Biomedical subjects

Dennis A Revicki

Publications and source records attributed to Dennis A Revicki.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Patient-based utilities for bipolar disorder-related health states.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder is a psychiatric disorder which impacts patient functioning and well-being. With increasing interest in cost-effectiveness of treatments, it is necessary to provide estimates of patient's perspectives on treatment outcomes. This study estimated health state utilities for hypothetical bipolar-related health states and patient's current health from bipolar I patients. METHODS: Clinicians completed Young Mania Rating Scale, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and Global Assessment Score. Patients completed structured standard gamble (SG) utility assessment interviews, and the other patient-based measures. Interviews obtained utilities for hypothetical bipolar-related health states describing symptom severity, functioning and well-being, and treatment-related side effects. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were recruited from psychiatry outpatient practices. Mean utilities for inpatient states ranged from 0.12 to 0.33; outpatient mania states ranged from 0.29 to 0.64; outpatient stable states ranged from 0.53 to 0.85. Mean utility for current health was 0.80 (S.D.=0.22). Patients preferred monotherapy compared with combination therapy health states. Ordinary least squares regression indicated weight gain was associated with a 0.066 decrease in health state utilities (P=0.013). LIMITATIONS: Study sample consisted of selected stable and educated patients and small sample sizes may limit generalizability for some utilities. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar disorder patients are capable of participating in utility assessment and providing ratings for hypothetical health states associated with different mood stabilizer treatments.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Prevalence and socioeconomic impact of upper gastrointestinal disorders in the United States: results of the US Upper Gastrointestinal Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study examined the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and symptom groupings and determined impact on disability days in a nationally representative US sample. METHODS: A telephone survey of 21,128 adults was conducted including questions about the presence of upper GI symptoms during the past 3 months. Respondents were categorized as symptomatic (ie, reported GI symptoms once per month) or asymptomatic. The survey included questions about missed work, leisure activity, or household activity days. Symptom groupings were identified by using factor analysis, and cluster analysis was used to assign respondents into distinct groups on the basis of these symptom groupings. RESULTS: The prevalence of an average of 1 or more upper GI symptoms during the past 3 months was 44.9%. The most common symptoms experienced during the past 3 months were early satiety, heartburn, and postprandial fullness. Factor analysis identified 4 symptom groupings: (1) heartburn/regurgitation; (2) nausea/vomiting; (3) bloating/abdominal pain; and (4) early satiety/loss of appetite. Five respondent clusters were identified; the largest clusters were primarily early satiety/fullness (44%) and gastroesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms (28%). Two small clusters reflected nausea and vomiting (7%) and a heterogeneous symptom profile (4%). Symptomatic respondents reported significantly more missed work, leisure, and household activity days than asymptomatic respondents (all P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Factor analysis separated GI symptoms into groupings reflecting gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia: early satiety, postprandial fullness, and loss of appetite; bloating and abdominal pain/discomfort; and nausea and vomiting. These upper GI symptoms were associated with significant loss of work and activity days.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Patient satisfaction with budesonide Turbuhaler versus triamcinolone acetonide administered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler in a managed care setting.

Dissatisfaction with medication may negatively affect compliance and thus the effectiveness of the treatment. However, no prospective well-controlled studies have assessed the relative patient satisfaction with competing inhaled corticosteroids in a real-life setting. The objective of the current study was to compare the relative patient satisfaction with budesonide inhalation powder administered via Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE) (200 to 1600 microg/d using one of 3 dosing strengths: 100, 200, or 400 microg per inhalation) and triamcinolone acetonide administered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (200 to 1600 microg/d) among persons treated in managed care settings. A total of 945 subjects 18 years of age or older diagnosed with asthma and enrolled in 25 managed care organizations participated in this prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, 12-month study. As part of the study, subjects completed a self-administered, 17-item patient satisfaction questionnaire that addressed 4 domains: side effects, knowledge/ease of use, convenience, and overall satisfaction. Questionnaire reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and validity was examined by correlating subscale scores with symptom-free days and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores. The satisfaction questionnaire also included a previously validated section addressing patient compliance. Patients receiving budesonide had significantly higher scores for all four satisfaction subscales throughout the study period than did those receiving triamcinolone acetonide. Similarly, compliance scores were consistently higher for the budesonide group. The difference between the treatment groups in overall satisfaction scores at the end of the study was clinically meaningful. Patients treated with budesonide were significantly more satisfied and compliant with their inhaled corticosteroid regimen compared with patients treated with triamcinolone acetonide.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed2005

