Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel E Furst

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel E Furst.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and the two in combination for painful knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate are used to treat osteoarthritis. The multicenter, double-blind, placebo- and celecoxib-controlled Glucosamine/chondroitin Arthritis Intervention Trial (GAIT) evaluated their efficacy and safety as a treatment for knee pain from osteoarthritis. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1583 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis to receive 1500 mg of glucosamine daily, 1200 mg of chondroitin sulfate daily, both glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate, 200 mg of celecoxib daily, or placebo for 24 weeks. Up to 4000 mg of acetaminophen daily was allowed as rescue analgesia. Assignment was stratified according to the severity of knee pain (mild [N=1229] vs. moderate to severe [N=354]). The primary outcome measure was a 20 percent decrease in knee pain from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 59 years, and 64 percent were women. Overall, glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate were not significantly better than placebo in reducing knee pain by 20 percent. As compared with the rate of response to placebo (60.1 percent), the rate of response to glucosamine was 3.9 percentage points higher (P=0.30), the rate of response to chondroitin sulfate was 5.3 percentage points higher (P=0.17), and the rate of response to combined treatment was 6.5 percentage points higher (P=0.09). The rate of response in the celecoxib control group was 10.0 percentage points higher than that in the placebo control group (P=0.008). For patients with moderate-to-severe pain at baseline, the rate of response was significantly higher with combined therapy than with placebo (79.2 percent vs. 54.3 percent, P=0.002). Adverse events were mild, infrequent, and evenly distributed among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate alone or in combination did not reduce pain effectively in the overall group of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Exploratory analyses suggest that the combination of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate may be effective in the subgroup of patients with moderate-to-severe knee pain. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00032890.).

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Risk genotypes in folate-dependent enzymes and their association with methotrexate-related side effects in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX) is an antifolate agent that is often associated with toxicity. This study investigated whether risk genotypes for folate-dependent enzymes are associated with the toxicity of MTX in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Blood was collected for analysis in a muticenter, cross-sectional study of RA patients who had been receiving MTX for at least 1 month prior to enrollment, and side effects occurring at the time of a single study visit were recorded. Low-penetrance risk genotypes in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677TT, thymidylate synthase (TSER) *2/*2 (variable number of tandem repeats), amino imidazole ribonucleotide transformylase (ATIC) 347GG, and serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT1) 1420CC were measured and summed to constitute the toxicogenetic index specific to each patient. Statistical analyses consisted of logistic regression models with clustered-center effects, and associations with risk genotypes were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Among 214 patients enrolled at 4 study sites, a total of 67 patients (31%) presented with a side effect (gastrointestinal event, headache, lethargy, alopecia, cough, or dyspnea). Risk genotypes associated with side effects in the central nervous system were MTHFR 677TT (OR 3.3, P < 0.01) and SHMT1 1420CC (OR 2.4, P < 0.05). ATIC 347GG was associated with gastrointestinal side effects (OR 3.0, P < 0.01), while TSER*2/*2 (OR 5.4, P < 0.01) and SHMT1 1420CC (OR 3.2, P < 0.01) were associated with alopecia. The toxicogenetic index ranged from 0 to 3 (median 1). An index of 3 was associated with an approximately 7-fold higher likelihood of having a side effect compared with an index of 0 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a composite index of the cumulative risk genotypes in folate-dependent enzymes may be an effective means of profiling RA patients who develop side effects to MTX.

Aged↗

Hemopoietic stem cell transplantation in rheumatic diseases--an update.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for autoimmune diseases has been recognized as a potential treatment for patients who have failed conventional therapy. Autologous (self) donor cells have been preferred over allogeneic (HLA-matched) cells for rescue after high dose immunotherapy, given the previous higher rates of mortality, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and the need for more intense myeloablation associated with the latter. The European Group for bone Marrow Transplantation in Basel Switzerland (EBMT) and various groups within the US funded by the NIH (including the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (ABMTR)) have been pivotal in maintaining registries on patients transplanted as well as promoting homogeneity for future studies including Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Although, patients transplanted for RA show initial success, relapse of the disease is common. In many, however, a second positive result can be obtained with the addition of DMARD therapy to which they were previously unresponsive, suggesting a "debulking" of disease by HSCT. SLE patients also have a high rate of success after HSCT, although current mortality rates appear high. Transplant in SSc patients has offered durable responses with improving transplant-related mortality related to careful patient selection.

