Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Dieter Ropers

Publications and source records attributed to Dieter Ropers.

35 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate whether contrast-enhanced multidetector spiral CT (MDCT) permits assessment of remodeling in coronary atherosclerotic lesions. BACKGROUND: With sufficient image quality, MDCT permits noninvasive visualization of the coronary arteries, but its ability to assess remodeling has not been evaluated. METHODS: Out of 102 patients in whom MDCT (16-slice scanner, intravenous contrast, 0.75-mm collimation, 420 ms rotation) was performed before invasive coronary angiography, 44 patients with high-quality MDCT data sets showing atherosclerotic plaque in a proximal coronary artery segment were chosen for evaluation. In multiplanar reconstructions orthogonal to the coronary artery, the cross-sectional vessel area was measured for the respective lesion and for a reference segment proximal to the lesion. The "Remodeling Index" was calculated by dividing the vessel area in the lesion by the reference segment. Results were correlated to the presence of stenosis (>50% diameter reduction) in invasive angiography. In a subset of 13 patients, MDCT measurements were verified by IVUS. RESULTS: Reference vessel area was not significantly different between nonstenotic versus stenotic lesions (20 +/- 8 mm(2), n = 23 vs. 22 +/- 8 mm(2), n = 21). The mean Remodeling Index was significantly higher in nonstenotic than in stenotic lesions (1.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.2, p < 0.001). In five stenotic lesions, "negative remodeling" (Remodeling Index < or = 0.95) was observed. Cross-sectional vessel areas and Remodeling Indices measured by MDCT correlated closely to IVUS (r(2) = 0.77 and r(2) = 0.82, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector spiral CT may permit assessment of remodeling of coronary atherosclerotic lesions in selected data sets of sufficient quality.

Coronary Angiography↗

Quantification of aortic valve calcification with electron beam tomography: a histomorphometric validation study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The exact quantification of the amount of calcification in aortic valves may be useful for the identification of risk factors for the progression of aortic valve calcification and to evaluate new therapeutic approaches for aortic valve disease. Electron beam tomography (EBT) allows the in vivo detection of calcifications in coronary vessels and in the aortic valve. The aim of this study was to validate the quantification of aortic valve calcification by EBT with in vivo and in vitro investigations. METHODS: In 15 patients (aortic stenosis in 13, aortic regurgitation in 2 cases), EBT was performed before aortic valve replacement (40 cross sections, 3-mm slice thickness, matrix 512 x 512, field of view 28 cm, ECG trigger at 40% of the cardiac cycle). EBT was repeated on the explanted aortic valve using the same protocol. In both data sets, the amount of aortic valve calcification was determined using a volumetric score. In serial cuts of the explanted valve (distance 1 mm), the calcified volume was determined by an independent investigator using histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: The mean calcified volume of the aortic valves as quantified by EBT was 1650.0 +/- 1401.0 mmł in vivo (EBT1) and 1544.4 +/- 1266.5 mmł in vitro (EBT2). Histomorphometric analysis showed a mean calcified volume of 1555.7 +/- 1272.5 mmł. The mean difference between EBT1 and EBT2 was 4.2 +/- 14.7%, between EBT1 and histomorphometry 3.6 +/- 12.1%, and between EBT2 and histomorphometry -0.5 +/- 5.9%. CONCLUSION: EBT allows accurate in vivo quantification of aortic valve calcifications.

Aged↗

Association of cardiovascular risk factors to aortic valve calcification as quantified by electron beam computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association among aortic valve calcification, cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary artery calcification using electron beam computed tomography (EBCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed cardiac EBCT data obtained for coronary calcium detection in 1000 consecutively enrolled patients (mean +/- SD age, 57.1 +/- 10 years; 69% men) between January 1, 1998, and July 23, 2001. In all patients, atherosclerotic risk factors (hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and family history of coronary artery disease) were documented. With EBCT, the amount of coronary calcification was determined using the Agatston score, and the amount of aortic valve calcification was measured using a volumetric score. RESULTS: Aortic valve calcification was detected in 177 (17.7%) of the total patient group and was found more frequently in patients with coronary calcification (20.5% in patients with coronary calcium vs 3.8% in patients without coronary calcium; P < .001), hyperlipidemia (19.5% vs 6.5%; P < .001), hypertension (21.7% vs 13.9%; P = .01), or diabetes (30.7% vs 16.6%; P = .002). The volume of aortic valve calcification was significantly higher in patients with vs without hyperlipidemia (P < .001), hypertension (P = .002), and diabetes (P = .001). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex, hyperlipidemia (P = .001) and the presence of coronary calcification (P < .001) were significant predictors of aortic valve calcification. CONCLUSION: A significant association exists among atherosclerotic risk factors, coronary calcification, and the presence and amount of aortic valve calcification.

