Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David M Gilbert

Publications and source records attributed to David M Gilbert.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Spatial distribution and specification of mammalian replication origins during G1 phase.

We have examined the distribution of early replicating origins on stretched DNA fibers when nuclei from CHO cells synchronized at different times during G1 phase initiate DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Origins were differentially labeled in vivo versus in vitro to allow a comparison of their relative positions and spacing. With nuclei isolated in the first hour of G1 phase, in vitro origins were distributed throughout a larger number of DNA fibers and did not coincide with in vivo origins. With nuclei isolated 1 h later, a similar total number of in vitro origins were clustered within a smaller number of DNA fibers but still did not coincide with in vivo origins. However, with nuclei isolated later in G1 phase, the positions of many in vitro origins coincided with in vivo origin sites without further change in origin number or density. These results highlight two distinct G1 steps that establish a spatial and temporal program for replication.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Maintenance of stable heterochromatin domains by dynamic HP1 binding.

One function of heterochromatin is the epigenetic silencing by sequestration of genes into transcriptionally repressed nuclear neighborhoods. Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) is a major component of heterochromatin and thus is a candidate for establishing and maintaining the transcriptionally repressive heterochromatin structure. Here we demonstrate that maintenance of stable heterochromatin domains in living cells involves the transient binding and dynamic exchange of HP1 from chromatin. HP1 exchange kinetics correlate with the condensation level of chromatin and are dependent on the histone methyltransferase Suv39h. The chromodomain and the chromoshadow domain of HP1 are both required for binding to native chromatin in vivo, but they contribute differentially to binding in euchromatin and heterochromatin. These data argue against HP1 repression of transcription by formation of static, higher order oligomeric networks but support a dynamic competition model, and they demonstrate that heterochromatin is accessible to regulatory factors.

Amanitins↗
PubMed2003

Epigenomic replication: linking epigenetics to DNA replication.

The information contained within the linear sequence of bases (the genome) must be faithfully replicated in each cell cycle, with a balance of constancy and variation taking place over the course of evolution. Recently, it has become clear that additional information important for genetic regulation is contained within the chromatin proteins associated with DNA (the epigenome). Epigenetic information also must be faithfully duplicated in each cell cycle, with a balance of constancy and variation taking place during the course of development to achieve differentiation while maintaining identity within cell lineages. Both the genome and the epigenome are synthesized at the replication fork, so the events occurring during S-phase provide a critical window of opportunity for eliciting change or maintaining existing genetic states. Cells discriminate between different states of chromatin through the activities of proteins that selectively modify the structure of chromatin. Several recent studies report the localization of certain chromatin modifying proteins to replication forks at specific times during S-phase. Since transcriptionally active and inactive chromosome domains generally replicate at different times during S-phase, this spatiotemporal regulation of chromatin assembly proteins may be an integral part of epigenetic inheritance.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Sensitivity of the origin decision point to specific inhibitors of cellular signaling and metabolism.

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells become committed to initiate DNA replication at specific sites within the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) locus at a discrete point during G1 phase, the origin decision point (ODP). To better understand the requirements for passage through the ODP, we evaluated the ability of various inhibitors of G1-phase progression to prevent passage through the ODP. Of several protein kinase inhibitors tested, only inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) activity (roscovitine, olomoucine) prevented passage through the ODP. Inhibitors of MAP kinase (PD98059), PKA (KT5720), PKG (KT5823), as well as inhibition of integrin-mediated signaling by preventing cell adhesion, all arrested cells in the post-ODP stages of G1 phase. Intriguingly, inhibitors of proteasome-dependent proteolysis (MG132, ALLN, lactacystin) and transcription (DRB, alpha-amanitin, actinomycin D) also inhibited passage through the ODP, whereas inhibition of protein synthesis (cycloheximide) had no effect on the ODP. Cross-checking each inhibitor for its affect on transcription revealed that the ODP could be uncoupled from transcription; MG132 and lactacystin did not inhibit transcription, and KT5720 was a potent inhibitor of transcription. Importantly, cells that were arrested upstream of the ODP with either roscovitine or lactacystin contained functional prereplication complexes (pre-RCs), supporting previous findings that pre-RC formation is not sufficient for origin specification. These results demonstrate that specification of the DHFR origin is independent of growth signaling mechanisms and does not require G1-phase synthesis of a protein regulator such as a cyclin or Dbf4/ASK1, positioning the ODP after pre-RC formation but prior to the activation of the known S-phase promoting kinases.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Mammalian nuclei become licensed for DNA replication during late telophase.

