Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David A Goldfarb

Publications and source records attributed to David A Goldfarb.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Right donor nephrectomy: a comparison of hand-assisted transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic approaches.

BACKGROUND: We compare the anatomic and functional outcomes of right live-donor nephrectomy (LDN) using either a hand-assisted approach (HALDN) or a pure retroperitoneoscopic approach (RLDN) in two institutions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were recorded prospectively in 59 patients undergoing right LDN using either hand-assisted (n=31) or pure retroperitoneoscopic (n=28) approaches. All HALDN cases were performed at the University of Cincinnati, and all RLDN cases were performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. RESULTS: Demographics were similar with respect to age (41.1+/-11.5 vs. 44.5+/-8.5 years) and human leukocyte antigen mismatches (2.7+/-1.8 vs. 2.6+/-1.6). Operative times were longer for HALDN (3.4+/-0.7 vs. 3.0+/-0.7 hours, P <0.04), whereas warm ischemia time was shorter (3:55+/-1:47 vs. 4:55+/-0:55 minutes, P <0.001). Length of renal vein and artery were equivalent (2.4/3.4 vs. 2.3/3.2 cm, P =0.5). Complication rates were similar (10% vs. 7%, P =0.5), including conversion to open surgery (n=1), accessory upper pole artery transection (n=1), and swollen testicle (n=1) in the HALDN group, and a small parenchymal injury (n=1) and a capsular tear (n=1) in the RLDN group. Donor length of stay and convalescence were similar in both groups (43.5+/-14.1 vs. 45.7+/-25.3 hours, P =0.1; convalescence 23.5+/-5.3 vs. 20.2+/-4.1 days, P =0.5). One-week, 1-month, and 1-year serum creatinine levels were equivalent with both approaches. No grafts were lost in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the HALDN and RLDN techniques can provide kidney grafts with equivalent-length vessels and excellent function.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Right retroperitoneal versus left transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To describe our preferred method of right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) using a retroperitoneoscopic approach to determine the indications for, and overall rate of, right LDN and to compare the donor and recipient early outcomes of right retroperitoneal LDN to those of left transperitoneal LDN in a consecutive single-institution series. METHODS: At our institution, LDN for allotransplantation was performed in 143 consecutive patients. The indications for right LDN (n = 29) included multiple left renal vessels (n = 18), early branching of the left renal artery (n = 1), left renal vein anomaly (n = 2), right renal arterial fibromuscular dysplasia (n = 2), right renal cyst (n = 3), mild right hydronephrosis with delay on renal scan (n = 1), or right nephrolithiasis (n = 2). RESULTS: Right LDN was performed in 29 (20.3%) of 143 patients using a retroperitoneal approach in all but the first case. Right retroperitoneal LDN was associated with decreased blood loss and operative time compared with left transperitoneal LDN. The hospital stay, analgesic use, and donor serum creatinine at discharge were similar in both groups. Despite a statistically significantly increased warm ischemia time and decreased renal vein length, right retroperitoneal LDN was associated with recipient functional outcomes at 5 and 30 days after transplant that were no different from those after left transperitoneal LDN. CONCLUSIONS: Right retroperitoneal laparoscopic LDN provides similar donor and recipient outcomes when compared with the left transperitoneal approach and obviates most of the technical challenges encountered with a right transperitoneal approach.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Factors related to delayed graft function after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Delayed graft function after live donor transplantation affects 5% to 10% of recipients regardless of procurement technique. This delay in function is associated with an increased risk of rejection and decreased graft survival. In the present study we critically assess allograft recovery to identify the risk factors related to delayed graft function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed donor and recipient medical records from 100 consecutive laparoscopic live donor nephrectomies from August 1997 to October 2001. Four criteria were used to classify delayed graft function: I) requirement of dialysis in postoperative week 1, II) creatinine 2.5 mg/dl or greater at postoperative day 5, III) time to half peak activity (mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan) at postoperative day 5 greater than 12.2 minutes (normal range 1 to 12.2) and IV) time to peak activity (mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan) at day 5 greater than 6.5 minutes (normal range 2.1 to 6.5). Patients could qualify for multiple outcome categories. Patients who did not match any of these criteria were classified as having normal renal function (outcome 0). RESULTS: The number of patients in the delayed graft function categories were 5 with outcome I, 14 with outcome II, 39 with outcome III and 24 with outcome IV. There were 23 patients represented in more than 1 category and 59 patients were classified as having normal function. Recipient age, donor/recipient gender relationship, unrelated highly mismatched donors and cold/total preservation time were identified as risk factors related to impaired early renal function recovery. None of the variables related to the laparoscopic technique itself represented risk factors for delayed graft function. CONCLUSIONS: Female donor kidneys into male recipients and highly HLA mismatched donors represent factors that may be controlled by donor selection when feasible. All attempts should be made to decrease cold ischemia time and, therefore, total preservation time. Prolonged carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, warm ischemia time, renal artery length or use of right kidney did not adversely affect the functional outcome of the allografts procured laparoscopically.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in the presence of circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is now an accepted alternative to open surgery in donors with normal renal vasculature. However, the suitability of laparoscopy for donors with anomalous vasculature is less well known. We compared the donor and recipient outcome data of 16 patients with circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein to 20 recent patients with normal left renal venous anatomy undergoing laparoscopic donor left nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 170 patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at our institution from October 1997 to October 2002, 18 (10.6%) had either a circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein (group 1). Demographic and perioperative parameters of these donors and their recipients were retrospectively compared to a contemporary cohort of 20 recent patients with a normal single left renal vein (group 2). RESULTS: All laparoscopic procedures were completed successfully without open conversion. Groups 1 and 2 were similar in regard to operative time (199 vs 226 minutes, p = 0.90), blood loss (125 vs 100 cc, p = 0.45), warm ischemia time (3.4 vs 3.9 minutes, p = 0.14) and hospital stay (2.9 vs 3.2 days, p = 0.45). Length of allograft renal artery and vein was similar between groups. Cold ischemia and revascularization times were also comparable between groups. Recipient serum creatinine was comparable at 5 days (1.7 vs 1.6 mg/dl), 3 months (1.5 vs 1.4 mg/dl) and 1 year (1.5 vs 1.5 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of a circumaortic or retroaortic renal vein is not a contraindication to laparoscopic live donor left nephrectomy. A left kidney with vasculature anatomically adequate for transplantation can be achieved with excellent donor and recipient outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Fate of donor kidney: laparoscopic versus open technique.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is an increasingly accepted modality for procuring donor kidneys for transplantation. We analyzed and compared the short and long-term outcomes of living transplant allografts from kidneys procured by laparoscopic or open donor (ODN) technique and managed with a single immunosuppression regimen in each group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of recipients who underwent living (laparoscopic or open) donor nephrectomy were reviewed from August 1999 to July 2001 for LDN and from January 1994 to December 1999 for ODN. Patients included were on a single immunosuppression regimen particular to each group. Sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone were given to the LDN group, and calcineurin inhibitor (FK-506 or cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone were given to the ODN group. Excluded from study were patients with prior kidney transplant or patients not receiving immunosuppression as previously described. Also excluded from study were patients lost to followup before 1 year. Data were retrieved retrospectively from case notes or from the transplant database and analyzed using SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). RESULTS: A total of 71 patients from the LDN group and 60 patients from the ODN group qualified for the study. Demographic data are comparable in both groups except for the significantly longer followup in the ODN group. Serum creatinine was 2.2 and 1.8 mg/dl at postoperative day 4, 1.3 and 1.3 mg/dl at day 10, and 1.3 and 1.4 mg/dl at 1 month in the LDN and ODN groups, respectively. Time to achieve nadir serum creatinine was 8.7 versus 6.6 days for LDN and ODN groups, respectively (p = not significant). Delayed graft function was noted in 5 of 71 (7%) in the LDN group and 3 of 60 (5%) in the ODN group (p = 0.5). In the LDN group 13 (18%) patients had a serum creatinine of greater than 1.5 mg/dl at postoperative day 30 compared to 6 (10%) in the ODN group (p = 0.06). Mean serum creatinine at 1 year was lower for LDN recipients (p = not significant). But at last followup this difference became statistically significant in favor of LDN. Mean followup was 939 versus 2,046 days for LDN versus ODN, respectively (p <0.0001). Recipient mean hospital stay was 5.2 versus 6.7 days for LDN versus ODN, respectively (p = 0.08). There were 8 of 78 (10.2%) episodes of acute rejection in the LDN group compared to 22% in the ODN group (p = 0.08). The complication rate (ureteral vascular, lymphocele, acute rejection and wound) was 11% in LDN compared to 15% in the ODN group. Long-term graft function, graft survival and patient survival in the LDN group were comparable to the ODN group. CONCLUSIONS: Early graft recovery is slower in LDN allografts, although not statistically significant, but long-term function in the LDN group is significantly better compared to the ODN group. Laparoscopic donor kidneys take longer to achieve nadir serum creatinine, but this does not influence long-term outcome and results.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Urological manifestations of vascular disease.

