Biomedical subjects

Dennis Deapen

Publications and source records attributed to Dennis Deapen.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Racial differences in the familial aggregation of breast cancer and other female cancers.

Although breast cancer familial aggregation has been studied in Caucasians, information for African-Americans is scant. We used family cancer history from the Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences study to assess the aggregation of breast and gynecological cancers in African-American and Caucasian families. Information was available on 41,825 first and second-degree relatives of Caucasian and 28,956 relatives of African-American participants. We used a cohort approach in which the relative's cancer status was the outcome in unconditional logistic regression and adjusted for correlated data using generalized estimating equations. Race-specific models included a family history indicator, the relative's age, and type. Relative risk (RR) estimates for breast cancer were highest for first-degree relatives, and the overall RR for breast cancer among case relatives was 1.96 (95% CI = 1.68-2.30) for Caucasian and 1.78 (95% CI = 1.41-2.25) for African-Americans. The effect of CARE participants' reference age on their relatives' breast cancer risk was greatest among first-degree relatives of African-American patients with RRs (95% CI) for ages <45 and > or =45 of 2.97 (1.86-4.74) and 1.48 (1.14-1.92), respectively. Among Caucasians, first-degree relatives of case subjects were at greater risk for ovarian cancer, particularly relatives younger than 45 years (RR (95% CI) = 2.06 (1.02-4.12)), whereas African-American first-degree relatives of case subjects were at increased cervical cancer risk (RR (95% CI) = 2.17 (1.22-3.85). In conclusion, these racially distinct aggregation patterns may reflect different modes of inheritance and/or environmental factors that impact cancer risk.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between cancer stage, surgical treatment and chemotherapy on quality of life (QOL) after breast cancer and determine if sociodemographic characteristics modify the observed relationships. METHODS: A population-based sample of women with Stages 0-II breast cancer in the United States (N = 1357) completed surveys including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and the Breast Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ BR-23). Regression models calculated mean QOL scores across primary surgical treatment and chemotherapy. Clinically significant differences in QOL were defined as > or = 10 point difference (out of 100) between groups. RESULTS: Meaningful differences in QOL by surgical treatment were limited to body image with women receiving mastectomy with reconstruction reporting lower scores than women receiving breast conserving surgery (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy lowered QOL scores overall across four QOL dimensions (p values < 0.001), with a disproportionately greater impact on those with lower levels of education. Younger women reported lower QOL scores for seven of nine QOL dimensions (p values < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women should be reassured that few QOL differences exist based on surgical treatment, however, clinicians should recognize that the impact of treatment on QOL does vary by a woman's age and educational level.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Residential mobility in the California Teachers Study: implications for geographic differences in disease rates.

BACKGROUND: Especially for cancers with long latency periods, such as breast cancer, the issue of residential mobility hinders ecologic analyses seeking to examine the role of environmental contaminants in chronic disease etiology. This study describes and evaluates characteristics associated with residential mobility in a sub-sample of the California Teachers Study (CTS) cohort. METHODS: In 2000, lifetime residential histories were collected for a sub-sample of 328 women enrolled in the CTS; women's degree of residential mobility and associated factors were analyzed. RESULTS: While most women moved many times during their lives (average = 8.9), the average number of years at their residence when they enrolled in the study was reasonably long (15.1 years). Age strongly predicted duration at current residence but was not related to the number of lifetime residences. After adjusting for age, California-born women and women living in high socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhoods were significantly more residentially stable. Agreement between self-reported urbanization of recent residences and that based on census data of the geocoded residences was very good (80% concordant). Among women currently living in urban areas, an average of 43.3 years, or 77%, of their lifetimes were spent in urban residences; among women currently living in a rural area, an average of 37.3 years, or 67% of their lifetimes were spent in rural residences. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that analyses of incidence rates based on current residence, while not capturing a woman's full exposure history, may reasonably reflect some aspect of longer term chronic exposures, especially those related to urbanization, at least in professional women.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Racial/Ethnic differences in functional outcomes in the 5 years after diagnosis of localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated racial/ethnic differences in functional outcomes up to 5 years after diagnosis among men with aggressively treated localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study, a population-based cohort study that surveyed patients at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after diagnosis. Analyses were stratified by primary treatment. Racial/ethnic differences at each time point were assessed using Generalized Estimating Equations, adjusting for pretreatment function, age at diagnosis, secondary treatment, and other confounders. An adjusted summary score for each functional domain was calculated for each time period. RESULTS: Patients included 1,475 non-Hispanic white, 321 African-American, and 279 Hispanic prostate cancer patients. After 60 months, among prostatectomy patients, African-Americans had significantly higher sexual function scores than non-Hispanic whites (43.9 v 36.1; P = .02), but were more likely to have a moderate to big problem with sexual function (50.6% v 44.4%; P = .04). African-Americans also had higher urinary function scores at 5 years than non-Hispanic whites (78.5 v 72.4; P = .04) and were less likely to have problems with incontinence. Changes in sexual and bowel function after radiotherapy showed no significant racial/ethnic differences. CONCLUSION: This long-term cohort study found that, among prostatectomy patients, African-Americans had better recovery of sexual and urinary function at 60 months after diagnosis that was likely to be of mild clinical significance, despite reporting more problems with sexual function than non-Hispanic whites. More study is necessary to understand reasons for these differences. In contrast, no racial/ethnic differences in recovery from radiotherapy were found.

