Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David R Holmes

Publications and source records attributed to David R Holmes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Acute coronary syndrome may occur with in-stent restenosis and is associated with adverse outcomes (the PRESTO trial).

Patients with de novo acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) have a higher rate of adverse cardiac events and recurrent revascularization after percutaneous coronary interventions compared with patients who have stable angina. However, it is not known if an ACS presentation in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) is associated with a worse prognosis. Using the large PRESTO database of patients with ISR, we compared outcomes after successful percutaneous coronary intervention in 824 patients who presented with ACS with 617 patients who had stable angina. In-hospital and 9-month follow-up for myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, death, and a combined outcome of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were obtained. Follow-up angiographic results were also compared in those patients included in the angiographic substudy (140 patients with ACS and 99 with stable angina). Patients with ISR who presented with ACS were older and less often men, with higher incidences of diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and congestive heart failure. In-hospital complications were rare and similar in the 2 groups. At follow-up, patients with ACS had higher incidences of target vessel revascularization (33% vs 21%, p <0.001), MACEs (35% vs 22%, p <0.001), and angiographic restenosis (> or =50% narrowing, 56% vs 42%, p = 0.043). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for baseline differences, an ACS presentation was associated with a higher incidence of long-term MACEs (odds ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.18, p <0.001). In conclusion, an ACS presentation in patients with ISR is associated with a higher incidence of recurrent adverse cardiovascular events and angiographic restenosis.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed2006

Effect of diabetes mellitus on five-year clinical outcomes after single-vessel coronary stenting (a pooled analysis of coronary stent clinical trials).

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of clinically driven, repeat revascularization of the stented lesion in the first year after coronary stenting. The effect of DM on the risk of repeat revascularization of the stented lesion beyond 1 year, revascularization at other coronary sites, and clinical outcomes of cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI) has not been reported. We pooled primary data from 4 multicenter trials of second-generation coronary stents that included 1,228 patients, 263 of whom (21%) had DM. Patients were followed annually to assess for prespecified end points, including repeat revascularization procedures, death, or MI. Repeat revascularization of the stented lesion was performed more frequently during the first year in patients with DM (16.0% vs 10.9%, p = 0.01) but decreased to a low frequency (1.8% vs 1.3% per year) thereafter in patients with and without DM. Repeat revascularization of other coronary segments was more frequent in patients with DM during the first and subsequent years (5-year rates, 32.2% vs 24.1%, p = 0.005). Cardiac death or MI was also more frequent among patients with DM (5-year rates, 25.4% vs 17.9%, p = 0.008) and remained significant after adjustment for all differences in baseline characteristics (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.0, p = 0.01). In conclusion, diabetic patients are at increased risk for revascularization of the stented lesion only in the first year after single-lesion stenting but are at increased risk for other clinical events, including cardiac death and MI, over the next 4 years.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Relation of preprocedural statin therapy to in-hospital procedural complications following percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with hyperlipidemia.

We investigated whether the observed protective effect of hyperlipidemia is stronger in patients who take statins and, if so, whether that effect is likely due to patient characteristics associated with statin use. In-hospital complications and long-term outcomes of patients with hyperlipidemia (cholesterol level > or = 240 mg/dl) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) on statins (group Ia, n = 2,052) and not on statins (group Ib, n = 1,650) were compared with 726 patients with lower cholesterol levels (group II). Despite a higher prevalence of co-morbidities and worse angiographic characteristics in patients with hyperlipidemia, patients in group Ia had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (0% vs 2% in the other 2 groups, p < 0.001), a lower increase in the postprocedure creatine kinase-MB fraction (14% vs 27% in group Ib and 28% in group II, p < 0.001), and fewer PCI complications (15% vs 30% in groups Ib and II, p < 0.001). After adjustment, patients in group Ia had a significant decrease in complications (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.92, p = 0.009). In contrast, those in group Ib had outcomes similar to those of patients with lower cholesterol. After application of propensity analysis to adjust for the likelihood of receiving statins based on clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, group Ia had fewer in-hospital complications (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.90, p = 0.002) and lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.84, p = 0.021). After successful PCI, overall survival after dismissal and survival free of myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization were similar. In conclusion, hyperlipidemia per se is not associated with lower in-hospital complications after PCI. The benefit is largely limited to patients on statin treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Prognostic value of circulating pregnancy-associated plasma protein levels in patients with chronic stable angina.

