Biomedical subjects

David K Whynes

Publications and source records attributed to David K Whynes.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Psychosocial and economic aspects of a trial of management of mild and borderline cervical abnormalities (TOMBOLA).

TOMBOLA is a randomized controlled trial to determine (a) the most effective and efficient management strategy for women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear results, and (b) the most appropriate treatment for women with abnormalities detected following colposcopy. This paper outlines the trial's psychosocial and economic protocol, and explains how TOMBOLA can provide detailed evidence on the psychosocial and economic impact of alternative management options and follow-up. This protocol has been developed in parallel with the clinical protocol, thereby offering the opportunity for the development of a type-specific outcome measure and detailed piloting of all instruments. The multi-disciplinary approach to TOMBOLA allows the combination of clinical outcomes with both generic and specific psychosocial and health-related quality of life measures. The convergent validity between these measures will be assessed, with a view to developing a specific utility index for the future assessment of cervical screening modalities.

Journal Article↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Assessing progressivity of out-of-pocket payment: with illustration to Malaysia.

Throughout the world, policy makers are considering or implementing financing strategies that are likely to have a substantial impact on the equity of health financing. The assessment of the equity implication is clearly important, given the potential impact that alternative finance sources have on households. Households incur out-of-pocket payment directly from their budget, apart from their public or private insurance. Out-of-pocket payment is the primary concern, given their undesirable impact on households. Progressivity measures departures from proportionality in the relationship between out-of-pocket payment and ability to pay. It is the most frequently used yardstick to assess the equity of out-of-pocket payments in empirical studies. This paper provides an evaluation of such progressivity measures, undertaken using four approaches (proportion approach, tabulation approach, concentration curve and Kakwani's index), in order to reveal their usefulness and underlying notion. It is illustrated empirically with data on out-of-pocket payment for health care in Malaysia for 1998/ 1999, based on the nationally representative Household Expenditure Survey. Results indicate that out-of-pocket payments are mildly progressive, whilst the four approaches have their benefits and limitations in assessing equity implications. This analysis is of interest from a policy perspective, given Malaysia's heavy reliance on out-of-pocket payments to finance health care.

Cost Sharing↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Eliciting willingness to pay: comparing closed-ended with open-ended and payment scale formats.

Willingness to pay (WTP) is increasingly being used as a measure of valuation in health technology assessment. A variety of formats for eliciting values are available, although the relative virtues of each remain the subject of methodological controversy. This article compares valuation results obtained using a WTP survey instrument in a closed-ended format with those obtained from instruments using open-ended and payment scale formats. Samples of subjects were drawn from a general population, and all were asked to value the same intervention--alternative methods of screening for colorectal cancer. It was discovered that, whereas the open-ended and payment scale formats produced broadly similar valuations, the closed-ended format produced significantly higher WTP valuations and different justifications for those valuations. It is hypothesized that anchoring and yea-saying effects explain these differences and that the closed-ended format triggers a different response mode in subjects.

Attitude to Health↗