Biomedical subjects

David P Figgitt

Publications and source records attributed to David P Figgitt.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Combined hepatitis A and B vaccines: a review of their immunogenicity and tolerability.

UNLABELLED: Three combined hepatitis A and B vaccine preparations are commercially available in various countries: a two-dose paediatric formulation (Ambirix) [administered at months 0 and 6-12]; and a three-dose adult (Twinrix Adult) or paediatric (Twinrix Paediatric) formulation (administered at months 0, 1 and 6). The adult vaccine provides consistent, marked immunogenicity which is at least similar to that of its constituent vaccines used together and with a tolerability profile that is possibly improved. An accelerated, day-0, -7 and -21 regimen has also shown immunogenicity similar to that of the monovalent vaccines given concurrently, and now has an emerging role in adults likely to travel to hepatitis A virus (HAV) and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) endemic regions within 1 month. The adult vaccine appears effective and generally well tolerated when given concurrently with monovalent typhoid vaccine (Typherix). Immunogenicity of the two-dose paediatric vaccine is high and appears to be similar whether administered as a month-0, -6 or month-0, -12 schedule and when compared to that of the three-dose paediatric vaccine (months 0, 1, 6), both of which provide a similar degree of protection to the adult vaccine. Although both preparations also provide high end-of-schedule seroprotection against hepatitis B surface antigen, protection between the first and second doses of the two-dose regimen appears lower than with the three-dose schedule. Therefore, the three-dose paediatric vaccine is a practical option in individuals at risk of immediate exposure to HBV, while the two-dose regimen may have an important function in immunisation programmes in regions where such risk is low. Combined hepatitis A and B vaccines are generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events in clinical trials were injection-site pain and redness, and general fatigue and headache; most events were mild and transient. Pharmacoeconomic models suggest the combined vaccine is cost effective compared with no vaccine (in children/adolescents) or monovalent hepatitis B vaccine (in children/adolescents and prison inmates). CONCLUSION: The three commercially available combined hepatitis A and B adult and paediatric vaccines are highly immunogenic and generally well tolerated; the adult vaccine demonstrates immunogenicity at least as marked as that of monovalent hepatitis A and B vaccines. While further research is required to confirm potential advantages such as improved cost effectiveness, the combined vaccines have established a key role in the prevention of hepatitis A and B in defined risk groups, and have an expanding role in population-based vaccination programmes with younger age groups.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2003

Topical 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel: a review of its use in patients with actinic keratoses.

Topical 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid (HA) gel (diclofenac HA gel; Solaraze) is an NSAID approved for the treatment of actinic keratoses (AK). The efficacy of diclofenac HA gel (0.5g applied twice daily to each 5cm x 5cm treatment area) in patients with AK has been evaluated in three randomized, double-blind, HA gel vehicle-controlled trials. In each trial, efficacy was assessed 30 days after the end of treatment because an earlier study revealed that resolution of lesions was greater when measured after a 4 week interval, rather than at the end of treatment. In two fully published multicenter trials, there was no difference in baseline characteristics of the study groups. In a further single center study (not yet published), patients randomized to diclofenac HA gel had a significantly higher mean number of target lesions at baseline compared with HA gel vehicle. In the two published studies, the efficacy of diclofenac HA gel increased with increased treatment duration. When compared with HA gel vehicle recipients, significant improvements in total lesion number scores (TLNS), cumulative lesion number scores (CLNS), patient global improvement indices (PGII) and investigator global improvement indices (IGII) were obtained in patients treated for 60 and 90 but not 30 days with diclofenac HA gel. Fifty percent of patients treated for 90 days with diclofenac HA gel (vs 20% in HA gel vehicle recipients) and 33% of those treated for 60 days (vs 10%) had TLNS and CLNS of zero at the end of follow-up. In the third trial, in which treatment was applied for 90 days, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with TLNS or CLNS of zero at the end of follow-up. However, when controlling for the significant difference in mean baseline target lesion scores by calculating the mean change from baseline in lesion counts, TLNS and CLNS were significantly lower in recipients of diclofenac HA gel than HA gel vehicle at the end of follow-up. Pruritus was the most frequently reported adverse event in all trials and the incidence was generally similar or lower in patients treated with diclofenac HA gel than HA gel vehicle. In conclusion, diclofenac HA gel produces significant reductions in the number of AK lesions, and can produce complete clearance of lesions when applied twice daily for 60 or 90 days. The product is well tolerated and did not produce serious adverse cosmetic effects in clinical trials. Thus, diclofenac HA gel represents a useful addition to the array of pharmacologic treatments available for AK.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed2002

Vardenafil.