Black or African American↗

PubMed2004

Reproductive factors and risk of breast carcinoma in a study of white and African-American women.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the association between reproductive factors and the risk of breast carcinoma among African-American women. The authors assessed whether the number of full-term pregnancies, age at first full-term pregnancy, and total duration of breastfeeding were associated with similar relative risk estimates in white and African-American women in a large multicenter, population-based case-control study of breast carcinoma. METHODS: Case patients were 4567 women (2950 white women and 1617 African-American women) ages 35-64 years with newly diagnosed invasive breast carcinoma between 1994 and 1998. Control patients were 4668 women (3012 white women and 1656 African-American women) who were identified by random-digit dialing and were frequency matched to case patients according to study center, race, and age. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: For white women, the reduction in risk of breast carcinoma per full-term pregnancy was 13% among younger women (ages 35-49 years) and 10% among older women (ages 50-64 years). The corresponding risk reductions for African-American women were 10% and 6%, respectively. Risk decreased significantly with increasing number of full-term pregnancies for both races and both age categories. Duration of lactation was inversely associated with breast carcinoma risk among younger parous white (trend P = 0.0001) and African-American (trend P = 0.01) women. African-American women tended to have more children compared with white women, but parity rates were lower in younger women than in older women in both racial groups. However, breastfeeding was substantially more common in young white women than in young African-American women. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, parity and lactation had similar effects on breast carcinoma risk in white and African-American women. If younger African-American women now are giving birth to fewer children than in the past, without a substantial increase in breastfeeding, breast carcinoma rates may continue to increase at a more rapid rate among these women compared with white women.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Active smoking, household passive smoking, and breast cancer: evidence from the California Teachers Study.

BACKGROUND: There is great interest in whether exposure to tobacco smoke, a substance containing human carcinogens, may contribute to a woman's risk of developing breast cancer. To date, literature addressing this question has been mixed, and the question has seldom been examined in large prospective study designs. METHODS: In a 1995 baseline survey, 116 544 members of the California Teachers Study (CTS) cohort, with no previous breast cancer diagnosis and living in the state at initial contact, reported their smoking status. From entry into the cohort through 2000, 2005 study participants were newly diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for breast cancer associated with several active smoking and household passive smoking variables using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Irrespective of whether we included passive smokers in the reference category, the incidence of breast cancer among current smokers was higher than that among never smokers (HR = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10 to 1.57 relative to all never smokers; HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.53 relative to only those never smokers who were unexposed to household passive smoking). Among active smokers, breast cancer risks were statistically significantly increased, compared with all never smokers, among women who started smoking at a younger age, who began smoking at least 5 years before their first full-term pregnancy, or who had longer duration or greater intensity of smoking. Current smoking was associated with increased breast cancer risk relative to all nonsmokers in women without a family history of breast cancer but not among women with such a family history. Breast cancer risks among never smokers reporting household passive smoking exposure were not greater than those among never smokers reporting no such exposure. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that active smoking may play a role in breast cancer etiology and suggests that further research into the connection is warranted, especially with respect to genetic susceptibilities.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Absence of an effect of injectable and implantable progestin-only contraceptives on subsequent risk of breast cancer.

