Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Donna G Blankenbaker

Publications and source records attributed to Donna G Blankenbaker.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Radiographic findings of osteoarthritis versus arthroscopic findings of articular cartilage degeneration in the tibiofemoral joint.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively correlate radiographic findings of osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint with arthroscopic findings of articular cartilage degeneration within the tibiofemoral joint in patients with chronic knee pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed in compliance with HIPAA regulations. Approval from an institutional review board and a waiver of informed consent were obtained. The study group consisted of 125 patients with osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint (66 men, 59 women; age range, 35-77 years; average age, 52 years) and 25 patients of similar age (14 men, 11 women; age range, 36-69 years; average age, 50 years) with no osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint. All patients underwent standing anteroposterior radiography of the knee prior to arthroscopic knee surgery. Each articular surface of the tibiofemoral joint was graded at arthroscopy. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the knee radiographs to determine the presence of marginal osteophytes, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and subchondral cysts. The sensitivity and specificity of the radiographic features of osteoarthritis for the detection of articular cartilage degeneration within the medial and lateral compartments of the tibiofemoral joint were determined. RESULTS: The sensitivity of marginal osteophytes, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and subchondral cysts for the detection of articular cartilage degeneration was 67%, 46%, 16%, and 10%, respectively, for the medial compartment and 49%, 7%, 6%, and 3%, respectively, for the lateral compartment. The specificity of marginal osteophytes, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and subchondral cysts for the detection of articular cartilage degeneration was 73%, 95%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, for the medial compartment and 81%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, for the lateral compartment. CONCLUSION: Marginal osteophytes were the most sensitive radiographic feature for the detection of osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint. Joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and subchondral cysts were less sensitive radiographic features of osteoarthritis and rarely occurred in the absence of associated osteophyte formation.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Sonography of the iliopsoas tendon and injection of the iliopsoas bursa for diagnosis and management of the painful snapping hip.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare sonographic evaluations of patients referred with suspected snapping of their iliopsoas tendon with the pain relief achieved from anesthetic injection of the iliopsoas bursa, and with the subsequent surgical outcome. This study also assessed the effectiveness of Kenalog injection into the iliopsoas bursa for long-term pain relief. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dynamic and static sonography was performed in 40 patients with clinically diagnosed snapping hips. The iliopsoas bursa was injected with Bupivicaine and Lidocaine in the first 22 patients, and an additional 1 ml Kenalog-40 was added to this mixture in the last 18 patients. We compared the static and dynamic sonographic findings with change in the patients' level of pain at 2 days after anesthetic injection. The sonographic findings and response to anesthetic injection were also compared to the response to Kenalog injection and the results of any subsequent surgery. RESULTS: Static sonography of the iliopsoas tendon was normal in 38 patients, and detected iliopsoas bursitis in one patient and iliopsoas tendinopathy in another. Snapping of the iliopsoas tendon was observed using dynamic sonography in 9 of the 40 patients. Following anesthetic injection of the iliopsoas bursa, 29 patients had complete or partial pain relief, and 11 patients had no pain relief. Eight of the nine patients with a snapping iliopsoas tendon had complete or partial pain relief from the bursal injection. Twelve of the 29 patients with pain relief after anesthetic injection later had an arthroscopic iliopsoas tendon release, and all of these 12 patients had a good postoperative result. Of the 18 patients who had Kenalog-40 injected into the iliopsoas bursa and did not have iliopsoas surgery, 16 had sustained pain relief following the injection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with groin pain and a clinically suspected snapping iliopsoas tendon can benefit from injection into the iliopsoas bursa even if the snapping tendon is not visualized sonographically. The use of a corticosteroid may provide long-term pain relief, and pain relief after injection is a predictor of good outcome after surgical release of the iliopsoas tendon.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

The painful hip: new concepts.

