Biomedical subjects

Douglas C Fitzpatrick

Publications and source records attributed to Douglas C Fitzpatrick.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Connections of functional areas in the mustached bat's auditory cortex with the auditory thalamus.

The auditory thalamus is the major target of the inferior colliculus and connects in turn with the auditory cortex. In the mustached bat, biosonar information is represented according to frequency in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICc) but according to response type in the cortex. In addition, the cortex has multiple areas with neurons of similar response type compared to the single tonotopic representation in the ICc. To investigate whether these transformations occur at the level of the thalamus, we injected anatomical tracers into physiologically defined locations in the mustached bat's auditory cortex. Injections in areas used for target ranging labeled contiguous regions of the auditory thalamus rather than separate patches corresponding to regions that respond to the different harmonic frequencies used for ranging. Injections in the two largest ranging areas produced labeling in separate locations. These results indicate that the thalamus is organized according to response type rather than frequency and that multiple mappings of response types exist. Injections in areas used for target detection labeled thalamic regions that were largely separate from those that interconnect with ranging areas. However, injections in an area used for determining target velocity overlapped with the areas connected to ranging areas and areas involved in target detection. Thus, separation by functional type and multiplication of areas with similar response type occurs by the thalamic level, but connections with the cortex segregate the functional types more completely than occurs in the thalamus.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

Detection of interaural correlation by neurons in the superior olivary complex, inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of the unanesthetized rabbit.

A critical binaural cue important for sound localization and detection of signals in noise is the interaural time difference (ITD), or difference in the time of arrival of sounds at each ear. The ITD can be determined by cross-correlating the sounds at the two ears and finding the ITD where the correlation is maximal. The amount of interaural correlation is affected by properties of spaces and can therefore be used to assess spatial attributes. To examine the neural basis for sensitivity to the overall level of the interaural correlation, we identified subcollicular neurons and neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) and auditory cortex of unanesthetized rabbits that were sensitive to ITDs and examined their responses as the interaural correlation was varied. Neurons at each brain level could show linear or non-linear responses to changes in interaural correlation. The direction of the non-linearities in most neurons was to increase the slope of the response change for correlations near 1.0. The proportion of neurons with non-linear responses was similar in subcollicular and IC neurons but increased in the auditory cortex. Non-linear response functions to interaural correlation were not related to the type of response as determined by the tuning to ITDs across frequencies. The responses to interaural correlation were also not related to the frequency tuning of the neuron, unlike the responses to ITD, which broadens for neurons tuned to lower frequencies. The neural discriminibility of the ITD using frozen noise in the best neurons was similar to the behavioral acuity in humans at a reference correlation of 1.0. However, for other reference ITDs the neural discriminibility was more linear and generally better than the human discriminibility of the interaural correlation, suggesting that stimulus rather than neural variability is the basis for the decline in human performance at lower levels of interaural correlation.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus of the unanesthetized rabbit: comparison with other structures.

Interaural time differences, a cue for azimuthal sound location, are first encoded in the superior olivary complex (SOC), and this information is then conveyed to the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL) and inferior colliculus (IC). The DNLL provides a strong inhibitory input to the IC and may serve to transform the coding of interaural time differences (ITDs) in the IC. Consistent with the projections from the SOC, the DNLL and IC had similar distributions of peak- and trough-type neurons, characteristic delays, and best ITDs. The ITD tuning widths of DNLL neurons were intermediate between those of the SOC and IC. Further sharpening is seen in the auditory thalamus, indicating that sharpening mechanisms are not restricted to the midbrain. The proportion of neurons that phase-locked to the tones delivered to each ear progressively decreased from the SOC to the auditory thalamus. The degree of phase-locking for a large majority of DNLL neurons was too weak to support their involvement in processing monaural inputs to generate a sensitivity to ITDs. The response rates of DNLL neurons were on average approximately 60% greater than in the IC or SOC, indicating that the inhibitory input provided to the IC by the DNLL is robust.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Transformations in processing interaural time differences between the superior olivary complex and inferior colliculus: beyond the Jeffress model.