Assessing symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease: how well do clinicians' assessments agree with those of their patients?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the extent of agreement between clinicians and patients regarding assessments of reflux symptom severity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: Data were analyzed from four randomized clinical trials involving 2,674 patients treated with esomeprazole, omeprazole, ranitidine, or placebo. The extent of agreement was determined for symptom severity before and after 4-8 wk of treatment, and for the absence of symptoms after treatment. Agreement was further analyzed by determining weighted kappa values, which were interpreted according to the criteria of Landis and Koch. RESULTS: Before treatment, clinician-patient agreement regarding symptom severity in the four studies was slight to moderate (kappa: 0.17-0.53); 48-52% of assessments agreed for heartburn, 24-35% for epigastric pain, 36-43% for regurgitation, and 63% agreed for dysphagia. Poor agreement reflected clinician underestimation of symptom severity relative to patient ratings in three studies and clinician overestimation in one study. Agreement regarding symptom severity improved following treatment, and was fair to substantial (kappa: 0.31-0.73); 58-78% of assessments agreed for heartburn, 42-60% for epigastric pain, 66-76% for regurgitation, and 86% agreed for dysphagia. After treatment, agreement was greatest for patients reporting absence of symptoms and decreased with increasing severity of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between clinicians and patients in their assessments of the severity of reflux symptoms is poor, particularly before treatment and for more severe symptoms. Improvements in clinician-patient communication may help to bridge this gap, and greater reliance on patient assessments may be appropriate.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2005

Bipolar disorder and health-related quality of life : review of burden of disease and clinical trials.

Bipolar disorder is a chronic psychiatric disorder with a variable course and significant impact on patients' social, occupational, and general functioning and wellbeing. Although there are effective pharmaceutical and psychosocial interventions for patients with bipolar disorder, many patients receive poor-quality care. Prospective longitudinal studies demonstrate that less than half of bipolar disorder patients have a good long-term response to treatment, long-term outcome is highly variable, and many patients do not fully recover. There is substantial evidence that bipolar disorder is associated with significant impairment to functioning and wellbeing.However, few clinical trials comparing treatments for bipolar disorder have incorporated health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) assessments. Existing studies suggest that, while treatment improves HR-QOL, there is limited evidence for differences between the mood stabilisers in terms of HR-QOL outcomes. Additional clinical trials are needed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes associated with the most frequently used pharmacological treatments to determine whether there are meaningful differences between treatments. There are challenges in measuring HR-QOL in patients with acute mania, and future studies should assess the psychometric qualities of HR-QOL instruments in these and other bipolar disorder patients. HR-QOL outcome data may be useful in informing psychiatrists, patients and patient family members of the effects of treatment for bipolar disorder on patients' everyday lives, functioning and wellbeing.

Antimanic Agents↗

PubMed2005

Efficacy of olanzapine and ziprasidone for the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review.

It is difficult to determine the relative efficacy of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia, based on the available literature. The purpose of this article is to review and compare the efficacy of two atypical antipsychotics: olanzapine and ziprasidone.This review focused on randomised trials in which these two antipsychotics were compared with placebo, conventional antipsychotics and each other. Common efficacy measures were the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms. When sufficient data were available, the mean treatment effect (with 95% confidence intervals) was computed and presented. Olanzapine was consistently found to be significantly superior to placebo and comparable with, or superior to, haloperidol for the treatment of overall, positive and negative schizophrenic symptoms. Ziprasidone appears to have significantly greater efficacy than placebo for overall and negative symptoms, but it remains uncertain whether ziprasidone is comparable in efficacy with conventional antipsychotics such as haloperidol. Two unpublished clinical trials have directly compared olanzapine and ziprasidone. One of these trials found no significant efficacy differences between the two drugs, whereas the results of the other study favoured olanzapine. Compared with ziprasidone, olanzapine has a larger body of evidence supporting its efficacy, and a greater proportion of findings for olanzapine have been published, allowing for greater scrutiny of results. Both drugs appear to be superior to placebo for the treatment of overall and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but olanzapine generally compares more favourably with conventional antipsychotics. Firm conclusions regarding the comparison between olanzapine and ziprasidone require additional published trials on ziprasidone, particularly in direct comparison with olanzapine.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed2004

Cross-cultural development and validation of a patient self-administered questionnaire to assess quality of life in upper gastrointestinal disorders: the PAGI-QOL.