Hip pain is a common condition, and the work-up often includes imaging. This article reviews the normal MR anatomy of the hip and the imaging findings of internal derangements, snapping hip, and femoral acetabular impingement. We will describe the role of MR arthrography in evaluating the patient with suspected labral and articular cartilage abnormalities, as well as the pitfalls in interpretation. We will review the causes of a snapping hip, and the role of sonography in evaluating and guiding treatment of the snapping iliopsoas tendon. We will also review the radiographic and MRI signs of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), a cause of early degenerative joint disease and hip pain.

Hip Injuries↗
PubMed2006

Axial rotation of the lumbar spinal motion segments correlated with concordant pain on discography: a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE: One possible cause of back pain in patients with intervertebral disk degeneration is decreased stability of the motion segment. Axial rotations between lumbar spinal vertebrae can be measured noninvasively with CT. We tested the hypothesis that larger axial rotations are found in motion segments with disks that test positive for concordant pain, which is considered by some investigators to be a reasonable, accurate predictor of spinal instability. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between October 2002 and March 2004, all patients undergoing discography were evaluated for inclusion in the study, with the approval of the institutional review board. All patients in whom concordant pain was detected at discography were enrolled in the study. The patients were placed supine in the CT scanner on a table that rotated the pelvis 8 degrees clockwise and then counterclockwise with respect to the thorax. CT images were obtained with the patient in the two positions of rotation. An automated program calculated the amount of rotation between each lumbar vertebra as a result of the table rotations. Rotations were stratified by disk level and by disk classification (concordant pain, nonconcordant pain, no significant pain). RESULTS: We recorded the axial rotations of 94 disks in 16 consecutive patients (10 women, six men; age range, 26-53 years) after two disks were excluded because of a previous fusion. There were 68 normal disks by MRI and discography, six disks with nonconcordant pain, and 20 disks with concordant pain. Rotation averaged 0.6 degrees for the normal disks, 1.4 degrees for disks with nonconcordant pain, and 1.8 degrees for disks with concordant pain. The differences were significant (analysis of variance, p < 0.001). Disks at L3-L4 with concordant pain rotated on average 1.2 degrees , whereas disks classified as normal or nonconcordant pain rotated on average 0.7 degrees (significant at p = 0.005). Disks at L4-L5 with concordant pain rotated on average 1.9 degrees , and those without concordant pain rotated on average 1.4 degrees (significant at p = 0.05). Disks with concordant pain at L5-S1 had an average rotation of 2.2 degrees , whereas disks without concordant pain had an average rotation of 1.5 degrees (marginally significant difference at p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Concordant pain at discography predicts increased axial rotation at a lumbar disk level.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Lumbar radiculopathy: treatment with selective lumbar nerve blocks--comparison of effectiveness of triamcinolone and betamethasone injectable suspensions.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine if there is a difference in the effectiveness of triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension versus betamethasone sodium phosphate and betamethasone acetate injectable suspension in the treatment of radiculopathy and low back pain with selective lumbar nerve blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant; informed consent was not required. Charts and self-reported pain score evaluations were retrospectively reviewed in 114 patients (56 men, 58 women; age range, 36-84 years; mean age, 60 years) treated for radiculopathy from 1997 to 2003 with 130 selective lumbar nerve blocks with triamcinolone or betamethasone. Perineural location was confirmed with fluoroscopic guidance. Forty-nine patients received a mixture of 1 mL of the triamcinolone, 40 mg/mL, and 1 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride. Eighty-one patients received a mixture of 1 mL of the betamethasone, 6 mg/mL, and 1 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride. Patients completed standardized pain evaluation sheets and compared their pain with baseline levels during 14 days after injection. Fisher exact test was used for data analysis. RESULTS: From day 0 to 1 after the procedure, there was no statistically significant difference in improvement in low back pain and lower extremity pain between groups. On day 3, 42% of triamcinolone recipients and 58% of betamethasone recipients demonstrated improvement in low back pain (P = .04, Fisher exact test), whereas 55% of triamcinolone recipients and 57% of betamethasone recipients had lower extremity pain improvement (P = .33). On day 7, 45% of triamcinolone recipients and 58% of betamethasone recipients had improvement in low back pain (P = .38), whereas 52% of triamcinolone recipients and 57% of betamethasone recipients had improvement in lower extremity pain (P = .69). On day 14, 42% of triamcinolone recipients and 53% of betamethasone recipients had improvement in low back pain (P = .26), whereas 49% of triamcinolone recipients and 55% of betamethasone recipients had improvement in lower extremity pain (P = .69). CONCLUSION: Selective nerve root blocks with betamethasone and triamcinolone reduced low back pain and lower extremity pain, although there was no significant difference in effectiveness between the two.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Is intra-articular pathology associated with MCL edema on MR imaging of the non-traumatic knee?

