Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel A Hernandez

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel A Hernandez.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Inclusion of eccentric actions on net caloric cost resulting from isoinertial resistance exercise.

Net O(2) uptake was measured from maximal-effort 3-set, 8-repetition seated leg press protocols on an isoinertial ergometer. Subjects (25 women, 9 men) did 2 workouts each exerting concentric-eccentric (CE) and concentric-only (CO) knee extensor forces to measure work and net caloric cost. Significant (p < 0.05) relationships between work and net caloric cost resulted from CE and CO workouts for the male, female, and total subject sample. Two-way repeated-measures analyses of variance showed CE workouts resulted in significantly higher work but not net caloric cost and values. CE workouts likely relied on the knee extensors series elastic element to perform an additional approximately 3,600 J of eccentric work at no additional net caloric cost. Unlike other exercise modes, maximal-effort eccentric actions on the isoinertial ergometer, as done in the current study, provide no additional net caloric cost and is thus safe to administer to populations in whom metabolic cost is a concern.

Adult↗

A multivariate approach to predicting knee extensor performance.

The impact of two predictor variables (estimated knee extensor fast-twitch fiber percentage, body mass) on performance measures (vertical jump power output, leg press peak angular velocity) were examined. Subjects (25 men, 27 women) performed 5 workouts involving 2 vertical jump, leg press, and 50-repetition isokinetic tests (to estimate knee extensor fast-twitch fiber percentage). Multivariate regression determined the following significant (p < 0.05) vertical jump equations: predicted male power output = -59.3464 + 1.566 (estimated knee extensor fast-twitch muscle fiber percent) + 15.7884 (body mass), predicted female power output = 36.1574 + 3.4248 (estimated knee extensor fast-twitch muscle fiber percent) + 9.8633 (body mass). Leg press peak angular velocity equations were insignificant by gender; thus, pooled data yielded the following: predicted leg press peak angular velocity = 18.6187 + 0.235 (estimated knee extensor fast-twitch muscle fiber percent) + 0.3801 (body mass). Body mass explained more variance for each performance measure.

Adult↗