OBJECTIVE: Summarize the Patient Assessment of Upper GastroIntestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL) development and provide results on its reliability and validity from the international psychometric validation in dyspepsia, GastroEsophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), and gastroparesis. METHODS: Subjects completed the pilot PAGI-QOL at baseline and 8 weeks; and a subsample also at 2 weeks. Other assessments were: Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index, SF-36, number of disability days. RESULTS: 1736 patients completed the PAGI-QOL at baseline. The questionnaire was reduced, producing a 30-item final version covering five domains: Daily Activities, Clothing, Diet and Food Habits, Relationship (REL), and Psychological Well-Being and Distress. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha range: 0.83-0.96). Test-retest reproducibility was good: intraclass correlations coefficients were over 0.70 except for the REL scale (0.61). Concurrent validity between the PAGI-QOL total score and all SF-36 subscale scores was good with moderate (0.52) to strong (0.72) correlations. PAGI-QOL scores showed excellent discriminant properties: patients who had spent some days in bed, had missed some days at work, and were kept from usual activities had much lower PAGI-QOL scores than those who did not (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The PAGI-QOL is a valid and reliable instrument assessing quality of life in patients with dyspepsia, GERD, or gastroparesis.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗

PubMed2004

Responsiveness and interpretation of a symptom severity index specific to upper gastrointestinal disorders.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Determining clinically meaningful change of patient-reported outcome measures is important for evaluating effectiveness of treatments for gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. This study evaluates responsiveness of the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia. METHODS: The PAGI-SYM was based on a review of the published literature and interviews with patients and clinicians. Items were developed to be linguistically and culturally appropriate for multicountry studies. The PAGI-SYM includes 6 subscales: heartburn/regurgitation, fullness/early satiety, nausea/vomiting, bloating, upper abdominal pain, and lower abdominal pain. Subjects with GERD (n = 810) or dyspepsia (n = 767) participated in this multicountry, observational study. All subjects completed the PAGI-SYM, a global symptom relief questionnaire, and a measure of patient-rated change in GI-related symptoms, the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) scale. Responsiveness was evaluated at 8 weeks by comparing groups by disease, symptom relief, and OTE (improved, stable, and worsened). RESULTS: Subjects reporting symptom relief reported significantly lower (better) PAGI-SYM scores than those reporting no symptom relief ( P < 0.0001 to P < 0.0005). Subjects with improvements in overall GI symptoms exhibited significant decreases in PAGI-SYM subscale scores compared with those who remained the same or worsened (all P values < 0.0001). Effect sizes ranged from 0.21-1.28, and standard errors of measurement ranged from 0.29-0.63, depending on subscale and disease sample. CONCLUSIONS: The PAGI-SYM is a brief symptom severity instrument that measures common GI symptoms. Results suggest that the PAGI-SYM is responsive and sensitive to change in clinical status in subjects with GERD or dyspepsia.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Responsiveness and interpretation of a quality of life questionnaire specific to upper gastrointestinal disorders.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL) has been developed and validated to assess quality of life in gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia, and gastroparesis. The aim of this work was to assess responsiveness of the PAGI-QOL to clinical changes and provide guidance for the interpretation of score changes. METHODS: The analysis was based on 2 observational multicenter, longitudinal, 8-week observation studies, one in the United States and one in 5 European countries. The Overall Treatment Effect scale completed by patients and clinicians at 8 weeks was used to define groups of improved, worsened, and stable patients. Responsiveness was assessed by describing the change in PAGI-QOL scores for each of these groups, comparing these changes over time, and calculating effect sizes and standardized response means. These data were used to define the minimal clinically important difference. RESULTS: A total of 1736 patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders were analyzed. High sensitivity to change over time was demonstrated, with effect sizes and standardized response means in improved patients for the PAGI-QOL total score ranging from 0.79-1.41. A change of 0.4 for the PAGI-QOL total score might be considered as the minimal clinically important difference when comparing pretreatment and post-treatment PAGI-QOL total scores. CONCLUSIONS: The PAGI-QOL questionnaire is a responsive and clinically relevant instrument for assessing quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI): development and validation of a patient reported assessment of severity of gastroparesis symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Patient-rated symptom assessments are needed for evaluating the effectiveness of medical treatments and for monitoring outcomes in gastroparesis. OBJECTIVE: This paper summarizes the development and psychometric evaluation of a new instrument, the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), for assessing severity of symptoms associated with gastroparesis. METHODS: The GCSI was based on reviews of the medical literature, patient focus groups, and interviews with clinicians. A sample of 169 patients with a documented diagnosis of gastroparesis participated in the psychometric evaluation study. Patients completed the GCSI, the SF-36 Health Survey, and disability days questions at baseline and after 8 weeks. A randomly selected sub-sample of 30 subjects returned at 2 weeks to assess test retest reliability. Clinicians rated severity of symptoms, and both clinicians and patients rated change in gastroparesis-related symptoms over the 8 week study. RESULTS: The GCSI is based on three subscales: post-prandial fullness/early satiety (4 items); nausea/vomiting (3 items), and bloating (2 items). Internal consistency reliability was 0.84 for the GCSI total score and ranged from 0.83 to 0.85 for the subscale scores. Two week test retest reliability was 0.76 for the total score and ranged from 0.68 to 0.81 for subscale scores. Construct validity was supported, given that we observed significant relationships between clinician assessed symptom severity and GCSI total score, significant differences between gastroparesis and dyspepsia patients (n = 760) on GCSI total (p < 0.0001) and subscale scores (p < 0.03 to p < 0.0001), moderate and significant relationships between GCSI total and SF-36 scores, and significant associations between GCSI total score and reports of restricted activity and bed disability days. Patients with greater symptom severity, as rated by clinicians, reported more symptom severity on GCSI total score. GSCI total scores were responsive to changes in overall gastroparesis symptoms as assessed by clinicians (p < 0.0001) and patients (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that the GCSI is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring symptom severity in patients with gastroparesis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

