) the use of the preferred hand in a bimanual task. The new paradigm, termed the WatHand Box Test (WBT), requires participants to perform a variety of unimanual tasks such as, using a hammer, tossing a ball, and opening a lock with a key. To determine the validity of the WBT and examine the developmental trends in hand preference, eighty right-handed children and adults (ages 3-4, 6-7, 9-10, and 18-24 years) performed the WBT. First, the WBT was found to correlate significantly with scores on a standard hand preference questionnaire for the adults. As well, significant developmental trends were noted in hand preference as measured by the WBT. Most specifically, three- and four-year-olds had significantly lower scores on the WBT indicating a less stable pattern of hand preference than in the other three age groups.
Adolescent↗
Age, gesture span, and dissociations among component subsystems of working memory.
Working memory was examined in old and young adults using a series of span tasks, including the forward versions of the visual-spatial and digit span tasks from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, and comparable hand gesture and visual design span tasks. The observation that the young participants performed significantly better on all the tasks except digit span suggested that aging has an impact on some component subsystems of working memory but not others. Analyses of intercorrelations in span performance supports the dissociation among three component subsystems, one for auditory verbal information (the articulatory loop), one for visual-spatial information (visual-spatial scratch-pad), and one for hand/body postural configuration.
Adult↗
The expression of manual asymmetries following extensive training of the nondominant hand: a kinematic perspective.
A single experiment involving 5600 discrete aiming trials with the left hand and 560 trials with the right hand designed to track the kinematic changes associated with left hand practice is reported. In general, performance data revealed that following practice movement time of the left hand achieved a level of performance similar to that of the right. However, the kinematic variables analyzed were instructive in identifying differential control processes associated with the right and left hand. Specifically, the right hand was more accurate during the ballistic phase of movement execution, while practice enabled the left hand to utilize response-produced feedback more efficiently.
Adult↗
A developmental analysis of the relationship between hand preference and performance: I. Preferential reaching into hemispace.
The present study describes a developmental performance measure of hand preference that considers task complexity and position in hemispace. Eighty right-handed children and adults (ages 3-4, 6-7, 9-10, 18-24) were observed for hand selection responses to 2 unimanual tasks (simple vs complex) across positions in hemispace. Results revealed an age-related trend in the tendency to use the preferred hand in right and left hemispace. While the adult's and 3- to 4-year-old's preferred hand use decreased as they moved into left hemispace, children between the ages of 6 and 10 years tended to use their preferred hands consistently throughout both regions of hemispace. The relationship between hand preference and skilled, cost-efficient performance throughout development are discussed.
Adolescent↗
Posture and target location effects on manual preference.
Twenty-nine right-handed participants made unimanual movements to 5 target locations while standing and while balancing on a rocker platform. Manual preference was affected by target location (p < .001; manual preference tended to be concordant with target hemispace) and posture (p < .05; responses from the rocker platform were associated with a lower level of right-hand responding). A location by posture interaction (p < .05) indicated that the effect of posture was present only for targets in left hemispace; the right hand was used less frequently in the rocker condition than simple standing. Manual preference is viewed as a process of response selection motivated by an effort to minimize neural processing and mechanical costs.
Brain↗