Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David J Webb

Publications and source records attributed to David J Webb.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Increased central pulse pressure and augmentation index in subjects with hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to investigate the relation between serum cholesterol, arterial stiffness and central blood pressure. BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness and pulse pressure are important determinants of cardiovascular risk. However, the effect of hypercholesterolemia on arterial stiffness is controversial, and central pulse pressure has not been previously investigated. METHODS: Pressure waveforms were recorded from the radial artery in 68 subjects with hypercholesterolemia and 68 controls, and corresponding central waveforms were generated using pulse wave analysis. Central pressure, augmentation index (AIx) (a measure of systemic stiffness) and aortic pulse wave velocity were determined. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in peripheral blood pressure between the two groups, but central pulse pressure was significantly higher in the group with hypercholesterolemia (37 +/- 11 mm Hg vs. 33 +/- 10 mm Hg [means +/- SD]; p = 0.028). Augmentation index was also significantly higher in the patients with hypercholesterolemia group (24.8 +/- 11.3% vs. 15.6 +/- 12.1%; p < 0.001), as was the estimated aortic pulse wave velocity. In a multiple regression model, age, short stature, peripheral mean arterial pressure, smoking and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol correlated positively with AIx, and there was an inverse correlation with heart rate and male gender. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hypercholesterolemia have a higher central pulse pressure and stiffer blood vessels than matched controls, despite similar peripheral blood pressures. These hemodynamic changes may contribute to the increased risk of cardiovascular disease associated with hypercholesterolemia, and assessment may improve risk stratification.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

High plasma concentrations of human urotensin II do not alter local or systemic hemodynamics in man.

OBJECTIVE: Human urotensin II (hUII) is an endocrine hormone that acts as a potent arterial vasoconstrictor in both in vitro and in vivo studies in animals. We examined, for the first time, the local and systemic hemodynamic response to hUII in man in vivo. METHODS: Four healthy male volunteers took part in pilot studies and 11 in definitive studies. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured in response to intra-arterial infusion of authentic, biologically active hUII (incremental rates of 0.001-300 pmol min(-1)) and saline placebo using venous occlusion plethysmography. Blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output and hUII plasma concentrations were also measured. Forearm studies were repeated in five subjects with inhibition of endothelial mediators using aspirin and a "nitric oxide clamp". Dorsal hand vein diameter was determined by a standard displacement technique in response to local administration of hUII (3-300 pmol min(-1)) with and without nitric oxide synthase inhibition. RESULTS: There was no significant change in FBF during brachial infusion of saline or hUII (dose range, 0.001 to 300 pmol min(-1)). A nitric oxide clamp did not unmask vasoactive effects of hUII. Human UII infusions (100 and 300 pmol min(-1)) significantly increased plasma hUII concentrations from baseline (12 +/- 3 pmol l(-1)) to 106 +/- 15 and 307 +/- 98 pmol l(-1), respectively. Despite high circulating hUII concentrations, no change was seen in systemic hemodynamics and ECGs were unchanged. Human UII had no effect on hand vein diameter (n=6). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to our hypothesised role of hUII, we found no vasoactive responses to hUII in vivo, consistent with recent in vitro studies in human blood vessels, but in contrast to non-human primate studies in vivo. Our data do not support a key role for hUII in the regulation of vascular tone and resting blood pressure in man. However, studies with hUII receptor antagonists are also needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Nitric oxide regulates local arterial distensibility in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness is an important determinant of cardiovascular risk. Several lines of evidence support a role for the endothelium in regulating arterial stiffness by release of vasoactive mediators. We hypothesized that nitric oxide (NO) acting locally regulates arterial stiffness in vivo, and the aim of this experiment was to test this hypothesis in an ovine hind-limb preparation. METHODS AND RESULTS: All studies were conducted in anesthetized sheep. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was calculated by the foot-to-foot methodology from 2 pressure waveforms recorded simultaneously with a high-fidelity dual pressure-sensing catheter placed in the common iliac artery. Intra-arterial infusion of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) increased iliac PWV significantly, by 3+/-2% (P<0.01). Infusion of acetylcholine and glyceryl trinitrate reduced PWV significantly, by 6+/-4% (P=0.03) and 5+/-2% (P<0.01), respectively. Only the effect of acetylcholine, however, was significantly inhibited during coinfusion of L-NMMA (P=0.03). There was no change in systemic arterial pressure throughout the studies. Importantly, infusion of L-NMMA or acetylcholine distal to the common iliac artery (via the sheath) did not affect PWV. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate, for the first time, that basal NO production influences large-artery distensibility. In addition, exogenous acetylcholine and glyceryl trinitrate both increase arterial distensibility, the former mainly through NO production. This may help explain why conditions that exhibit endothelial dysfunction are also associated with increased arterial stiffness. Therefore, reversal of endothelial dysfunction or drugs that are large-artery vasorelaxants may be effective in reducing large-artery stiffness in humans, and thus cardiovascular risk.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2002

