Biomedical subjects

Diana Faulds

Publications and source records attributed to Diana Faulds.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Ximelagatran/Melagatran: a review of its use in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery.

UNLABELLED: Ximelagatran (Exanta), the first available oral direct thrombin inhibitor, and its active form, melagatran, have been evaluated in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. After oral administration ximelagatran is rapidly bioconverted to melagatran. Melagatran inactivates both circulating and clot-bound thrombin by binding to the thrombin active site, thus, inhibiting platelet activation and/or aggregation and reducing fibrinolysis time. The efficacy of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran has been investigated in four European trials and the efficacy of an all oral ximelagatran regimen has been investigated in five US trials. In a dose-ranging European study, preoperatively initiated subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg twice daily followed by oral ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was significantly more effective than subcutaneous dalteparin sodium 5000IU once daily in preventing the occurrence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. In one study, there were no significant differences in VTE prevention between subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg administered after surgery followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily and enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) 40 mg once daily. Compared with enoxaparin, significantly lower rates of proximal DVT and/or PE (major VTE) and total VTE were observed when melagatran was initiated preoperatively (2mg) then postoperatively (3mg) and followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily. In the US, four studies showed that postoperatively initiated ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was of similar efficacy to enoxaparin or warfarin in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. However, ximelagatran 36 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin (target international normalised ratio of 2.5) at preventing the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing total knee replacement in two studies.Ximelagatran alone or after melagatran was generally well tolerated. Overall, the incidence of bleeding events and transfusion rates were not markedly different from those documented for comparator anticoagulants. In a post-hoc analysis of one study, transfusion rates were lower in ximelagatran than enoxaparin recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ximelagatran alone or in conjunction with subcutaneous melagatran has shown good efficacy and was generally well tolerated in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, patients receiving ximelagatran/melagatran do not require anticoagulant monitoring. The drug has a low potential for drug interactions and can be administered either by subcutaneous injection or orally. Thus, on the basis of available evidence, ximelagatran/melagatran appears poised to play an important role in the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed2003

Pantoprazole: an update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of acid-related disorders.

Pantoprazole (Protonix) is an irreversible proton pump inhibitor (PPI) that reduces gastric acid secretion. In combination with two antimicrobial agents (most commonly metronidazole, clarithromycin or amoxicillin) for 6-14 days, pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily produced Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of 71-93.8% (intent-to-treat [ITT] or modified ITT analysis) in patients without known antibacterial resistance. Pantoprazole-containing triple therapy was at least as effective as omeprazole- and similar in efficacy to lansoprazole-containing triple therapy in large trials. In the treatment of moderate to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), oral pantoprazole 40 mg/day was as effective as other PPIs (omeprazole, omeprazole multiple unit pellet system, lansoprazole and esomeprazole) and significantly more effective than histamine H(2)-antagonists. Pantoprazole 20 mg/day provided effective mucosal healing in patients with GORD and mild oesophagitis. Intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg/day can be used in patients who are unable to take oral medication. Oral pantoprazole 20-40 mg/day for up to 24 months prevented relapse in most patients with healed GORD. According to preliminary data, oral pantoprazole 20 or 40 mg/day was effective at healing and preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related ulcers, and intravenous pantoprazole was at least as effective as intravenous ranitidine in preventing ulcer rebleeding after endoscopic haemostasis. Oral or intravenous pantoprazole up to 240 mg/day maintained target acid output levels in most patients with hypersecretory conditions, including Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Oral and intravenous pantoprazole appear to be well tolerated in patients with acid-related disorders in short- and long-term trials. Tolerability with oral pantoprazole was similar to that with other PPIs or histamine H(2)-antagonists in short-term trials. Formal drug interaction studies have not revealed any clinically significant interactions between pantoprazole and other agents. In conclusion, pantoprazole is an effective agent in the management of acid-related disorders. As a component of triple therapy for H. pylori eradication and as monotherapy for the healing of oesophagitis and maintenance of GORD, pantoprazole has shown similar efficacy to other PPIs and greater efficacy than histamine H(2)-antagonists. Limited data suggest that it is also effective in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and in preventing ulcer rebleeding. Pantoprazole is well tolerated with minimal potential for drug interactions. The availability of pantoprazole as both oral and intravenous formulations provides flexibility when the oral route of administration is not appropriate. Thus, pantoprazole is a valuable alternative to other PPIs in the treatment of acid-related disorders.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2002

Airmax: a multi-dose dry powder inhaler.

Airmax is a multi-dose dry powder inhaler. An internal pump measures out the drug dose using controlled air pressure. Inhalation transports the drug into a cyclone separator (where active drug is separated from the lactose carrier) and then into the patient airway. In vitro studies indicate that Airmax may be less dependent on airflow than Turbuhaler for drug delivery; greater dose consistency was seen with administration of budesonide via Airmax than via Turbuhaler. At a low flow rate, the lung deposition of budesonide administered via Airmax was greater than that of budesonide administered via Turbuhaler or a pressurised metered dose inhaler in patients with asthma. In cumulative-dose studies, the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) achieved with salbutamol (albuterol) or formoterol administered via Airmax was equivalent to that achieved with twice the dose administered via dry powder inhalers. black triangle In randomised, double-blind studies, budesonide administration via Airmax was equivalent to administration via Turbuhaler with regards to FEV(1) and improvement in asthma symptoms in both adults and children with asthma. The concentration of adenosine monophosphate producing a 20% fall in FEV(1) increased from pretreatment levels by a greater extent with budesonide administered via Airmax, compared with Turbuhaler. Both adults and children preferred Airmax to Turbuhaler, and more found Airmax easier to use. In one study, the majority of children found learning how to use Airmax trade mark easier than learning how to use Turbuhaler.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed2002

Gefitinib.