AIMS: Unstable coronary atherosclerotic plaque can be present in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Our objective was to assess whether measurement of plasma pregnancy-associated plasma protein (PAPP-A) level, a reflection of plaque instability, in patients with chronic stable CAD had an independent prognostic value on the subsequent incidence of death, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and revascularization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients referred for coronary angiography were recruited. A cohort of 103 patients with stable symptoms for at least 6 weeks and with a coronary angiogram showing at least a 50% luminal diameter narrowing formed our study population. Median follow-up was 4.9 years. Mean age was 65+/-10 years. In a multivariable model that included CAD traditional risk factors, ejection fraction, extent of coronary atherosclerosis, prior history of myocardial infarction, prior revascularization, discharge medications, and C-reactive protein, the plasma PAPP-A was found to be significantly associated with the endpoint of future death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 5.29; 95% CI 1.27-22.0; P=0.023] and with the endpoint of future death and ACS (adjusted HR 3.56; 95% CI 1.27-10.0; P=0.015), but not with the endpoint of future death and revascularization. CONCLUSION: Measurement of plasma PAPP-A level in patients with chronic stable CAD has an independent prognostic value on the occurrence of death and ACS.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-a is markedly expressed by monocyte-macrophage cells in vulnerable and ruptured carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a link between inflammation and cerebrovascular events.

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to evaluate serologic expression of pregnancy-associated protein-A (PAPP-A) in patients affected by cerebrovascular accidents and to correlate it with histopathologic carotid plaque complexity. BACKGROUND: Little is known about PAPP-A expression in carotid atherosclerotic disease and whether this protein represents a marker of plaque vulnerability also in carotid district. METHODS: Seventy-two carotid plaques from patients submitted to surgical endarterectomy (19 who suffered a major stroke, 24 transient ischemic attack, and 29 asymptomatic) were evaluated. Serologic PAPP-A levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay. Plaques were divided in three groups based on histology: 1) stable (n = 38); 2) vulnerable (n = 13); 3) ruptured with thrombus (n = 14). Immunohistochemical staining for PAPP-A, smooth muscle cells, macrophages, and T-lymphocytes was performed in all cases. Real-time polymerase chain reaction assessed local PAPP-A production, and double immunofluorescence confocal microscopy (ICM) characterized cell type expressing PAPP-A. RESULTS: Pregnancy-associated protein-A (serologic values were 4.02 +/- 0.18 mIU/l in Group 1, 7.43 +/- 0.97 mIU/l in Group 2, and 6.97 +/- 0.75 mIU/l in Group 3 [1 vs. 3, p = 0.01; 1 vs. 2, p = 0.004; 2 vs. 3, p = 0.71, respectively]). Pregnancy-associated protein-A (expression showed a mean score value of 0.62 +/- 0.06 for stable plaques, 2.54 +/- 0.14 for vulnerable plaques, and 2.71 +/- 0.12 for ruptured plaques [1 vs. 2, p = 0.001; 1 vs. 3, p = 0.001; 2 vs. 3, p = 0.37, respectively]). Real-time polymerase chain reaction demonstrated local messenger ribonucleic acid PAPP-A production, and double ICM confirmed monocyte/macrophage expression of PAPP-A in Groups 2 and 3 but not Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PAPP-A is a marker of carotid plaque destabilization and rupture. Further studies are necessary to determine if PAPP-A can represents a new target for stratifying the risk of cerebrovascular events.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Impact of completeness of percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization on long-term outcomes in the stent era.