Aged↗

Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the ability of multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) to detect atherosclerotic plaque in nonstenotic coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 22 patients without significant coronary stenoses, contrast-enhanced MDCT (0.75-mm collimation, 420-ms rotation) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) of one coronary artery were performed. A total of 83 coronary segments were imaged by IVUS (left main, 19; left anterior descending, 51; left circumflex, 4; right coronary, 9). MDCT data sets were evaluated for the presence and volume of plaque in the coronary artery segments. Results were compared with IVUS in a blinded fashion. For the detection of segments with any plaque, MDCT had a sensitivity of 82% (41 of 50) and specificity of 88% (29 of 33). For calcified plaque, sensitivity was 94% (33 of 36) and specificity 94% (45 of 47). Coronary segments containing noncalcified plaque were detected with a sensitivity of 78% (35 of 45) and specificity of 87% (33 of 38), but presence of exclusively noncalcified plaque was detected with only 53% sensitivity (8 of 15). If analysis was limited to the 41 proximal segments (segments 1, 5, 6, and 11 according to American Heart Association classification), sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 88% for any plaque, 95% and 91% for calcified plaque, and 91% and 89% for noncalcified plaque. MDCT substantially underestimated plaque volume per segment as compared with IVUS (24+/-35 mm3 versus 43+/-60 mm3, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate the potential of MDCT to detect coronary atherosclerotic plaque in patients without significant coronary stenoses. However, further improvements in image quality will be necessary to achieve reliable assessment, especially of noncalcified plaque throughout the coronary tree.

Calcinosis↗

Relation between coronary calcium and 10-year risk scores in primary prevention patients.

In 380 patients, coronary calcifications were quantified by electron beam tomography and compared with the predicted 10-year cardiovascular event risk determined by the Framingham equation, Adult Treatment Panel III tables, and the PROCAM algorithm. The correlation between the amount of calcium and the predicted cardiac event risk was low (correlation coefficient range 0.19 to 0.28). The assessment of coronary calcium may thus potentially yield information that is additive to the analysis of traditional risk factors.

Age Factors↗

Quantitative parameters of image quality in multidetector spiral computed tomographic coronary imaging with submillimeter collimation.

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) permits visualization of the coronary arteries, but limited spatial and temporal resolution can lead to artifacts. We quantitatively evaluated the image quality that can be obtained with the latest generation of MDCT scanners with submillimeter collimation and increased gantry rotation speed. Thirty patients with angiographically proved absence of significant coronary artery stenoses (mean age 56 +/- 13 years, mean heart rate 62 +/- 13 beats/min) were studied by MDCT (12 x 0.75 mm collimation, 420-ms tube rotation, 210-ms temporal resolution, 500 mA, 120 kVp, retrospective electrocardiographic gating). In multiplanar reconstructions of the 4 major coronary arteries (left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery), the overall visualized vessel length and the length of segments without motion artifacts were measured. Vessel diameters at 8 predefined locations were measured in MDCT maximum intensity projections and in corresponding invasive angiograms. The mean lengths of visualized coronary arteries were left main 13 +/- 6 mm, left anterior descending 138 +/- 39 mm, left circumflex 84 +/- 34 mm, and right coronary artery 155 +/- 41 mm. On average, 93 +/- 13% of the total visualized vessel length was depicted without motion artifacts (left main 100 +/- 0%, left anterior descending 93 +/- 12%, left circumflex 91 +/- 17%, and right coronary artery 87 +/- 14%). The percentage of vessel length visualized free of motion artifacts was significantly higher in patients with a heart rate </=60 beats/min compared with patients with a heart rate >60 beats/min (96 +/- 8% vs 89 +/- 17%, p <0.05). Vessel diameters in MDCT correlated closely to quantitative coronary angiography (R(2) 0.83 to 0.87). In conclusion, MDCT with submillimeter collimation and improved temporal resolution permits reliable visualization of the vessel lumen and accurate measurements of vessel dimensions.

Analysis of Variance↗

Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the accuracy of multi-detector row spiral computed tomography (MDCT) using a 16-slice CT scanner with improved spatial and temporal resolution, as well as routine premedication with beta-blockers for detection of coronary stenoses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients with suspected coronary disease were studied by MDCT (12x0.75-mm cross-sections, 420 ms rotation, 100 mL contrast agent IV at 5 mL/s). Patients with a heart rate above 60/min received 50 mg atenolol before the scan. In axial MDCT images and multiplanar reconstructions, all coronary arteries and side branches with a diameter of 1.5 mm or more were assessed for the presence of stenoses exceeding 50% diameter reduction. In comparison to invasive coronary angiography, MDCT correctly classified 35 of 41 patients (85%) as having at least 1 coronary stenosis and correctly detected 57 of 78 coronary lesions (73%). After excluding 38 of 308 coronary arteries (left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery in 77 patients) classified as unevaluable by MDCT (12%), 57 of 62 lesions were detected, and absence of stenosis was correctly identified in 194 of 208 arteries (sensitivity: 92%; specificity: 93%; accuracy: 93%; positive and negative predictive values: 79% and 97%). CONCLUSIONS: MDCT coronary angiography with improved spatial resolution and premedication with oral beta-blockade permits detection of coronary artery stenoses with high accuracy and a low rate of unevaluable arteries.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Clinical results of minimally invasive coronary angiography using computed tomography.

