Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Derek H Arnold

Publications and source records attributed to Derek H Arnold.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Spatially localized distortions of event time.

A fundamental question about the perception of time is whether the neural mechanisms underlying temporal judgements are universal and centralized in the brain or modality specific and distributed. Time perception has traditionally been thought to be entirely dissociated from spatial vision. Here we show that the apparent duration of a dynamic stimulus can be manipulated in a local region of visual space by adapting to oscillatory motion or flicker. This implicates spatially localized temporal mechanisms in duration perception. We do not see concomitant changes in the time of onset or offset of the test patterns, demonstrating a direct local effect on duration perception rather than an indirect effect on the time course of neural processing. The effects of adaptation on duration perception can also be dissociated from motion or flicker perception per se. Although 20 Hz adaptation reduces both the apparent temporal frequency and duration of a 10 Hz test stimulus, 5 Hz adaptation increases apparent temporal frequency but has little effect on duration perception. We conclude that there is a peripheral, spatially localized, essentially visual component involved in sensing the duration of visual events.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2005

Motion induced spatial conflict following binocular integration.

When a moving border defined by small changes in luminance (or by differences in colour) is placed in close proximity to moving borders defined by large changes in luminance, the low contrast border can appear to jitter. Previously, the existence and characteristics of this phenomenon were established using subjective reports. Here, we show that spatial judgments become more difficult in the presence of illusory jitter, presumably because of the positional uncertainty that is induced. We also explore the influence of the distance between the different types of moving border. We find that this manipulation influences the salience and amplitude, but not the perceived rate, of illusory jitter. Finally, we show that illusory jitter remains when the different types of moving border are presented to different eyes. These observations suggest that this phenomenon arises at the cortical level and are consistent with our earlier proposal--that illusory jitter can occur because the visual system periodically resolves a spatial conflict that arises when a rigid moving object contains different apparent speeds.

Color Perception↗
PubMed2005

Perceptual pairing of colour and motion.

Observers often pair colours with earlier periods of motion. This observation has prompted the proposal that changes in colour are processed faster and perceived as occurring before physically coincident changes in direction--a brain-time account. Alternatively, it has been proposed that the sudden onset of a surface, or a direction reversal within a persistent surface, can trigger an analysis that determines the perceptual properties of the surface. Hypothetically, this analysis persists for some period of time and the consequences are perceived as having occurred when the analysis commenced--a post-dictive account. Hypotheses based upon these alternate accounts are contrasted in a series of experiments. It is shown that the optimal conditions for pairing specific combinations of colour and motion arise when colour changes are delayed relative to direction changes. In these conditions observers can pair more rapid oscillations of colour and motion and perceptual pairings are more systematic relative to when the changes in colour and direction are physically synchronous. It is also shown that, when pairing colour and motion, the sudden onset of a moving surface does not have the same consequences as a direction reversal within a persistent surface. These findings are consistent with the brain-time, but are inconsistent with the post-dictive, account of perceptual asynchrony.

Color Perception↗
PubMed2004

Timing sight and sound.

It has been proposed that there is a perceptual compensation for the difference between the speeds of light and sound. We examined this possibility using a range of auditory-visual tasks, in which performance depends on the relative timing of auditory and visual information, and manipulated viewing distance to test for perceptual compensation. We explored auditory-visual integration, cross modal causal attributions, and auditory-visual temporal order judgments. We observed timing shifts with viewing distance following loudspeaker, but not headphone, presentations. We were unable to find reliable evidence of perceptual compensation. Our findings suggest that auditory and visual signals of an event that reach an observer at the same point in time tend to become perceptually bound, even when the sources of those signals could not have occurred together.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2003

Motion-induced spatial conflict.

Borders defined by small changes in brightness (luminance contrast) or by differences in colour (chromatic contrast) appear to move more slowly than those defined by strong luminance contrast. As spatial coding is influenced by motion, if placed in close proximity, the different types of moving border might appear to drift apart. Using this configuration, we show here that observers instead report a clear illusory spatial jitter of the low-luminance-contrast boundary. This visible interaction between motion and spatial-position coding occurred at a characteristic rate (approximately 22.3 Hz), although the stimulus motion was continuous and invariant. The jitter rate did not vary with the speed of movement. The jitter was not due to small involuntary movements of the eyes, because it only occurred at a specific point within the stimulus, the low-luminance-contrast boundary. These findings show that the human visual system contains a neural mechanism that periodically resolves the spatial conflict created by adjacent moving borders that have the same physical but different perceptual speeds.

Color↗
PubMed2003

A paradox of temporal perception revealed by a stimulus oscillating in colour and orientation.

Psychophysical experiments with stimuli oscillating concurrently in colour and orientation revealed an apparently paradoxical dissociation between the perceived simultaneity of stimulus changes and the perceptual pairing of the events demarked by those changes. When subjects were required to report whether changes in colour and orientation were simultaneous, judgements were generally accurate within +/-10 ms. When subjects were required to report which colour was paired predominantly with which orientation, judgements showed a systematic temporal bias of up to 50 ms in favour of colour. This dissociation between different temporal judgements concerning the same stimulus sequence is not predicted by any of the current models of binding in conscious vision. We propose an account of these data based on the temporal response properties of colour- and orientation-selective model neurons such that the perceived pairing of visual attributes is modelled as the cross-correlation of time-varying neural response profiles and thus reflects both neuronal latencies and the rate of rapid adaptation rather than simply the temporal pattern of responses to stimulus transitions.

Color↗
PubMed2003

Latency differences and the flash-lag effect.

The tendency for briefly flashed stimuli to appear to lag behind the spatial position of physically aligned moving stimuli is known as the flash-lag effect. Possibly the simplest explanation for this phenomenon is that transient stimuli are processed more slowly than moving stimuli. We tested this proposal using a task based upon the simultaneous tilt illusion. When an oriented stimulus is surrounded by another oriented stimulus, the inner stimulus can appear to be rotated away from the orientation of the surround. By flashing central static sinewave gratings at specific phases of an annular gratings rotation cycle, we were able to determine the temporal dependence of the tilt illusion. Our results suggest a small, approximately 20 ms, processing advantage for the rotating stimulus relative to the flashed stimulus. Such a small advantage, if due to differential latencies, is insufficient to account for the flash-lag effect.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Determinants of asynchronous processing in vision.

When a stimulus oscillates in both colour and direction of motion, changes in colour must lag behind those in direction if they are to be seen as concurrent. It has been argued that this lag is the consequence of asynchronous visual processing, with colour being processed more rapidly than motion. This proposal is contentious: it has been criticized on the basis that the time-course of cortical activity may not correlate directly with that of perceptual experience. Here, we demonstrate that the extent of the apparent asynchrony can vary according to the prevailing stimulus conditions. The apparent asynchrony is greatest if the stimulus is composed of opponent directions of motion and is reduced if the angular difference between the directions is reduced. This pattern of results suggests that asynchronous neural activity arises, in part, as a consequence of differential levels of inhibition within relatively independent cortical structures.

Color Perception↗