Animals↗

Correlation of the degree of dyspnea with health-related quality of life, functional abilities, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide in patients with systemic sclerosis and active alveolitis: results from the Scleroderma Lung Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether baseline self-assessment measures of health status and physiologic indices of disease severity in alveolitis-positive patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) correlate with the severity of their dyspnea, and to quantify functional impairment in patients with scleroderma lung disease and compare it with that in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: SSc patients (n = 138) with diffuse (n = 81) or limited (n = 57) cutaneous disease and active alveolitis (determined by bronchoalveolar lavage and/or high-resolution computed tomography) who participated in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral cyclophosphamide for treatment of SSc-associated interstitial lung disease were evaluated. Pearson's univariate correlations were determined between the Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scales, functional questionnaires, and physiologic parameters of breathing (forced vital capacity [FVC] and single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide [DLCO]). Student's t-test was used to compare subgroups. Scores from 2 instruments for self-assessment of breathlessness, Mahler's baseline dyspnea index (BDI) and a visual analog scale (VAS) for breathing, were divided at the median. Values for the DLCO and FVC (% predicted) were divided based on the American Thoracic Society guidelines for mild (>70% of predicted), moderate (50-70% of predicted), and severe (<50% of predicted) physiologic impairment. RESULTS: Scores on the BDI and VAS for breathing were highly correlated (r = -0.61). The PCS and MCS were able to differentiate patients with more breathlessness (measured by BDI and VAS for breathing) and more abnormal physiologic measures (FVC and DLCO). In SSc patients with alveolitis, all 8 domains of the SF-36 were significantly impaired as compared with the healthy population and were similar to those reported by patients with COPD. CONCLUSION: The SF-36 was able to discriminate between scleroderma lung disease patients with more severe and less severe breathlessness, the primary symptom of active alveolitis. The SF-36 complements the BDI and VAS scores for breathing in scleroderma lung disease and is variably correlated with results of pulmonary function tests, suggesting that the SF-36 should be included as an outcome measure in intervention trials in this population.

Carbon Monoxide↗

Sustained benefits of infliximab therapy for dermatologic and articular manifestations of psoriatic arthritis: results from the infliximab multinational psoriatic arthritis controlled trial (IMPACT).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of infliximab therapy for the articular and dermatologic manifestations of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: One hundred four patients with PsA in whom prior therapy with at least 1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) had failed were recruited into this investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. During the initial blinded portion of the study, patients received infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14. After week 16, patients initially assigned to receive placebo crossed over to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through week 50, while patients initially randomized to infliximab continued to receive active treatment at the same dose through week 50. The primary efficacy outcome was achievement of the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement in rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20) at week 16. Additional predefined clinical efficacy assessments included the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, the ACR50 and ACR70 criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, ratings of enthesitis and dactylitis, and the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria score. RESULTS: The proportion of infliximab-treated patients who achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 (65%) was significantly higher than the proportion of placebo-treated patients who achieved this response (10%). In addition, 46% of infliximab-treated patients achieved an ACR50 response, and 29% achieved an ACR70 response; no placebo-treated patient achieved these end points. Among patients who had PASI scores of >/=2.5 at baseline, 68% of infliximab-treated patients achieved improvement of >/=75% in the PASI score at week 16 compared with none of the placebo-treated patients. Continued therapy with infliximab resulted in sustained improvement in articular and dermatologic manifestations of PsA through week 50. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Therapy with infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg significantly improved the signs and symptoms of arthritis, psoriasis, dactylitis, and enthesitis in patients with active PsA that had been resistant to DMARD therapy. With continued infliximab treatment, benefits were sustained through 50 weeks. The benefit-to-risk ratio appeared favorable in this study population.

