Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

David R Crosslin

Publications and source records attributed to David R Crosslin.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Unsupervised characterization of 100,272 EHR patients identifies high-risk groups and comorbidities linked to premature aging.

Electronic health records (EHRs) contain extensive multidimensional patient data, presenting challenges for the discovery of novel and meaningful clinical patterns. Unsupervised clustering of high-dimensional clinical data holds great potential for identifying novel clinical patterns. Here, we performed unsupervised clustering and characterized 100,272 patients in the Electronic Medical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) Network. We identified 70 clusters defined by distinct comorbidity patterns. Meanwhile, age and sex are also strongly associated with patient stratification, influencing phenotype prevalence and onset time. Notably, phenotype onset time accurately predicted chronological age and was significantly associated with overall mortality risk. Besides age and sex, we assessed the contribution of genetic variation to phenotype development and observed evidence of cross-phenotype associations influencing cluster membership and comorbidity patterns. However, the role of genetics recedes during aging. We also identified several high-risk clusters with elevated Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores and validated these findings in an independent cohort. Further analysis of these clusters revealed phenotypes linked to premature aging and highlighted a survival selection among older participants in observational studies. Overall, this study enables phenome-wide unsupervised patient stratification for multimorbidity discovery in largely unannotated clinical data, offering valuable insights into patient stratification, comorbidity analysis, aging, and health outcomes.

Journal Article

Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: Health-system leaders and primary care providers weigh in.

PURPOSE: The fourth phase of the Electronic Medical Records and Genome Network is testing the return of 10 polygenic risk scores (PRS) across multiple clinics. Understanding the perspectives of health-system leaders and frontline clinicians can inform plans for implementation of PRS. METHODS: A total of 15 health-system leaders and 20 primary care providers took part in semistructured interviews. A descriptive thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Interviewees generally perceived PRS to have limited clinical utility, although they saw value in the potential to identify and act upon risks that are not otherwise detectable. Perceived potential drawbacks included negative psycho-emotional effects on patients, unnecessary follow-up, distracting from population health priorities, opportunity costs, and medicolegal liability. Implementation considerations included increased encounter time and the need for clinical practice guidelines, provider training, care coordination, and point-of-care resources. CONCLUSION: Participants generally expressed favorable views of precision medicine and also identified potential challenges to introducing PRS in clinical care. Implementation will require careful assessment of clinical utility vs usual care; ensuring that the benefit to be realized merits the time and resources required to interpret, return, and act on results and developing guidelines and other decision-making supports for providers and patients.

Humans