Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Debabrata Mukherjee

Publications and source records attributed to Debabrata Mukherjee.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Peripheral arterial disease in patients with end-stage renal disease: observations from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease are at high risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aims of the present study were to describe the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and its effects on prognosis and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in an international cohort of patients on hemodialysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), a prospective, international, observational study of hemodialysis patients (n=29,873), were analyzed. Associations between baseline clinical variables and PAD were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Cox regression models were used to test the association between PAD and risk for all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and hospitalization. PAD was diagnosed in 7411 patients (25.3%) with significant geographic variation. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors including age, male sex, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking were identified, together with the duration of hemodialysis, as significant correlates of PAD. Diagnosis of PAD was associated with increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]=1.36; P<0.0001), cardiac mortality (HR=1.43; P<0.0001), all-cause hospitalization (HR=1.19; P<0.0001), and hospitalization for a major adverse cardiovascular event (HR=2.05; P<0.0001). HRQOL questionnaires revealed physical health scores that were significantly lower in PAD compared with non-PAD patients (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PAD is common in hemodialysis patients and is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization and reduced HRQOL.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Outcome of multivessel coronary intervention in the contemporary percutaneous revascularization era.

Clinical outcomes after multivessel versus single-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the era of stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and clopidogrel pretreatment have not been well studied. Thus, we compared outcomes from the Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial (TARGET) for patients who underwent multivessel versus single-vessel PCI and separately considered the effect of acute coronary syndromes on the results. Composite clinical outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) were evaluated at 30 days and 6 months and mortality at 1 year. Safety analysis included in-patient major and minor bleeding. Despite similar baseline characteristics, patients who underwent multivessel PCI (n = 775) had significantly higher 30-day and 6-month composite event rates than did those who were treated in a single coronary artery territory (n = 3,969). This association remained significant at 30 days (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.33, p = 0.025) after using propensity matching to minimize confounding factors. The higher event rate was primarily due to an increase in periprocedural myocardial infarction. However, there were no significant differences in propensity-matched ischemic outcomes at 6 months and 1 year or in bleeding. In addition, in a propensity-matched analysis that included 810 patients with acute coronary syndrome, multivessel stenting resulted in numerically more ischemic events than did single-vessel stenting, although this did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 2.05, p = 0.221). In conclusion, multivessel PCI was more often associated with periprocedural myocardial infarction than single-vessel intervention, although this did not translate into higher 1-year mortality. A randomized trial comparing multivessel PCI with staged or surgical revascularization is warranted.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2006

Association of peripheral artery disease with treatment and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend the use of secondary prevention modalities for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and coronary artery disease. The effect of prior PAD on the treatment and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), however, is not well characterized. The objectives of this study were to assess treatment practices and hospital outcomes in patients with ACS and prior PAD. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 41,108 patients aged > or =18 years with ACS and enrolled in the large multinational GRACE between 1999 and 2004. RESULTS: Of the 41,108 patients, 4003 (9.7%) had prior PAD. Patients with PAD were older, more likely to be men, to have a variety of prior comorbidities, and to present with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and a higher Killip class than patients without PAD. Patients with PAD were less likely to be treated with effective cardiac medications than patients without PAD. At the time of hospital presentation, patients with prior PAD had low rates of use of beneficial cardiac medications, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, aspirin, beta-blockers, and lipid-lowering agents. Patients with PAD were significantly more likely to experience the composite hospital end point (death, shock, recurrent angina, stroke) than patients without prior PAD (adjusted OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior PAD received less aggressive treatment with proven cardiac medications during hospitalization for an ACS than patients without PAD. Utilization of beneficial medical therapies in patients with PAD before hospitalization with ACS was also less than optimal. Given the poorer hospital outcomes in patients with PAD, our findings suggest considerable opportunity to improve care for these high-risk patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Impact of drug-eluting stents on outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on chronic dialysis are at heightened risk for target vessel revascularization (TVR) after coronary stenting. However, ESRD patients were excluded from the trials that demonstrated the superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stents (BMS) in reducing TVR. We sought to identify the impact of stent type (DES versus BMS) on TVR and other cardiac adverse events in ESRD patients. METHODS: The study included 89 consecutive ESRD patients who underwent coronary stenting and were followed for greater than or equal to 9 months. TVR was the primary endpoint, and the secondary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and TVR. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to adjust for differences in clinical and procedural characteristics. RESULTS: DES were used in 24 and BMS in 65 patients. The stent diameter was smaller (p = 0.008), but the stent length was longer (p = 0.006) in the DES group. TVR was required in 1 (4%) of DES and 17 (26%) BMS patients, while 8 (33%) DES and 39 (60%) BMS patients met the secondary endpoint. By multivariate logistic regression, DES use was associated with a significant reduction in TVR (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.006-0.844; p = 0.036) and a significant reduction in death, MI and TVR (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.022-0.513; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: A high rate of ischemic events was noted for ESRD patients, regardless of stent type. However, in ESRD patients undergoing coronary revascularization, DES use is effective in reducing 9-month TVR and the composite of death, MI and TVR.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Does a coxib-associated thrombotic risk limit the clinical use of the compounds as analgesic anti-inflammatory drugs? Arguments in favor.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors (coxibs) are commonly used as analgesic and anti-inflammatory agents. Selective COX-2 inhibitors or coxibs were primarily developed as a response to the gastrointestinal toxicity of conventional NSAIDs but may have other side effects. Currently available data suggests definite prothrombotic risk with the coxibs, and the magnitude of risk may vary with individual agents. Based on available data, coxibs should be restricted to use as 2nd-line, possibly as 3rd-line, agents for carefully chosen patients and randomized trials versus placebo or an accepted comparator must be performed to define the overall safety profile in diverse patient populations. The recently announced Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety vs. Ibuprofen or Naproxen (PRECISION) trial will assess the relative cardiovascular safety of three of the most commonly used pain relievers in the treatment of arthritis patients, ibuprofen, naproxen and celecoxib. The study will enroll patients with osteoarthritis, the most common form of arthritis, who have known coronary heart disease or who have multiple risk factors for heart disease and also some patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients will be followed for an average of two years to track the occurrence of serious cardiovascular events, including death, heart attack and stroke. This study should provide some definitive evidence of the relative cardiovascular safety of the available anti-inflammatory agents but would be even more useful if it included an arm where patients were treated with analgesics such as acetaminophen and/or moderate strength narcotics.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2005