Mcm 2-7 are essential replication proteins that bind to chromatin in mammalian nuclei during late telophase. Here, we have investigated the relationship between Mcm binding, licensing of chromatin for replication, and specification of the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) replication origin. Approximately 20% of total Mcm3 protein was bound to chromatin in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells during telophase, while an additional 25% bound gradually and cumulatively throughout G1-phase. To investigate the functional significance of this binding, nuclei prepared from CHO cells synchronized at various times after metaphase were introduced into Xenopus egg extracts, which were either immunodepleted of Mcm proteins or supplemented with geminin, an inhibitor of the Mcm-loading protein Cdt1. Within 1 hour after metaphase, coincident with completion of nuclear envelope formation, CHO nuclei were fully competent to replicate in both of these licensing-defective extracts. However, sites of initiation of replication in each of these extracts were found to be dispersed throughout the DHFR locus within nuclei isolated between 1 to 5 hours after metaphase, but became focused to the DHFR origin within nuclei isolated after 5 hours post-metaphase. Importantly, introduction of permeabilized post-ODP, but not pre-ODP, CHO nuclei into licensing-deficient Xenopus egg extracts resulted in the preservation of a significant degree of DHFR origin specificity, implying that the previously documented lack of specific origin selection in permeabilized nuclei is at least partially due to the licensing of new initiation sites by proteins in the Xenopus egg extracts. We conclude that the functional association of Mcm proteins with chromatin (i.e. replication licensing) in CHO cells takes place during telophase, several hours prior to the specification of replication origins at the DHFR locus.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Evidence for a pre-restriction point Cdk3 activity.

We have examined the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 3 (cdk3) during G1-phase of the cell cycle in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) fibroblasts. Histone H1 kinase activity associated with anti-cdk3 immunoprecipitates peaked during a brief window of time, 2-3 h prior to the restriction point. In vitro cdk3 activity was sensitive to roscovitine, a drug previously shown to inhibit cdks 1, 2, and 5, but not cdk4 or 6. Early G1-phase activation of cdk3 was downregulated by treatment of cells with MG132, an inhibitor of the proteasome, and by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. These results provide evidence for a pre-restriction point cdk3 activity that requires both the synthesis of a regulatory subunit and degradation of an inhibitor.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Heterochromatin, HP1 and methylation at lysine 9 of histone H3 in animals.

We show that methylated lysine 9 of histone H3 (Me9H3) is a marker of heterochromatin in divergent animal species. It localises to both constitutive and facultative heterochromatin and replicates late in S-phase of the cell cycle. Significantly, Me9H3 is enriched in the inactive mammalian X chromosome (Xi) in female cells, as well as in the XY body during meiosis in the male, and forms a G-band pattern along the arms of the autosomes. Me9H3 is a constituent of imprinted chromosomes that are repressed. The paternal and maternal pronuclei in one-cell mouse embryos show a striking non-equivalence in Me9H3: the paternal pronucleus contains no immunocytologically detectable Me9H3. The levels of Me9H3 on the parental chromosomes only become equivalent after the two-cell stage. Finally, we provide evidence that Me9H3 is neither necessary nor sufficient for localisation of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) to chromosomal DNA.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect.

In general, transcriptionally active euchromatin replicates during the first half of S phase, whereas silent heterochromatin replicates during the second half. Moreover, changes in replication timing accompany key stages of development. Although there is not a strict correlation between replication timing and transcription per se, recent results reveal a strong relationship between heritably repressed chromatin and late replication that is conserved in all eukaryotes. A long-standing question is whether replication timing dictates the structure of chromatin or vice versa. Mounting evidence supports a model in which replication timing is both cause and consequence of chromatin structure by providing a means to inherit chromatin states that, in turn, regulate replication timing in the subsequent cell cycle. Moreover, new findings relating aberrations in replication timing to defects in centromere function, chromosome cohesion and genome instability suggest that the role of replication timing extends beyond its relationship to transcription. Novel systems in both yeasts and mammals are finally beginning to reveal some of the determinants that regulate replication timing, which should pave the way for a long-anticipated molecular dissection of this complex liaison.

Alleles↗