OBJECTIVE: Edema surrounding the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is seen on MR imaging in patients with MCL injuries and in patients with radiographic osteoarthritis in the non-traumatic knee. Because we noted MCL edema in patients without prior trauma or osteoarthritis, we studied the association between intra-articular pathology and MCL edema in patients without knee trauma. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We evaluated the MR examinations of 247 consecutive patients (121 male, 126 female with a mean age of 44 years) without recent trauma for the presence of edema surrounding the MCL, meniscal and ACL tears, medial meniscal extrusion, medial compartment chondromalacia, and osteoarthritis. The percentages of patients illustrating MCL edema with and without each type of pathology were compared using Fisher's exact test to determine if there was a statistically significant association. RESULTS: We found MCL edema in 60% of 247 patients. MCL edema was present in 67% of patients with medial meniscal tears, 35% with lateral meniscal tears, 100% with meniscal extrusion of 3 mm or more, 78% with femoral chondromalacia, 82% with tibial chondromalacia, and 50% with osteoarthritis. The percentage of patients with edema increased with the severity of the chondromalacia. These associations were all statistically significant (p <0.02). The mean age of those with MCL edema was 49.7 years compared with 34.9 years without MCL edema ( p <0.001). Patient gender and ACL tear did not correlate with MCL edema. Nine (4%) of the 247 patients had MCL edema without intra-articular pathology. None of these 9 patients had MCL tenderness or joint laxity on physical examination. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that MCL edema is associated with osteoarthritis, but is also associated with meniscal tears, meniscal extrusion, and chondromalacia. In addition, MCL edema can be seen in patients without intra-articular pathology, recent trauma or MCL abnormality on physical examination.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Selective nerve root blocks.

Selective nerve root blocks are valuable diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in patients with radicular symptoms. Understanding the anatomy, benefits, and risks, as well as precise needle placement, are important factors in performing successful nerve root blocks. The techniques we describe come from our training and ongoing experience. There are other acceptable methods as well.

Back Pain↗
PubMed2003

Efficacy of epidural injections of Kenalog and Celestone in the treatment of lower back pain.

OBJECTIVE: Epidural corticosteroid injections have been used extensively to treat lower back pain, but the relative effectiveness of one corticosteroid versus another has never been reported in a large patient series. We retrospectively reviewed 597 patients who had epidural corticosteroid injections to determine any difference in Kenalog or Celestone efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed charts and self-reported pain score evaluations of 597 patients who received either Kenalog or Celestone Soluspan as an epidural injection for the treatment of lower back pain from 1997 to 2002 at our university hospital and affiliated Veterans Affairs hospital. Kenalog was used for the initial 2 years and Celestone was used for the next 3 years. Fluoroscopic guidance was used to confirm epidural location, and each patient was injected with a mixture of 5 mL of 0.5% preservative-free lidocaine and 2 mL of either Kenalog 40 mg/mL (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension) or Celestone Soluspan 6 mg/mL (betamethasone sodium phosphate and betamethasone acetate injectable suspension). Each patient was given a standardized pain evaluation sheet that used an 11-point scale for initial pain severity. Scoring of pain compared with baseline during the following 14 days was based on a 5-point scale of pain improvement or worsening. RESULTS: On days 0-3 after the procedure, no statistical significance in improvement of lower back and buttock pain was seen between groups. On day 7, 59% of Celestone recipients and 73% of Kenalog recipients showed improvement in lower back pain (p = 0.002, Pearson's chi-square test), and 58% of Celestone recipients and 75% of Kenalog recipients had improvement in leg or buttock pain (p < 0.001). On day 14, 54% of Celestone recipients and 71% of Kenalog recipients showed improvement in lower back pain (p < 0.001), and 54% of Celestone recipients and 71% of Kenalog recipients had improvement in leg or buttock pain (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The epidural injection of Celestone Soluspan and Kenalog reduced lower back and radicular pain in more than half the patients, although Kenalog reduced pain in a significantly larger number of patients than Celestone Soluspan at 1 and 2 weeks after injection.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed2002