The effect of oxidative stress on endothelium-dependent and nitric oxide donor-induced relaxation: implications for nitrate tolerance.

Increased inactivation of nitric oxide (NO) by superoxide has been implicated in nitrate tolerance. Here, we set out to compare the inhibitory effect of superoxide on endothelium-dependent, acetylcholine (ACh)-mediated vascular relaxation with that on the endothelium-independent effects of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) and another NO donor drug, S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO). Rings of thoracic aorta from adult male Wistar rats (350-450 g) were precontracted with phenylephrine (approximately EC(90)) prior to cumulative additions (10 nM/L-10 microM/L) of GTN, GSNO, or ACh. Rings were then treated with the superoxide generator pyrogallol (300 micromol/L) alone or following pretreatment with the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase inhibitor diethyldithiocarbamate (DETCA; 100 micromol/L), and cumulative additions of the vasodilators were repeated. All experiments were conducted in the presence of catalase (3000 U/ml) to prevent accumulation of hydrogen peroxide. Relaxation to ACh was abolished by pyrogallol-derived superoxide. Relaxation to GSNO was significantly inhibited by superoxide (P < 0.05, n = 8) and was more pronounced at lower GSNO concentrations. However, GTN was relatively resistant to inhibition by superoxide with modest inhibition only occurring in rings pretreated with DETCA prior to pyrogallol (P < 0.05; n = 8). In contrast to GSNO, the inhibitory effect was more pronounced with high concentrations of GTN, suggesting that the mechanism underlying superoxide-mediated inhibition is different for the two NO donor drugs. Further experiments showed that vascular responses to ACh were not inhibited (P > 0.05, n = 6) in aortic rings made tolerant to GTN (10 micromol/L, 2-h incubation) and that treatment of vessels with the antioxidant vitamin C (1 mmol/L) successfully prevented the development of tolerance. Taken together, these results suggest that superoxide is not a major factor in tolerance in vitro and imply that the protective actions of vitamin C are unrelated to its antioxidant activity in this setting.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2002

Phosphodiesterase type 5 as a pharmacologic target in erectile dysfunction.

The scientific rationale of pharmacologically inhibiting phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) is reviewed. Published literature on the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway for penile erection and on PDE5 inhibition using sildenafil as the model for pharmacologic PDE5 inhibition are assessed. The key second messenger in the mediation of penile erection is cGMP. PDE5 is the predominant PDE in the corpus cavernosum, and cGMP is its primary substrate. Therefore, in men with ED, elevation of cGMP in corpus cavernosal tissue via selective inhibition of cGMP-specific PDE5 is a means of improving erectile function at minimal risk of adverse events. This approach is validated by the clinical efficacy and safety of sildenafil, the pioneering drug for selective PDE5 inhibitor therapy for ED. Sildenafil exhibits inhibitory potency against PDE5 and a 10-fold lower dose-related inhibitory potency against rod outer segment PDE6, the predominant PDE in the phototransduction cascade in rods. Thus, its pharmacologic profile is predictable, with close correlation between pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Clinically, sildenafil improves erectile function in a large percentage of men with ED. The most common adverse events are due to PDE5 inhibition in vascular and visceral smooth muscle; similar adverse events are expected during therapeutic use of all PDE5 inhibitors. As free sildenafil plasma concentrations approach concentrations sufficient to inhibit retinal PDE6, usually at higher therapeutic doses, transient, reversible visual adverse events can occur, albeit infrequently. Selective inhibition of PDE5 is a rational therapeutic approach in ED, as proved by the clinical success of sildenafil.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2002

Heart rate dependency of pulse pressure amplification and arterial stiffness.

