Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D W Cranston

Publications and source records attributed to D W Cranston.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Is follow-up necessary after transurethral resection of the prostate?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the necessity for routine out-patient review following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hypertrophy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One-hundred and two patients with histologically proven benign prostatic hypertrophy were prospectively reviewed as out-patients. The views of their general practitioners were established by postal questionnaire. RESULTS: At their first out-patient review 94 of 102 (92%) patients were discharged and only 2% (2/102) patients remained under review after 1 year. Apart from routine urine analysis, only four additional investigations were initiated at the routine clinical assessment. One patient was listed to undergo prostatic surgery again following the post-operative out-patient review. Over the next 16 months only three patients (3%) were re-referred with further urological problems. Confidence in a system without routine hospital out-patient review was expressed by 90% of general practitioners and 78% of patients. CONCLUSION: Follow-up after TURP cannot be justified in terms of the perceived therapeutic benefit to patients. Patients should be discharged to the community and be assessed rapidly in out-patients if and when problems arise.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Is day-case prostatectomy feasible?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the possibility of discharging patients, catheter-free, on the same day that they undergo contact-laser prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients underwent contact vaporization of the prostate using the SLT (Surgical Laser Technologies, Oaks, PA, USA) Nd:YAG laser with an MTRL10 6 mm tip. Patients were selected in the out-patient clinic for day-case surgery on the basis of their good general health and clinically small glands. All patients had pre-operative urodynamic assessment and were proven obstructed and stable. Contact vaporization was carried out under general anaesthesia. Both intra-operative blood loss and irrigant absorption were assessed. The follow-up at 3 and 6 months included American Urological Association (AUA-7) symptom scores and the measurement of urinary flow rates. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 25.2 min, with a mean application of 43.05 kJ of laser energy. The mean absorption of irrigant fluid was 30 mL and the mean intra-operative blood loss was 31 mL. Nine patients were discharged on the day of treatment. Two patients went into clot retention following discharge and had a suprapubic catheter sited, and two failed to void once discharged, necessitating catheterization for 2 weeks. At 3 and 6 months, there was a substantial decrease in the AUA symptom score and an improvement in urinary flow rate. CONCLUSION: Day-case laser prostatectomy is possible, but the patients must be selected carefully and, perhaps more importantly, a specialist day-case anaesthetist must be available.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Double J stents in the treatment of gynaecological injury to the ureter.

Ureteric injury is a recognized complication of hysterectomy and may present with obstruction or fistula. Between 1987 and 1989 in Oxford nine patients with 10 injured ureters underwent attempted retrograde placement of double J stents. Three patients had successful outcomes and one patient with bilateral ureteric obstruction required reimplantation of the right ureter after successful stenting of the left ureter. One patient required removal of a stent due to irritation but her fistula eventually closed. In three patients placement was unsuccessful and in one patient injury to the bladder base prevented the ureteric orifices from being seen and hence stenting was not possible. Thus five of these 10 injured ureters were managed successfully with double J stents. We advocate the initial use of double J stents in gynaecological ureteric injury. This approach is simple and may cure the fistula. If it is unsuccessful, subsequent reimplantation is not hindered.

Female↗