Adult↗

Increased radiographic damage scores at the onset of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis in older patients are associated with osteoarthritis of the hands, but not with more rapid progression of damage.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of patient age at symptom onset on radiographic joint damage at study entry, and on subsequent progression of damage in a cohort of patients with early seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We studied 186 patients with RA of <15 months' duration. All patients had active disease and had not received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. At study entry and during followup, total Sharp scores (TSS), RA-associated joint space narrowing (RA-JSN), and erosions were determined on hand and foot radiographs. Baseline radiographs were also scored for osteoarthritis (OA)-related JSN (OA-JSN) and osteophytes. Older patients (>55 years) and younger patients (</=55 years) were compared by t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square, or Fisher's exact test. Multiple linear regression models were also constructed. RESULTS: The older group (n = 74) had a higher baseline total Sharp score (median 6.21) compared with the younger group (n = 112) (median 2.33) (P = 0.0002). This was mainly due to a higher baseline JSN score in the older group (median 3.96 versus 1.08) and not to differences in erosion score (median 0.91 versus 0.70). Disease activity and duration of RA symptoms were similar in the 2 groups, as were progression rates of the TSS, JSN score, and erosion score. At baseline, 26% of patients had osteophytes, with a prevalence of 13% in the younger age group and 50% in the older group. The presence of OA-JSN was highly correlated with the presence of osteophytes (r = 0.72). Also, increased age and RA-JSN were associated with increased severity of osteophytes and OA-JSN at baseline. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that both age and hand osteophytes contributed to the increase in baseline RA-JSN score and TSS, but not to erosion score. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of patients with early RA, an increase in the baseline RA-JSN score and TSS can be accounted for in part by the presence of hand OA.

Adult↗

Reduction of the efficacy of methotrexate by the use of folic acid: post hoc analysis from two randomized controlled studies.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of folic acid on the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 12 months in 2 phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of leflunomide in which MTX was used as a comparator. METHODS: Analyses were restricted to patients randomized to receive MTX who had rheumatoid factor data. The US study recruited 482 patients with active RA; 179 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and all were mandated to receive 1 mg of oral folic acid once or twice daily. The multinational European study recruited 999 patients with active RA; 489 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and oral folic acid was not required, although 50 received folate after developing an adverse event. Because of similar entry criteria for both studies, the data for patients with available primary outcome data at week 52 were pooled (n = 668), and the patients were grouped by folic acid use (n = 225) and nonuse (n = 443). To account for the significant between-study differences in the MTX groups, baseline covariates were adjusted using propensity scores so that folic acid users could be matched with nonusers. This allowed for a comparison of differences in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria at week 52. RESULTS: At study entry, non-folic acid users had a significantly lower mean body weight, shorter mean RA duration, and higher mean disease activity (measured by joint counts, patient's and physician's global assessments, and acute-phase reactant levels). The mean MTX dosage at week 52 was similar in the 2 RCTs. Using propensity score matching techniques, the proportion of patients achieving an ACR 20% response at week 52 averaged 17% higher in the non-folic acid group than in the folic acid group (range 15-21%). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving ACR 50% and ACR 70% responses averaged 14% (range 12-16%) and 12% (range 9-14%) higher, respectively, in the non-folic acid group. Adverse events were reported in 93% of US study patients and 94% of the multinational study patients. Elevated liver transaminase levels (above the upper limit of normal) were reported in 29% of the US study patients (majority receiving folic acid) and 62% of the multinational study patients (majority not receiving folic acid). CONCLUSION: After using propensity scores to adjust for differences in the baseline characteristics of folic acid users and non-folic acid users, 9-21% fewer MTX-treated RA patients taking folic acid had ACR 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement at 52 weeks compared with those who did not receive folic acid in the 2 phase III RA clinical trials. As a post hoc analysis, the results of this data analysis should be considered "hypothesis generating" and an impetus for future studies regarding the effects of folic acid on the efficacy of MTX in RA.

Adult↗

Systemic sclerosis mortality in the United States: 1979-1998.

The US national mortality rates from systemic sclerosis (SSc) have not been reported since 1979. We studied age, gender and race specific time trends in US national mortality rates of SSc during the period 1979-1998 using poisson regression models. Over the 4.93 billion person-years of observation during the study period, there were 18,126 deaths from SSc, representing a mortality rate of 3.9 per million. The age adjusted mortality rates for men and women were 1.9 and 5.4 per million respectively. There were relatively few deaths in the extremes of age. SSc mortality rates increased with age in both genders and in all racial groups (p<0.001). In multivariable models adjusted for two-way statistical interactions, being African-American, female and of older age were associated with higher death rates. Over the 20 years of observation, overall (age-adjusted) SSc mortality rates showed a 36% increase (p<0.001) and subgroup analyses revealed that the increases were confined to women of both races. This rise occurred during a period in which post-diagnosis survival of SSc is known to have increased, suggesting an increasing incidence of this disease.