Vardenafil selectively inhibits phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), an enzyme which hydrolyses cyclic guanosine monophosphate in the cavernosum tissue of the penis. Inhibition of PDE5 results in increased arterial blood flow leading to enlargement of the corpus cavernosum. Because of the increased tumescence, veins are compressed between the corpus cavernosum and the tunica albuginea, resulting in an erection. Vardenafil has a high bioavailabilty and is rapidly absorbed. An erection of >60% rigidity was maintained for approximately twice as long following visual stimulation in patients treated with vardenafil 10 or 20mg than in recipients of placebo. In a large, placebo-controlled trial in patients with mild to severe erectile dysfunction (ED), vardenafil 5, 10 or 20mg taken as needed over a 12-week period significantly improved the scores in questions 3 and 4 of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The rate of successful attempts at intercourse with ejaculation was also significantly higher with vardenafil (71 to 75%) than in the placebo group (39.5%), and significantly more patients treated with vardenafil than placebo responded 'yes' to a Global Assessment Question (GAQ) asking if treatment had improved erections. In a 26-week trial in 736 men with ED of varied aetiologies and severity patients receiving vardenafil 5, 10 or 20mg experienced significantly improved erections with 85% of vardenafil 20mg recipients reporting improved erectile function (assessed using the GAQ) compared with 28% of placebo recipients. Treatment with vardenafil also significantly improved scores in response to questions 3 and 4 of the IIEF compared with placebo. A 12-week trial in 452 men with ED associated with diabetes mellitus demonstrated that treatment with vardenafil 20mg compared with placebo significantly improved IIEF erectile function domain scores and the rate of positive responders to the erectile improvement GAQ. Similar results were reported in a placebo-controlled trial of vardenafil 10 to 20mg involving 440 patients with ED after radical prostatectomy. Adverse events associated with vardenafil were those commonly associated with PDE5 inhibitors: headache, flushing, dyspepsia and rhinitis. These were mostly dose-dependent and mild to moderate in intensity.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2002

Almotriptan: a review of its use in migraine.

UNLABELLED: Almotriptan is a selective serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist ('triptan'). Its efficacy and tolerability have been assessed in a number of randomised, controlled trials in over 4800 adults with moderate or severe attacks of migraine. Oral almotriptan has a rapid onset of action (significant headache relief is observed 0.5 hours after administration of a 12.5mg dose) and efficacy is sustained in most patients who respond by 2 hours. The drug is significantly more effective than placebo as measured by a number of parameters including 2-hour headache response and pain-free response rates. Other symptoms of migraine, including nausea, photophobia and phonophobia, are also alleviated by almotriptan. The efficacy of oral almotriptan appears to be maintained over repeated doses for multiple attacks of migraine treated over a long period (up to 1 year). High headache response rates were reported over all attacks without tachyphylaxis. For the relief of single attacks of migraine, oral almotriptan 12.5mg had similar efficacy to oral sumatriptan 50mg. Patients given almotriptan report less concern with adverse effects than patients given sumatriptan. The lower incidence of chest pain following treatment with almotriptan than with sumatriptan may lead to a reduction in direct costs, with fewer patients requiring management of chest pain. Almotriptan is well tolerated. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity, transient, and generally resolved without intervention or the need for treatment withdrawal. The most common adverse events associated with oral almotriptan 12.5mg treatment were dizziness, paraesthesia, nausea, fatigue, headache, somnolence, skeletal pain, vomiting and chest symptoms. The incidence of adverse events did not differ from placebo and decreased in the longer term. Almotriptan can be coadministered with drugs that share a common hepatic metabolic path; in addition, dosage reduction is required only in the presence of severe renal or hepatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Almotriptan is an effective drug for the acute treatment of moderate or severe attacks of migraine in adults. An oral dose of almotriptan 12.5mg has shown greater efficacy than placebo; current data indicate that efficacy is similar to that of oral sumatriptan 50mg, and is maintained in the long term (<or=1 year). Almotriptan has a good adverse event profile and a generally similar overall tolerability profile to sumatriptan; of note, almotriptan is associated with a significantly lower incidence of chest pain than sumatriptan. However, further clinical experience is required to clearly define the place of almotriptan among the other currently available triptans. Nevertheless, because triptans have an important place in various management regimens, and because the nature of individual patient response to triptans is idiosyncratic, almotriptan is likely to become a useful treatment option in the management of adults with moderate or severe migraine headaches.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Botulinum toxin B: a review of its therapeutic potential in the management of cervical dystonia.

