Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Fitzmaurice

Publications and source records attributed to David Fitzmaurice.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

What are the barriers to warfarin use in atrial fibrillation?: Development of a questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence of their benefit and efforts to increase usage, anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients remains underutilized. Previous surveys have assessed reasons for underuse of anticoagulation but have limitations including non-structured approach for eliciting barriers and use of clinical vignettes and not patient-level data. The objectives of this study were to develop a questionnaire to assess barriers to anticoagulation use for stroke prophylaxis in AF patients at a patient- and physician-level and to conduct a preliminary field-test of the instrument. METHODS: Barriers to warfarin use were identified from a literature review, input from clinical experts, and a physician focus group. A sample of US physicians who treat AF patients completed the questionnaire. Physicians ranked their reluctance on a 1-10 scale (10 = very reluctant) in general to prescribe warfarin if a specific barrier was present in a patient and then indicated critical barriers to prescribing warfarin in a sample of their own AF patients not receiving warfarin. RESULTS: Forty-one barriers to warfarin use were identified and classified into 4 groups: patient medical characteristics (n = 17), health care system factors (n = 7), patient capability (n = 12), and patient preference (n = 5). Several new items were developed (e.g., difficulty in obtaining venous access), existing items were revised (e.g., timeframe for bleeding episodes subdivided into > or <or= 3 months), and multi-factorial barriers (e.g., dementia, epilepsy) were explored. The factor that most strongly influenced physicians' (n = 30) decisions not to prescribe warfarin was severe bleeding < 3 months ago (mean +/- SD: 9.2 +/- 1.3) while the most prevalent critical barriers to prescribing warfarin in specific AF patients (n = 24) was patient unwilling to undergo repeat testing (29%). CONCLUSION: This questionnaire has the potential to assist in better understanding barriers to warfarin use with a view to addressing and then overcoming warfarin underutilization. Preliminary data suggest patient preference and capabilities are at least as important as medical characteristics as barriers to prescribing warfarin in AF patients.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

Thromboembolism.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anticoagulants↗

A randomised controlled trial and cost effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in the over 65s: (SAFE) [ISRCTN19633732].

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been recognised as an important independent risk factor for thromboembolic disease, particularly stroke for which it provides a five-fold increase in risk. This study aimed to determine the baseline prevalence and the incidence of AF based on a variety of screening strategies and in doing so to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies, including targeted or whole population screening, compared with routine clinical practice, for detection of AF in people aged 65 and over. The value of clinical assessment and echocardiography as additional methods of risk stratification for thromboembolic disease in patients with AF were also evaluated. METHODS: The study design was a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with a study population of patients aged 65 and over from 50 General Practices in the West Midlands. These purposefully selected general practices were randomly allocated to 25 intervention practices and 25 control practices. GPs and practice nurses within the intervention practices received education on the importance of AF detection and ECG interpretation. Patients in the intervention practices were randomly allocated to systematic (n = 5000) or opportunistic screening (n = 5000). Prospective identification of pre-existing risk factors for AF within the screened population enabled comparison between high risk targeted screening and total population screening. AF detection rates in systematically screened and opportunistically screened populations in the intervention practices were compared to AF detection rate in 5,000 patients in the control practices.

Aged↗

Thromboembolism.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anticoagulants↗

Protocol for Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged study (BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial of warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in the management of atrial fibrillation in an elderly primary care population [ISRCTN89345269].

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important independent risk factor for stroke. Randomised controlled trials have shown that this risk can be reduced substantially by treatment with warfarin or more modestly by treatment with aspirin. Existing trial data for the effectiveness of warfarin are drawn largely from studies in selected secondary care populations that under-represent the elderly. The Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged (BAFTA) study will provide evidence of the risks and benefits of warfarin versus aspirin for the prevention of stroke for older people with AF in a primary care setting. STUDY DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial where older patients with AF are randomised to receive adjusted dose warfarin or aspirin. Patients will be followed up at three months post-randomisation, then at six monthly intervals there after for an average of three years by their general practitioner. Patients will also receive an annual health questionnaire.1240 patients will be recruited from over 200 practices in England. Patients must be aged 75 years or over and have AF. Patients will be excluded if they have a history of any of the following conditions: rheumatic heart disease; major non-traumatic haemorrhage; intra-cranial haemorrhage; oesophageal varices; active endoscopically proven peptic ulcer disease; allergic hypersensitivity to warfarin or aspirin; or terminal illness. Patients will also be excluded if the GP considers that there are clinical reasons to treat a patient with warfarin in preference to aspirin (or vice versa). The primary end-point is fatal or non-fatal disabling stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or significant arterial embolism. Secondary outcomes include major extra-cranial haemorrhage, death (all cause, vascular), hospital admissions (all cause, vascular), cognition, quality of life, disability and compliance with study medication.

Aged↗

Thromboembolism.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anticoagulants↗

Thromboembolism.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anticoagulants↗

Thromboembolism.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anticoagulants↗