Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel B Rowe

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel B Rowe.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Characterizing phase-only fMRI data with an angular regression model.

FMRI voxel time series are complex-valued with real and imaginary parts that are usually converted to magnitude-phase polar coordinates. Magnitude-only data models that discard the phase portion of the data have dominated fMRI analysis. However, when such analyses are performed, the data that is discarded may contain valuable biologic information that is not in the magnitude data. This biologic information from BOLD fMRI data may be vascular [Menon RS. Postacquisition suppression of large-vessel BOLD signals in high-resolution fMRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47(1):1-9] or neuronal [Bodurka J, Jesmanowicz A, Hyde JS, Xu H, Estowski L, Li S-J. Current-induced magnetic resonance phase imaging. J Magn Reson 1999;137(1):265-71] in origin. When phase-only time series that discard the magnitude portion of the data have been analyzed, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression has been the technique of choice. However, OLS models may fit poorly when phase-wrap or low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is present. We have explored alternatives to the OLS model which will account for the angular response of the phase while also allowing us the flexibility to develop similar hypothesis tests. We adopt an angular regression model by Fisher and Lee [Fisher NI, Lee AJ. Regression models for an angular response. Biometrics 1992;48:665-77] for our analysis and show its improvement over the OLS model at low SNR in terms of both parameter estimation and inferences. We found an improvement in parameter estimation along with modeling for the Fisher and Lee method in simulated data while detailing potential benefits when used with experimentally acquired data. Finally, we look at a map of the statistics testing the association of the observed voxel phase time course and the reference function in our acquired data. This shows the possible detection of biological information in the generally discarded phase.

Algorithms↗

Signal and noise of Fourier reconstructed fMRI data.

In magnetic resonance imaging, complex-valued measurements are acquired in time corresponding to spatial frequency measurements in space generally placed on a Cartesian rectangular grid. These complex-valued measurements are transformed into a measured complex-valued image by an image reconstruction method. The most common image reconstruction method is the inverse Fourier transform. It is known that image voxels are spatially correlated. A property of the inverse Fourier transformation is that uncorrelated spatial frequency measurements yield spatially uncorrelated voxel measurements and vice versa. Spatially correlated voxel measurements result from correlated spatial frequency measurements. This paper describes the resulting correlation structure between voxel measurements when inverse Fourier reconstructing correlated spatial frequency measurements. A real-valued representation for the complex-valued measurements is introduced along with an associated multivariate normal distribution. One potential application of this methodology is that there may be a correlation structure introduced by the measurement process or adjustments made to the spatial frequencies. This would produce spatially correlated voxel measurements after inverse Fourier transform reconstruction that have artificially inflated spatial correlation. One implication of these results is that one source of spatial correlation between voxels termed connectivity may be attributed to correlated spatial frequencies. The true voxel connectivity may be less than previously thought. This methodology could be utilized to characterize noise correlation in its original form and adjust for it. The exact statistical relationship between spatial frequency measurements and voxel measurements has now been established.

Artifacts↗

Parameter estimation in the magnitude-only and complex-valued fMRI data models.

In functional magnetic resonance imaging, voxel time courses are complex-valued data but are traditionally converted to real magnitude-only data ones. At a large signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the magnitude-only data Ricean distribution is approximated by a normal distribution that has been suggested as reasonable in magnitude-only data magnetic resonance images for an SNR of 5 and potentially as low as 3. A complex activation model has been recently introduced by Rowe and Logan [Rowe, D.B., and Logan, B.R. (2004). A complex way to compute fMRI activation. NeuroImage, 23 (3):1078-1092] that is valid for all SNRs. The properties of the parameter estimators and activation statistic for these two models and a more accurate Ricean approximation based on a Taylor series expansion are characterized in terms of bias, variance, and Cramer-Rao lower bound. It was found that the unbiased estimators in the complex model continued to be unbiased for lower SNRs while those of the normal magnitude-only data model became biased as the SNR decreased and at differing levels for the regression coefficients. The unbiased parameter estimators from the approximate magnitude-only Ricean Taylor model were unbiased to lower SNRs than the magnitude-only normal ones. Further, the variances of the parameter estimators achieved their minimum value in the complex data model regardless of SNR while the magnitude-only data normal model and Ricean approximation using a Taylor series did not as the SNR decreased. Finally, the mean activation statistic for the complex data model was higher and not SNR dependent while it decreased with SNR in the magnitude-only data models but less so for the approximate Ricean model. These results indicate that using the complex data model and not approximations to the true magnitude-only Ricean data model is more appropriate at lower SNRs. Therefore, since the computational cost is relatively low for the complex data model and since the SNR is not inherently known a priori for all voxels, the complex data model is recommended at all SNRs.

Algorithms↗

Modeling both the magnitude and phase of complex-valued fMRI data.