UNLABELLED: Botulinum toxins are well known as the causative agents of human botulism food poisoning. However, in the past two decades they have become an important therapeutic mainstay in the treatment of dystonias including cervical dystonia, a neurological disorder characterised by involuntary contractions of the cervical and/or shoulder muscles. The toxins inhibit acetylcholine release from neuromuscular junctions, producing muscle weakness when injected into dystonic muscles. Data from three double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials demonstrate that botulinum toxin B effectively reduces the severity, disability and pain of cervical dystonia. In two of the trials, mean Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total score at week 4 (primary efficacy measure) after botulinum toxin B 10 000U was reduced by 11.7 (25%) or 11 (21%) compared with baseline. These changes were significantly greater than those obtained with placebo [4.3 (10%) or 2 (4%)] and were generally similar in patients who were responsive or resistant to botulinum toxin A. Statistically significant benefits compared with placebo were also evident for a range of other efficacy parameters including TWSTRS-Severity, -Pain and -Disability subscales, patient- assessed pain and patient-/physician-assessed global improvement ratings. In another trial, the percentage of patients with botulinum toxin A-resistant or -responsive cervical dystonia who had a > or =20% improvement in the TWSTRS-Total score between baseline and week 4 was significantly higher with botulinum toxin B 2500 to 10 000U (58 to 77%) than with placebo (27%). Overall, botulinum toxin B was generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were dry mouth and dysphagia. Most adverse events in patients receiving botulinum toxin B were mild or moderate; no serious adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were associated with the use of botulinum toxin B and, where reported, no patients discontinued from any of the clinical trials as a result of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin B has shown clinical efficacy in patients with cervical dystonia at doses up to 10 000U and is generally well tolerated. Its efficacy extends to patients who are resistant to botulinum toxin A. Although the potential for secondary resistance to botulinum toxin B remains unclear, it may occur less than with botulinum toxin A because methods for manufacturing commercially available botulinum toxin B do not include lyophilisation and the product does not require reconstitution before use. As injection with botulinum toxin is generally considered the treatment of choice for patients with cervical dystonia, botulinum toxin B should be considered a potential treatment option in this setting.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Ceftriaxone: an update of its use in the management of community-acquired and nosocomial infections.

UNLABELLED: Ceftriaxone is a parenteral third-generation cephalosporin with a long elimination half-life which permits once-daily administration. It has good activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, methicillin-susceptible staphylococci, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Neisseria spp. Although active against Enterobacteriaceae, the recent spread of derepressed mutants which hyperproduce chromosomal beta-lactamases and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases has diminished the activity of all third-generation cephalosporins against these pathogens necessitating careful attention to sensitivity studies. Extensive data from randomised clinical trials confirm the efficacy of ceftriaxone in serious and difficult-to-treat community-acquired infections including meningitis, pneumonia and nonresponsive acute otitis media. Ceftriaxone also has efficacy in other community-acquired infections including uncomplicated gonorrhoea, acute pyelonephritis and various infections in children. In the nosocomial setting, extensive data also confirm the efficacy of ceftriaxone with or without an aminoglycoside in serious Gram-negative infections, pneumonia, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and as surgical prophylaxis. Outpatient use of ceftriaxone, either as part of a step-down regimen or parenterally, is a distinguishing feature of the data gathered on the agent over the last decade. The review focuses on new applications of the drug and its use in infections in which the causative pathogens or their resistance patterns have changed over the past decade. Ceftriaxone has a good tolerability profile, the most common events being diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, candidiasis and rash. Ceftriaxone may cause reversible biliary pseudolithiasis, notably at higher dosages of the drug (>/=2 g/day); however, the incidence of true lithiasis is <0.1%. Injection site discomfort or phlebitis can occur after intramuscular or intravenous administration. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of its strong activity against S. pneumoniae, ceftriaxone holds an important place, either alone or as part of a combination regimen, in the treatment of invasive pneumococcal infections, including those with reduced beta-lactam susceptibility. Its once-daily administration schedule allows simplification of otherwise complex regimens in a hospital setting and has also contributed to its popularity as a parenteral agent in an ambulatory setting. These properties, together with a well characterised tolerability profile, mean that ceftriaxone is likely to retain its place as an important third-generation cephalosporin in the treatment of serious community-acquired and nosocomial infections.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

ET-743.