The impact of diabetic retinopathy: perspectives from patient focus groups.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) affects 50-85% of people with diabetes and may result in visual impairment or blindness. OBJECTIVE: This exploratory qualitative research was conducted to evaluate the symptom experience of DR, its impact on daily activities and health-related quality of life (HRQL), and the applicability of two vision-specific questionnaires. METHODS: Four focus groups (n = 15) were conducted with people with DR to explore their symptom experience and the impact on functioning and HRQL. Adults with type I or II diabetes and mild, moderate or severe non-proliferative DR (NPDR) or proliferative DR (PDR) were recruited. Content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Participants described a range of symptoms and impact. Difficulty driving, especially at night, and trouble reading were noted with all levels of severity. Participants with PDR and decreased visual acuity have foregone many other important life aspects such as work, reading and sports. For the severely affected, diabetic care activities (e.g. exercising, reading nutritional labels, preparing insulin injections and glucose testing) were difficult to accomplish. Loss of independence, especially mobility and increased fear of accidents, had a profound impact on social activities. For those patients who had not experienced other complications of diabetes, the threat of vision loss was the most devastating. CONCLUSION: The loss of independence and mobility associated with decreased visual functioning and visual loss were major concerns. Moderate, severe NPDR and PDR associated with visual impairment have a significant impact on HRQL, particularly in the areas of independence, mobility, leisure and self-care activities.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2004

The link between health-related quality of life and clinical symptoms among children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Clinical research on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has begun to integrate measures of health-related quality of life (HRQL) as part of the overall assessment of treatment outcomes. This study examines the association between HRQL and measures of clinical symptoms of ADHD. Data were gathered from 297 children and adolescents in an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of atomoxetine treatment for ADHD. HRQL was assessed with the Child Health Questionnaire 50-item Parent Form. ADHD symptoms were assessed with the ADHD Rating Scale-IV; Parent Version and Clinical Global Impressions-ADHD-Severity. Associations between HRQL and clinical symptoms were assessed with correlations, analyses of variance with post hoc comparisons, and t tests. The Child Health Questionnaire 50-item Parent Form scales assessing psychosocial domains of HRQL were significantly negatively correlated with clinical measures. Improvement in clinical symptoms was associated with corresponding improvement in psychosocial aspects of HRQL. The findings suggest that HRQL instruments can add important information to efficacy measures in clinical trials of ADHD treatment.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Health-related quality of life improves with treatment-related GERD symptom resolution after adjusting for baseline severity.

