Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Yzebe

Publications and source records attributed to D Yzebe.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

[Detection of liver metastases in colorectal cancer on chemotherapy. Comparative study between MRI with teslascan and computed tomography with intravenous contrast media].

OBJECTIVE: To compare MRI of the liver with mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) and computed tomography with intravenous contrast media in the follow-up of liver metastases in patient on chemotherapy for colorectal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study with patients on chemotherapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Patients underwent both contrast-enhanced helical CT using 2 cc/kg contrast at 3 cc/sec and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T using 2-3 cc/min contrast at 5 micro mol/kg within a two week interval. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed all scans in a blinded fashion and recorded image quality as well as presence and number of liver lesions. Statistical analysis was performed using the wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: All examinations were of good quality. A total of 71 lesions were detected at CT, with 69 lesions consistent with metastases and 2 lesions consistent with cysts. A total of 98 lesions were detected at MRI, with 97 consistent with metastases and 1 lesion consistent with a cyst. T1 weighted images with MnDPDP significantly detected two additional lesions compared to CT (p<0.05). No significant difference was demonstrated between T1 weighted images without MnDPDP and CT or between T2 weighted images and CT. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging with MnDPDP is significantly more sensitive than unenhanced MRI and helical CT for the follow-up of liver lesions.

Aged↗

Trial summary software.

Medical practice is most strongly founded when based on the results of well conducted clinical trials. Clinical trial results normally enter the domain of medical knowledge and practice through their publication in scientific journals. This in itself poses problems of accessibility and selection. The results of this is a slow and selective diffusion of new medical facts which has a consequent cost in human lives and human suffering. In an attempt to shorten this information path initiatives such as the Cochrane collaboration produce and maintain systematic reviews by speciality of the current state of knowledge. The ability to store a representation of a clinical trial in a standard form seems to us to be a necessary condition for the efficient and reproducible preparation of systematic reviews. Furthermore the consequent increased accessibility of research results due to the existence of the summaries would itself be of great use. In this aim a relational database client server system was developed and we publish here the results of our preliminary findings, including the data model, which we feel is an important contribution to the future discussion and development of computer based representations of clinical trial protocols and results and their use in clinical decision making.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