ET-743 is a novel antineoplastic DNA-binding agent derived from the marine tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata. It has significant cytotoxic activity against soft tissue sarcomas (STS). It also has in vitro activity against melanoma, breast, ovarian, colon, renal, non-small cell lung and prostate carcinomas. The drug has unique mechanism of action which includes in vitro inhibition of transcription-dependent nucleotide excision repair pathways and inhibition of cell cycle progression leading to p53-independent apoptosis. It also selectively inhibits transcriptional activation of multidrug-resistance (MDR1) gene in human sarcoma cells in vivo. The efficacy of ET-743 has been investigated in patients with advanced STS in three multicentre phase II clinical trials. Patients receiving ET-743 as second- or third-line treatment had partial tumour response rates of 6 to 8%. Patients receiving ET-743 as first-line chemotherapy had a partial response rate of 18%. Forty-two to 50% of all patients in these trials achieved stable disease. All responses were durable up to 14 months. A pooled analysis of the three multicentre phase II trials showed the following: median overall survival time of 10.2 months, 1-year survival rate of 40% and 6-month progression-free rate of 27.2%. ET-743 is generally well tolerated. The most common adverse events in clinical trials were non-cumulative haematological and hepatic toxicities. Transient and reversible elevation of hepatic transaminases, nausea, vomiting and asthenia were common but seldom severe and never treatment-limiting. Mucositis, alopecia and cardiac or neurotoxicities were not observed.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗

PubMed2002

Dexmethylphenidate.

Dexmethylphenidate comprises only the d-enantiomer (the pharmacologically effective isomer) of racemic methylphenidate and is indicated for the treatment of patients aged > or =6 years with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In a 4-week, double-blind trial in 132 children with ADHD, significantly greater improvements from baseline in teacher-rated Swanson, Nolan and Pelham (SNAP)-ADHD scores were seen in dexmethylphenidate and methylphenidate recipients, compared with placebo recipients. In addition, significantly more dexmethylphenidate and methylphenidate recipients, compared with placebo recipients, were much improved or very much improved according to Clinical Global Impression-Improvement of Illness scale scores. In the same study, parent-rated SNAP-ADHD scores had decreased by a significantly greater extent in dexmethylphenidate recipients at 3pm and 6pm and in methylphenidate recipients at 3pm, compared with placebo recipients. Significantly fewer dexmethylphenidate than placebo recipients failed treatment in a double-blind, treatment-withdrawal trial in 75 children with ADHD (17.1 vs 61.5%). In a noncomparative study in 22 children with ADHD, symptoms of ADHD, as assessed by teachers and parents, were controlled during the entire school day in 68 and 86% of dexmethylphenidate recipients, respectively, with a median duration of effect of 6.3 and 7.5 hours, respectively. Dexmethylphenidate was generally well tolerated in children with ADHD; adverse events were consistent with those known to be associated with agents containing methylphenidate.

Absorption↗

PubMed2002

Levofloxacin: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.

UNLABELLED: Levofloxacin is the L-form of the fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent, ofloxacin. In in vitro studies, levofloxacin demonstrated a broad range of activity against Gram-positive and -negative organisms and anaerobes. The drug is more active against Gram-positive organisms than ciprofloxacin, but less active than newer fluoroquinolones such as gatifloxacin. Its activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae is unaffected by the presence of penicillin resistance. In several randomised controlled trails, 5 to 14 days' treatment with intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin proved an effective therapy for upper and lower respiratory tract infections. In patients with mild to severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin 500mg once or twice daily was as effective as intravenous and/or oral gatifloxacin, clarithromycin, azithromycin or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Overall, clinical response rates with levofloxacin ranged from 86 to 95% versus 88 to 96% with comparator agents; bacteriological response rates were 88 to 95% and 86 to 98%, respectively. Sequential (intravenous +/- oral switch) therapy with levofloxacin 750mg once daily was as effective as intravenous imipenem/cilastatin (+/- oral switch to ciprofloxacin) in patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia. Generally, oral levofloxacin 250 or 500mg once daily was at least as effective as oral cefaclor, cefuroxime axetil, clarithromycin or moxifloxacin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis as assessed by either clinical or bacteriological response rates. This approach also provided similar efficacy to amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid or clarithromycin in patients with acute sinusitis. Sequential therapy with levofloxacin 500mg twice daily for 7 to 14 days' was as effective as intravenous imipenem/cilastatin in patients with suspected bacteraemia. Oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7 to 10 days was also an effective treatment in patients with uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, and in those with complicated urinary tract infections. A higher dosage of sequential levofloxacin 750mg once daily proved as effective as intravenous ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (+/- oral switch to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Pharmacoeconomic studies suggest that levofloxacin may be cost-saving in comparison to conventional therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin continues to demonstrate good clinical efficacy in the treatment of a range of infections, including those in which S. pneumoniae is a potential pathogen. Importantly, it has efficacy in CAP similar to that of gatifloxacin and at least as good as that of the third generation cephalosporins. Extensive clinical data confirm the good tolerability profile of this agent without the phototoxicity, hepatic and cardiac events evident with some of the other newer fluoroquinolone agents. Levofloxacin therefore offers a unique combination of documented efficacy and tolerability, and provides an important option for the treatment of bacterial infections.