Animal data indicate that both estrogens and progestins could be carcinogenic and that progestins could serve as tumor promoters. Human studies have not confirmed an increased risk of breast cancer from long-term use of oral contraceptives, but have shown an increased risk from hormone replacement therapy including progestins. The present study analyzed the relationship between breast cancer and use of injectable and implantable progestin-only contraceptives. Analyses were performed on data collected in a population-based, multicenter, case-control study, the Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The study involved 4575 randomly sampled cases with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1994 and 1998, and 4682 controls, identified using random digit dialing. We assessed the association between exposure to injectable contraceptives and risk of breast cancer. The use of injectable contraceptives was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7, 1.2]. Risk was not increased among current users, defined as women who used injectable contraceptives within 1 year of the reference date (OR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4, 1.3) or those who initiated use in the 5 years immediately preceding the reference date (OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.5, 1.4), or with use beginning before age 35 (OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.6, 1.3). Among users, risk increased with increasing duration of use (p = 0.03). However, short-term users (<6 months duration) were at decreased risk relative to never users (OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4, 1.0). When the short-term users were then excluded from the duration-response analysis, the slope of the duration-response became slightly (and nonsignificantly) negative. Risk was not increased among women with 24 or more months of use relative to never users (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.8, 2.5). No increased risk was seen from implantable contraceptives either, although the sample sizes were small. This study does not support an increased risk of breast cancer associated with the use of injectable or implantable progestin-only contraceptives in women aged 35 to 64.

Absorbable Implants↗

PubMed2004

Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and incidence of breast cancer in the California Teachers Study cohort.

We examined the association between residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and breast cancer incidence among members of the California Teachers Study cohort, a large study of professional school employees with extensive information on breast cancer risk factors, followed for cancer incidence since 1995. We identified 1552 invasive breast cancer cases, diagnosed between 1996 and 1999, among 114,835 cohort members. We used California Pesticide Use Reporting data to select pesticides for analysis based on use volume, carcinogenic potential, and exposure potential; a Geographic Information System was used to estimate pesticide applications within a half-mile radius of subjects' residences. We applied Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard rate ratios (HR) for selected pesticides, adjusting for age, race, and socioeconomic status. We saw no association between residential proximity to recent agricultural pesticide use and invasive breast cancer incidence. HR estimates for the highest compared to the lowest exposure categories for groups of agents were as follows: probable or likely carcinogens (1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-1.32), possible or suggestive carcinogens (1.06, 95% CI: 0.87-1.29), mammary carcinogens (1.15, 95% CI: 0.90-1.48), and endocrine disruptors (1.03, 95% CI: 0.86-1.25). HR estimates for other groups and individual pesticides did not differ from unity, nor was there a trend for any groupings of or individual pesticides examined. Stratifying by menopausal status or family history of breast cancer did not substantially affect our results. Our analyses suggest that breast cancer incidence is not elevated in areas of recent, high agricultural pesticide use in California.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Correlates of active and passive smoking in the California Teachers Study cohort.

OBJECTIVES: These analyses were designed to describe characteristics associated with active and passive smoking in a large cohort of women in order to identify possible confounders of the relationship between smoking exposures and breast cancer risk. METHODS: Analyses were based on 1995 data collected from the California Teachers Study (CTS) and were restricted to those with complete and usable tobacco data (n = 128,174). Age-adjusted and race-adjusted odds ratios (OR) were generated by unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with never smokers, both current and former smokers experienced menarche at an earlier age. Current and former smokers also were more likely than their never smoking counterparts to be nulliparous. Among parous women, current, but not former smokers were less likely than never smokers to have had their first child at an older age. Similarly, among never smokers, those exposed to household passive smoking experienced menarche at an earlier age, were more likely to be nulliparous, and among parous women, were less likely to have had their first child at an older age than never smokers not exposed to passive smoking. Greater alcohol consumption was strongly associated with both active and passive smoking exposures. Compared with never smokers, current smokers were less likely to take antioxidant supplements, whereas former smokers were more likely to take antioxidant supplements. Among never smokers, antioxidant use did not differ depending on passive smoking exposure. A number of other dietary correlates of active and passive smoking were identified. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a number of reproductive and dietary correlates to smoking exposures that underscore the need to adjust for such factors in an analysis of smoking and breast cancer and potentially other disease entities. Furthermore, these findings may suggest potential mechanisms underlying an association between breast cancer and smoking.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Regional variations in breast cancer among california teachers.