Implications of periaortic hematoma in patients with acute aortic dissection (from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection).

The clinical profiles, presentation, and outcomes of patients with acute aortic dissections and associated periaortic hematomas on aortic imaging have not been described in a large cohort. This study sought to assess the prognostic implications of periaortic hematomas in patients with aortic dissections and to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with periaortic hematomas. The study population was 971 patients with acute aortic dissections enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection with available imaging data on presentation with the presence or absence of periaortic hematomas. Patients with periaortic hematomas (n = 227, 23.4%) were more likely to be women, to have a history of hypertension and atherosclerosis, and to present early to the hospital. At presentation, they had greater frequencies of shock, cardiac tamponade, coma, and/or altered consciousness. Clinical outcomes were significantly worse in patients with periaortic hematomas, including significantly greater mortality (33% vs 20.3%, p <0.001). A multivariate model demonstrated periaortic hematomas to be an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic dissections (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.54, p = 0.007). In conclusion, this study provides insight into the profiles, presentation, and outcomes of patients with periaortic hematomas and acute aortic dissections. The early identification and aggressive management of patients with periaortic hematomas may potentially improve clinical outcomes.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Effect of statin use in patients with acute coronary syndromes and a serum low-density lipoprotein<or=80 mg/dl.

We identified 155 patients who were admitted with an acute coronary syndrome and a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level<or=80 mg/dl and were not on statin therapy at hospital admission. The relation between statin therapy at discharge and clinical outcome was evaluated in these patients. Compared with patients who were not discharged on statins, those who were had a lower incidence of death, reinfarction, or stroke at 6 months (29.0% vs 9.5%, p=0.005). These results suggest that patients who have an acute coronary syndrome and a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level<or=80 mg/dl in the absence of statin therapy may benefit from such therapy at discharge.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Hormone replacement therapy and secondary cardiovascular prevention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in women. Several randomized clinical trials of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in women with and without coronary artery disease have found no benefit of HRT in decreasing cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefits and risks of HRT for prevention of cardiovascular events by conducting a meta-analysis of all randomized trials of HRT, and estimate cardiovascular event rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: All relevant randomized, clinical trials were identified in MEDLINE (1966-2001), HealthSTAR (1975-2001), and Cochrane Library databases. The search terms were hormone replacement or HRT, estrogen, progesterone, women and heart disease. We used all published data of randomized, clinical trials of HRT if they reported cardiovascular endpoints. Meta-analysis of the randomized, clinical trials involving 21,066 patients revealed that HRT did not reduce mortality compared with control group (1.9 vs. 1.9%, odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.86-1.30, p = 0.58) or significantly reduce risk of myocardial infarction (3.7 vs. 3.7%, odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.21, p = 0.58) or revascularization (6.4 vs. 6.8%, odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.85-1.08, p = 0.50). The rate of acute coronary syndrome rate was 9.1% in the HRT group vs. 9.3% with odds ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.90-1.12, p = 0.98. CONCLUSION: HRT use is not associated with reduced death, myocardial infarction or revascularization rate. This suggests that HRT is not an effective secondary cardiovascular preventive measure.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Mortality at 1 year for the direct comparison of tirofiban and abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization: do tirofiban and ReoPro give similar efficacy outcomes at trial 1-year follow-up.