Interaural time differences (ITDs) are used to localize sounds and improve signal detection in noise. Encoding ITDs in neurons depends on specialized mechanisms for comparing inputs from the two ears. Most studies have emphasized how the responses of ITD-sensitive neurons are consistent with the tenets of the Jeffress model. The Jeffress model uses neuronal coincidence detectors that compare inputs from both sides and delay lines so that different neurons achieve coincidence at different ITDs. Although Jeffress-type models are successful at predicting sensitivity to ITDs in humans, in many respects they are a limited representation of the responses seen in neurons. In the superior olivary complex (SOC), ITD-sensitive neurons are distributed across both the medial (MSO) and lateral (LSO) superior olives. Similar response types are found in neurons sensitive to ITDs in two signal types: low-frequency sounds and envelopes of high-frequency sounds. Excitatory-excitatory interactions in the MSO are associated with peak-type responses, and excitatory-inhibitory interactions in the LSO are associated with trough-type responses. There are also neurons with responses intermediate between peak- and trough-type. In the inferior colliculus (IC), the same basic types remain, presumably due to inputs arising from the MSO and LSO. Using recordings from the SOC and IC, we describe how the response types can be described within a continuum that extends to very large values of ITD, and compare the functional organization at the two levels.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Monaural and binaural processing in the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus: a major source of inhibition to the inferior colliculus.

The ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (VNLL) is a major source of input to the inferior colliculus. This paper reviews recent studies of neural responses in the VNLL of the unanesthetized rabbit. The VNLL has generally been viewed as a monaural nucleus, with its neurons responding primarily to stimulation of the contralateral ear. In the rabbit, the VNLL is divided into a medial division (VNLLm) comprising neurons intercalated in the medial limb of the lemniscus, a compact lateral division (VNLLl), and a dorsal division. The VNLLm contains an abundance of neurons sensitive to interaural temporal disparities (ITDs), one of the major binaural cues for sound localization. These neurons respond only at the onset of tones, and therefore appear to encode the ITDs of transients. Even in the VNLLl, many neurons are sensitive to binaural stimulation. The VNLLl contains a variety of neurons with different discharge patterns, the two most common of which are sustained and onset. The discharge patterns, frequency-tuning and dynamic ranges of VNLLl neurons indicate that this division is able to supply the inferior colliculus with a variety of inputs, each serving a different function in the analysis of sound.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Processing of interaural temporal disparities in the medial division of the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus.

The medial division of the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (VNLLm) contains a specialized population of neurons that is sensitive to interaural temporal disparities (ITDs), a potent cue for sound localization along the azimuth. Unlike many ITD-sensitive neurons elsewhere in the auditory system, neurons in the VNLLm respond only at the onset of tones. An onset response may be significant for behavior because, under echoic conditions, tones require sharp onsets for accurate localization. In contrast, noise can generally be localized even with gradual onsets, presumably because transients occur at random intervals in noise. We recorded responses of neurons in the VNLLm to tones and noise in unanesthetized rabbits. We found that although tones elicited a transient response, noise elicited a sustained response as if it was a sequence of transients. The responses to tones indicate that these neurons represent a secondary stage in the processing of ITDs. The onset response to tones was only weakly synchronized to the phase of the tone, indicating that neurons in the VNLLm inherit their sensitivity to ITDs from their inputs. The latencies were short (~8 ms), implying that the ITD sensitivity is derived from ascending inputs. Most neurons in the VNLLm discharged maximally at the same ITD at all frequencies, a characteristic shared with neurons of the medial superior olive. However, the latency of neurons in the VNLLm to interaurally delayed stimuli is linked strongly to the timing of the contralateral stimulus. This suggests that these neurons receive a suprathreshold, contralateral input that is modulated by a subthreshold input conveying information about ITDs. Other stations in the auditory pathway contain a subset of neurons that respond transiently to tones and are sensitive to ITDs. These neurons may represent a novel pathway that assists in localizing sounds in the presence of reflections.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response.

The scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR) is gaining recognition as an objective audiometric tool, but little is known about the neural sources that underlie this potential. We hypothesized, based on our human studies and single-unit recordings in animals, that the scalp-recorded AMFR reflects the interaction of multiple sources. We tested this hypothesis using an animal model, the unanesthetized rabbit. We compared AMFRs recorded from the surface of the brain at different locations and before and after the administration of agents likely to enhance or suppress neural generators. We also recorded AMFRs locally at several stations along the auditory neuraxis. We conclude that the surface-recorded AMFR is indeed a composite response from multiple brain generators. Although the response at any modulation frequency can reflect the activity of more than one generator, the AMFRs to low and high modulation frequencies appear to reflect a strong contribution from cortical and subcortical sources, respectively.

Acoustic Stimulation↗