Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Magid

Publications and source records attributed to David Magid.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Telephone screening for hazardous drinking among injured patients seen in acute care clinics: feasibility study.

AIMS: We evaluated the effectiveness of telephoning injured patients after discharge, compared with contacting them in the clinic during the acute care visit, for screening for hazardous drinking and eliciting willingness to participate in a lifestyle intervention trial. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-randomized controlled trial among acutely injured adult patients in trauma and acute care clinics, assigning telephone and clinic screening strategies systematically by week. During telephone weeks, we mailed study information to patients identified from computerized records, then telephoned them. During clinic weeks, researchers recruited patients awaiting care. We screened for hazardous drinking using the AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C). We examined the proportion of all injured adult patients who were screened, the proportion of screened patients with hazardous drinking (AUDIT-C score >or=4), and the proportion willing to participate in a (hypothetical) lifestyle intervention trial. Differences were analysed with non-linear mixed models using generalized estimating equations, controlling for age, sex, and facility. Levers and barriers to screening were explored through structured interviews with research staff. RESULTS: We enrolled 29% (469/1,609) of all injured adult patients and 76% of injured patients contacted and found to be eligible. Of screened patients, 23.1% screened positive for hazardous drinking. Telephone and clinic contact were equally effective for screening patients (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.59-1.87), identifying hazardous drinking (OR=0.97; 95% CI = 0.54-1.74), and eliciting willingness to participate in an intervention trial (OR=1.49; 95% CI = 0.97-2.30). Clinic site modified results: telephone was more effective than clinic contact for screening urban patients (OR=1.99; 95% CI = 1.36-2.93), but less effective for screening suburban patients (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.69-0.71). Barriers to clinic screening included lack of clinic staff support, time constraints, and difficulty recruiting elderly or acutely distressed patients. Barriers to telephone screening included erroneous contact information and failure to answer the telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone screening is a feasible and efficient method for screening moderately injured adult patients for hazardous drinking, but characteristics of the clinical site (including personnel) influence its effectiveness. Trauma and acute care clinics are likely to be fruitful sites for identification of patients with hazardous drinking, whether for enrollment into brief intervention trials or treatment programmes.

Adult↗

Evaluation of clinician-reported adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis in two U.S. health plans.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess clinician adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended treatments for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in two health plans. STUDY DESIGN: Using hypothetical scenarios, a 1999-2000 mail survey questioned clinicians about how they would treat a cervicitis patient (CT and gonorrhea treatment recommended) and two patients with laboratory-confirmed CT: an injection drug user (single-dose azithromycin promotes adherence) and a pregnant patient (nonteratogenic drugs recommended). RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-three (82%) of the 907 nonretired clinicians receiving the survey completed it. Eighty-one percent (N=599) reported providing recent CT care. Of these, 70.1% reported they would presumptively treat patients with cervicitis for CT and gonorrhea, 17.1% for CT only, and 11.7% for neither pathogen. Of the 580 clinicians addressing drug injectors, 61.7% reported they would prescribe azithromycin. Most (88.8%) of the 343 clinicians seeing pregnant patients reported they would prescribe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recommended antibiotics. Reported adherence varied by clinician specialty and sources of treatment guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinicians reported treatment consistent with CDC guidelines.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗

How safe is triage by an after-hours telephone call center?

OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to assess (1) compliance with nurse disposition recommendations, (2) frequency of death or potential underreferral associated with hospitalization within 24 hours after a call, and (3) factors associated with potential underreferral, for children receiving care within an integrated health care delivery organization who were triaged by a pediatric after-hours call center. METHODS: The study population included all pediatric patients enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Colorado whose families called the Children's Hospital after-hours call center in Denver, Colorado, during the period between October 1, 1999, and March 31, 2003. Postcall disposition recommendations were categorized as urgent (visit within 4 hours), next day (visit in > 4 hours but within 24 hours), later visit (visit in > 24 hours), or home care (care at home without a visit). Compliance with the nurses' triage disposition recommendations was calculated as the proportion of cases for which utilization data matched the disposition recommendations. RESULTS: Of the 32,968 eligible calls during the study period, 21% received urgent, 27% next day, 4% later visit, and 48% home care disposition recommendations. Rates of compliance with both urgent and home care disposition recommendations were 74%, and the rate of compliance with next day recommendations was 44%. No deaths occurred within < 1 week after the after-hours calls. The rate of potential underreferral with subsequent hospitalization was 0.2%, or 1 case per 599 triaged calls. In multivariate modeling, age of < 6 weeks or > 12 years and being triaged after 11 pm were associated with higher rates of potential under-referral. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately three fourths of families complied with recommendations for their child to be evaluated urgently or to be treated at home, with much lower rates of compliance with intermediate dispositions. The rate of potential underreferral with hospitalization was low, and age and time of call triage were associated with this outcome.

Adolescent↗

Use of emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent quality of care: observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.

BACKGROUND: National practice guidelines strongly recommend activation of the 9-1-1 Emergency Medical Systems (EMS) by patients with symptoms consistent with an acute myocardial infarction (MI). We examined use of the EMS in the United States and ascertained the factors that may influence its use by patients with acute MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: From June 1994 to March 1998, the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 enrolled 772 586 patients hospitalized with MI. We excluded those who transferred in, arrived at the hospital >6 hours from symptom onset, or who were in cardiogenic shock. We compared baseline characteristics and initial management for patients who arrived by ambulance versus self-transport. EMS was used in 53.4% of patients with MI, a proportion that did not vary significantly over the 4-year study period. Nonusers of the EMS were on average younger, male, and at relatively lower risk on presentation. In addition, payer status was significantly associated with EMS use. Use of EMS was independently associated with slightly wider use of acute reperfusion therapies and faster time intervals from door to fibrinolytic therapy (12.1 minutes faster, P<0.001) or to urgent PTCA (31.2 minutes faster, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Only half of patients with MI were transported to the hospital by ambulance, and these patients had greater and significantly faster receipt of initial reperfusion therapies. Wider use of EMS by patients with suspected MI may offer considerable opportunity for improvement in public health.

Aged↗