Fast, high-resolution CT techniques, such as EBCT and MDCT permit imaging of the coronary arteries. Continuous improvements in the capabilities of both technologies for visualization of the coronary lumen and detection of coronary artery stenoses are being made. Image quality currently is not robust enough in all patients to consider non-invasive coronary angiography by EBCT and MDCT a routine clinical tool. In selected patients and carefully performed, however, they show promise as means to exclude the presence of coronary artery stenoses in a non-invasive fashion. This may become a beneficial and important application of these technologies. Other possible applications pertain to smaller patient subsets, such as patients with anomalous coronary arteries, fistulas or aneurysms. The development of techniques to visualize non-calcified plaque is interesting with respect to assessment of coronary risk, but this requires further investigation.

Coronary Angiography↗

Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the image quality of electron beam tomography (EBT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT) for coronary artery visualization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of 30 patients without coronary stenoses were studied by MSCT (4 x 1 mm collimation) or EBT (3 mm slice thickness). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), overall length of the visualized arteries and vessel length free of motion artifacts were measured. RESULTS: Length of visualized arteries was equal in MSCT and EBT. In EBT, longer segments were depicted free of motion artifacts (MSCT: 73%, EBT: 92% of visualized length, P< 0.001) and CNR was significantly higher than in MSCT (15.4 vs. 9.0; P< 0.001). In both modalities, vessel diameters correlated closely to quantitative coronary angiography. CONCLUSIONS: EBT and MSCT permit reliable coronary artery visualization and measurement of vessel diameters. For the used scan protocol, MSCT images had a lower CNR and were more frequently affected by motion.

Aged↗

Diagnostic value of maximum intensity projections versus source images for assessment of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We compared maximum intensity projections (MIP) versus original source images (SI) in respect to detection of coronary artery stenoses by means of magnetic resonance (MR) coronary angiography. METHODS: MR coronary angiography was performed on 61 patients. MIP and SI were independently evaluated as to presence of significant stenoses in the proximal and midcoronary segments and compared with x-ray angiography. RESULTS: A total of 315 of 427 (74%) coronary artery segments could be evaluated in MIP and 328 of 427 (77%) in SI. In segments able to be evaluated, MIP images demonstrated 84% (54/64) sensitivity and 87% (219/251) specificity, whereas SI images showed 85% (58/68) sensitivity and 90% (235/260) specificity. Overall accuracy was 87% (273/310) for MIP and 89% (293/328) for SI. There was no statistically significant difference between both modalities. CONCLUSIONS: The MIP reconstructions showed comparable accuracy to unprocessed SI. However, MIP postprocessing is compromised by a higher number of images that were unable to be evaluated due to overlap of coronary arteries with adjacent cardiac structures.

Algorithms↗

Comparison of contrast-enhanced breath-hold and free-breathing respiratory-gated imaging in three-dimensional magnetic resonance coronary angiography.

Suppression of respiratory motion is one of the major challenges of magnetic resonance (MR) coronary angiography. Two approaches to compensate for respiratory motion have often been proposed: breath-hold (BH) and free-breathing respiratory-gated (FBRG) imaging. So far, however, these approaches have never been directly compared. MR coronary angiography was performed in 32 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. MR data were acquired using contrast-enhanced BH and FBRG 3-dimensional MR coronary angiographic techniques. MR images were compared with regard to image quality using quantitative parameters and with regard to accuracy for stenosis detection in the proximal and mid-coronary segments in comparison to x-ray angiography. With regard to image quality, BH was superior to FBRG. Signal-to-noise ratio was 29.1 +/- 10.7 for BH versus 18.8 +/- 9.7 for FBRG (p <0.05) and contrast-to-noise was 18.0 +/- 7.4 for BH versus 11.3 +/- 7.9 for FBRG (p </=0.05). One hundered seventy-one of 224 coronary artery segments (76%) were evaluable in BH compared with 155 of 224 in FBRG (69%). In the evaluable segments, BH demonstrated a sensitivity of 87% (26 of 30 stenoses detected) and specificity of 92% (129 of 141 nonstenotic segments correctly identified), whereas FBRG showed a sensitivity of 60% (15 of 25) and specificity of 89% (115 of 130). Overall accuracy was 91% (155 of 171) for BH and 84% (130 of 155) for FBRG. Sensitivity was significantly higher for BH (p = 0.0320), whereas specificity and overall accuracy were not significantly different. Thus, contrast-enhanced BH MR coronary angiography compares favorably to FBRG imaging with regard to image quality and detection of coronary stenoses.