BACKGROUND: The importance of completeness of revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease is unclear in that there is little information on the impact of incomplete revascularization outside of randomized trials. The objective of this study is to compare long-term mortality and subsequent revascularization for percutaneous coronary intervention patients receiving stents who were completely revascularized (CR) with those who were incompletely revascularized (IR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients from New York State's Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Reporting System were subdivided into patients who were CR and IR. Then subsets of IR patients were contrasted with CR patients. Differences in long-term survival and subsequent revascularization for CR and IR patients were compared after adjustment for differences in preprocedural risk. A total of 68.9% of all stent patients with multivessel disease who were studied were IR, and 30.1% of all patients had total occlusions and/or > or =2 IR vessels. At baseline, the following patients were at higher risk: those who were older and those with more comorbid conditions, worse ejection fraction, and more renal disease and stroke. After adjustment for these baseline differences, IR patients were significantly more likely to die at any time (adjusted hazard ratio=1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.30) than CR patients. IR patients with total occlusions and a total of > or =2 IR vessels were at the highest risk compared with CR patients (hazard ratio=1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 1.66). CONCLUSIONS: IR with stenting is associated with an adverse impact on long-term mortality, and consideration should be given to either achieving CR, opting for surgery, or monitoring percutaneous coronary intervention patients with IR more closely after discharge.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Recent trends in the percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs) has a lower success rate than PCI for non-CTO lesions. We sought to determine trends in the treatment of CTOs within the current interventional era. Using 4 sequential recruitment waves of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry, we assessed the relative prevalence and success rates in treating CTO (n=371) versus non-CTO (n=4,802) lesions over a 7-year period (1997 to 2004). Characteristics of attempted lesions and factors associated with PCI outcome were evaluated. CTO lesion attempts decreased by 41% over time, from 9.6% (1997 to 1998) to 5.7% (2004, p<0.0001 for trend). More contemporary CTO lesions were longer (22.4 vs 17.0 mm, p=0.006 for trend), had thrombus less often (21.3% vs 35.4%, p=0.03 for trend), and were more often treated with stents (69.8% vs 45.4% p=0.02). The rate of successful intervention for CTO lesions decreased nonsignificantly during this time, from 79.7% to 71.4% (p=0.18). Using multivariable analysis, female gender (adjusted odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.88, p=0.02), and thrombus (adjusted odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.61, p=0.0008) were associated with higher success rates, whereas the presence of severe noncardiac disease (adjusted odds ratio 1.91, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 3.45, p=0.03) was associated with a higher risk for PCI failure. Recruitment wave and patient age were not independently related to lesion success. In conclusion, during the PCI period of 1997 to 2004, CTO lesions were attempted less frequently and success rates did not increase, indicating a need for new operator techniques or device technologies to treat this important lesion subset by a percutaneous approach.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

The fate of patients with clinical recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation (a two-year follow-up analysis from the SIRIUS trial).

Although clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) have been previously described ("primary" success rates), the fate of patients whose SES implantation fail and who require ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization is poorly understood. The SIRIUS trial is a prospective, randomized, clinical trial that includes 533 evaluable patients with SESs. Twenty-two of these patients had adjudicated ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (4.1%) within the first year of follow-up and comprised the study population of this analysis. Of these patients, 11 (50%) had diabetes, and restenotic lesions were focal and located at the proximal stent edge in 91% and 73% of patients, respectively. Restenosis was treated with bare metal stent implantation, balloon dilatation, or intravascular brachytherapy in 82%, 13.5%, and 4.5% of patients, respectively. At 1-year follow-up after the first recurrence (2-year follow-up after the index procedure), only 5 of these patients (23%) required a second repeat revascularization procedure. Risk factors for a second recurrence after treatment of SES restenosis were female gender, long lesions that required long stents at the index procedure, and an early first recurrence. In conclusion, SES failure treated with traditional percutaneous coronary intervention yielded good outcome at 1-year follow-up (secondary failure rate only 23%), perhaps due to the focal nature of the SES restenotic lesion. Future studies should evaluate other methods, including drug-eluting stents, to further optimize the outcome of treatment of SES failures.

Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation↗
PubMed2006

Two-year outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: results from the Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in de Novo Native Coronary Lesions (SIRIUS) trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the two-year clinical outcomes in patients enrolled in the Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Lesions (SIRIUS) study. BACKGROUND: The SIRIUS study was a double-blinded randomized study which demonstrated that sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) significantly improved angiographic results (at 8 months) and clinical outcomes (at 9 and 12 months) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS). METHODS: Patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions randomized to either SES (533 patients) or control BMS (525 patients) were followed for two years. RESULTS: Between one and two years, there were infrequent additional clinical events that were equally distributed between the sirolimus and control groups. After two years, target lesion revascularization was 5.8% and 21.3% in SES and control patients, respectively (p < 0.001), and major adverse cardiovascular events and target vessel failure rates were 10.1% versus 24.4% and 12.0% versus 26.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both). There were no differences in death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes two years after implantation of SES continue to demonstrate significant reduction in the need for repeat target lesion (and vessel) revascularization compared with BMS without evidence for either disproportionate late restenosis or late stent thrombosis.

Coronary Angiography↗
PubMed2006

A total of 1,007 percutaneous coronary interventions without onsite cardiac surgery: acute and long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare clinical outcomes of elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery to those at a tertiary center with onsite cardiac surgery. BACKGROUND: Disagreement exists about whether hospitals with cardiac catheterization laboratories, but without onsite cardiac surgery, should develop PCI programs. Primary PCI for STEMI at hospitals without onsite cardiac surgery have achieved satisfactory outcomes; however, elective PCI outcomes are not well defined. METHODS: A total of 1,007 elective PCI and primary PCI procedures performed from March 1999 to August 2005 at the Immanuel St. Joseph's Hospital-Mayo Health System (ISJ) in Mankato, Minnesota, were matched one-to-one with those performed at St. Mary's Hospital (SMH) in Rochester, Minnesota. Strict protocols were followed for case selection and PCI program requirements. Clinical outcomes (in-hospital procedural success, death, any myocardial infarction, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and emergency coronary artery bypass surgery) and follow-up survival were compared between groups. RESULTS: Among 722 elective PCIs, procedural success was 97% at ISJ compared with 95% at SMH (p = 0.046). Among 285 primary PCIs for STEMI, procedural success was 93% at ISJ and 96% at SMH (p = 0.085). No patients at ISJ undergoing PCI required emergent transfer for cardiac surgery. Survival at two years' follow-up by treatment location was similar for patients with elective PCI and primary PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Similar clinical outcomes for elective PCI and primary PCI were achieved at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery compared with those at a tertiary center with onsite cardiac surgery using a prospective, rigorous protocol for case selection and PCI program requirements.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial.

CONTEXT: Although vascular brachytherapy is the only approved therapy for restenosis following bare-metal stent implantation, drug-eluting stents are now being used. Data on the relative merits of each are limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of the sirolimus-eluting stent compared with vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of patients with restenosis within a bare-metal stent. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of 384 patients with in-stent restenosis who were enrolled between February 2003 and July 2004 at 26 academic and community medical centers. Data presented represent all follow-up as of June 30, 2005. INTERVENTIONS: Vascular brachytherapy (n = 125) or the sirolimus-eluting stent (n = 259). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Target vessel failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) at 9 months postprocedure. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were well matched. Lesion length was similar between vascular brachytherapy and sirolimus-eluting stent patients (mean [SD], 16.76 [8.55] mm vs 17.22 [7.97] mm, respectively; P = .61). Procedural success was 99.2% (124/125) in the vascular brachytherapy group and 97.3% (250/257) in the sirolimus-eluting stent group (P = .28). The rate of target vessel failure was 21.6% (27/125) with vascular brachytherapy and 12.4% (32/259) with the sirolimus-eluting stent (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.8; P = .02). Target lesion revascularization was required in 19.2% (24/125) of the vascular brachytherapy group and 8.5% (22/259) of the sirolimus-eluting stent group (RR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.3-3.9]; P = .004). At follow-up angiography, the rate of binary angiographic restenosis for the analysis segment was 29.5% (31/105) for the vascular brachytherapy group and 19.8% (45/227) for the sirolimus-eluting stent group (RR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.0-2.2]; P = .07). Compared with the vascular brachytherapy group, minimal lumen diameter was larger in the sirolimus-eluting stent group at 6-month follow-up (mean [SD], 1.52 [0.63] mm vs 1.80 [0.63] mm; P<.001), reflecting greater net lumen gain in the analysis segment (0.68 [0.60] vs 1.0 [0.61] mm; P<.001) due to stenting and no edge restenosis. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus-eluting stents result in superior clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of restenosis within a bare-metal stent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00231257.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