Gefitinib (ZD1839) is an orally active selective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, an enzyme that regulates intracellular signalling pathways implicated in the proliferation and survival of cancer cells. In human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines and xenografts, gefitinib dose-dependently inhibited cellular proliferation and tumour growth, and potentiated the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy and/or radiation. Gefitinib is orally bioavailable and is cleared via the cytochrome P450 3A4 pathway. In patients receiving gefitinib (50 to 700 mg/day) in phase I trials, steady-state plasma concentration was reached in 7 to 10 days. In patients with advanced NSCLC who had failed one or two prior chemotherapies, gefitinib 250 or 500mg once daily induced an objective response in approximately 19% of patients in a double-blind trial (n = 210). In another double-blind trial including 216 patients with NSCLC who had failed two or more prior chemotherapies, gefitinib 250 or 500mg once daily induced an objective response in 11.8 and 8.8% of patients, respectively; approximately 40% showed an improvement in disease-related symptoms. Gefitinib was generally well tolerated and the most common adverse events were mild skin rashes and diarrhoea.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1993

Cyclosporin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in immunoregulatory disorders.

Cyclosporin is a lipophilic cyclic polypeptide which produces calcium-dependent, specific, reversible inhibition of transcription of interleukin-2 and several other cytokines, most notably in T helper lymphocytes. This reduces the production of a range of cytokines, inhibiting the activation and/or maturation of various cell types, including those involved in cell-mediated immunity. Thus, cyclosporin has immunosuppressive properties, and has a proven place as first line therapy in the prophylaxis and treatment of transplant rejection. Cyclosporin has also been evaluated in a large range of disorders where immunoregulatory dysfunction is a suspected or proven aetiological factor, and this is the focus of the present review. In patients with severe disease refractory to standard treatment, oral cyclosporin is an effective therapy in acute ocular Behçet's syndrome, endogenous uveitis, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, active Crohn's disease and nephrotic syndrome. Concomitant low dose corticosteroid therapy may improve response rates in some disorders. The drug can be considered as a first line therapy in patients with moderate or severe aplastic anaemia who are ineligible for bone marrow transplantation, with the additional benefit of reducing platelet alloantibody titres. It may also be of considerable therapeutic benefit in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, particularly those with less advanced disease. Limited evidence suggests cyclosporin is effective in patients with intractable pyoderma gangrenosum, polymyositis/dermatomyositis or severe, corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Indeed, the steroid-sparing effect of cyclosporin is a significant advantage in a number of indications. Furthermore, the drug has shown some efficacy in a wide range of other, generally uncommon disorders in which controlled clinical trials are lacking and/or are unlikely to be performed. Cyclosporin does not appear to be effective in patients with allergic contact dermatitis, multiple sclerosis or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. It is only temporarily effective in patients with type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and should not be used in this indication. To avoid relapse after control of active disease, patients should receive cyclosporin maintenance therapy at the lowest effective dosage. However, maintenance therapy appears to be of no benefit in patients with Crohn's disease and cyclosporin should be discontinued in these patients once active disease is controlled. Hypertrichosis, gingival hyperplasia, and neurological and gastrointestinal effects are the most common adverse events in cyclosporin recipients, but are usually mild to moderate and resolve on dosage reduction. Changes in laboratory variables indicating renal dysfunction are relatively common, although serious irreversible damage is rare.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

PubMed1993

Interleukin-2. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in patients with cancer.

Recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) products (e.g. aldesleukin, teceleukin) are nonglycosylated, modified forms of the endogenous compound. IL-2 acts as a pleiotropic mediator within the immune system, having a variety of effects via specific cell surface receptors. The interaction of IL-2 with the IL-2 receptor induces proliferation and differentiation of a number of T lymphocyte subsets, and stimulates a cytokine cascade that includes various interleukins, interferons and tumour necrosis factors. Antitumour effects of IL-2 appear to be mediated by its effects on natural killer, lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) and other cytotoxic cells. In vivo and in vitro effects of IL-2 seem to be dependent to a large extent on the environment; many studies have reported conflicting results, perhaps due to diverse populations of effector cells, the availability of other cytokines that have synergistic or inhibitory influences, and the dosage regimens used. The recombinant products appear to be biologically indistinguishable from native IL-2 in vitro and in vivo; the former induce minor antibody formation but this does not appear to alter functional properties. In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, IL-2 therapy achieves average objective response rates of 20% (range 0 to 40%), with a complete response rate of about 5% (range 0 to 19%). Response duration varies considerably but can be durable (lasting for > 12 months), with some patients remaining in complete response for > 60 months. It is unclear at present whether higher dosage regimens improve clinical response, or whether combination therapy with other agents and/or adoptive therapy is beneficial. Survival duration may depend on the risk factors present, with poorer performance status and more than one site of metastases associated with shorter survival times. Patients with metastatic malignant melanoma receiving IL-2 as monotherapy show an average objective response rate of 13% (range 3 to 24%); however, objective response rate averages 30% (range 4 to 59%) when IL-2 is used in combination with other agents. Overall median survival appears to be about 10 months. Preliminary data indicate that IL-2 produces a lower response rate in patients with refractory colorectal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, bladder cancer, acute myeloid leukemia or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Adverse effects accompanying high dose, intravenous IL-2 therapy can be severe, with cardiovascular, pulmonary, haematological, hepatic, neurological, endocrine, renal and/or dermatological complications frequently requiring doses to be withheld.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