In MRI and fMRI, images or voxel measurement are complex valued or bivariate at each time point. Recently, (Rowe, D.B., Logan, B.R., 2004. A complex way to compute fMRI activation. NeuroImage 23 (3), 1078-1092) introduced an fMRI magnitude activation model that utilized both the real and imaginary data in each voxel. This model, following traditional beliefs, specified that the phase time course were fixed unknown quantities which may be estimated voxel-by-voxel. Subsequently, (Rowe, D.B., Logan, B.R., 2005. Complex fMRI analysis with unrestricted phase is equivalent to a magnitude-only model. NeuroImage 24 (2), 603-606) generalized the model to have no restrictions on the phase time course. They showed that this unrestricted phase model was mathematically equivalent to the usual magnitude-only data model including regression coefficients and voxel activation statistic but philosophically different due to it derivation from complex data. Recent findings by (Hoogenrad, F.G., Reichenbach, J.R., Haacke, E.M., Lai, S., Kuppusamy, K., Sprenger, M., 1998. In vivo measurement of changes in venous blood-oxygenation with high resolution functional MRI at .95 Tesla by measuring changes in susceptibility and velocity. Magn. Reson. Med. 39 (1), 97-107) and (Menon, R.S., 2002. Postacquisition suppression of large-vessel BOLD signals in high-resolution fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 47 (1), 1-9) indicate that the voxel phase time course may exhibit task related changes. In this paper, a general complex fMRI activation model is introduced that describes both the magnitude and phase in complex data which can be used to specifically characterize task related change in both. Hypotheses regarding task related magnitude and/or phase changes are evaluated using derived activation statistics. It was found that the Rowe-Logan complex constant phase model strongly biases against voxels with task related phase changes and that the current very general complex linear phase model can be cast to address several different hypotheses sensitive to different magnitude/phase changes.

Algorithms↗

Complex fMRI analysis with unrestricted phase is equivalent to a magnitude-only model.

Due to phase imperfections, voxel time course measurements are complex valued. However, most fMRI studies measure activation using magnitude-only time courses. We show that magnitude-only analyses are equivalent to a complex fMRI activation model in which the phase is unrestricted, or allowed to dynamically change over time. This suggests that improvements to the magnitude-only model are possible by modeling the phase in each voxel over time.

Animals↗

An evaluation of thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.

This paper reviews and compares individual voxel-wise thresholding methods for identifying active voxels in single-subject fMRI datasets. Different error rates are described which may be used to calibrate activation thresholds. We discuss methods which control each of the error rates at a prespecified level alpha, including simple procedures which ignore spatial correlation among the test statistics as well as more elaborate ones which incorporate this correlation information. The operating characteristics of the methods are shown through a simulation study, indicating that the error rate used has an important impact on the sensitivity of the thresholding method, but that accounting for correlation has little impact. Therefore, the simple procedures described work well for thresholding most single-subject fMRI experiments and are recommended. The methods are illustrated with a real bilateral finger tapping experiment.

Algorithms↗

A complex way to compute fMRI activation.

In functional magnetic resonance imaging, voxel time courses after Fourier or non-Fourier "image reconstruction" are complex valued as a result of phase imperfections due to magnetic field inhomogeneities. Nearly all fMRI studies derive functional "activation" based on magnitude voxel time courses [Bandettini, P., Jesmanowicz, A., Wong, E., Hyde, J.S., 1993. Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 30 (2): 161-173 and Cox, R.W., Jesmanowicz, A., Hyde, J.S., 1995. Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 33 (2): 230-236]. Here, we propose to directly model the entire complex or bivariate data rather than just the magnitude-only data. A nonlinear multiple regression model is used to model activation of the complex signal, and a likelihood ratio test is derived to determine activation in each voxel. We investigate the performance of the model on a real dataset, then compare the magnitude-only and complex models under varying signal-to-noise ratios in a simulation study with varying activation contrast effects.

Algorithms↗

Characterization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched-exponential model.

Experience with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) shows that signal attenuation is consistent with a multicompartmental theory of water diffusion in the brain. The source of this so-called nonexponential behavior is a topic of debate, because the cerebral cortex contains considerable microscopic heterogeneity and is therefore difficult to model. To account for this heterogeneity and understand its implications for current models of diffusion, a stretched-exponential function was developed to describe diffusion-related signal decay as a continuous distribution of sources decaying at different rates, with no assumptions made about the number of participating sources. DWI experiments were performed using a spin-echo diffusion-weighted pulse sequence with b-values of 500-6500 s/mm(2) in six rats. Signal attenuation curves were fit to a stretched-exponential function, and 20% of the voxels were better fit to the stretched-exponential model than to a biexponential model, even though the latter model had one more adjustable parameter. Based on the calculated intravoxel heterogeneity measure, the cerebral cortex contains considerable heterogeneity in diffusion. The use of a distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) is suggested to measure mean intravoxel diffusion rates in the presence of such heterogeneity.

Animals↗