Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Dan A Oren

Publications and source records attributed to Dan A Oren.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Intramuscular aripiprazole for the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with intramuscular haloperidol.

INTRODUCTION: This double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) aripiprazole and IM haloperidol for the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four-hundred and forty-eight patients were randomized (2:2:1 ratio) to IM aripiprazole 9.75 mg, IM haloperidol 6.5 mg, or IM placebo. Patients could receive up to three injections over the first 24 h, with second and third injections administered > or =2 and > or =4 h, respectively, after the first if deemed clinically necessary. Primary efficacy measure was mean change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PEC) score from baseline to 2 h. RESULTS: Mean improvement in PEC at 2 h was significantly greater for IM aripiprazole (-7.27) vs placebo (-4.78; p<0.001); IM aripiprazole was noninferior to IM haloperidol (-7.75) on PEC. All secondary efficacy measures showed significantly greater improvements at 2 h for IM aripiprazole and IM haloperidol over placebo. Mean number of injections/patient and percentage of patients requiring benzodiazepines were significantly lower for IM aripiprazole vs placebo (p<0.01). IM aripiprazole was well tolerated. Extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse events were similar for aripiprazole (1.7%) and placebo (2.3%) and lower than with haloperidol (12.6%). CONCLUSION: These results show that IM aripiprazole is an effective treatment, comparable to IM haloperidol, and well-tolerated for acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia.

Acute Disease↗

Tyramine pressor sensitivity during treatment with the selegiline transdermal system 6 mg/24 h in healthy subjects.

The oral tyramine pressor test was administered to healthy males during treatment with a selegiline transdermal system (STS; 6 mg/24 h). The tyramine sensitivity factor (TSF) was calculated from the ratio of baseline and on-treatment tyramine pressor doses. The tyramine sensitivity factor value following 9 days of treatment with the selegiline transdermal system was 1.85 +/- 0.10. Extended treatment, 33 days, produced a small, clinically non-meaningful increase in this value. The tyramine sensitivity factor for the selegiline transdermal system was similar to that following treatment with 10 mg/d of oral selegiline capsules but more than 20 times less than observed during tranylcypromine treatment. A larger increase in the tyramine sensitivity factor was observed following extended selegiline transdermal system treatment at a higher dose (12 mg/24 h), which was significantly decreased following coadministration of tyramine capsules with a meal. These results suggest a wide tyramine safety margin for the selegiline transdermal system and provide evidence that the 6-mg/24-h selegiline transdermal system can be administered safely without dietary tyramine restrictions.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Circadian phase shifting, alerting, and antidepressant effects of bright light treatment.

Bright light treatment is the most potent melatonin suppressor and circadian phase shifter and is a safe nonpharmacologic antidepressant for seasonal depression. In addition, bright light treatment may restore performance in conditions of sleep debt and misalignment between peak performance and the athletic event. This article discusses the therapeutic use of bright light treatment, its side effects, and mechanisms of action.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Addition of the alpha2-antagonist yohimbine to fluoxetine: effects on rate of antidepressant response.

Electrophysiological studies suggest that alpha2-adrenoceptors profoundly affect monoaminergic neurotransmission by enhancing noradrenergic tone and serotonergic firing rates. Recent reports suggest that alpha2-antagonism may hasten and improve the response to antidepressant medications. To test this hypothesis, a randomized double-blind controlled trial was undertaken to determine if the combination of an alpha2-antagonist (yohimbine) with a selective serotonin reuptake agent (SSRI) (fluoxetine) results in more rapid onset of antidepressant action than an SSRI agent alone. In all, 50 subjects with a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder confirmed by SCID interview were randomly assigned to receive either fluoxetine 20 mg plus placebo (F/P) or fluxetine 20 mg plus a titrated dose of yohimbine (F/Y). The yohimbine dose was titrated based on blood pressure changes over the treatment period, in a blind-preserving manner. Hamilton depression scale ratings (HDRS) and clinical global impression (CGI) ratings were obtained weekly over a period of 6 weeks. The rate of achieving categorical positive responses was significantly more rapid in the F/Y group compared to the F/P group using both the HDRS and the CGI scales as outcome measures in a survival analysis using a log-rank test (chi2(1) = 5.86, p = 0.016 and chi2(1) = 5.29, p = 0.021, respectively). At the last observed visit, 18 (69%) of the 26 F/Y subjects met the response criteria for CGI compared to 10 (42%) of 24 F/P subjects. Using the HDRS criteria, 17 (65%) of 26 F/Y subject vs 10 (42%) of 24 F/P subjects were responders. The addition of the alpha2-antagonist yohimbine to fluoxetine appears to hasten the antidepressant response. There is also a trend suggesting an increased percentage of responders to the combined treatment at the end of the 6-week trial.