BACKGROUND: Observed regional differences in breast cancer incidence could provide valuable clues to the etiology of this disease. The pattern of historically higher breast cancer rates among residents of California's San Francisco Bay and Southern Coastal areas is evident in the disease experience among members of the California Teachers Study. This large cohort study has followed female professional school employees for cancer incidence since 1995 and has collected extensive information on breast cancer risk factors. METHODS: Between 1996 and 1999, invasive breast cancer was diagnosed in 1562 of the 115,611 cohort members who could be geocoded to a California address in 1995 and who had no previous breast cancer diagnosis. Adjusted hazard rate ratios (HRs) were estimated through multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Rates were higher for cohort members in the San Francisco Bay area (HR = 1.22; 95% confidence interval = 1.06-1.40) and Southern Coastal area (1.16; 1.04-1.30) compared with those in the rest of California. The distributions of variables representing socioeconomic status, urbanization, and personal risk factors were consistent with higher risks for cohort members residing in the San Francisco Bay and Southern Coastal areas. Adjustment for these factors, however, did not explain regional differences in incidence, resulting in HRs that remained elevated for these 2 areas. CONCLUSION: Regional differences in breast cancer incidence in this large, well-defined cohort are not easily explained by known risk factors.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Patterns of alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort.

Alcohol consumption of approximately two drinks or more per day has been associated with elevated breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort as well as in many other populations. The objective of this analysis is to examine effects of age at drinking and drinking patterns and to identify effect modifiers. Of the 103,460 at-risk cohort members, age <85, who resided in California and completed the baseline alcohol assessment, 1,742 were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer after joining the cohort and before January 2001. Incident breast cancers were identified through the California Cancer Registry and follow-up for death and confirmation of continued California residence used various sources. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate relative risks (RRs). Elevated breast cancer risk was most evident for recent drinking [RR = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.54 for >/=20 g/day versus nondrinkers], with no clear pattern for consumption during earlier periods of life. This elevation in risk was 32% among postmenopausal women (95% CI: 1.06-1.63) and 21% among pre/perimenopausal women (95% CI: 0.76-1.92). Highest risks associated with heavy alcohol consumption were observed among postmenopausal women with a history of biopsy-diagnosed benign breast disease (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.39-2.79 compared to nondrinkers without benign breast disease) or who had used combination hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (RR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.59-3.14 compared to nondrinkers who never used HRT). Recent alcohol consumption equivalent to two or more drinks per day increases the risk of invasive breast cancer, with the greatest RRs observed among heavy drinkers who are also postmenopausal and have a history of benign breast disease or who use HRT.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Validating California teachers study self-reports of recent hospitalization: comparison with California hospital discharge data.

Determining an accurate method of obtaining complete morbidity data is a long-standing challenge for epidemiologists. The authors compared the accuracy and completeness of existing California hospital discharge data with self-reports of recent hospitalizations and surgeries from participants in the California Teachers Study. Self-reports were collected by questionnaire in 1997 from 91433 female teachers and administrators residing in California. Of the 13430 hospital discharge diagnoses identified for these women, cohort members reported 58%. Self-reporting was highest for neoplasms and musculoskeletal and connective tissue diseases and was most accurate for scheduled admissions, more recent admissions, longer lengths of stay, and less severe disorders. Hospitalizations for mental health and infectious disease were not as well reported. Among the 26383 self-reports-including outpatient surgeries, which are not captured by the hospital discharge database-confirmation was lower, as expected, especially for disorders of the nervous system and sense organs and skin and subcutaneous tissue. Confirmation was highest for childbirth admissions. The hospital discharge database was more specific, but the self-reports were more comprehensive, since many conditions are now treated in outpatient settings. The combination of self-reports and secondary medical records provides more accurate and complete morbidity data than does use of either source alone.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Childbearing and survival after breast carcinoma in young women.