BACKGROUND: Pulse pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity, measures of arterial stiffness, are both important determinants of cardiovascular risk. However, assessment of peripheral pulse pressure does not always provide a reliable measure of changes in central pulse pressure or arterial stiffness. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of acute changes in heart rate on arterial stiffness and on peripheral and central pulse pressure in healthy subjects. METHODS: Twenty subjects (age range, 20 to 72 years) were studied at cardiac catheterization. Pulse wave analysis was used to determine central pressure, augmentation index (AIx), a measure of systemic arterial stiffness, and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) during right atrial pacing (80 to 120 beats/min). RESULTS: Pulse pressure amplification increased during pacing due to a reduction in central pressure augmentation. AIx was significantly and inversely related to heart rate (r = -0.70, P < .001) due to an alteration in the relative timing of the reflected pressure wave, rather than a reduction in arterial stiffness, as PWV did not change. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that peripheral pulse pressure does not provide an accurate assessment of changes in central hemodynamics in relation to changes in heart rate, and that aortic stiffness is not affected by acute changes in heart rate.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Forearm vasoconstriction to endothelin-1 is impaired, but constriction to sarafotoxin 6c and vasodilatation to BQ-123 unaltered, in patients with essential hypertension.

The importance of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in the pathophysiology of essential hypertension is unclear. We therefore compared the effects of endothelin ET(A) receptor blockade and the stimulation of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, and their interaction with the sympathetic nervous system, in the forearm resistance vessels of patients with essential hypertension and healthy control subjects. A total of 27 untreated patients with essential hypertension (blood pressure >160/100 mmHg) and 25 normotensive (blood pressure <140/90 mmHg) age- and sex-matched control subjects participated in these studies. A total of 10 patients and 10 controls took part in each phase. Locally active doses of study drugs were infused into the non-dominant brachial artery, while forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. A 60 min infusion of BQ-123 (an ET(A) receptor antagonist; 100 nmol/min) significantly increased forearm blood flow by 40+/-8% in hypertensive patients and by 35+/-5% in controls, with no difference between groups (P=0.49). Forearm vasoconstriction to ET-1 (an ET(A) and ET(B) receptor agonist; 5 pmol/min) for 90 min was significantly blunted in hypertensive patients (21+/-4%) compared with control subjects (37+/-3%; P=0.0001). Forearm vasoconstriction to sarafotoxin S6c (an ET(B) receptor agonist; 10 pmol/min) for 90 min was similar in hypertensive patients (44+/-5%) and control subjects (48+/-4%; P=0.95). Sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction produced by lower-body negative pressure was not different in hypertensive patients compared with controls, and was not affected by infusion of ET-1 or sarafotoxin S6c. There were no differences in the observed increase in forearm blood flow with a control vasodilator (sodium nitroprusside) or the observed decrease in forearm blood flow with a control vasoconstrictor (noradrenaline) between hypertensive patients and control subjects. BQ-123 produced a significant increase in forearm blood flow in hypertensive patients, consistent with the anti-hypertensive actions of this agent. In conclusion, forearm vasoconstriction to ET-1, but not to sarafotoxin S6c, was reduced in patients with essential hypertension, consistent with possible down-regulation of the ET(A) receptor in this condition.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2002

Acute endothelin(A) receptor antagonism improves coronary artery compliance in coronary artery disease patients.