Adolescent↗

Randomized clinical trial of bright light therapy for antepartum depression: preliminary findings.

BACKGROUND: Bright light therapy was shown to be a promising treatment for depression during pregnancy in a recent open-label study. In an extension of this work, we report findings from a double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. METHOD: Ten pregnant women with DSM-IV major depressive disorder were randomly assigned from April 2000 to January 2002 to a 5-week clinical trial with either a 7000 lux (active) or 500 lux (placebo) light box. At the end of the randomized controlled trial, subjects had the option of continuing in a 5-week extension phase. The Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Scale-Seasonal Affective Disorder Version was administered to assess changes in clinical status. Salivary melatonin was used to index circadian rhythm phase for comparison with antidepressant results. RESULTS: Although there was a small mean group advantage of active treatment throughout the randomized controlled trial, it was not statistically significant. However, in the longer 10-week trial, the presence of active versus placebo light produced a clear treatment effect (p =.001) with an effect size (0.43) similar to that seen in antidepressant drug trials. Successful treatment with bright light was associated with phase advances of the melatonin rhythm. CONCLUSION: These findings provide additional evidence for an active effect of bright light therapy for antepartum depression and underscore the need for an expanded randomized clinical trial.

Adult↗

Regional brain metabolic correlates of alpha-methylparatyrosine-induced depressive symptoms: implications for the neural circuitry of depression.

CONTEXT: We previously used positron emission tomography (PET) measurement of brain metabolism with 18fluorodeoxyglucose to show that patients receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) who have a tryptophan depletion-induced return of depressive symptoms have an acute decrease in metabolism in orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and thalamus. Many patients with depression in remission while taking norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NRIs) (but not SSRIs) experience a return of depressive symptoms with depletion of norepinephrine and dopamine using alpha-methylparatyrosine (AMPT). OBJECTIVE: To assess brain metabolic correlates of AMPT administration in patients with depression in remission while receiving NRIs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial in which 18 patients recruited in 1997-2000 from the general community who had depression in remission while taking NRIs had PET imaging in a psychiatric research unit following AMPT and placebo administration. INTERVENTIONS: After initial medication with desipramine and follow-up until response, patients underwent active AMPT (five 1-g doses administered orally over 28 hours) and placebo (diphenhydramine hydrochloride, five 50- mg doses administered similarly) catecholamine depletion challenges in randomized order of assignment, after which PET imaging was performed on day 3 of each condition. Both study conditions were performed 1 week apart. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Regional brain metabolism rates in patients with and without AMPT-induced return of depressive symptoms. RESULTS: AMPT-induced return of depressive symptoms was experienced by 11 of the 18 patients and led to decreased brain metabolism in a number of cortical areas, with the greatest magnitude of effects in orbitofrontal (P =.002) and dorsolateral prefrontal (P =.03) cortex and thalamus (P =.006). Increased resting metabolism in prefrontal and limbic areas predicted vulnerability to return of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Different neurochemical systems that mediate depression may have effects on a common brain circuitry. Baseline metabolism in successfully treated depressed patients may predict vulnerability to future episodes of depression.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

Lack of a therapeutic effect of a 2-week sub-threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation course for treatment-resistant depression.