Bacterial Infections↗

PubMed2002

Bicalutamide: in early-stage prostate cancer.

Bicalutamide is an oral, once-daily nonsteroidal antiandrogen. Its efficacy in localised or locally advanced prostate cancer is currently being investigated as part of the Early Prostate Cancer (EPC) programme. In the EPC programme, bicalutamide 150 mg/day, as an adjunct to radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting, significantly reduced the risk of objective disease progression, the incidence of bone metastases and the risk of prostate specific antigen progression compared with placebo (p < 0.0001 for all three parameters) after a median follow-up of 3 years. Survival data are currently immature, with an overall mortality rate of 6% in both treatment arms. On two nonblind, randomised trials, bicalutamide 150 mg/day monotherapy was as effective as medical or surgical castration in terms of overall survival in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer. After a median follow-up of 6.3 years, median survival was 63.5 and 69.9 months for bicalutamide and castration, respectively; time to disease progression was also similar between treatment groups. Bicalutamide recipients reported a significantly smaller loss in sexual interest and a better physical capacity than recipients of castration (p <or= 0.05 for both parameters). Bicalutamide is well tolerated in studies of up to 6.3 years' duration.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2002

Spotlight on fluvoxamine in anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.

Fluvoxamine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) which may be used for the management of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Absorption of fluvoxamine was similar in adolescents to that in adults, which suggests that the maximum dosage of the drug for patients aged between 12 and 17 years can be as high as 300 mg/day. However, steady-state plasma fluvoxamine concentrations were 2 to 3 times higher in children (aged between 6 and 11 years) than in adolescents; thus, the maximum fluvoxamine dosage recommended for children is 200 mg/day. Fluvoxamine (50 to 300 mg/day) for 8 to 16 weeks significantly reduced symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) [measured across multiple assessment scales] compared with placebo in a well controlled trial in paediatric patients (n = 120) or from baseline in noncomparative trials in adolescent (n = 20) or paediatric (n = 16) patients. Improvements with fluvoxamine (up to 200 mg/day) were observed for up to 1 year in 98 patients with OCD in a noncomparative trial. The drug (up to 250 or 300 mg/day) also improved symptoms of anxiety compared with placebo in an 8-week well controlled trial in 128 paediatric patients with social phobia, separation anxiety disorder or generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). Fluvoxamine (50 to 300 mg/day) appears to be well tolerated in paediatric patients, with most adverse events with the drug (except abdominal discomfort, which occurred more often in patients receiving fluvoxamine) occurring with a similar incidence to those with placebo. The most common adverse events involved the CNS or gastrointestinal system. Most adverse events reported by paediatric patients with OCD were similar to those reported by adults. In conclusion, fluvoxamine is generally well tolerated and has demonstrated short-term efficacy compared with placebo in the treatment of OCD, and social phobia, separation anxiety disorder or GAD in well controlled trials in paediatric patients. Reductions in symptoms of anxiety with fluvoxamine have been observed for up to 1 year in children and adolescents with OCD. However, there are currently no comparative trials of fluvoxamine with other pharmacological agents. In the absence of such trials, current consensus opinion recommends that when pharmacotherapy is indicated, fluvoxamine, like other SSRIs, can be used as first-line treatment for anxiety disorders, particularly OCD, in paediatric patients. However, direct comparisons are required to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological agents in order to make firm recommendations for the treatment of anxiety disorders in this patient group.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Spotlight on almotriptan in migraine.

