Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel M Sosin

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel M Sosin.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Evaluation challenges for syndromic surveillance--making incremental progress.

INTRODUCTION: The 2003 National Syndromic Surveillance Conference provided an opportunity to examine challenges and progress in evaluating syndromic surveillance systems. OBJECTIVES: Using the conference abstracts as a focus, this paper describes the status of performance measurement of syndromic surveillance systems and ongoing challenges in system evaluation. METHODS: Ninety-nine original abstracts were reviewed and classified descriptively and according to their presentation of evaluation attributes. RESULTS: System evaluation was the primary focus of 35% of the abstracts submitted. Of those abstracts, 63% referenced prospective evaluation methods and 57% reported on outbreak detection. However, no data were provided in 34% of the evaluation abstracts, and only 37% referred to system signals, 20% to investigation of system signals, and 20% to timeliness. CONCLUSIONS: Although this abstract review is not representative of all current syndromic surveillance efforts, it highlights recent attention to evaluation and the need for a basic set of system performance measures. It also proposes questions to be answered of all public health systems used for outbreak detection.

Disease Outbreaks↗
PubMed2004

Framework for evaluating public health surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks: recommendations from the CDC Working Group.

The threat of terrorism and high-profile disease outbreaks has drawn attention to public health surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks. State and local health departments are enhancing existing surveillance systems and developing new systems to better detect outbreaks through public health surveillance. However, information is limited about the usefulness of surveillance systems for outbreak detection or the best ways to support this function. This report supplements previous guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. Use of this framework is intended to improve decision-making regarding the implementation of surveillance for outbreak detection. Use of a standardized evaluation methodology, including description of system design and operation, also will enhance the exchange of information regarding methods to improve early detection of outbreaks. The framework directs particular attention to the measurement of timeliness and validity for outbreak detection. The evaluation framework is designed to support assessment and description of all surveillance approaches to early detection, whether through traditional disease reporting, specialized analytic routines for aberration detection, or surveillance using early indicators of disease outbreaks, such as syndromic surveillance.

Disease Outbreaks↗
PubMed2003

Draft framework for evaluating syndromic surveillance systems.

Interest in public health surveillance to detect outbreaks from terrorism is driving the exploration of nontraditional data sources and development of new performance priorities for surveillance systems. A draft framework for evaluating syndromic surveillance systems will help researchers and public health practitioners working on nontraditional surveillance to review their work in a systematic way and communicate their efforts. The framework will also guide public health practitioners in their efforts to compare and contrast aspects of syndromic surveillance systems and decide whether and how to develop and maintain such systems. In addition, a common framework will allow the identification and prioritization of research and evaluation needs. The evaluation framework is comprised of five components: a thorough description of the system (e.g., purpose, stakeholders, how the system works); system performance experience (e.g., usefulness, acceptability to stakeholders, generalizability to other settings, operating stability, costs); capacity for outbreak detection (e.g., flexibility to adapt to changing risks and data inputs, sensitivity to detect outbreaks, predictive value of system alarms for true outbreaks, timeliness of detection); assessment of data quality (e.g., representativeness of the population covered by the system, completeness of data capture, reliability of data captured over time); and conclusions and recommendations. The draft framework is intended to evolve into guidance to support public health practice for terrorism preparedness and outbreak detection.

Bioterrorism↗