Stimulation parameters seem to strongly influence the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the management of treatment-resistant depressed patients. The most effective and safest parameters are yet to be defined. Moreover, systematic follow-up data available to document the duration of the therapeutic effects remain sparse. Twenty-one treatment-resistant depressed patients were randomized to either active rTMS (N=12) or to sham (N=9) treatment in a double-blind design. Patients were kept on their medications. Sub-motor-threshold (MT) stimulation (80% MT) was delivered for 10 consecutive work days (20 Hz, 2-s trains, 20 trains). Subjects meeting pre-set criteria for responding were entered into a follow-up phase for up to 5 months. Utilizing the above stimulation parameters, we found no significant difference between groups. Six patients in the active group and one subject in the sham group met criteria for the follow-up phase. The period of time before subjects met criteria for relapse was highly variable ranging from 2 to 20 weeks. Sub-threshold rTMS stimulation for 2 weeks is not significantly superior to sham treatment for treatment-resistant depressed patients. The duration of the therapeutic effects of rTMS delivered to the left prefrontal cortex using the above-described parameters is highly variable.

Adult↗

Monoamine depletion in unmedicated depressed subjects.

BACKGROUND: Although significant evidence suggests that diminished monoamine function is associated with clinical depression, catecholamine or indoleamine depletion alone has not been associated with significant mood changes in unmedicated depressed subjects or never-depressed control subjects. This study assesses the integrated role of these monoamine systems in depressed patients. METHODS: Unmedicated depressed subjects underwent a 2-week, double-blind, random-ordered crossover study consisting of the following active and control conditions respectively: indoleamine (via tryptophan depletion) plus catecholamine (via alpha-methyl-paratyrosine administration) depletion and, separately, indoleamine plus sham (via diphenhydramine administration) catecholamine depletion. Ten subjects completed both conditions; two subjects were withdrawn after active testing and one after control testing. RESULTS: Mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores decreased progressively throughout the study days (baseline 26.7 points +/- 1.7 SEM and termination 20.0 +/- 2.4, active depletion; baseline 26.1 points +/- 2.3 SEM and termination 23.2 +/- 2.6, control testing) but did not differ between groups. Only three patients demonstrated 20% or greater increases from baseline HDRS at any point during the observation days. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, results show that simultaneous disruptions of indoleamine and catecholamine function do not exacerbate symptoms in unmedicated depressed subjects, thus lending further support to the notion that monoamines regulate mood in actively depressed patients via indirect mechanisms.

Adult↗

Effects of light on low nocturnal bilirubin in winter depression: a preliminary report.

BACKGROUND: The light-absorbing pigments involved in the induction of treatment of winter depression are unknown. It has been proposed that circulating bilirubin serves as a photoreceptor, in part because of its similarity to the chromophore of phytochrome, a primary time-setting plant molecule. METHODS: We measured nocturnal bilirubin levels in nine patients with winter depression, and seven age- and gender-matched normal comparison volunteers. RESULTS: Nocturnal bilirubin levels were lower in patients than in controls (p <.02), increased in both groups during the night (p <.0001), and increased in patients after 2 weeks of morning light treatment (p =.0009), which was accompanied by clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Low nocturnal bilirubin levels may be associated with winter seasonal depression.

Adult↗

An open trial of morning light therapy for treatment of antepartum depression.

OBJECTIVE: About 5% of pregnant women meet criteria for major depression. No pharmacotherapy is specifically approved for antepartum depression; novel treatment approaches may be welcome. The authors explored the use of morning bright light therapy for antepartum depression. METHOD: An open trial of bright light therapy in an A-B-A design was conducted for 3-5 weeks in 16 pregnant patients with major depression. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorders Version, was administered to assess changes in mood. A follow-up questionnaire was used to assess outcome after delivery. RESULTS: After 3 weeks of treatment, mean depression ratings improved by 49%. Benefits were seen through 5 weeks of treatment. There was no evidence of adverse effects of light therapy on pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence that morning light therapy has an antidepressant effect during pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to test this alternative to medication.

Adult↗