Adult↗

Influence of lipid-lowering therapy on the progression of coronary artery calcification: a prospective evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Coronary calcification measured by fast computed tomography techniques is a surrogate marker of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden. In a cohort study, we prospectively investigated whether lipid-lowering therapy with a cholesterol synthesis enzyme inhibitor reduces the progression of coronary calcification. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 66 patients with coronary calcifications in electron beam tomography (EBT), LDL cholesterol >130 mg/dL, and no lipid-lowering treatment, the EBT scan was repeated after a mean interval of 14 months and treatment with cerivastatin was initiated (0.3 mg/d). After 12 months of treatment, a third EBT scan was performed. Coronary calcifications were quantified using a volumetric score. Cerivastatin therapy lowered the mean LDL cholesterol level from 164+/-30 to 107+/-21 mg/dL. The median calcified volume was 155 mm3 (range, 15 to 1849) at baseline, 201 mm3 (19 to 2486) after 14 months without treatment, and 203 mm3 (15 to 2569) after 12 months of cerivastatin treatment. The median annualized absolute increase in coronary calcium was 25 mm3 during the untreated versus 11 mm3 during the treatment period (P=0.01). The median annual relative increase in coronary calcium was 25% during the untreated versus 8.8% during the treatment period (P<0.0001). In 32 patients with an LDL cholesterol level <100 mg/dL under treatment, the median relative change was 27% during the untreated versus -3.4% during the treatment period (P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the cholesterol synthesis enzyme inhibitor cerivastatin significantly reduces coronary calcium progression in patients with LDL cholesterol >130 mg/dL.

Adult↗

A direct comparison of noninvasive coronary angiography by electron beam tomography and navigator-echo-based magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of restenosis following coronary angioplasty.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare electron beam tomography (EBT) with MR imaging (MRI) for detection of restenosis after coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: One hundred eighteen patients after PTCA were investigated. By EBT, 50 axial images were acquired (3-mm slice thickness, 120-160 mL radiographic contrast agent). MRI was performed using respiratory-gated sequences (24-48 cross-sections, 2-mm slice thickness, 20 mL Gd-DTPA). EBT and MRI images were evaluated concerning high-grade post-PTCA restenosis (> or = 70%) and validated against coronary angiography. RESULTS: In EBT, 28 patients and in MRI, 31 patients were not evaluable. In the remaining patients, sensitivity for restenosis detection was 90% in EBT (17/19) and 73% in MRI (11/15; P = 0.370). In EBT, specificity was significantly higher (66% vs. 49%, P = 0.043). Overall accuracy was 71% for EBT and 53% for MRI (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: For the detection of high-grade restenosis after PTCA, EBT demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than MRI.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection.

OBJECTIVE: Although multidetector CT (MDCT) with retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction has been shown to permit noninvasive visualization of the coronary arteries, the 125-250 msec required for image acquisition frequently causes motion artifacts. We investigated the influence of a patient's heart rate on the presence of motion artifacts and on accuracy of stenosis detection on contrast-enhanced MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 100 patients, MDCT was performed, and ECG-gated cross-sectional images were retrospectively reconstructed. From the 10 data sets obtained for each patient (reconstructed at 0-90% of the cardiac cycle in increments of 10%), we chose the best data set for every coronary artery. The images of the arteries were evaluated for occurrence of artifacts and the presence of high-grade stenosis (diameter reduction exceeding 70%) or occlusions. MDCT results were compared with coronary angiographic findings. RESULTS: Of the 400 coronary arteries, 115 (29%) could not be evaluated because of motion artifacts (n = 84) or other reasons (n = 31). Overall, 51 (49%) of 104 stenoses were revealed on MDCT. For detecting stenosis in those arteries that we could evaluate, MDCT had a sensitivity of 91% (51 of 56 stenoses detected) and a specificity of 89%. As the heart rate increased, the number of arteries that could be evaluated decreased, and overall sensitivity for stenosis detection decreased from 62% (heart rate < or = 70 beats per minute) to 33% (heart rate > 70 beats per minute). CONCLUSION: MDCT can reveal coronary stenoses, but the usefulness of MDCT as an aid in accurately evaluating stenoses decreases as a patient's heart rate increases.

Adult↗