Biomedical subjects

Dara S Manoach

Publications and source records attributed to Dara S Manoach.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Prefrontal cortex dysfunction during working memory performance in schizophrenia: reconciling discrepant findings.

Working memory (WM) deficits are a persistent, disabling and relatively treatment-resistant feature of schizophrenia that may underlie many cognitive deficits and symptoms. They are associated with prefrontal cortex dysfunction. While most neuroimaging studies of WM demonstrate "task-related hypofrontality" in schizophrenic relative to healthy subjects, several recent studies have reported equal or increased prefrontal activity. These findings challenge central assumptions regarding cognitive deficits and prefrontal cortex dysfunction in schizophrenia. The goal of this review is to reconcile these seemingly discrepant findings. Methodological factors addressed include the use of intersubject averaging, WM task parameters and the reliability of the measures. Factors intrinsic to schizophrenia and their relevance to the selection of experimental methods and the interpretation of group data are also discussed. Both hypo- and hyperfrontality are hypothesized to be valid and informative reflections of prefrontal cortex dysfunction in schizophrenia. Due to the heterogeneity and variability of both performance and regional recruitment in schizophrenia, whether individual data is considered, the level and type of WM demands and the composition of the sample with regard to performance deficits all influence study outcome and contribute to discrepancies. Although the prefrontal cortex is consistently implicated in WM deficits, the basis of its dysfunction and its exact contribution remain unclear. Future work might focus on delineating the exact WM processes, domains and components that are deficient. In addition, variability in behavior and activation might best be regarded as intrinsic to schizophrenia and having a neural basis that requires explanation. In combination with other techniques, neuroimaging can identify the neural circuitry responsible for WM deficits and elucidate the contribution of each anatomical component.

Humans↗

PubMed2002

Motor cortical excitability in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a method to examine cortico-cortical motor excitability and hemispheric asymmetry in unmedicated and medicated schizophrenia patients. METHODS: Fourteen right-handed schizophrenia patients (seven on conventional neuroleptics and seven medication-free) were compared with seven right-handed, age- and gender-matched normal control subjects. Motor threshold for induction of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and bihemispheric intracortical inhibition and facilitation were measured with single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS. RESULTS: Medicated patients showed an approximately 5% higher motor thresholds in both hemispheres than unmedicated patients and control subjects. Normal control subjects had a nearly 10% higher threshold for the left than the right hemisphere, whereas the opposite was true for the patient groups (5-10% higher threshold on the right than the left). Medicated patients showed significantly decreased intracortical inhibition relative to unmedicated patients and control subjects. This difference was more pronounced for the right than for the left hemisphere. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with conventional neuroleptics is associated with increased motor threshold and decreased intracortical inhibition, whereas unmedicated patients did not differ from normal control subjects on these measures; however, schizophrenia may be characterized by a reversed pattern of interhemispheric corticospinal excitability.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Schizophrenic subjects show deficient inhibition but intact task switching on saccadic tasks.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenic patients have executive function deficits, presumably on the basis of prefrontal cortex dysfunction. Although they consistently show impaired inhibition, the evidence of a task switching deficit is less consistent and is often based on performance of neuropsychological tests that require several cognitive processes (e.g., the Wisconsin Card Sort Test [WCST]). We investigated inhibition and task switching using saccadic tasks to determine whether schizophrenic patients have selective impairments of these executive functions. METHODS: Sixteen normal and 21 schizophrenic subjects performed blocks of randomly mixed prosaccade and antisaccade trials. This gave rise to four trial types: prosaccades and antisaccades that were either repeated or switched. Response accuracy and latency were measured. Schizophrenic subjects also performed the WCST. RESULTS: Schizophrenic subjects showed abnormal antisaccade and WCST performance. In contrast, task switching was normal and unrelated to either antisaccade or WCST performance. CONCLUSIONS: The finding of intact task switching performance that is unrelated to other measures of executive function demonstrates selective rather than general impairments of executive functions in schizophrenia. The findings also suggest that abnormal WCST performance is unlikely to be a consequence of deficient task switching. We hypothesize that inhibition and task switching are mediated by distinct neural networks, only one of which is dysfunctional in schizophrenia.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Antisaccades and task-switching: interactions in controlled processing.

Smaller latency costs for switching from dominant (habitual) to non-dominant (unusual) tasks compared to the reverse direction have been noted in some studies of task-switching. This asymmetry has been cited as evidence of inhibitory effects from the prior trial. We examined accuracy and latency costs of task-switching between prosaccades and antisaccades, where task-switching is limited to stimulus-response re-mapping and occurs between tasks highly asymmetric in dominance. Eighteen subjects executed prosaccades and antisaccades in single-task and mixed-task blocks. In mixed-task blocks, antisaccade and prosaccade trials were ordered randomly, resulting in 'repeated' trials that were preceded by the same type of trial (i.e. antisaccade-antisaccade), and 'switched' trials that were preceded by the opposite type of trial. Comparisons of the single-task blocks and repeated trials of the mixed-task blocks indexed the mixed-list costs, which were small for prosaccades and insignificant for antisaccades. Comparison of the repeated and switched trials from the mixed-task blocks indexed the residual task-switch cost. Accuracy costs of task-switching and antisaccades were equivalent. The accuracy of trials incorporating both switching and antisaccades in a single response (i.e. switched antisaccade) equalled the product of the accuracies of doing each operation alone, supporting independence of these two functions. In contrast, the latency cost of antisaccade performance was 3 times greater than that of task-switching. Task-switching from prosaccades to antisaccades resulted in a paradoxical decrease in antisaccade latency. This decrease correlated with other indices of vigilance, with the paradoxical effect minimized in more attentive observers. The latency data suggest that either an antisaccade on the prior trial perturbs saccadic responses more than a task-switch, or concurrent task-switching specifically facilitates antisaccades. In either case, the paradoxical benefit of task-switching for antisaccades challenges current models of task-switching.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Antisaccades and task switching: studies of control processes in saccadic function in normal subjects and schizophrenic patients.

Executive functions allow us to respond flexibly rather than stereotypically to the environment. We examined two such functions, task switching and inhibition in the antisaccade paradigm, in two studies. One study involved 18 normal subjects; the other, 21 schizophrenic patients and 16 age-matched controls. Subjects performed blocks of randomly mixed prosaccades and antisaccades. Repeated trials were preceded by the same type of trial (i.e., an antisaccade following an antisaccade), and switched trials were preceded by a trial of the opposite type. We measured accuracy rate and latency as indices of processing costs. Whereas schizophrenic patients had a threefold increase in error rate for antisaccades compared to normals, the effect of task switching on their accuracy did not differ from that in normal subjects. Moreover, the accuracy rate of trials combining antisaccade and task switching was equivalent to a multiplication of the accuracy rates from trials in which each was done alone. Schizophrenic latencies were disproportionately increased for antisaccades, but again they were no different from normal subjects in the effect of task switching. In both groups the effect of task switching on antisaccades was a paradoxical latency reduction. We conclude that the executive dysfunction in schizophrenia is not generalized but selective, sparing task switching from exogenous cues, in which the switch is limited to a stimulus-response remapping. The accuracy data in both groups support independence of antisaccade and task-switching functions. The paradoxical task-switching benefit in antisaccadic latency effects challenges current models of task switching. It suggests either carryover inhibition by antisaccadic performance in the prior trial or facilitation of antisaccades by simultaneous performance of other cognitive operations.

Attention↗