BACKGROUND: Many young patients with breast carcinoma have not started, or completed, their desired families. How childbearing after a diagnosis of breast carcinoma affects survival is of importance to these women and their families. The authors measured relative mortality among young patients with breast carcinoma with and without births occurring after diagnosis. METHODS: The authors conducted a cohort study using data from three population-based cancer registries in the U.S. (Seattle, Detroit, and Los Angeles), linked to birth certificate data in each state. Four hundred thirty-eight women younger than 45 years of age with primary invasive breast carcinoma were identified as having births after diagnosis. In addition, 2775 comparison women, matched on the basis of age at the time of diagnosis, race/ethnicity, diagnosis year, disease stage, and presence of previous nonbreast primary tumors, were identified among those with breast carcinoma without births after diagnosis. Relative mortality was assessed using multivariable statistical methods. RESULTS: After adjustment for stage of disease, age at diagnosis, study region, diagnosis year, and race/ethnicity, women with births occurring 10 months or more after diagnosis had a significantly decreased risk of dying (relative Risk [RR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.71) compared to women without subsequent births. Women pregnant at the time of diagnosis had a mortality rate similar to those who did not give birth (RR = 1.10, 95% CI, 0.80-1.60). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study, in light of growing evidence from other studies using various methods, may provide some reassurance to young women with breast carcinoma that subsequent childbearing is unlikely to increase their risk of mortality.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

General quality of life 2 years following treatment for prostate cancer: what influences outcomes? Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between primary treatment, urinary dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, and general health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in prostate cancer. METHODS: A sample of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 1994 and 1995 was randomly selected from six population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. A baseline survey was completed by 2,306 men within 6 to 12 months of diagnosis, and these men also completed a follow-up HRQOL survey 2 years after diagnosis. Logistic regression models were used to determine whether primary treatment, urinary dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction were independently associated with general HRQOL outcomes approximately 2 years after diagnosis as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey. The magnitude of this effect was estimated using least square means models. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, primary treatment was not associated with 2-year general HRQOL outcomes in men with prostate cancer. Urinary function and bother were independently associated with worse general HRQOL in all domains. Sexual function and bother were also independently associated with worse general HRQOL, although the relationship was not as strong as in the urinary domains. CONCLUSION: Primary treatment is not associated with 2-year general HRQOL outcomes in prostate cancer. Although both sexual and urinary function and bother are associated with quality of life, men who are more bothered by their urination or impotence are more likely to report worse quality of life. This implies that future research should be directed toward finding ways to improve treatment-related outcomes or help patients better cope with their posttreatment urinary or sexual dysfunction.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Combined effect of oral contraceptive use and hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: We examined breast cancer risk related to lifetime exposure to oral contraceptives (OCs) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. METHODS: The Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences (CARE) Study was a population-based case-control study that included 1847 postmenopausal women with incident invasive breast cancer, and 1932 control subjects, identified using random digit dialing. RESULTS: 45% of cases and 49% of controls used both OCs and HRT. OC users were not at increased risk regardless of subsequent HRT exposure. HRT users who had used OCs previously did not have a higher risk of breast cancer than women with no exposure to OCs. We observed a negative interaction (p-value: 0.032) of combined hormone replacement therapy (CHRT) and past OC use. The increase in risk with CHRT was stronger in women who had never used OCs in the past (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.10 per year of exclusive CHRT use) than in women who had used OCs (odds ratio: 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: We found no indication that adverse effects of exposure to OCs or HRT appeared only in the presence of the other hormone or were exacerbated by exposure to the other hormone.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Breast cancer: do specialists make a difference?