Severity and frequency of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) related symptoms are associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). This study evaluated the association between baseline heartburn severity and endpoint HRQL of patients treated for heartburn and the relationship between complete resolution of heartburn symptoms and HRQL outcomes after controlling for baseline severity. We completed a secondary analysis of clinical symptom and HRQL data from three clinical trials in adult patients receiving either omeprazole or ranitidine treatment for GERD. HRQL was assessed using the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB) in each of the three clinical trials, and two of the trials also included the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep disturbance scale. Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated using either the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale or a modified version of the scale. Baseline heartburn severity (none/minor, mild, moderate or severe) was defined based on patient-reported symptoms. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to compare mean HRQL scores by baseline level of heartburn symptom severity and whether or not patients experienced complete heartburn resolution. At baseline, PGWB scores were significantly worse (p < 0.05) for patients with more severe heartburn symptoms. There were no statistically significant baseline severity by symptom resolution interactions in any of the ANCOVA models. For all three trials and across all follow-up assessments, mean PGWB scores were statistically significantly higher for patients with completely resolved heartburn symptoms versus those whose symptoms were unresolved (all p-values < 0.05). Few significant effects were observed for sleep disturbance scores. While the severity of heartburn symptoms at the start of medical treatment for GERD is not associated with improvements in HRQL in subsequent weeks of treatment, complete resolution of symptoms is associated with improvements in psychological well-being.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Two Phase III randomized controlled clinical trials were conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of weekly subcutaneous administration of efalizumab for the treatment of psoriasis. Patient reported measures of psoriasis-related functionality and health-related quality of life and of psoriasis-related symptom assessments were included as part of the trials. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the patient reported outcome measures that were used in the trials - the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Psoriasis Symptom Assessment (PSA) Scale, and two itch measures, a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) itch measure. METHODS: Subjects aged 18 to 70 years with moderate to severe psoriasis for at least 6 months were recruited into the two clinical trials (n = 1095). Internal consistency reliability was evaluated for all patient reported outcomes at baseline and at 12 weeks. Construct validity was evaluated by relations among the different patient reported outcomes and between the patient reported outcomes and the clinical assessments (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; Overall Lesion Severity Scale; Physician's Global Assessment of Change) assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks, as was the change over the course of the 12 week portion of the trial. RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.86 to 0.95 for the patient reported outcome measures. The patient reported outcome measures were all shown to have significant construct validity with respect to each other and with respect to the clinical assessments. The four measures also demonstrated significant responsiveness to change in underlying clinical status of the patients over the course of the trial, as measured by the independently assessed clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The DLQI, the PSA, VAS, and the NPF are considered useful tools for the measurement of dermatology-related limitations of functional ability and the frequency, severity and impact of psoriasis symptoms on patients' lives and psoriasis-related quality of life.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Treating depression in predominantly low-income young minority women: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Impoverished minority women experience a higher burden from depression than do white women because they are less likely to receive appropriate care. Little is known about the effectiveness of guideline-based care for depression with impoverished minority women, most of whom do not seek care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of an intervention to deliver guideline-based care for depression compared with referral to community care with low-income and minority women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized controlled trial conducted in the Washington, DC, suburban area from March 1997 through May 2002 of 267 women with current major depression, who attended county-run Women, Infants, and Children food subsidy programs and Title X family planning clinics. Outcomes Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measured monthly from baseline through 6 months; instrumental role functioning (Social Adjustment Scale) and social functioning (Short Form 36-Item Health Survey) measured at baseline and 3 and 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to an antidepressant medication intervention (trial of paroxetine switched to buproprion, if lack of response) (n = 88), a psychotherapy intervention (8 weeks of manual-guided cognitive behavior therapy) (n = 90), or referral to community mental health services (n = 89). RESULTS: Both the medication intervention (P<.001) and the psychotherapy intervention (P =.006) reduced depressive symptoms more than the community referral did. The medication intervention also resulted in improved instrumental role (P =.006) and social (P =.001) functioning. The psychotherapy intervention resulted in improved social functioning (P =.02). Women randomly assigned to receive medications were twice as likely (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-4.27; P =.057) to achieve a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 7 or less by month 6 as were those referred to community care. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline-concordant care for major depression is effective for these ethnically diverse and impoverished patients. More women engaged in a sufficient duration of treatment with medications compared with psychotherapy, and outcome gains were more extensive and robust for medications.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Health-related quality-of-life outcomes of sirolimus-treated kidney transplant patients after elimination of cyclosporine A: results of a 2-year randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This study compared 2-year health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) outcomes of sirolimus (SRL)-treated kidney transplant patients after elimination of cyclosporine A (CsA) to patients continuing on a combined CsA and SRL regimen. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, clinical trial was performed in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Four hundred thirty kidney transplant patients were randomly assigned to sirolimus plus steroids (ST) (n=215) or SRL and CsA+ST (n=215) therapy after 3 months of combined SRL+CsA+ST treatment. HRQL was measured using the Kidney Transplant Questionnaire (KTQ) and the SF-36 Health Survey at month 3 (time of randomization) and months 12 and 24 after transplantation. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance was used to evaluate treatment differences in HRQL scores over the 2-year period. RESULTS: HRQL scores were available for 361 (86%) eligible study patients. Statistically significant treatment-by-assessment time interactions, favoring SRL+ST, were found on KTQ Fatigue (P=0.0158) and Appearance scores (P=0.0007). No treatment differences were observed in KTQ Physical Symptom, Uncertainty-Fear, and Emotion scores. Statistically significant treatment-by-assessment time interactions were observed for SF-36 Vitality scores (P=0.0203) but not other SF-36 scores (P>0.05). For Vitality scores, the SRL+ST group remained stable (mean, 0.4-point change) from month 3 to month 24 compared with decreases in the SRL+CsA+ST group (mean, -6.5-point change). CONCLUSIONS: SRL-based therapy with early elimination of CsA results in fewer appearance-related problems, less fatigue, and better vitality compared with continuous treatment with SRL, CsA, and ST.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Depression with atypical features in the National Comorbidity Survey: classification, description, and consequences.

