The effect of managed care on medical education.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D W Light.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Although the increase of corporate managed care has helped to reduce excesses and costs, continued gains in cost-effectiveness depend on good clinically managed care. Benefits of clinically managed care depend on stable contracts and universal coverage. Instead, employers are decreasing coverage and creating a market of "lemons" in which low-cost plans are rewarded for cost-cutting tactics. These tactics have spawned movements that demand rights for patients and providers. Choosing to shore up those rights, however, will increase the number of uninsured persons. This tragic choice, which no other industrialized nation has permitted, will not be resolved until some form of universal health insurance is implemented.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The health care systems of most advanced industrialized countries are currently undergoing extensive reforms. In Europe, in addition to economic and political issues, issues of "equity" and "solidarity" are very much on the minds of some health care reformers. Elsewhere in Europe, economics and politics dominate health care reform, and concerns about fairness are either absent or of secondary importance. Similarly, the recent health care debates in the United States were largely carried out in terms of payment schemes, cost-containment and outcome measures, campaign strategies, and political concessions. Issues of fairness were either hidden in the many features of the competing proposals and the debates about them, or totally ignored. In both cases, there has been no practical way to gauge how a given change would alter the equity or fairness of existing health care services. This article addresses that void by presenting ten scorable benchmarks of fairness.
This essay reviews research and poses questions for thought or discussion about the changing character of health care services and the impact of ageing, welfare, rising demand and related trends. It then asks what it would take to make the present medical service into a real health service and to empower patients and citizens. A third section worries about recruitment, retention and the morale of health care staff, and a final section considers the options for funding health care in the next 25 years.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: This paper describes how Ireland created a level playing field for competition in health insurance, the strategies of a major insurer to introduce risk-rated policies that would segment the market, the successful campaign to block these policies, and the policy implications of the European Union requirement of competition in health insurance. METHODS: Policy documents, interviews, and press reports were analyzed. RESULTS: The minister of health forced the commercial insurer to withdraw its policies and replace them with community-rated policies. CONCLUSIONS: Because it is easier and more profitable for insurers to engage in risk selection than to become more efficient, beneficial competition in health insurance markets is extremely difficult to create. Carefully drawn rules and monitoring are required to overcome inherent causes of market failure. The current enthusiasm for saving money through competitive schemes in health insurance seems likely to produce higher costs and greater inequality.
The new Labour government in Britain has issued three variations of a White Paper that outline significant changes in how the world's largest managed care health system will be run. All three emphasize systemwide criteria for quality, effectiveness, and health gain, which in turn imply redressing past inequalities in funding and service. One, the Scottish Paper, eliminates Thatcher's internal market and returns to a simple organizational structure centering on the health boards. The other two propose combining primary care practices into purchasing groups, a daunting task that will spawn many new problems and expenses as it recreates the internal market.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The United Kingdom led the world in transforming the largest single health care system from a publicly administered service to a set of interlocking contracts. Policy lessons that can be adapted by employers, nations, and other large payers are identified. These lessons are drawn from the improvements that the British made over the design of managed competition, the mistakes and problems they experienced, the underlying trends toward privatization and class discrimination, and the limitations to competition that have led the British toward managed cooperation in collaborative purchasing for the health needs of communities. Yet market reform and the rhetoric of efficiency have justified the shrinking of health services, the shift of costs to household budgets, and the use of public moneys to support private services and investors at greater expense by moving properties and services off the public ledger. In these ways, managed competition can Americanize health care and pose fundamental questions about what policy goals are really being pursued.
As the paradox of medical success leaves behind more chronicity, policy makers around the world increasingly focus on community-based programs both to address chronic health problems and to prevent major disorders. This essay presents my comparative sociological framework of ideal-type models for understanding the countervailing powers that underlie and shape different kinds of heath care systems and their limitations in addressing the health care needs of the twenty-first century. In this context, I then analyze the revival of community health care rhetoric in the United States and compare it to the realities in which it operates. The realities of institutional power, fragmentation in funding, illness as a private condition and health care as a private good, the lack of societal commitment, competition, and the waning of community cohesion all suggest that communal democracy will be difficult to achieve. Current successes require further investigation. Examples from abroad suggest, ironically, that community health care develops best if the state and health professionals make a deep commitment to it, against their own immediate interests but for their enlightened self-interest.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The organization and delivery of health care in the United States is undergoing significant social, organizational, economic, political, and cultural changes with important implications for the future of medicine as a profession. This essay will draw upon some of these changes and briefly review major sociological writings on the nature of medicine's professional status to examine the nature of professional dynamics in a changing environment. To this end, we focus on the nature of medical work and how this work impacts on and is impacted by medicine's own internal differentiation and the presence of contested domains at medicine's periphery. We trace this dynamic through a number of issues including the multidimensional nature of medical work, the role of elites in that work, and how changes in the terms and conditions of work can exert changes at medicine's technical core. We close with some thoughts on the relationship of public policy to medicine's professional status, the role health policy might take in shaping a new professional status, the role health policy might take in shaping a new professional ethnic for medicine, and the role sociologists might play in this process.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.