Wildfire coverage.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to David Mintz.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
When patients fail to respond to psychopharmacologic treatment, one reason is that the meanings that treatment and/or wellness hold for them are psychologically intolerable. The result may be noncompliance with medications or the repeated emergence of intolerable side-effects, or a defensive attachment to the medications that prevents improvement. When treatment resistance emerges from the level of meaning, it may be that it can be resolved only by addressing it at that level. This paper argues for the importance of integrating psychological understanding into the pharmacologic treatment of treatment-resistant patients, and explores some factors that mitigate against integration. Several treatment vignettes are presented, suggesting ways of working with meaning in relation to pharmacology. Finally, the paper explores benefits of integration for treaters, even if integration does not result in the resolution of treatment resistance.
Medical language frequently contains linguistic forms that serve to create a social distance between physicians and patients. This distance develops not only out of poor communication with the patient, but also, and more importantly, arises as the language that a physician uses comes to modulate his or her experience of the patient. It is suggested that some of the problem lies in the very nature of language itself, and that further fault can be found in the particular structures of Western language. Unfortunately, however, medical language has adopted special forms and metaphors which further serve to create distance.