Adolescent↗

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use in the elderly rheumatoid arthritis patient.

During the 10-year period since the last review was done by Gardner and Furst, studies have furthered our knowledge of use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient. This article will briefly review the clinical pharmacology of human as they age, and detail the effects of aging on the specific pharmacokinetics and responses to commonly used DMARDs. There has been some progress in understanding the elderly RA patient, however, there is insufficient data for much confidence in DMARDs effects in the elderly.

Aged↗

COX-2 controversy: where are we and where do we go from here?

Much has been written in the last few months on the association between the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-selective inhibitors and cardiovascular events. We summarize the randomized controlled studies of different COX-2 inhibitors that led to rofecoxib withdrawal, provide evidence on the differences between various selective coxibs and summarize recommendations from the FDA and the American College of Rheumatology on use of COX-2 inhibitors. We give suggestions on the use of coxibs and briefly mention a general approach to the future of coxibs.

Animals↗

Responsiveness of the SF-36 and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index in a systemic sclerosis clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the responsiveness to change of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), a measure of health related quality of life (HRQOL), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), a function instrument, in a randomized clinical trial for treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: A phase 2/3, multicenter, prospective, placebo controlled trial was conducted to evaluate human recombinant relaxin treatment in patients with diffuse SSc over 24 weeks. At baseline, subjects had stable, moderately severe, diffuse SSc of disease duration < or = 5 years, modified Rodnan skin score > or = 20, serum creatinine < 2.0 mg/dl, percentage forced vital capacity (% FVC) predicted > or = 50%, and % DLCO predicted > or = 40% and were not receiving concomitant disease modifying therapies. Internal consistency reliability of multi-item scales was estimated using Cronbach's alpha. Responsiveness to change of the SF-36 and HAQ-DI was computed between Weeks 0 and 24. Subjects were classified as unchanged or having a meaningful change in 4 different external measures: Change in (1) skin score > or = 30%; (2) % FVC predicted of > or = 15%; (3) self-reported patient global assessment by visual analog scale (VAS) > or = 20%; and (4) physician global assessment by VAS of > or = 20%. Responsiveness indices were computed and Cohen's effect size criteria were used to assess the magnitude of change. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients participated in this trial, with 196 completing the 24 week trial. Cronbach's alpha for the SF-36 scales ranged from 0.76 to 0.93 and for the HAQ-DI ranged from 0.69 to 0.91 (good to excellent). The SF-36 had a larger magnitude of responsiveness in overall disease (patient and physician global assessment) compared to the HAQ-DI, while the HAQ-DI had a larger magnitude of responsiveness in clinical measures (i.e., change in skin score and % FVC predicted) than the SF-36. CONCLUSION: These data support inclusion of both the SF-36 and HAQ-DI as outcome measures in future clinical trials of diffuse SSc.

Adult↗

Challenges and progress in adverse event ascertainment and reporting in clinical trials.

Toxicity, safety, and tolerability are integral facets of patient risk/benefit decisions, yet the capacity to define, measure, and compare these aspects is underdeveloped compared to aspects of efficacy. There are many reasons for this, scientific and administrative, but all are surmountable. Probably the greatest primary obstacle is the absence of a measurement instrument designed specifically for this purpose. There are increasing calls from various stakeholders for better evidence, and therefore better ascertainment, in this area, especially in randomized trials, and for these reasons OMERACT began deliberations about these concepts in 1994. A prototype coding instrument (the Rheumatology Common Toxicity Criteria) was developed and discussed at OMERACT 5. In the 2 years before OMERACT 7, a process of concept development and iterative design and testing were conducted to develop a patient self-report and investigator-reported adverse event instruments designed for use in trials at the time of visit. The predominant workload is performed by the patient in a self-report checklist, which is then mapped by the trialist onto a medically sophisticated version. This article presents background on the process of developing a dual adverse event instrument, which was presented and critically discussed in detail at OMERACT 7.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗

Standardized assessment of adverse events in rheumatology clinical trials: summary of the OMERACT 7 drug safety module update.