BACKGROUND: Many believe that breast cancer should be treated by specialists. We studied the effect of surgeon and hospital specialization on survival after breast cancer treatment in a large, well-defined patient population. METHODS: The Cancer Surveillance Program database for Los Angeles County was reviewed. Between 1990 and 1998, 43,411 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed, of which 29,666 had complete data on surgeon, hospital, and staging information. Patients were stratified on the basis of surgeon and hospital specialization, as well as by age, race, stage, surgical procedure, and surgeon and hospital case volume. An analysis of survival and its dependence on these factors was performed. RESULTS: Age, race, socioeconomic status, tumor size, nodal status, extent of disease, surgeon specialization, surgeon case volume, and hospital case volume were all associated with 5-year survival after diagnosis of breast cancer. Treatment at a specialty center did not affect survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that type of surgeon was an independent predictor of survival (relative risk,.77), as were both hospital and surgeon case volume. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment by a surgical oncologist resulted in a 33% reduction in the risk of death at 5 years. The effect of surgical specialization cannot be entirely attributed to volume effects.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Association of regimens of hormone replacement therapy to prognostic factors among women diagnosed with breast cancer aged 50-64 years.

This study was conducted to assess the histopathological features of breast cancers in women diagnosed with breast cancer at 50-64 years of age who have and have not used hormone replacement therapy (HRT). A case-case analysis of the tumors from women aged 50-64 years who participated in a multicenter population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer was conducted. In-person interviews collected a detailed history of all episodes of hormone use. Information was collected on selected tumor characteristics from 2346 women with breast cancer. Polytomous logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), contrasting the histopathological characteristics of the tumors of women who used various regimens of HRT with those of women who have never used HRT. The tumors of cases who used each regimen of HRT were smaller and of earlier stage than those of non-HRT users. Adjustment for screening diminished the magnitude of the effect, and only cases who used estrogen alone (estrogen replacement therapy) had reduced odds of being diagnosed with later-stage disease (regional or distant) than cases who never used HRT (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9). Higher proportions of estrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumors were seen in cases who used any regimen of HRT versus those who did not use HRT. However, after adjustment for age and race, only the tumors of cases who used continuous combined HRT remained more likely to be ER+ and PR+ [OR ER- = 0.6 (95% CI, 0.4-0.9) and OR PR- = 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.7)]. The tumors of women with breast cancer who used HRT have some better prognostic factors than those of women who have not used HRT. However, with the exception of the results noted above, this advantage may be due to the racial and age differences in those who use the various regimens of HRT and the effect of more frequent screening among HRT users, leading to earlier diagnosis.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2002

Relation of regimens of combined hormone replacement therapy to lobular, ductal, and other histologic types of breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of invasive lobular carcinoma has been increasing among postmenopausal women in some parts of the United States. Part of this may be due to changes in classification over time. However, the use of combined (estrogen and progestin) hormone replacement therapy (CHRT) also has increased during the last decade and may account in part for the increase in invasive lobular breast carcinoma. METHODS: A large, multicenter case-control study of Caucasian and African-American women who were diagnosed at age < 65 years with their first invasive breast tumor from July 1, 1994 through April 30, 1998 was conducted. In-person interviews were conducted with 1749 postmenopausal patients, and their responses were compared with the responses of 1953 postmenopausal control women identified through random-digit dialing who met the study criteria of being postmenopausal at the time of diagnosis. Polytomous logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) as an estimate of the relative risk and to compute the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) associated with the use of various regimens of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among women diagnosed with ductal breast carcinoma, lobular (or mixed lobular and ductal) breast carcinoma, and a grouping of other histologic types of breast carcinoma. RESULTS: Ever use of unopposed estrogen therapy (ERT) was not associated with an increase in the risk of any histologic type of breast carcinoma. The risk of invasive lobular breast carcinoma and the risk of breast carcinoma of the grouping of other histologies increased among women currently using CHRT (OR, 2.2; 95%CI, 1.4-3.3; and OR, 1.9; 95%CI, 1.0-3.4, respectively). The risk increase was greater for the mixed lobular-ductal type than for the pure lobular type of breast carcinoma, although the difference was not statistically significant. There was some indication that >or= 5 years of continuous CHRT (>or= 25 days per month of progestin) was associated with a higher risk of lobular breast carcinoma (OR, 2.5; 95%CI, 1.4-4.3) compared with sequential CHRT (< 25 days per month of progestin; OR, 1.5; 95%CI, 0.8-2.6). Current use of continuous CHRT was only moderately associated with risk of ductal breast carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women who take CHRT appear to be at an increased risk of lobular breast carcinoma. Data from this study suggest that neither ERT use nor CHRT substantially increase the risk of ductal breast carcinoma among women age < 65 years.

Adult↗