ENRICHD and SADHART: implications for future biobehavioral intervention efforts.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to David S Sheps.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To describe factors influencing chest pain expression in patients with cardiac or noncardiac disease. METHODS: The authors conducted a case presentation and review of literature. RESULTS: Causes of chest pain are diverse. Psychologic factors influence chest pain expression commonly in patients with or without cardiac disease. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and other therapists must be aware of psychologic influences on chest pain expression to provide optimal treatment to their patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened an interdisciplinary working group of experts to develop recommendations for the assessment and treatment of depression in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). METHOD: Consensus of experts. RESULTS: Our current recommendations are that the Beck Depression Inventory-I be employed for epidemiological studies of depression and CHD, that the Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item version be employed for screening for trial eligibility, that the Depression Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH) be employed for diagnostic ascertainment for trial inclusion, and that the Hamilton rating scale, which is part of the DISH, be employed for both depression symptom reduction and the remission criterion in any trial. We further recommend that a randomized controlled trial be undertaken to determine whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, psychotherapy, or combined treatment can reduce the risk of CHD events and mortality associated with depression in CHD patients. CONCLUSIONS: This report summarizes the recommendations made by the working group and discusses the rationale for each recommendation, the strengths and weaknesses of alternative approaches to assessment and treatment, and the implications for future research in this area.