We have detailed several of the urological manifestations of vascular disease. With the aging of the North American population, urologists will encounter the urological complications of vascular disease with ever-increasing frequency.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2003

Prospective comparison of 3-dimensional volume rendered computerized tomography and conventional renal arteriography for surgical planning in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: We prospectively assessed the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3-D) volume rendered computerized tomography (CT) and conventional renal arteriography to visualize renovascular anatomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (left side in 46 and right side in 14) prospectively underwent 3-D CT and renal angiography. A short videotape of 3-D CT was prepared using volume rendering software that demonstrated the anatomical location, number, anomalies and spatial interrelationships of the renal arteries and veins. These 3-D videotapes and arteriogram findings were directly correlated with intraoperative surgical findings at laparoscopy and during ex vivo bench preparation of the harvested kidney. The perceived intraoperative value of 3D-CT to delineate renovascular anatomical detail was scored subjectively by the laparoscopic surgeon for each case on a 10-point scale of 0--completely inaccurate to 10--completely accurate. RESULTS: There were no complications related to the 3-D CT protocol and volume rendering was successful in all patients. Three-D CT accurately identified the number of renal arteries in 59 patients (98%). In 1 patient with 3 renal arteries 3-D CT and arteriogram each identified only 2. In the 46 patients undergoing left donor nephrectomy 3-D CT accurately identified the number of veins and venous anomalies in 45 (98%), including 2 with a circumaortic left renal vein. Another case of circumaortic vein was misdiagnosed as 2 renal veins. On the right side in 14 patients 3-D CT accurately identified the renal veins in 13 (94%) and missed 1 vein in a patient with 2 renal veins. Angiography correctly identified the number of renal veins in only 52 cases (87%). Furthermore, it misdiagnosed all 3 cases of circumaortic left renal vein. The laparoscopic surgeon believed that 3-D CT accurately identified the location and anatomical interrelationship of the renal vessels with precision. Mean subjective score +/- SEM was 8.5 +/- 1 for the arterial system, 8.6 +/- 1.1 for the venous system and 9.2 +/- 0.5 for any vascular anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Three-D CT accurately identifies renal vascular anatomy in a manner that may facilitate renal hilar dissection during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, especially during the initial surgeon experience. This imaging modality integrates essential information from angiography, venography and excretory urography into a single study, and it can obviate the need for more invasive vascular imaging in most cases.

Angiography↗