Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Dietmar Georg

Publications and source records attributed to Dietmar Georg.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Pre-clinical evaluation of an inverse planning module for segmental MLC based IMRT delivery.

Phantom tests are performed for pre-clinical evaluation of a commercial inverse planning system (HELAX TMS, V 6.0) for segmented multileaf collimator (MLC) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivery. The optimization module has available two optimization algorithms: the target primary feasibility and the weighted feasibility algorithm, only the latter allows the user to specify weights for structures. In the first series, single beam tests are performed to evaluate the outcome of inverse planning in terms of plausibility for the following situations: oblique incidence, presence of inhomogeneities, multiple targets at different depths and multiple targets with different desired doses. Additionally, for these tests a manual plan is made for comparison. In the absence of organs at risk, both the optimization algorithms are found to assign the highest priority to low dose constraints for targets. In the second series, tests resembling clinical relevant configurations (simultaneous boost and concave target with critical organ) are performed with multiple beam arrangements in order to determine the impact of the system's configuration on inverse planning. It is found that the definition of certain segment number and segment size limitations does not largely compromise treatment plans when using multiple beams. On the other hand, these limitations are important for delivery efficiency and dosimetry. For the number of iterations and voxels per volume of interest, standard values in the system's configuration are considered to be sufficient. Additionally, it is demonstrated that precautions must be taken to precisely define treatment goals when using computerized treatment optimization. Similar phantom tests could be used for a direct dosimetric verification of all steps from inverse treatment planning to IMRT delivery.

Algorithms↗

Determination and application of the reference isodose length (RIL) for commercial endovascular brachytherapy devices.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During the last years endovascular brachytherapy has been established as a new field in radiotherapy. In a recent recommendation of the EndoVAscular, Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie, European Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology, Working Group the reference isodose length (RIL) has been introduced as a central parameter for treatment planning. It is defined as the vessel length at the reference depth enclosed by the 90% isodose. The dose is normalized to 100% at the reference depth (i.e. lumen radius plus 1 mm into the vessel wall) at the central plane. In order to avoid a geographic miss the clinical target length has to be encompassed by the RIL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RILs are determined by Monte Carlo calculations and GafChromic film dosimetry for three endovascular brachytherapy devices currently in clinical use (192Ir seed ribbon, 32P wire source, 90Sr seed train). For all measurements, phantoms and devices the sensitive layer of GafChromic film is located in a plane at 2+/-0.1 mm parallel to the axis of the source delivery catheter. The EGSnrc code system is applied to calculate the dose profile at 2 and 3 mm distance from the source axis. RESULTS: For the ten seed 192Ir source calculated RIL at 2 mm radial distance is 30.2 mm whereas the measured RIL is 33.5 mm. In case of a 20 mm 32P wire source with two steps the calculated RIL of 36.6 mm shows excellent agreement compared with the measured value of 36.2 mm. The calculated RIL of a 40 mm 90Sr seed train was 35.8 mm compared to a measured value of 34.8 mm. CONCLUSION: As a compromise between calculated and measured RIL values at 2 and 3 mm radial distances we propose to use a RIL of 30 mm for the 192Ir ten seed ribbon, 36 mm for the32P wire source with two steps and 35 mm for the 40 mm 90Sr seed train. These parameter values can be used to define the maximum intervention length for endovascular sources.

Beta Particles↗