Sublabral foramen and buford complex: inferior extent of the unattached or absent labrum in 50 patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the inferiormost extent of the anterosuperior labral variants on conventional transverse MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed transverse MR images in 50 consecutive patients with a sublabral foramen or Buford complex at arthroscopy. Images were randomly mixed with those of 58 patients with either a normal labrum (n = 20) or an anterior labral tear (n = 38) at arthroscopy. MR imaging was fat suppressed fast spin echo intermediate or T2 weighted (repetition time msec/effective echo time msec, 1,800-3,000/30-102). Two radiologists evaluated by means of consensus the anterior labrum while blinded to patient history and arthroscopic results. Transverse images obtained through the glenoid fossa were totalled to determine the midpoint. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR for depicting a sublabral foramen or Buford complex were calculated along with 95% CIs, by using surgical findings as the reference standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of MR for diagnosing a sublabral foramen or Buford complex was 0.94 (47 of 50 patients, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.00), specificity was 0.80 (16 of 20 patients, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.97), and accuracy was 0.90 (63 of 70 patients, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.97). The anterior labrum was abnormal on the first transverse section inferior to the midpoint in nine (18%) patients. The labrum was also abnormal on the second section below the midpoint in three (6%) patients. Because of the anterior tilt of the scapula, the midpoint was near the anterior glenoid notch at about the position between 2- and 3-o'clock. CONCLUSION: The labrum may be unattached or absent on the first two transverse images obtained below the midpoint.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Usefulness of two indirect MR imaging signs to diagnose lateral meniscal tears.

OBJECTIVE: We determined whether using two recently described indirect MR imaging signs would improve the sensitivity of diagnosis of lateral meniscal tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 121 consecutive patients who had undergone knee MR imaging and knee arthroscopy. Their MR imaging examinations were evaluated for the conventional criteria of a meniscal tear (meniscal distortion or intrameniscal signal contacting the surface) and the two new signs (presence of an abnormal popliteomeniscal fascicle and posterolateral pericapsular edema). These observations were correlated with the arthroscopic findings, which were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: Thirty-two (89%) of the 36 torn lateral menisci had two or more images with distortion or signal contacting the surface. Three torn menisci and eight intact menisci had one image with distortion or surface signal. Only one of 75 menisci without distortion or surface signal was torn. An abnormal superior fascicle was highly associated (p < 0.001) with lateral meniscal tears but was not specific for a tear because three of the 14 menisci with abnormal fascicles were not torn. Posterolateral pericapsular edema was not associated with a lateral meniscal tear (p = 0.06). Using an abnormal fascicle as an additional criterion improved the sensitivity from 89% to 94%, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: We confirmed that an abnormal fascicle is highly associated with a lateral meniscal tear but found that posterolateral pericapsular edema was not associated with lateral meniscal tears. Identifying an abnormal fascicle did not significantly improve the sensitivity of diagnosis of a lateral meniscal tear.

Adult↗