AIMS: Compared with placebo, abciximab has been associated with mortality reduction at late follow-up. The TARGET trial was performed to test whether tirofiban and abciximab provide similar efficacy outcomes among patients undergoing non-emergent, stent-based percutaneous coronary intervention. We report here the 1-year mortality of the study population. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 18 countries at 149 hospitals, 4,809 patients undergoing elective or urgent stent implantation were randomly assigned a bolus and infusion of tirofiban or abciximab. Ischaemic events were assessed at 30 days and 6 months and mortality was assessed at 1 year. We previously reported that abciximab was superior to tirofiban considering the composite rate of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days among all patients and at 6 months among those with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). At 1-year follow-up death occurred in 46 (1.9%) patients who received tirofiban and 42 (1.7%) patients who received abciximab (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.72-1.67; P=0.660). Mortality rates for patients with ACS were 2.3% with tirofiban vs. 2.2% with abciximab (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.67; P=0.897) and those without ACS were 1.4 vs. 1.0% (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 0.56-3.13; P=0.530). CONCLUSION: At 1 year, tirofiban provided a similar level of survival benefit compared with abciximab.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of results of carotid stenting followed by open heart surgery versus combined carotid endarterectomy and open heart surgery (coronary bypass with or without another procedure).

We compared a novel strategy of carotid stenting (CS) followed by open heart surgery (OHS) to the combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and the OHS approach in patients requiring coronary and carotid revascularization. Between 1997 and 2002, CS as a prelude to OHS was performed in 56 patients, and 111 patients underwent combined CEA+OHS. Adverse events included stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), death, and their combinations. At baseline, the CS+OHS group had more unstable/severe angina (52% vs 27%, p = 0.002), severe left ventricular dysfunction (20% vs 9%, p = 0.05), symptomatic carotid disease (46% vs 23%, p = 0.002), and the need for repeat OHS (32% vs 9%, p = 0.0002). Severe contralateral carotid disease was more prevalent in the CEA+OHS group (28% vs 11%, p = 0.01). At 30 days, CS+OHS patients had a significantly lower incidence of stroke or MI (5% vs 19%, p = 0.02). A propensity score was created for each patient to account for baseline differences. In a final logistic regression model that included the propensity score, CS+OHS was associated with a trend toward reduced stroke or MI (odds ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 1.09, p = 0.06) and reduced death, stroke, or MI (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 1.27, p = 0.12). In conclusion, despite a higher baseline risk profile, patients who underwent CS+OHS had significantly fewer adverse events than those undergoing CEA+OHS. CS may be a safer carotid revascularization option for this challenging patient population.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Potential impact of the HIPAA privacy rule on data collection in a registry of patients with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule has the potential to affect data collection in outcomes research. METHODS: To examine the extent to which data collection may be affected by the HIPAA Privacy Rule, we used a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study design to assess participation rates with informed consent in 2 cohorts of patients eligible for the University of Michigan Acute Coronary Syndrome registry. The pre-HIPAA period included telephone interviews conducted at 6 months that sought verbal informed consent from patients. In the post-HIPAA period, informed consent forms were mailed to ask for permission to call to conduct a telephone interview. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients who provided consent. Incremental costs associated with the post-HIPAA period were also assessed. RESULTS: The pre-HIPAA period included 1221 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome, and the post-HIPAA period included 967 patients. Consent for follow-up declined from 96.4% in the pre-HIPAA period to 34.0% in the post-HIPAA period (P<.01). In general, patients who returned written consent forms during the post-HIPAA period were older, were more likely to be married, and had lower mortality rates at 6 months. Incremental costs for complying with the HIPAA Privacy Rule were $8704.50 for the first year and $4558.50 annually thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: The HIPAA Privacy Rule significantly decreases the number of patients available for outcomes research and introduces selection bias in data collection for patient registries.

Acute Disease↗