Protecting the brain in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Daniel B Mark.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Obesity is an important risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD); however, its effect on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients' long-term clinical and economic outcomes has not been quantified. We assessed the impact of increasing body mass index (BMI) on 10-year outcomes for ACS patients. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: ACS patients with significant CAD receiving an initial cardiac catheterization at Duke University Medical Center between 1986 and 1997 were included. Patients with a BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2) were excluded; the remaining patients were classified by BMI as normal, overweight, obese, or very obese. Medical costs were estimated from a prior ACS clinical trial with costs adjusted to 1997 dollars and discounted at 3% per annum. RESULTS: There were 9405 patients with data available for analysis. Follow-up was complete on >95% of patients. Patients who were obese at baseline increased from 20% to 33% between 1986 and 1997. Increased BMI was associated with younger age, multi-morbidity, and less severe CAD at baseline. It was also associated with more clinical events, higher cumulative inpatient medical costs, and significant differences in unadjusted survival at 10 years. However, it was not associated with differences in 10-year survival after adjusting for baseline characteristic differences. DISCUSSION: Obese ACS patients are younger and are hospitalized more frequently during the first 10 years of their illness than are non-obese patients. They also incur higher cumulative inpatient medical costs, especially the very obese. These findings highlight the opportunities for therapeutic benefit that aggressive weight management and secondary prevention may provide this population.
OBJECTIVE: Previous analyses of variability in bypass resource use have not focused on hospital-level variation or adequately explored the influence of patient risk. We combined a clinical database with claims data to fully characterize patient level and hospital level variability in bypass surgery cost and length of stay in New York State and explored the extent to which lower cost is associated with worse quality of care. METHODS: By use of 1992 clinical and claims data, we identified by multivariable regression which patient characteristics influence bypass cost and length of stay. Hospital was then incorporated as a random variable in mixed linear models to determine its impact on resource use. The relationship between risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality and cost was then explored. RESULTS: In the 21 hospitals for which cost data were available, mean leveled cost (exclusive of professional fees and noncomparable costs) was $15,713, with a mean length of stay of 14 days (n = 12,087). One fifth of the variation in resource use was explained by baseline patient risk. After adjustment for patient risk, hospital explained an additional 42% of variation in cost and an additional 8% of variation in length of stay. Among hospitals, risk-adjusted cost varied almost 3-fold and risk-adjusted length of stay varied 50%. There was no association between cost and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: As of 1992, there was considerable interhospital variability in bypass surgery cost after patient baseline risk was accounted for. This suggests that reductions in bypass cost could be achieved by normalizing clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Angiographic features of vessels in which stents have been deployed can be used to predict the risk of postprocedural ischemic events. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of abciximab in patients with and without high-risk postprocedure features. METHODS AND RESULTS: Protocol-mandated stent implantation was performed in 1586 patients in the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting trial, 783 of whom received abciximab, and was successful in 97% of the patients. High-risk features were defined as the presence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow <3, presence of thrombus or major dissection, or residual stenosis >10%. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent target vessel revascularization at 30 days. High-risk features were present in 21% of the patients. In patients without high-risk features after stent placement, abciximab reduced the primary endpoint from 9.0% to 3.9% (P <.001) compared with 16.2% to 8.6% (P =.046) in patients in whom high-risk features were present. There was no statistical evidence of interaction between abciximab treatment and the presence or absence of high-risk features. CONCLUSION: Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonism with abciximab is equally effective in prevention of a composite of ischemic events in patients with and without high-risk features after stent placement. However, patients in whom high-risk features are present after stent placement are at increased risk of ischemic cardiac events even with abciximab treatment.
BACKGROUND: The Inhibition of Metallo Protease by BMS-186716 in a Randomized Exercise and Symptoms Study in Subjects With Heart Failure (IMPRESS) clinical trial randomized patients with congestive heart failure to a daily regimen of either omapatrilat or lisinopril. At 24 weeks, patients randomized to omapatrilat had a significant reduction in the combined end point of death, hospitalization, or discontinuation of study drug for worsening heart failure when compared with patients randomized to lisinopril. They also had significantly fewer serious cardiac adverse events. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the economic consequences of the lower event rates of patients who were given omapatrilat. METHODS: Economic outcomes (major hospitalizations and their associated medical costs) were compared between treatment groups and assessed by use of the societal perspective. Hospitalization information was obtained from the IMPRESS trial's standardized case report and serious adverse event forms. Hospital costs were evaluated by means of assigning each hospital admission a diagnosis-related group and an average cost for physician and hospital services. Emergency department visits were included only when they were made for worsening heart failure and were assigned costs equivalent to the average hospital and physician Medicare reimbursement for these visits in Duke University Medical Center's heart failure program. Drug costs were not assessed. RESULTS: Although the typical patient in both treatment groups was event-free, there was a trend toward a greater number of hospitalizations in the patients given lisinopril than in the patients given omapatrilat (P =.07). Differences in the distribution of cardiac hospitalizations between patients given lisinopril and patients given omapatrilat were significant (P =.03). There was a trend toward lower medical costs at 24 weeks in patients given omapatrilat versus patients given lisinopril ($1930 vs $2002, P =.09). Considering only cardiac medical costs, this trend toward reduced medical costs was significant ($1240 vs $1442, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: At 24 weeks, patients with heart failure treated with omapatrilat had fewer hospitalizations and lower medical costs than patients treated with lisinopril. However, drug treatment costs were not available for this analysis.