A presentation, demonstration, and discussion of recently developed adverse event instruments were the topics for the OMERACT 7 Drug Safety Module. The module began with a plenary introducing the needs and challenges of adverse event ascertainment. It was followed by a review of module work from previous OMERACT meetings on a prototype coding instrument (Rheumatology Common Toxicity Criteria), then a brief description of the process behind the recently developed patient self-report and investigator report adverse event instruments. These current instruments are designed for use in controlled trials although they could be used in other settings. The instruments rely primarily on patient self-reporting using a checklist, which the investigator then folds into a parallel structured but more medically sophisticated instrument. In pilot testing, this innovative dual-use system has shown reliability and acceptability, while preserving validity. A "stakeholder panel" of representatives from 8 sectors followed--patient, nurse investigator, regulator, clinician scientist, industry, OMERACT, global public health/WHO, and Cochrane Collaboration--for their perspectives on the needs, challenges, and potential ways forward for adverse event ascertainment and reporting in clinical trials. At the breakout session small focus groups participated in hands-on interactive testing of one of 3 versions of the instruments, which differ in degree of comprehensiveness. Each focus group had a participatory patient with rheumatoid arthritis. At a second plenary there was group feedback by rapporteurs and presentation of results from pilot studies of iterative testing of validity, reliability, and feasibility of the instruments. During plenary discussion a frequent suggestion for improvement was to refine the process so that event ascertainment could be done entirely using the patient instrument with minimal input from the investigator at the visit, if patient-investigator agreement was high. Most found the patient checklist attractive, particularly if the patient instrument was shown to be reliable and valid. Finally, a future research agenda was discussed.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗

A phase 2 dose-finding study of PEGylated recombinant methionyl human soluble tumor necrosis factor type I in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: In a phase 2 study, to assess the efficacy and safety of pegsunercept, a soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type I, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive weekly subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 61) or active drug [400 microg/kg (n = 67) or 800 microg/kg (n = 66)] for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Secondary efficacy measures included ACR50 and ACR70 responses, and changes in individual ACR components at Week 12. Safety assessments included summaries of adverse events including infectious episodes. RESULTS: Treatment with pegsunercept resulted in a significantly higher ACR20 response at Week 12 in the 800 microg/kg group (45%) compared with the placebo group (26%; p = 0.020). The treatment effect of pegsunercept (both doses) over the study period showed statistically significant improvement for most ACR components and health related quality of life, with the 800 microg/kg group showing greater clinical improvements in efficacy measures. The overall incidence of adverse events and infectious episodes was similar among the treatment and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: In this 12 week dose-finding study of 194 patients, weekly subcutaneous dosing with pegsunercept showed beneficial effects in improving the signs and symptoms of RA. It appeared to be safe and well tolerated in this small number of patients. Significant clinical improvements were seen in patients in the 800 microg/kg group; however, this dose may be suboptimal, and further evaluation of this product with higher doses or a more frequent dosing regimen is warranted.

Adult↗

Outcome measures for acute and chronic gout.

Gout provides some unique challenges in classification and measurement of outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate criteria for classification and to develop and validate optimal instruments to measure outcomes for acute and chronic gout. A planning committee and interested attendees met to propose classification criteria and domains for outcomes. Seven of the current American Rheumatism Association preliminary criteria for classification were proposed as the best current criteria for acute gouty arthritis, pending further studies. The presence of gout is best established by crystal identification, although this technique has limitations. Five domains for acute gout outcomes and 9 for chronic gout were identified along with proposed instruments for testing and validation. The unique problems of gout evaluation can and will be addressed.

Acute Disease↗

Scleroderma--developing measures of response.

The scleroderma research community continued its focus on the development and proper validation of the outcome measures for clinical trials in scleroderma during the special interest group meeting at OMERACT 7. Deliberations focused on progress in the assessment of gastrointestinal disease, renal physiology, vascular damage, and the unique challenges inherent in studying pediatric patients with scleroderma.

Adolescent↗