Endothelin (ET) exerts a tonic, stiffening effect on the common carotid artery in rats in vitro. This effect is mediated via the ET(A) receptor. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of ET(A) receptor antagonism on coronary artery compliance in humans. We examined 22 patients with stable angina after diagnostic coronary arteriography. Intracoronary BQ-123 (6 micromol), an ET(A) receptor antagonist (14 patients), or saline (8 patients), was infused in an artery without significant lesion over 20 min. The artery lumen area in the proximal arterial segment was measured at end diastole and end systole before and after BQ-123 or saline administration using an intravascular ultrasound catheter. Calculations were made of absolute (in mm(2)/mmHg x 10(3)) and normalized compliance index (in mmHg(-1) x 10(3)). Pulse pressure decreased from 64+/-21 to 61+/-17 mmHg after BQ-123 administration and increased from 59+/-16 to 68+/-20 mmHg after saline administration (F=9.54, P=0.006). The respective changes in absolute compliance index were from 24+/-18 to 39+/-25 and from 19+/-15 to 14+/-17 (F=6.43, P=0.02). Normalized compliance index changed from 2.5+/-2.0 to 3.6+/-2.4 and from 2.7+/-2.6 to 1.6+/-1.8 (F=11.92, P=0.002) respectively, in the two groups. Acute ET(A) receptor antagonism improves coronary artery compliance in coronary artery disease patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Differential vasoactive response to endothelin receptor antagonists and prostacyclin in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a rare disease of the pulmonary vasculature with diverse pathogenetic mechanisms. Vasoactive substances such as endothelin A receptor (ET(A)) antagonists and prostanoids have been used to improve haemodynamics and clinical outcome. We compared the hemodynamic response to BQ-123 (an ET(A) receptor antagonist) and prostacyclin or its analogue iloprost in ten patients (four men) with a mean age of 35.9+/-15.6 years. Seven patients had primary PH and three had PH owing to connective tissue disease. Patients underwent haemodynamic evaluation before and after administration of intra-atrial BQ-123 (200 mmol/min for 60 min), intravenous prostacyclin (3 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 4 h) or iloprost as an aerosol (100 microg over 24 h). Response to vasodilator administration was defined as >15% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI). Of the ten patients, five showed a response to BQ-123 and eight responded to prostanoids. Four patients were responders and one patient was a non-responder to both agents. PVRI decreased by 16.6+/-13.4% with BQ-123, and 24.4+/-15.7% with prostanoids (not statistically significant). The aetiology of PH did not affect the response to either drug. In conclusion, response to ET(A) antagonist or prostanoid administration can be achieved in a large group of patients with severe PH, however few patients respond identically to both agents. These findings are consistent with a multifactorial mechanism involved in this disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Local nitric oxide release does not affect tachyphylaxis to angiotensin II in dorsal hand veins in man in the presence of prostaglandin synthesis inhibition.

AIMS: Local prostaglandin (PG) production contributes to tachyphylaxis to angiotensin II (ANGII) in veins. Our aim was to assess the hypothesis that local nitric oxide (NO) generation is also, in part, responsible for tachyphylaxis to ANGII in veins, using the Aellig dorsal hand vein technique. METHODS: Eight healthy male volunteers received 600 mg of aspirin (orally) to inhibit PG production. The venoconstrictor effects of ANGII and noradrenaline (NA) were then compared in dorsal hand veins during co-infusion of the NO synthase inhibitor L-NMMA or saline, on separate occasions. RESULTS: ANGII and NA produced a similar degree of initial venoconstriction. However, the response to ANGII was significantly attenuated by 12 min compared with NA (AUC 147 +/- 38 vs 196 +/- 40, respectively; [95% confidence interval for difference: 7, 92], P = 0.02). Infusion of L-NMMA did not influence the response to ANGII or NA (P = 0.2 and P = 0.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Tachyphylaxis to ANGII in dorsal hand veins is not dependent on local NO release.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2002

Repeatability of local forearm vasoconstriction to endothelin-1 measured by venous occlusion plethysmography.

AIMS: We investigated the repeatability of the forearm blood flow response to intra-arterial infusion of endothelin-1 (ET-1), assessed by venous occlusion -plethysmography. METHODS: In eight healthy men (aged 18-50 years), on four separate occasions, ET-1 (2.5 or 10 pmol min-1) was infused for 120 min via a 27 SWG cannula sited in the brachial artery of the nondominant arm. Each dose level was administered twice on consecutive visits. The dose order was randomized. Results are expressed as percentage change from baseline at 120 min (mean +/- s.e. mean). RESULTS: ET-1 caused significant vasoconstriction (P < 0.0001 anova) at both doses (38 +/- 3%, 2.5 pmol min-1 and 62 +/- 3%, 10 pmol min-1; mean visit 1 and 2). There was no difference in the response to either dose on repeated challenge. Responses appeared to be less variable when expressed as percentage change in the ratio of blood flow (infused:noninfused) in both arms than as percentage change in blood flow in the infused arm alone, as indicated by repeatability coefficients (15% vs 21%, 2.5 pmol min-1 and 11% vs 13%, 10 pmol min-1; ratio vs infused arm alone). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown dose-dependent vasoconstriction in the forearm vascular bed to intra-arterial infusion of ET-1 and that this response is less variable when expressed as percentage change in the ratio of forearm blood flow than percentage change in the infused arm. These data should also provide useful information to determine the power of early clinical pharmacology studies investigating the activity of endothelin receptor antagonists.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Inhibition of basal nitric oxide synthesis increases aortic augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in vivo.

