Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Darrin P Lewis

Publications and source records attributed to Darrin P Lewis.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Kernel hierarchical gene clustering from microarray expression data.

MOTIVATION: Unsupervised analysis of microarray gene expression data attempts to find biologically significant patterns within a given collection of expression measurements. For example, hierarchical clustering can be applied to expression profiles of genes across multiple experiments, identifying groups of genes that share similar expression profiles. Previous work using the support vector machine supervised learning algorithm with microarray data suggests that higher-order features, such as pairwise and tertiary correlations across multiple experiments, may provide significant benefit in learning to recognize classes of co-expressed genes. RESULTS: We describe a generalization of the hierarchical clustering algorithm that efficiently incorporates these higher-order features by using a kernel function to map the data into a high-dimensional feature space. We then evaluate the utility of the kernel hierarchical clustering algorithm using both internal and external validation. The experiments demonstrate that the kernel representation itself is insufficient to provide improved clustering performance. We conclude that mapping gene expression data into a high-dimensional feature space is only a good idea when combined with a learning algorithm, such as the support vector machine that does not suffer from the curse of dimensionality. AVAILABILITY: Supplementary data at www.cs.columbia.edu/compbio/hiclust. Software source code available by request.

Algorithms↗

Exploring gene expression data with class scores.

We address a commonly asked question about gene expression data sets: "What functional classes of genes are most interesting in the data?" In the methods we present, expression data is partitioned into classes based on existing annotation schemes. Each class is then given three separately derived "interest" scores. The first score is based on an assessment of the statistical significance of gene expression changes experienced by members of the class, in the context of the experimental design. The second is based on the co-expression of genes in the class. The third score is based on the learnability of the classification. We show that all three methods reveal significant classes in each of three different gene expression data sets. Many classes are identified by one method but not the others, indicating that the methods are complementary. The classes identified are in many cases of clear relevance to the experiment. Our results suggest that these class scoring methods are useful tools for exploring gene expression data.

Analysis of Variance↗