We studied the relationship between mood and mood shift immediately before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 3 end points: total ischemic burden during PCI, adverse cardiac end points (ACE) after PCI, and death by 6-month follow up. Patients (n = 119) with unstable angina or myocardial infarction completed a visual analog scale (VAS) twice before PCI; before and after a session of stress relaxation, imagery, or touch; or approximately 30 minutes apart for patients assigned to prayer or to standard care. VAS included happiness, satisfaction, calm, hope, worry, shortness of breath, fear, and sadness. We observed a significant correlation between higher hope score before PCI and lower ischemic burden. Patients who experienced ACE had significantly lower hope and happiness scores than those who did not. Patients who survived to 6 months had significantly greater increases in worry and in hope. Our data suggest correlations between simple mood assessments before PCI and clinical outcomes during and after the procedure. More study is needed to understand whether attempts to alter patient mood can affect clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This article presents a reanalysis of an earlier study that reported a nonsignificant relation between the 50-item Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS) and survival in a sample of coronary patients. Since publication of those results, there have been significant developments in the measurement of hostility that suggest that an abbreviated scale may be a better predictor of health outcomes. This study examined the ability of the total CMHS and an abbreviated form of the CMHS (ACM) to predict survival in a sample of patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD) with increased statistical power. METHODS: Nine hundred thirty-six patients (83% were male; mean age = 51.48) with CAD who were followed for an average of 14.9 years. The ACM consisted of the combination of the cynicism, hostile attribution, hostile affect, and aggressive responding subscales that were identified in an earlier study (Barefoot et al. [1989]) by a rational analysis of the item content. The relation between hostility and survival was examined with Cox proportional hazard models (hazard ratios [HRs] based on a two standard deviation difference). RESULTS: Controlling for disease severity, the ACM was a significant predictor for both CHD mortality (HR = 1.33, p <.009) and total mortality (HR = 1.28, p <.02). The total CMHS was only a marginally significant predictor of either outcome (p values < 0.06). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that hostility is associated with poorer survival in CAD patients, and it may be possible to refine measures of hostility in order to improve prediction of health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have shown network assessments of social contact predict mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Fewer studies have demonstrated an association between perceived social support and longevity in patient samples. It has been suggested that 1 of the mechanisms linking social support with elevated risk for mortality is the association between social support and other risk factors associated with decreased longevity such as smoking, failure to exercise, and depressive symptoms. The present study examined an assessment of perceived support as a predictor of all-cause and CAD mortality and examined the hypothesis that smoking, sedentary behavior, and depressive symptoms may mediate and/or moderate this association. METHODS: Ratings of social support and the risk factors of smoking, sedentary behavior, and depressive symptoms were examined as predictors of survival in 2711 patients with CAD, and associations between support and these risk factors were assessed. Smoking, sedentary behavior, and depressive symptoms were examined as mediators and/or moderators of the association between social support and mortality. RESULTS: Social support, smoking, sedentary behavior, and depressive symptoms were predictors of mortality (p's <.01). Results also indicated that sedentary behavior, but not smoking status or depressive symptoms, may substantially mediate the relationship between support and mortality. No evidence for moderation was found. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between social support and longevity may be partially accounted for by the association between support and sedentary behavior.
OBJECTIVE: Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been shown to improve quality of life and functional capacity for many patients, recent studies have demonstrated that a significant number of patients exhibit impairment in cognitive function immediately following surgery and beyond. We sought to determine the impact of this postoperative cognitive dysfunction on quality of life (QOL) and to characterize the dysfunction from the patient's perspective. METHODS: With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and written informed consent, 732 patients at Duke University Hospital undergoing CABG were enrolled. Five hundred fifty-one (75%) completed baseline, 6-week, and 1-year neurocognitive tests and psychometric measures designed to assess QOL. Neurocognitive status was assessed by a composite cognitive index score representing the mean of the scores in four cognitive domains. Change in QOL was assessed by subtracting baseline from 1-year scores for each of 10 QOL measures. The association between QOL and cognitive dysfunction was investigated using multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Cognitive decline limited improvement in QOL, with substantial correlation between change in cognition and change in QOL. One-year QOL measures are associated with both 6-week and 1-year change in cognition (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, p < .0001; Duke Activity Status Index, p < .02; Cognitive Difficulties, p < .0001; Symptom Limitations, p = .0001; Center for Epidemiologic Study Depression, p < .0001; General Health Perception, p = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative cognitive decline may diminish improvements in QOL. Strategies to reduce cognitive decline may allow patients to achieve the maximum improvement in QOL afforded by CABG, as even short-term cognitive dysfunction has implications for QOL 1 year later.