There is intense interest in the relationship between inflammation, thrombosis, platelet aggregation, and hyperlipidemia in patients with coronary artery disease. The specific role of inflammation with its linkage to the coagulation cascade has been well studied. A number of inflammatory markers have been identified which can be used for risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Patients with acute coronary syndromes at the time of presentation often have an underlying inflammatory state which needs therapy with antiplatelet regimens including now increasingly frequently clopidogrel in addition to the standard of aspirin. In those patients who are treated medically for their acute coronary syndromes, long-term treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy has been documented to be associated with improved outcome. In patients who undergo an invasive approach with placement of intracoronary stents, the importance of dual antiplatelet therapy is increased. Drug-eluting stents are now used in approximately 90% of all interventional procedures. There is evidence to suggest that while these patients have improved outcome in terms of a decreased need for subsequent procedures to treat restenosis, there is the potential for late subacute stent thrombosis. When late subacute stent thrombosis occurs, it results in mortality or infarction in 40-60% of patients. Dual antiplatelet therapy is therefore recommended for an increasingly longer time in this patient group. At the present time, protocols indicate 3 months for one of the drug-eluting stents and 6 months for the other. However, increasingly longer antiplatelet therapy is being used clinically. Assessment of platelet function during follow-up is as yet early. There are issues about which specific test to use and the definition of platelet hyperreactivity. In the future, more individually targeted therapy may be possible if we can more adequately assess the degree of hyperreactivity and underlying inflammation.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

A risk score to predict in-hospital mortality for percutaneous coronary interventions.

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to develop a risk score to predict in-hospital mortality for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a statewide population-based PCI registry. BACKGROUND: Risk scores predicting adverse outcomes after PCI have been developed from a single or a small group of hospitals, and their abilities to be generalized to other patient populations might be affected. METHODS: A logistic regression model was developed to predict in-hospital mortality for PCI using data from 46,090 procedures performed in 41 hospitals in the New York State Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System in 2002. A risk score was derived from this model and was validated using 2003 data from New York. RESULTS: The risk score included nine significant risk factors (age, gender, hemodynamic state, ejection fraction, pre-procedural myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, congestive heart disease, renal failure, and left main disease) that were consistent with other reports. The point values for risk factors range from 1 to 9, and the total risk score ranges from 0 to 40. The observed and recalibrated predicted risks in 2003 were highly correlated for all PCI patients as well as for those in the higher-risk subgroup who suffered myocardial infarctions within 24 h before the procedure. The total risk score for mortality is strongly associated with complication rates and length of stay in the 2003 PCI data. CONCLUSIONS: The risk score accurately predicted in-hospital death for PCI procedures using future New York data. Its performance in other patient populations needs to be further studied.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Geographical differences in the rates of angiographic restenosis and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization after percutaneous coronary interventions: results from the Prevention of Restenosis With Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) Trial.