AIMS: To investigate the role of basal nitric oxide (NO) production in regulating large artery stiffness in vivo. METHODS: Incremental doses of the NO synthase inhibitor L-N(G)-monomethyl arginine (LNMMA: 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 mg kg-1 min-1) or placebo were infused in eight healthy men. Arterial stiffness was assessed noninvasively by pulse wave analysis. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, infusion of LNMMA led to a dose-dependent increase in mean arterial pressure, peripheral vascular resistance, and aortic and systemic arterial stiffness. There was an accompanying reduction in heart rate and cardiac index. The highest dose of LNMMA resulted in an increase of 25% in AIx (95% confidence limits; 12, 38) and of 16 mmHg in mean arterial pressure (9, 23) compared with infusion of saline. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate functional regulation of large artery stiffness in vivo by NO, and may provide new therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular risk reduction.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

No effect on central or peripheral blood pressure of systemic urotensin II infusion in humans.

AIMS: In rodent and primate studies, urotensin II is an extremely potent vasoconstrictor peptide with effects in the central aortic and arterial vasculature as well as on cardiac function. The aim of the present study was to assess systemic haemodynamic responses to intravenous urotensin II infusion in humans. METHODS: In 10 healthy male volunteers, intravenous urotensin II (3, 30 and 300 pmol min-1) and saline placebo were given on separate occasions in a single-blind randomized manner. Systemic haemodynamics and arterial stiffness were assessed by sphygmomanometry, transthoracic bioimpedance, and pulse wave analysis. Plasma urotensin II immuno-reactivity was measured by radio-immunoassay. RESULTS: Intravenous urotensin II infusions were well tolerated with no adverse clinical effects and no electrocardiographic changes. Circulating plasma urotensin II immuno-reactivity increased from baseline of 16 +/- 1 to 1460 +/- 82 pmol l-1 (mean +/- s.e. mean) during infusion of urotensin II at 300 pmol min-1 (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant placebo adjusted changes in heart rate (95% confidence intervals: -3.6, + 4.4 min-1), mean arterial pressure (-5.8, + 1.7 mmHg) or cardiac index (-0.1, + 0.4 l min-1 m-2). There were also no changes in augmentation index (-4.1, + 5.2%) or pulse wave velocity (-1.3, + 0.3 m s-1). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous urotensin II infusion did not affect systemic haemodynamics or arterial stiffness, despite achieving an approximately 100-fold increase in plasma immuno-reactivity. We conclude that urotensin II is unlikely to have a physiological role in the short term regulation of vascular tone or blood pressure in man. Further confirmatory studies with urotensin II receptor antagonists are required.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Endogenous endothelin-1 limits exercise-induced vasodilation in hypertensive humans.

Essential hypertension is a common disorder, associated with increased endothelin-1-mediated vasoconstrictor tone at rest. We hypothesized that increased vasoconstrictor activity of endothelin-1 might explain why the normal decrease in peripheral vascular resistance in response to exercise is attenuated in hypertensive patients. Therefore, we investigated the effect of endothelin A (ET(A)) receptor blockade on the vasodilator response to handgrip exercise. Forearm blood flow responses to handgrip exercise (15%, 30%, and 45% of maximum voluntary contraction) were assessed in hypertensive patients and matched normotensive subjects, before and after intra-arterial infusions of the ET(A) receptor antagonist BQ-123; a control dilator, hydralazine; and placebo (saline). Preinfusion (baseline) vasodilation in response to exercise was significantly attenuated at each workload in hypertensive patients compared with normotensive subjects. Intra-arterial infusions of hydralazine and saline did not increase the vasodilator response to exercise in either hypertensives or normotensives at any workload. The vasodilator response to exercise was markedly enhanced after BQ-123 at the 2 higher workloads in hypertensives (157+/-48%, P<0.01; 203+/-58%, P<0.01) but not in normotensives. This suggests that the impaired vasodilator response to exercise in hypertensive patients is, at least in part, a functional limitation caused by endogenous ET(A) receptor-mediated vasoconstriction. Treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists may, therefore, increase exercise capacity in essential hypertension.

Adult↗