BACKGROUND: Atypical depression has been found to be distinct from other types of depression in terms of psychiatric symptom profile and treatment response. However, debate continues regarding its specific characteristics, impact, and diagnostic criteria. The current study was conducted to increase understanding of atypical depression diagnosed using only the reversed vegetative symptoms of hypersomnia and hyperphagia. METHODS: An atypical depression group (n = 304 [36.4% of the depressed sample; 39.0% when weighted to approximate the national population]) was identified within the US National Comorbidity Survey, which assessed psychiatric disorders among a nationally representative sample using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. The atypical group was identified based on DSM-III-R criteria for a major depressive episode, in addition to atypical features of hypersomnia and hyperphagia. Comparison groups were those with nonatypical depression (n = 532) and individuals without a psychiatric disorder (n = 4071). RESULTS: Compared with nonatypical depression, atypical depression was associated with a greater percentage of women and an earlier age of onset. The atypical group also reported higher rates of most depressive symptoms, suicidal thoughts and attempts, psychiatric comorbidity (panic disorder, social phobia, and drug dependence), disability and restricted activity days, use of some health care services, paternal depression, and childhood neglect and sexual abuse (P<.05). Compared with people without psychiatric disorders, the atypical group reported higher rates of disability and restricted activity days, use of all mental health care services, parental depression, and childhood abuse (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of a nationally representative US sample suggests that overeating and oversleeping can be used to identify an atypical depression subgroup that is distinct from other depressed patients in terms of demographics, psychiatric comorbidities, and abuse history. Findings also suggest that atypical depression is associated with increased distress, suicidal ideation, and disability compared with nonatypical depression.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2003

Evaluating effects of method of administration on Walking Impairment Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent claudication resulting from peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can substantially impair walking function. The Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) assesses patient self-reported difficulty in walking. Currently this questionnaire is validated for interviewer administration only. Since this can be burdensome in a large clinical trial, we examined the effects of alternative methods of administration on patient responses on the WIQ. METHODS: The WIQ, which consists of four subscales (pain severity, distance, speed, stairs), was modified to be self-administered or interviewer-administered by telephone. Patients with PAD were recruited from two sites and randomized into two groups: in group 1 the WIQ was self-administered, then telephone-administered; in group 2 the WIQ was telephone-administered, then self-administered. The two administrations occurred 4 to 7 days apart. Additional measures (SF-36, EQ-5D, and PAD symptom scale) and clinical data were included to further assess the validity of the WIQ and symptoms in patients with claudication. Telephone interviews were conducted by trained interviewers using standardized scripts. Two-week test-retest reliability was assessed for both the self-administered WIQ (group 1) and the telephone-administered WIQ (group 2). RESULTS: Sixty patients were recruited at two sites (n = 30 per group). Seventy-eight percent were men; mean patient age was 67.1 years; and 83% of patients were white. Mean duration of PAD symptoms was 6.8 years. No significant differences were observed in WIQ subscale scores between self administration and telephone administration. No interaction effects between order and method of administration were detected. Cronbach alpha for distance, speed, and stair-climbing subscales ranged from 0.82 to 0.94. Correlations among WIQ subscales and the symptom scale were good (r = -0.34 to -0.57). Correlations of WIQ subscales with physical health subscales of the SF-36 (r = 0.24-0.59) were higher than for mental health-related subscales (r = 0.08-0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The modified WIQ demonstrated good reliability and validity with both methods of administration. These results suggest that the self-administered and telephone-administered versions of the WIQ can be used reliably and efficiently in clinical trials.

Aged↗