UNLABELLED: Many cardiologists consider it reasonable to assume in clinical practice that percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents ought to be considered equivalent, if not superior, to bypass surgery. In the absence of a definitive clinical trial to support this view, how should the prudent, cutting-edge cardiologist proceed? OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the geographical differences in target vessel revascularization (TVR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Prevention of Restenosis With Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial. BACKGROUND: An aggressive approach to PCI is more common in the U.S. than in other countries. The impact of this approach on restenosis outcomes has not been studied. METHODS: Using the PRESTO trial, we compared nine-month ischemic TVR after PCI in U.S.-treated patients (n = 5,026) with rates in other countries (n = 6,458). We defined TVR as repeat intervention for chest pain/positive stress test. Additionally, angiographic restenosis (> or =50% narrowing or > or =50% loss of gain at nine-month follow-up) was compared between U.S. and non-U.S. patients within the prespecified angiographic subset (n = 2,823). Regression models were developed to adjust for clinical and lesion-related characteristics. RESULTS: Higher rates of TVR (18% vs. 11%), and angiographic restenosis (65% vs. 48%) were observed in patients treated in the U.S. as compared with the other patients (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Patients treated in the U.S. were more likely to be female, diabetic, not currently smoking, to have unstable angina, and to have a prior PCI. In U.S. patients, lesions tended to be longer, but less likely to be American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class C. After adjusting for clinical and angiographic variables, PCI in the U.S. was still associated with increased angiographic restenosis and ischemic TVR. CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic restenosis and ischemia-driven TVR rates were higher in patients treated in the U.S. The difference could only partially be explained by the higher prevalence of measured adverse clinical and angiographic features.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase.

BACKGROUND: Changes in the treatment of coronary artery disease both surgically and percutaneously have rendered the major randomized trials historical. Furthermore, the restrictive criteria of previous trials excluded most patients treated in daily practice. Although coronary surgery is still considered the current, evidence-based, gold-standard treatment of left main (LM) and 3-vessel coronary disease, the added benefit of drug-eluting stents has further expanded the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) beyond less complex populations in daily practice. STUDY DESIGN: The 1500-patient, prospective, multicenter, multinational (European and North American), randomized SYNTAX study with nested registries will enroll "all-comers." Consecutive patients with de novo 3-vessel disease (3VD) and/or LM disease will be screened for eligibility by the Heart Team (composed of an interventionalist, a cardiac surgeon, and the study coordinator) at each site and then allocated to either (1) the randomized cohort, if comparable revascularization can be achieved by either PCI or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), or (2) to one of the nested registries for CABG-ineligible patients (PCI registry) or for PCI-ineligible patients (CABG registry). Randomized patients will be stratified based on LM disease and diabetes by site. The primary end point for the randomized comparison is noninferiority of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events between the 2 groups at 1 year. To adequately project the expected enrollment rate per site, a run-in phase was mandated for each site interested in participating in the trial. Both cardiothoracic and interventional cardiology departments within the same institution were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their frequency of treatment of LM and 3VD over a retrospective 3-month period. IMPLICATIONS: By replacing most traditional inclusion and exclusion criteria with the real-world decision between the cardiothoracic surgeon and the interventionalist, this study will define the roles of CABG and PCI using drug-eluting stents in the contemporary management of LM and 3VD. Results of the run-in phase were used by the steering committee to determine eligibility and to project enrollment for each site.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed fibrinolytic therapy: have expectations been met?

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction has revolutionized modern cardiovascular care. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two strategies have been tested widely: fibrinolytic therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Fibrinolytic therapy has the advantage that it can be given in many medical care institutions that do not have immediate access to catheterization laboratories. Unfortunately, in a substantial number of patients, fibrinolytic therapy may not achieve optimal results, and a strategy of rescue or salvage PCI may be undertaken. There is a relative paucity of evidence-based outcomes on which to judge the merits of rescue PCI, although the volume is increasing. CONCLUSIONS: At present, several recommendations can be offered: (1) implementation of a policy of rescue PCI requires clear guidelines of patient selection, training of personnel, logistics of patient movement, and outcomes assessment; and (2) there needs to be heightened awareness with a high index of suspicion about the potential failure of fibrinolytic therapy.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Drug-eluting coronary stents.

The introduction and widespread use of coronary stents have been the most important advancement in the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease since the introduction of balloon angioplasty. Coronary artery stents reduce the rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis compared to balloon angioplasty. This angiographic restenosis was further reduced with the introduction of drug-eluting stents and hence further reduction in the frequency of major adverse cardiac events. Herein we present a comprehensive and up-to-date review about the use of drug-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