UNLABELLED: Almotriptan is a selective serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist ('triptan'). Its efficacy and tolerability have been assessed in a number of randomised, controlled trials in over 4800 adults with moderate or severe attacks of migraine. Oral almotriptan has a rapid onset of action (significant headache relief is observed 0.5 hours after administration of a 12.5mg dose) and efficacy is sustained in most patients who respond by 2 hours. The drug is significantly more effective than placebo as measured by a number of parameters including 2-hour headache response and pain-free response rates. Other symptoms of migraine, including nausea, photophobia and phonophobia, are also alleviated by almotriptan. The efficacy of oral almotriptan appears to be maintained over repeated doses for multiple attacks of migraine treated over a long period (up to 1 year). High headache response rates were reported over all attacks without tachyphylaxis. For the relief of single attacks of migraine, oral almotriptan 12.5mg had similar efficacy to oral sumatriptan 50mg. Patients given almotriptan report less concern with adverse effects than patients given sumatriptan. The lower incidence of chest pain following treatment with almotriptan than with sumatriptan may lead to a reduction in direct costs, with fewer patients requiring management of chest pain. Almotriptan is well tolerated. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity, transient and generally resolved without intervention or the need for treatment withdrawal. The most common adverse events associated with oral almotriptan 12.5mg treatment were dizziness, paraesthesia, nausea, fatigue, headache, somnolence, skeletal pain, vomiting and chest symptoms. The incidence of adverse events did not differ from placebo and decreased in the longer term. Almotriptan can be coadministered with drugs that share a common hepatic metabolic path; in addition, dosage reduction is required only in the presence of severe renal or hepatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Almotriptan is an effective drug for the acute treatment of moderate or severe attacks of migraine in adults. An oral dose of almotriptan 12.5mg has shown greater efficacy than placebo; current data indicate that efficacy is similar to that of oral sumatriptan 50mg, and is maintained in the long term (< or = 1 year). Almotriptan has a good adverse event profile and a generally similar overall tolerability profile to sumatriptan; of note, almotriptan is associated with a significantly lower incidence of chest pain than sumatriptan. However, further clinical experience is required to clearly define the place of almotriptan among the other currently available triptans. Nevertheless, because triptans have an important place in various management regimens, and because the nature of individual patient response to triptans is idiosyncratic, almotriptan is likely to become a useful treatment option in the management of adults with moderate or severe migraine headaches.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2002

Zidovudine: a review of its use in the management of vertically-acquired pediatric HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: Zidovudine is a thymidine analog that, after intracellular phosphorylation to zidovudine triphosphate metabolite, inhibits HIV-specific reverse transcriptase and terminates proviral DNA. Zidovudine administered to mildly symptomatic women with HIV infection in the antepartum (100mg orally 5 times/day), intrapartum (2 mg/kg intravenously over 1 hour then 1 mg/kg/h) and then to the neonate for 6 weeks (2 mg/kg), significantly reduced the rate of vertical HIV transmission by about two thirds, in the absence of breast-feeding (The Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 076 trial, standard protocol). Shorter zidovudine regimens, reduced the risk of transmission of HIV by 50% in a non-breast-feeding population and by about 37% in breast-feeding populations. Zidovudine (standard protocol) in combination with lamivudine was superior to zidovudine alone. A short oral zidovudine regimen was not as effective as a two-dose oral nevirapine regime, although the combination of short-course zidovudine plus lamivudine was as effective. Suppression of viral replication in neonates, infants and children has been achieved with zidovudine when used in triple-therapy regimens that include other antiviral drugs. Results from a trial of treatment-naive children indicate that the antiviral efficacy of combinations of zidovudine and lamivudine or abacavir, given with the protease inhibitor nelfinavir, is superior to treatment with this combination minus nelfinavir. When zidovudine was used in other highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens significant improvements in surrogate markers were consistently seen. Changing to ritonavir-containing regimens was superior to changing to treatment with two new nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Short- and long-term (up to 5.6 years) outcomes from clinical trials showed that prenatal and neonatal exposure to zidovudine was generally well tolerated with the exception of mild anemia that resolved spontaneously after treatment cessation. Zidovudine was generally well tolerated as monotherapy in clinical trials of pediatric patients with HIV infection, and adverse events were similar to those reported in adults, with anemia and neutropenia being the most common. CONCLUSION: Zidovudine, as monotherapy or in combination with other antiretroviral agents, remains a first-choice therapy for the prophylaxis of mother-to-child HIV transmission as shown by substantial reductions in transmission rates. Where feasible, the optimal strategy to prevent vertical transmission is to combine drug therapy with Cesarean section delivery and no breast-feeding. In addition, zidovudine in combination with another nucleoside analogue and a protease inhibitor is a first- or second-choice therapy for the treatment of pediatric HIV infection as significant and sustained reductions in viral load have been shown in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

Adolescent↗